London, United Kingdom

University of East London

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

4 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: genai_policy_scope_staff_students_suppliers_partners_affiliates

原始证据

证据 1
Scope: The policy applies to all staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates of UEL who engage in the development, deployment, or use of Gen AI technologies.

本地化显示 only

The policy applies to UEL staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.

Ai Tool Treatment

UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: responsible_genai_transparency_ethics_data_usage_legal_compliance

原始证据

证据 1
This policy provides a framework for the responsible and ethical use of Generative AI (Gen AI) at the University of East London (UEL). It emphasises transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

本地化显示 only

UEL's GenAI policy emphasizes transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and legal/regulatory compliance.

Academic Integrity

UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: genai_unfair_advantage_submitted_as_own_work

原始证据

证据 1
Generative AI: The use of generative artificial Intelligence tools to gain an unfair advantage. Such as ChatGPT, Bing Char or DALL-E to produce content that is then submitted as your own original work.

本地化显示 only

UEL defines GenAI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain unfair advantage by submitting generated content as one's own work.

Security Review

UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%

标准化值: ai_safety_documentation_security_protocols_human_checks

原始证据

证据 1
AI systems must be designed and implemented in ways that prioritise user safety and ethical standards. Clear documentation must be provided to ensure transparent and explainable AI. Robust security protocols must be implemented to protect AI systems from malicious attacks and unauthorised access.

本地化显示 only

UEL requires AI systems to prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols.

Source record

官方来源

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度96%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of East London AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 23, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-east-london

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志