Policy presence
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Salzburg, Austria
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Academic integrity
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Named AI services
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Teaching guidance
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
For exams, the guide says AI-tool use is at the discretion of teachers; if no corresponding rule has been made, AI tools are unauthorized aids and are not permitted.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: exam_ai_use_requires_rule
Original evidence
Evidence 1Auch der Einsatz von KI-Werkzeugen bei Prüfungen liegt im Ermessen der Lehrenden. Wurde keine entsprechende Regelung getroffen, sind KI-Werkzeuge unerlaubte Hilfsmittel und daher nicht zulässig (§ 2a HS QSG).
Localized display only
For exams, AI-tool use is at teachers' discretion; if no rule was made, AI tools are unauthorized aids and not permitted.
Ai Tool Treatment
The University of Salzburg guide says teachers and thesis supervisors set, for each course, assessment, exam, or supervised thesis, whether and to what extent AI technologies may or should be used, and that these requirements for assessed work should be communicated transparently and in writing in advance.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: course_or_supervisor_specific_ai_rules
Original evidence
Evidence 1Lehrende und Betreuende legen für jede Lehrveranstaltung und Prüfungsleistung bzw. für jede unter ihrer Betreuung zu verfassende Abschlussarbeit individuell und spezifisch fest, ob und in welchem Umfang KI-Technologien genutzt werden dürfen oder sollen.
Localized display only
Teachers and supervisors set for each course, assessment, exam, or supervised thesis whether and how AI technologies may or should be used.
Teaching
The guide recommends specifying AI use along three levels: unrestricted use, use within a defined framework, or a general ban as an unauthorized aid.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: three_level_ai_use_framework
Original evidence
Evidence 1Es wird empfohlen, die Zulässigkeit des Einsatzes von KI-Technologien entlang einer dreistufigen Definition festzulegen: Der Einsatz von KI ist ohne Einschränkung erlaubt. Der Einsatz von KI ist in einem definierten Rahmen erlaubt. Der Einsatz von KI ist als unerlaubtes Hilfsmittel generell verboten.
Localized display only
The guide recommends defining AI use as unrestricted, allowed within a defined framework, or generally prohibited as an unauthorized aid.
Privacy
The guide advises against entering personal or copyright-protected data into freely accessible free AI tools and recommends the University of Salzburg licensed tools Microsoft Copilot in M365 or Academic AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: avoid_personal_or_copyright_data_in_free_ai_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1Bei der Nutzung frei zugänglicher und kostenloser KI-Tools im Internet sollten keine personenbezogenen oder urheberrechtlich geschützten Daten eingegeben werden ... Es wird daher empfohlen, die für die Universität Salzburg lizenzierten Werkzeuge Microsoft Copilot in M365 oder Academic AI zu verwenden.
Localized display only
The guide says not to enter personal or copyright-protected data into free public AI tools and recommends licensed Microsoft Copilot in M365 or Academic AI.
Teaching
The Senate recommendation says curriculum commissions may identify exams to be taken in secure environments or by analog means to prevent AI use, and may identify exams where AI instruments are useful or desired, especially using the university-licensed Academic AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: curriculum_commissions_may_define_ai_exam_conditions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Die Curricularkommissionen können im Curriculum definierte Prüfungen identifizieren, die in einer sicheren Umgebung oder überhaupt mit analogen Mitteln abzulegen sind, um die Heranziehung von KI zu unterbinden. Sie können außerdem ... Prüfungen identifizieren, bei deren Ablegung eine Inanspruchnahme von Instrumenten der KI sinnvoll oder sogar erwünscht ist ...
Localized display only
Curriculum commissions may identify exams to be taken securely or analog to prevent AI use, and exams where AI instruments are useful or desired.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
2 source attribution
Einsatz von KI-Werkzeugen in Abschlussarbeiten, beurteilungsrelevanten Arbeiten und Prüfungen
plus.ac.at
Empfehlungen des Senats betr. Regelungen zum Einsatz von KI in Curricula an der Universität Salzburg
plus.ac.at