London, United Kingdom

University of East London

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

4 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: genai_policy_scope_staff_students_suppliers_partners_affiliates

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Scope: The policy applies to all staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates of UEL who engage in the development, deployment, or use of Gen AI technologies.

Localized display only

The policy applies to UEL staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.

Ai Tool Treatment

UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: responsible_genai_transparency_ethics_data_usage_legal_compliance

Original evidence

Evidence 1
This policy provides a framework for the responsible and ethical use of Generative AI (Gen AI) at the University of East London (UEL). It emphasises transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Localized display only

UEL's GenAI policy emphasizes transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and legal/regulatory compliance.

Academic Integrity

UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: genai_unfair_advantage_submitted_as_own_work

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Generative AI: The use of generative artificial Intelligence tools to gain an unfair advantage. Such as ChatGPT, Bing Char or DALL-E to produce content that is then submitted as your own original work.

Localized display only

UEL defines GenAI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain unfair advantage by submitting generated content as one's own work.

Security Review

UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: ai_safety_documentation_security_protocols_human_checks

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI systems must be designed and implemented in ways that prioritise user safety and ethical standards. Clear documentation must be provided to ensure transparent and explainable AI. Robust security protocols must be implemented to protect AI systems from malicious attacks and unauthorised access.

Localized display only

UEL requires AI systems to prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols.

Source record

Official sources

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence96%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of East London AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 23, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-east-london

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log