London, United Kingdom

University of East London

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Affirmations révisées

4 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance96%

Valeur normalisée: genai_policy_scope_staff_students_suppliers_partners_affiliates

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Scope: The policy applies to all staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates of UEL who engage in the development, deployment, or use of Gen AI technologies.

Affichage localisé only

The policy applies to UEL staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.

Ai Tool Treatment

UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%

Valeur normalisée: responsible_genai_transparency_ethics_data_usage_legal_compliance

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
This policy provides a framework for the responsible and ethical use of Generative AI (Gen AI) at the University of East London (UEL). It emphasises transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Affichage localisé only

UEL's GenAI policy emphasizes transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and legal/regulatory compliance.

Academic Integrity

UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%

Valeur normalisée: genai_unfair_advantage_submitted_as_own_work

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Generative AI: The use of generative artificial Intelligence tools to gain an unfair advantage. Such as ChatGPT, Bing Char or DALL-E to produce content that is then submitted as your own original work.

Affichage localisé only

UEL defines GenAI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain unfair advantage by submitting generated content as one's own work.

Security Review

UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance91%

Valeur normalisée: ai_safety_documentation_security_protocols_human_checks

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
AI systems must be designed and implemented in ways that prioritise user safety and ethical standards. Clear documentation must be provided to ensure transparent and explainable AI. Robust security protocols must be implemented to protect AI systems from malicious attacks and unauthorised access.

Affichage localisé only

UEL requires AI systems to prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols.

Source record

Sources officielles

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Révisionagent reviewedConfiance96%Snapshot statusNon publiéJSONJSON public

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of East London AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 23, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-east-london

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Journal des modifications ouvert