University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Język
ENZHFRPL

Dziennik zmian

University of East London

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaOstatnio sprawdzono23 maj 2026Ostatnio zmieniono23 maj 2026Twierdzenia4Źródła2Najnowsze wydaniepublic-release-20260526-003Rejestry wydań1
Strona uczelniPubliczne JSONRaport miesięcznyIndeks uczelni

Podsumowanie zmian

Aktualna świeżość publicznych rekordów i stan weryfikacji.

University of East London currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 23 maj 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 4 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

Ta strona łączy wszystkie publiczne diffy wydań dla University of East London. Indywidualne migawki wersji pozostają dostępne pod adresami URL specyficznymi dla danej wersji.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Właśnie wyodrębnione twierdzenia to dodania do trackeru i niekoniecznie są nowo opublikowane przez uniwersytet. Zmiany w migawce źródła pokazują zmiany sum kontrolnych dla tego samego URL źródłowego i same w sobie nie stanowią zmian polityki.

Kategorie różnic

Klasyfikacja semantyczna dla tej różnicy wersji.

Tekst polityki0Właśnie wyodrębnione4Dowód0Migawki źródłowe0Tekst źródłowy0Dodano źródło2Usunięto źródło0

Połączone diffy wydań

Zjednoczona różnica trackerów wygenerowana ze wszystkich publicznych migawek wydań dla tej uczelni.

Uczelnia of East London combined release różnica

Porównywanie public-release-20260526-001 z public-release-20260526-003.

+16-0
11 # University of East London AI policy diff
22 ## Source attribution added
33 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
4+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/general-policies/generative-artificial-intelligence-usage-policy snapshot 3f445bb16721b1abed489e3547b71c0d6fb45c5b9a3c0b88e6f9a55e5d5bc108
5+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
46 ## Source attribution added
57 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
8+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/manual-general-regulations/academic-integrity-academic-misconduct snapshot 1becfca5271f6e6f0e02cc957bf5b02ffa74c6369bd94ace2f9de0295a1edcfc
9+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
610 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
711 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
12+security_review: UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.
13+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): AI systems must be designed and implemented in ways that prioritise user safety and ethical standards. Clear documentation must be provided to ensure transparent and explainable AI. Robust security protocols must be implemented to protect AI systems from malicious attacks and unauthorised access.
14+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
815 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
916 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
17+academic_integrity: UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.
18+Evidence (en, 1becfca5271f): Generative AI: The use of generative artificial Intelligence tools to gain an unfair advantage. Such as ChatGPT, Bing Char or DALL-E to produce content that is then submitted as your own original work.
19+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1020 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1121 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
22+ai_tool_treatment: The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.
23+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): Scope: The policy applies to all staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates of UEL who engage in the development, deployment, or use of Gen AI technologies.
24+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1225 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1326 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
27+ai_tool_treatment: UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
28+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): This policy provides a framework for the responsible and ethical use of Generative AI (Gen AI) at the University of East London (UEL). It emphasises transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
29+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z

Historia wydań

1 różnica publicznej publikacji

public-release-20260526-003

Porównanie z public-release-20260526-001.

Tekst polityki0Właśnie wyodrębnione4Migawki źródłowe0Tekst źródłowy0
Różnice wersjiRóżnice JSON

Uczelnia of East London public-release-20260526-003 różnica

Porównywanie public-release-20260526-001 z public-release-20260526-003.

+16-0
11 # University of East London AI policy diff
22 ## Source attribution added
33 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
4+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/general-policies/generative-artificial-intelligence-usage-policy snapshot 3f445bb16721b1abed489e3547b71c0d6fb45c5b9a3c0b88e6f9a55e5d5bc108
5+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
46 ## Source attribution added
57 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
8+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/manual-general-regulations/academic-integrity-academic-misconduct snapshot 1becfca5271f6e6f0e02cc957bf5b02ffa74c6369bd94ace2f9de0295a1edcfc
9+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
610 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
711 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
12+security_review: UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.
13+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): AI systems must be designed and implemented in ways that prioritise user safety and ethical standards. Clear documentation must be provided to ensure transparent and explainable AI. Robust security protocols must be implemented to protect AI systems from malicious attacks and unauthorised access.
14+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
815 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
916 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
17+academic_integrity: UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.
18+Evidence (en, 1becfca5271f): Generative AI: The use of generative artificial Intelligence tools to gain an unfair advantage. Such as ChatGPT, Bing Char or DALL-E to produce content that is then submitted as your own original work.
19+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1020 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1121 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
22+ai_tool_treatment: The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.
23+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): Scope: The policy applies to all staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates of UEL who engage in the development, deployment, or use of Gen AI technologies.
24+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1225 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1326 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
27+ai_tool_treatment: UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
28+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): This policy provides a framework for the responsible and ethical use of Generative AI (Gen AI) at the University of East London (UEL). It emphasises transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
29+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z

Zmiany twierdzeń

4 Twierdzenie rekordów

ai_tool_treatment

The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność96%Dowód1Językien

ai_tool_treatment

UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%Dowód1Językien

academic_integrity

UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność93%Dowód1Językien

security_review

UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność91%Dowód1Językien

Migawki źródłowe

2 source attributions