Vienna, Austria

Technische Universität Wien

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage4 reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources4Source languagedePublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/technische-universitat-wien.json

Policy profile

Coverage score90/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

AI disclosure

Technische Universität Wien has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

TU Wien's student guidance says ChatGPT and other large language models must be documented as aids in written work, AI-used passages must be marked, and undisclosed generative-AI use in student work is treated as equivalent to plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: disclose_and_mark_genai_use_in_written_work

Original evidence

Evidence 1
ChatGPT und andere Large Language Models müssen als Hilfsmittel dokumentiert und die Stellen, bei denen KI’s eingesetzt wurden, entsprechend markiert werden. ... Es ist wichtig zu verstehen, dass die nicht offengelegte Verwendung von generativer KI in einer studentischer Arbeit einem Plagiat gleichkommt.

Localized display only

ChatGPT and other large language models must be documented as aids and AI-used passages marked; undisclosed generative-AI use in a student work is treated as equivalent to plagiarism.

Privacy

TU Wien's teacher handout tells instructors to raise awareness that data entered into AI models requires caution and compliance with data-protection rules, and warns not to enter personal or identifying data in prompts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: avoid_personal_or_identifying_data_in_ai_prompts

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Schaffen Sie in Ihrer Lehrveranstaltung Bewusstsein dafür, dass man bei der Eingabe von Daten in das Modell vorsichtig sein und die gesetzlichen Regeln zum Datenschutz einhalten muss. Achtung: Geben Sie niemals personenbezogene Daten von sich und insbesondere von anderen Personen ... ein oder Daten, die Personen identifizierbar machen.

Localized display only

Instructors should raise awareness that data entered into the model requires caution and compliance with data-protection rules; never enter personal or identifying data.

Academic Integrity

TU Wien's teacher handout says reliable technical identification of AI-tool use is hardly possible and recommends adapting exam formats so they cannot be solved exclusively by AI outputs.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: assessment_design_should_account_for_ai_detection_limits

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Eine zuverlässige technische Identifikation des Einsatzes von KI-Tools ist kaum möglich. ... Prüfungsformate werden so umgestaltet, dass Sie nicht ausschließlich durch KI-Outputs gelöst werden können.

Localized display only

Reliable technical identification of AI-tool use is hardly possible; exam formats should be redesigned so they cannot be solved exclusively by AI outputs.

Teaching

TU Wien's generative-AI teaching guidance says instructors decide whether to use AI systems in courses; if they do, the rules must be clearly defined and the handling of those technologies must be made central.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: instructor_discretion_with_clear_course_rules

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Die Entscheidung, ob Lehrkräfte KI-Systeme verwenden obliegt ihnen selbst. Sollten diese verwendet werden, dann müssen die Vorgaben klar definiert sein und der Umgang mit diesen entsprechend in den Fokus gestellt werden.

Localized display only

The decision whether instructors use AI systems is up to them; if used, the rules must be clearly defined and handling of the technologies must be made central.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

4 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities