Policy presence
University of East London has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
London, United Kingdom
University of East London
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
University of East London has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of East London has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
University of East London has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
University of East London has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
University of East London has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
Named AI services
University of East London has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
University of East London has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_policy_scope_staff_students_suppliers_partners_affiliates
Original evidence
Evidence 1Scope: The policy applies to all staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates of UEL who engage in the development, deployment, or use of Gen AI technologies.
Localized display only
The policy applies to UEL staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.
Ai Tool Treatment
UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: responsible_genai_transparency_ethics_data_usage_legal_compliance
Original evidence
Evidence 1This policy provides a framework for the responsible and ethical use of Generative AI (Gen AI) at the University of East London (UEL). It emphasises transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
Localized display only
UEL's GenAI policy emphasizes transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and legal/regulatory compliance.
Academic Integrity
UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_unfair_advantage_submitted_as_own_work
Original evidence
Evidence 1Generative AI: The use of generative artificial Intelligence tools to gain an unfair advantage. Such as ChatGPT, Bing Char or DALL-E to produce content that is then submitted as your own original work.
Localized display only
UEL defines GenAI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain unfair advantage by submitting generated content as one's own work.
Security Review
UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_safety_documentation_security_protocols_human_checks
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI systems must be designed and implemented in ways that prioritise user safety and ethical standards. Clear documentation must be provided to ensure transparent and explainable AI. Robust security protocols must be implemented to protect AI systems from malicious attacks and unauthorised access.
Localized display only
UEL requires AI systems to prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
2 source attribution
Academic Integrity and Academic Misconduct
uel.ac.uk
Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy
uel.ac.uk