University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Lisbon, Portugal

Universidade Católica Portuguesa

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: 781-790Updated2026年5月20日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

5 reviewed claims

隐私

UCP guidance says copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information should be respected and not exported to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services that are not licensed by UCP.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: do_not_export_personal_or_confidential_data_to_unlicensed_external_ai_platforms

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
Respeito pelo material protegido por direitos de autor, dados pessoais e informacoes confidenciais (incluindo propriedade intelectual nao protegida), nao os exportando para plataformas geridas por entidades externas (servidores e servicos cloud nao licenciados pela UCP).

本地化显示 only

Respect copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information, without exporting them to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services not licensed by UCP.

来源语言
pt
快照哈希
5670a767…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Orientacoes gerais para a utilizacao de ferramentas generativas na UCP, p. 2

Academic Integrity

For theses, essays, or other documents submitted for evaluation or discussion, UCP guidance says the work should result from personal work and that text entirely produced by AI from simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: submitted_academic_work_must_be_personal_not_entirely_ai_generated

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
Os documentos (teses, ensaios ou outros) apresentados para avaliacao ou discussao devem resultar do trabalho pessoal, apresentando as suas ideias, argumentos e pontos de vista. E evidente que um texto que e inteiramente produzido pela IA atraves de uma simples serie de instrucoes nao pode ser considerado como trabalho proprio.

本地化显示 only

Documents submitted for evaluation or discussion should result from personal work; a text entirely produced by AI through simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.

来源语言
pt
快照哈希
5670a767…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Orientacoes especificas para a utilizacao de ferramentas generativas na escrita academica, p. 3

Ai Tool Treatment

UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: transparent_disclosure_required_for_academic_materials

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
Os professores, estudantes e investigadores tem a obrigacao de serem transparentes quanto a utilizacao que fazem da IA generativa na producao de materiais academicos, por exemplo, em materiais utilizados para efeitos de avaliacao e progressao academica.

本地化显示 only

Professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including assessment and academic progression materials.

来源语言
pt
快照哈希
5670a767…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Orientacoes gerais para a utilizacao de ferramentas generativas na UCP, p. 2

Academic Integrity

UCP guidance states that professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce with AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources used in those materials are reliable and true.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: ai_outputs_sources_must_be_verified

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
Os professores, estudantes e investigadores sao responsaveis pelos materiais que produzem utilizando ferramentas de IA e, por conseguinte, tem a obrigacao de verificar se as informacoes e as fontes utilizadas nos seus materiais sao fiaveis e verdadeiras.

本地化显示 only

Professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce using AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources are reliable and true.

来源语言
pt
快照哈希
5670a767…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Orientacoes gerais para a utilizacao de ferramentas generativas na UCP, p. 2

教学

In teaching contexts, UCP guidance says students should explain, in an appendix to written work, the process that produced AI-induced elements or reasoning; if that is not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as a complementary assessment element.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%

标准化值: students_should_explain_ai_induced_elements_or_reasoning

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
No contexto do ensino os estudantes devem, em apendice ao trabalho escrito, explicar o processo que deu origem aos elementos ou raciocinios induzidos pela IA. Caso nao seja possivel incluir esta explicacao no proprio texto, recomenda-se uma discussao oral do texto como elemento complementar de avaliacao.

本地化显示 only

In teaching contexts, students should explain the process behind AI-induced elements or reasoning in an appendix; if not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as complementary assessment.

来源语言
pt
快照哈希
5670a767…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Explicabilidade, p. 4

Source record

官方来源

1 source

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度94%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universidade Católica Portuguesa AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 20, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universidade-catolica-portuguesa

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志