Policy presence
University of Minho has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Braga, Portugal
University of Minho
University of Minho has 2 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 2 reviewed claims. Last checked May 17, 2026.
University of Minho AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
University of Minho has 2 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 2 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 17, 2026. Discovery context: University of Minho is listed as QS 2026 rank =566.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Minho as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 2 source-backed claims, including 2 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-minho.json. The entity-level confidence is 86%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
University of Minho has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
University of Minho has 1 source-backed public claim for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Minho has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
Approved tools
University of Minho has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
University of Minho has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
University of Minho has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
An official UMinho SASUM notice says the University of Minho community has free protected access to IAedu in a pilot phase, can authenticate with institutional credentials, and that the initiative is framed as responsible and secure because data are not used to train AI language models.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: iaedu_access_for_uminho_community
Original evidence
Evidence 1A Universidade do Minho aderiu ao projeto IAedu ... que nesta fase-piloto garante a toda a nossa Comunidade o acesso gratuito e protegido a várias ferramentas de Inteligência Artificial a partir de um só portal. Os membros desta Academia podem aceder a chat.iaedu.pt, selecionar o logótipo da UMinho, autenticar-se com as respetivas credenciais institucionais ... Esta iniciativa visa democratizar o uso da IA, sendo baseada numa política de utilização responsável ... e segura (os dados não são usados para treino dos modelos de linguagem IA).
Localized display only
The SASUM notice says UMinho joined IAedu, giving its community free protected access through institutional login, and frames the initiative as responsible and secure because data are not used to train AI language models.
Research
University of Minho Open Science guidance summarizes responsible generative-AI use in research, including human responsibility for research outputs, reporting generative-AI use, avoiding import of sensitive information into AI tools, and not using these tools for tasks with direct impact on third parties such as peer review or proposal evaluation.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_guidance_responsible_genai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1As recomendações são dirigidas a 3 atores – investigadores, organizações de investigação e financiadores – e têm um pendor muito prático, desde logo destacando que os seres humanos (e não a IA) são responsáveis pelos resultados de investigação ... o uso de ferramentas de IA generativa deve ser reportado; informação sensível não deve ser importada para ferramentas de IA ... e que estas ferramentas não devem ser usadas para tarefas com impacto direto em terceiros, ex. revisão por pares e avaliação de propostas de investigação.
Localized display only
The guidance says humans, not AI, are responsible for research outputs; generative-AI use should be reported; sensitive information should not be imported into AI tools; and these tools should not be used for peer review or proposal evaluation.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
Comunidade da UMinho com acesso gratuito à plataforma IAedu
sas.uminho.pt
Diretrizes sobre a utilização responsável da IA generativa na investigação
openscience.usdb.uminho.pt
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.