University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Langue
ENZHFRPL

Journal des modifications

University of East London

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Révision: Révisé par un agentVérifié pour la dernière fois23 mai 2026Dernière modification23 mai 2026Affirmations4Sources2Dernière versionpublic-release-20260526-003Enregistrements de version1
Page universitaireJSON publicRapport mensuelIndex des universités

Résumé des modifications

Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.

University of East London currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 23 mai 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 4 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour University of East London. Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.

Catégories de différences

Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.

Texte de la politique0Récemment extraits4Preuve0Instantanés source0Texte source0Source ajoutée2Source supprimée0

Différentiel de version combinée

Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.

différentiel Université of East London combined release

Comparaison de public-release-20260526-001 avec public-release-20260526-003.

+16-0
11 # University of East London AI policy diff
22 ## Source attribution added
33 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
4+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/general-policies/generative-artificial-intelligence-usage-policy snapshot 3f445bb16721b1abed489e3547b71c0d6fb45c5b9a3c0b88e6f9a55e5d5bc108
5+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
46 ## Source attribution added
57 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
8+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/manual-general-regulations/academic-integrity-academic-misconduct snapshot 1becfca5271f6e6f0e02cc957bf5b02ffa74c6369bd94ace2f9de0295a1edcfc
9+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
610 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
711 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
12+security_review: UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.
13+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): AI systems must be designed and implemented in ways that prioritise user safety and ethical standards. Clear documentation must be provided to ensure transparent and explainable AI. Robust security protocols must be implemented to protect AI systems from malicious attacks and unauthorised access.
14+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
815 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
916 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
17+academic_integrity: UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.
18+Evidence (en, 1becfca5271f): Generative AI: The use of generative artificial Intelligence tools to gain an unfair advantage. Such as ChatGPT, Bing Char or DALL-E to produce content that is then submitted as your own original work.
19+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1020 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1121 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
22+ai_tool_treatment: The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.
23+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): Scope: The policy applies to all staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates of UEL who engage in the development, deployment, or use of Gen AI technologies.
24+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1225 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1326 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
27+ai_tool_treatment: UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
28+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): This policy provides a framework for the responsible and ethical use of Generative AI (Gen AI) at the University of East London (UEL). It emphasises transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
29+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z

Historique des versions

1 diff de publication publique

public-release-20260526-003

Comparé à public-release-20260526-001.

Texte de la politique0Récemment extraits4Instantanés source0Texte source0
Diff de versionDifférences JSON

différentiel Université of East London public-release-20260526-003

Comparaison de public-release-20260526-001 avec public-release-20260526-003.

+16-0
11 # University of East London AI policy diff
22 ## Source attribution added
33 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
4+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/general-policies/generative-artificial-intelligence-usage-policy snapshot 3f445bb16721b1abed489e3547b71c0d6fb45c5b9a3c0b88e6f9a55e5d5bc108
5+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
46 ## Source attribution added
57 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
8+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/manual-general-regulations/academic-integrity-academic-misconduct snapshot 1becfca5271f6e6f0e02cc957bf5b02ffa74c6369bd94ace2f9de0295a1edcfc
9+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
610 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
711 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
12+security_review: UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.
13+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): AI systems must be designed and implemented in ways that prioritise user safety and ethical standards. Clear documentation must be provided to ensure transparent and explainable AI. Robust security protocols must be implemented to protect AI systems from malicious attacks and unauthorised access.
14+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
815 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
916 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
17+academic_integrity: UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.
18+Evidence (en, 1becfca5271f): Generative AI: The use of generative artificial Intelligence tools to gain an unfair advantage. Such as ChatGPT, Bing Char or DALL-E to produce content that is then submitted as your own original work.
19+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1020 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1121 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
22+ai_tool_treatment: The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.
23+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): Scope: The policy applies to all staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates of UEL who engage in the development, deployment, or use of Gen AI technologies.
24+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1225 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1326 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
27+ai_tool_treatment: UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
28+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): This policy provides a framework for the responsible and ethical use of Generative AI (Gen AI) at the University of East London (UEL). It emphasises transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
29+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z

Modifications d'affirmations

4 Affirmation enregistrements

ai_tool_treatment

The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance96%Preuve1Languesen

ai_tool_treatment

UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%Preuve1Languesen

academic_integrity

UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%Preuve1Languesen

security_review

UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance91%Preuve1Languesen

Instantanés source

2 source attributions