Change log

Paris Lodron University of Salzburg

Tracker history: 0 release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

5 current claims; 2 official sources.

This page combines all public release diffs for Paris Lodron University of Salzburg. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No recorded updates are available in this tracker history.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Tracker claim text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Recorded text comparisons

Only recorded comparisons with an exact Claim ID match are shown.

No recorded updates are available in this tracker history.

Release history

Tracker history: 0 release records.

Current claim records

Current claim records: 5.

teaching

The Senate recommendation says curriculum commissions may identify exams to be taken in secure environments or by analog means to prevent AI use, and may identify exams where AI instruments are useful or desired, especially using the university-licensed Academic AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesde

privacy

The guide advises against entering personal or copyright-protected data into freely accessible free AI tools and recommends the University of Salzburg licensed tools Microsoft Copilot in M365 or Academic AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

For exams, the guide says AI-tool use is at the discretion of teachers; if no corresponding rule has been made, AI tools are unauthorized aids and are not permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesde

teaching

The guide recommends specifying AI use along three levels: unrestricted use, use within a defined framework, or a general ban as an unauthorized aid.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesde

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Salzburg guide says teachers and thesis supervisors set, for each course, assessment, exam, or supervised thesis, whether and to what extent AI technologies may or should be used, and that these requirements for assessed work should be communicated transparently and in writing in advance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesde

Source snapshots

Official source records: 2.