Policy presence
University of Minho has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Braga, Portugal
University of Minho
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
University of Minho has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
University of Minho has 1 source-backed public claim for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Minho has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
Approved tools
University of Minho has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
University of Minho has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
University of Minho has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
An official UMinho SASUM notice says the University of Minho community has free protected access to IAedu in a pilot phase, can authenticate with institutional credentials, and that the initiative is framed as responsible and secure because data are not used to train AI language models.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: iaedu_access_for_uminho_community
Original evidence
Evidence 1A Universidade do Minho aderiu ao projeto IAedu ... que nesta fase-piloto garante a toda a nossa Comunidade o acesso gratuito e protegido a várias ferramentas de Inteligência Artificial a partir de um só portal. Os membros desta Academia podem aceder a chat.iaedu.pt, selecionar o logótipo da UMinho, autenticar-se com as respetivas credenciais institucionais ... Esta iniciativa visa democratizar o uso da IA, sendo baseada numa política de utilização responsável ... e segura (os dados não são usados para treino dos modelos de linguagem IA).
Localized display only
The SASUM notice says UMinho joined IAedu, giving its community free protected access through institutional login, and frames the initiative as responsible and secure because data are not used to train AI language models.
Research
University of Minho Open Science guidance summarizes responsible generative-AI use in research, including human responsibility for research outputs, reporting generative-AI use, avoiding import of sensitive information into AI tools, and not using these tools for tasks with direct impact on third parties such as peer review or proposal evaluation.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_guidance_responsible_genai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1As recomendações são dirigidas a 3 atores – investigadores, organizações de investigação e financiadores – e têm um pendor muito prático, desde logo destacando que os seres humanos (e não a IA) são responsáveis pelos resultados de investigação ... o uso de ferramentas de IA generativa deve ser reportado; informação sensível não deve ser importada para ferramentas de IA ... e que estas ferramentas não devem ser usadas para tarefas com impacto direto em terceiros, ex. revisão por pares e avaliação de propostas de investigação.
Localized display only
The guidance says humans, not AI, are responsible for research outputs; generative-AI use should be reported; sensitive information should not be imported into AI tools; and these tools should not be used for peer review or proposal evaluation.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
2 source attribution
Comunidade da UMinho com acesso gratuito à plataforma IAedu
sas.uminho.pt
Diretrizes sobre a utilização responsável da IA generativa na investigação
openscience.usdb.uminho.pt