Vienna, Austria

Technische Universität Wien

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage6 reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources5Source languagede, enPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/technische-universitat-wien.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence80%

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records2

Aqueduct API

Technische Universität Wien

Tool
Aqueduct API
About
TU Wien dataLAB lists Aqueduct as API access to TU Wien AI services.
Access
Access steps and audience are not stated on the cited page.
Cost
Not specified by the cited source.
Availability
Unknown
Review
Agent reviewed
Sources

Open WebUI Chat

Technische Universität Wien

Tool
Open WebUI Chat
About
TU Wien dataLAB lists Open WebUI Chat as a chat interface for TU Wien AI services.
Access
Access steps and audience are not stated on the cited page.
Cost
Not specified by the cited source.
Availability
Unknown
Review
Agent reviewed
Sources

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Ai Tool Treatment

Aqueduct API is listed for Technische Universität Wien in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"Aqueduct API","description":"TU Wien dataLAB lists Aqueduct as API access to TU Wien AI services.","howToObtain":"Access steps and audience are not stated on the cited page.","costToUser":"Not specified by the cited source.","availability":"not_mentioned","endorsementType":"not_specified"}

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
The TU Wien dataLAB provides several services: Aqueduct API access to TU Wien AI services.

Widok lokalny only

The TU Wien dataLAB provides several services: Aqueduct API access to TU Wien AI services.

Ai Tool Treatment

Open WebUI Chat is listed for Technische Universität Wien in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"Open WebUI Chat","description":"TU Wien dataLAB lists Open WebUI Chat as a chat interface for TU Wien AI services.","howToObtain":"Access steps and audience are not stated on the cited page.","costToUser":"Not specified by the cited source.","availability":"not_mentioned","endorsementType":"not_specified"}

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
The TU Wien dataLAB provides several services: Open WebUI Chat interface for TU Wien AI services.

Widok lokalny only

The TU Wien dataLAB provides several services: Open WebUI Chat interface for TU Wien AI services.

Academic Integrity

TU Wien's student guidance says ChatGPT and other large language models must be documented as aids in written work, AI-used passages must be marked, and undisclosed generative-AI use in student work is treated as equivalent to plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: disclose_and_mark_genai_use_in_written_work

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
ChatGPT und andere Large Language Models müssen als Hilfsmittel dokumentiert und die Stellen, bei denen KI’s eingesetzt wurden, entsprechend markiert werden. ... Es ist wichtig zu verstehen, dass die nicht offengelegte Verwendung von generativer KI in einer studentischer Arbeit einem Plagiat gleichkommt.

Widok lokalny only

ChatGPT and other large language models must be documented as aids and AI-used passages marked; undisclosed generative-AI use in a student work is treated as equivalent to plagiarism.

Privacy

TU Wien's teacher handout tells instructors to raise awareness that data entered into AI models requires caution and compliance with data-protection rules, and warns not to enter personal or identifying data in prompts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: avoid_personal_or_identifying_data_in_ai_prompts

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
Schaffen Sie in Ihrer Lehrveranstaltung Bewusstsein dafür, dass man bei der Eingabe von Daten in das Modell vorsichtig sein und die gesetzlichen Regeln zum Datenschutz einhalten muss. Achtung: Geben Sie niemals personenbezogene Daten von sich und insbesondere von anderen Personen ... ein oder Daten, die Personen identifizierbar machen.

Widok lokalny only

Instructors should raise awareness that data entered into the model requires caution and compliance with data-protection rules; never enter personal or identifying data.

Academic Integrity

TU Wien's teacher handout says reliable technical identification of AI-tool use is hardly possible and recommends adapting exam formats so they cannot be solved exclusively by AI outputs.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: assessment_design_should_account_for_ai_detection_limits

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
Eine zuverlässige technische Identifikation des Einsatzes von KI-Tools ist kaum möglich. ... Prüfungsformate werden so umgestaltet, dass Sie nicht ausschließlich durch KI-Outputs gelöst werden können.

Widok lokalny only

Reliable technical identification of AI-tool use is hardly possible; exam formats should be redesigned so they cannot be solved exclusively by AI outputs.

Teaching

TU Wien's generative-AI teaching guidance says instructors decide whether to use AI systems in courses; if they do, the rules must be clearly defined and the handling of those technologies must be made central.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: instructor_discretion_with_clear_course_rules

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
Die Entscheidung, ob Lehrkräfte KI-Systeme verwenden obliegt ihnen selbst. Sollten diese verwendet werden, dann müssen die Vorgaben klar definiert sein und der Umgang mit diesen entsprechend in den Fokus gestellt werden.

Widok lokalny only

The decision whether instructors use AI systems is up to them; if used, the rules must be clearly defined and handling of the technologies must be made central.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

5 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedJul 16, 2026Last changedJul 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities