Policy presence
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Salzburg, Austria
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 18, 2026.
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 18, 2026. Discovery context: Paris Lodron University of Salzburg is listed as QS 2026 rank =650.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Paris Lodron University of Salzburg as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 18, 2026 and last changed on May 18, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/paris-lodron-university-of-salzburg.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Academic integrity
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Named AI services
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Teaching guidance
Paris Lodron University of Salzburg has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
For exams, the guide says AI-tool use is at the discretion of teachers; if no corresponding rule has been made, AI tools are unauthorized aids and are not permitted.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: exam_ai_use_requires_rule
Original evidence
Evidence 1Auch der Einsatz von KI-Werkzeugen bei Prüfungen liegt im Ermessen der Lehrenden. Wurde keine entsprechende Regelung getroffen, sind KI-Werkzeuge unerlaubte Hilfsmittel und daher nicht zulässig (§ 2a HS QSG).
Localized display only
For exams, AI-tool use is at teachers' discretion; if no rule was made, AI tools are unauthorized aids and not permitted.
Ai Tool Treatment
The University of Salzburg guide says teachers and thesis supervisors set, for each course, assessment, exam, or supervised thesis, whether and to what extent AI technologies may or should be used, and that these requirements for assessed work should be communicated transparently and in writing in advance.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: course_or_supervisor_specific_ai_rules
Original evidence
Evidence 1Lehrende und Betreuende legen für jede Lehrveranstaltung und Prüfungsleistung bzw. für jede unter ihrer Betreuung zu verfassende Abschlussarbeit individuell und spezifisch fest, ob und in welchem Umfang KI-Technologien genutzt werden dürfen oder sollen.
Localized display only
Teachers and supervisors set for each course, assessment, exam, or supervised thesis whether and how AI technologies may or should be used.
Teaching
The guide recommends specifying AI use along three levels: unrestricted use, use within a defined framework, or a general ban as an unauthorized aid.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: three_level_ai_use_framework
Original evidence
Evidence 1Es wird empfohlen, die Zulässigkeit des Einsatzes von KI-Technologien entlang einer dreistufigen Definition festzulegen: Der Einsatz von KI ist ohne Einschränkung erlaubt. Der Einsatz von KI ist in einem definierten Rahmen erlaubt. Der Einsatz von KI ist als unerlaubtes Hilfsmittel generell verboten.
Localized display only
The guide recommends defining AI use as unrestricted, allowed within a defined framework, or generally prohibited as an unauthorized aid.
Privacy
The guide advises against entering personal or copyright-protected data into freely accessible free AI tools and recommends the University of Salzburg licensed tools Microsoft Copilot in M365 or Academic AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: avoid_personal_or_copyright_data_in_free_ai_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1Bei der Nutzung frei zugänglicher und kostenloser KI-Tools im Internet sollten keine personenbezogenen oder urheberrechtlich geschützten Daten eingegeben werden ... Es wird daher empfohlen, die für die Universität Salzburg lizenzierten Werkzeuge Microsoft Copilot in M365 oder Academic AI zu verwenden.
Localized display only
The guide says not to enter personal or copyright-protected data into free public AI tools and recommends licensed Microsoft Copilot in M365 or Academic AI.
Teaching
The Senate recommendation says curriculum commissions may identify exams to be taken in secure environments or by analog means to prevent AI use, and may identify exams where AI instruments are useful or desired, especially using the university-licensed Academic AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: curriculum_commissions_may_define_ai_exam_conditions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Die Curricularkommissionen können im Curriculum definierte Prüfungen identifizieren, die in einer sicheren Umgebung oder überhaupt mit analogen Mitteln abzulegen sind, um die Heranziehung von KI zu unterbinden. Sie können außerdem ... Prüfungen identifizieren, bei deren Ablegung eine Inanspruchnahme von Instrumenten der KI sinnvoll oder sogar erwünscht ist ...
Localized display only
Curriculum commissions may identify exams to be taken securely or analog to prevent AI use, and exams where AI instruments are useful or desired.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
Einsatz von KI-Werkzeugen in Abschlussarbeiten, beurteilungsrelevanten Arbeiten und Prüfungen
plus.ac.at
Empfehlungen des Senats betr. Regelungen zum Einsatz von KI in Curricula an der Universität Salzburg
plus.ac.at
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.