University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

Technische Universität Wien

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Claims4Sources4
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Technische Universität Wien currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Technische Universität Wien current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+8-0
11 # Technische Universität Wien AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: TU Wien's student guidance says ChatGPT and other large language models must be documented as aids in written work, AI-used passages must be marked, and undisclosed generative-AI use in student work is treated as equivalent to plagiarism.
3+Evidence (de, f96810a6cbe4): ChatGPT und andere Large Language Models müssen als Hilfsmittel dokumentiert und die Stellen, bei denen KI’s eingesetzt wurden, entsprechend markiert werden. ... Es ist wichtig zu verstehen, dass die nicht offengelegte Verwendung von generativer KI in einer studentischer Arbeit einem Plagiat gleichkommt.
4+privacy: TU Wien's teacher handout tells instructors to raise awareness that data entered into AI models requires caution and compliance with data-protection rules, and warns not to enter personal or identifying data in prompts.
5+Evidence (de, fa0d1ed4b736): Schaffen Sie in Ihrer Lehrveranstaltung Bewusstsein dafür, dass man bei der Eingabe von Daten in das Modell vorsichtig sein und die gesetzlichen Regeln zum Datenschutz einhalten muss. Achtung: Geben Sie niemals personenbezogene Daten von sich und insbesondere von anderen Personen ... ein oder Daten, die Personen identifizierbar machen.
6+academic_integrity: TU Wien's teacher handout says reliable technical identification of AI-tool use is hardly possible and recommends adapting exam formats so they cannot be solved exclusively by AI outputs.
7+Evidence (de, fa0d1ed4b736): Eine zuverlässige technische Identifikation des Einsatzes von KI-Tools ist kaum möglich. ... Prüfungsformate werden so umgestaltet, dass Sie nicht ausschließlich durch KI-Outputs gelöst werden können.
8+teaching: TU Wien's generative-AI teaching guidance says instructors decide whether to use AI systems in courses; if they do, the rules must be clearly defined and the handling of those technologies must be made central.
9+Evidence (de, 8fc0523ec4bd): Die Entscheidung, ob Lehrkräfte KI-Systeme verwenden obliegt ihnen selbst. Sollten diese verwendet werden, dann müssen die Vorgaben klar definiert sein und der Umgang mit diesen entsprechend in den Fokus gestellt werden.

Claim changes

4 claim records

academic_integrity

TU Wien's student guidance says ChatGPT and other large language models must be documented as aids in written work, AI-used passages must be marked, and undisclosed generative-AI use in student work is treated as equivalent to plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesde

privacy

TU Wien's teacher handout tells instructors to raise awareness that data entered into AI models requires caution and compliance with data-protection rules, and warns not to enter personal or identifying data in prompts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

TU Wien's teacher handout says reliable technical identification of AI-tool use is hardly possible and recommends adapting exam formats so they cannot be solved exclusively by AI outputs.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesde

teaching

TU Wien's generative-AI teaching guidance says instructors decide whether to use AI systems in courses; if they do, the rules must be clearly defined and the handling of those technologies must be made central.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesde

Source snapshots

4 source attributions