Policy presence
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Lisbon, Portugal
Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 20, 2026.
Universidade Católica Portuguesa AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 20, 2026. Discovery context: Universidade Católica Portuguesa is listed as QS 2026 rank 781-790.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Universidade Católica Portuguesa as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 20, 2026 and last changed on May 20, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universidade-catolica-portuguesa.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 2 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
UCP guidance says copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information should be respected and not exported to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services that are not licensed by UCP.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_export_personal_or_confidential_data_to_unlicensed_external_ai_platforms
Original evidence
Evidence 1Respeito pelo material protegido por direitos de autor, dados pessoais e informacoes confidenciais (incluindo propriedade intelectual nao protegida), nao os exportando para plataformas geridas por entidades externas (servidores e servicos cloud nao licenciados pela UCP).
Localized display only
Respect copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information, without exporting them to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services not licensed by UCP.
Academic Integrity
For theses, essays, or other documents submitted for evaluation or discussion, UCP guidance says the work should result from personal work and that text entirely produced by AI from simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: submitted_academic_work_must_be_personal_not_entirely_ai_generated
Original evidence
Evidence 1Os documentos (teses, ensaios ou outros) apresentados para avaliacao ou discussao devem resultar do trabalho pessoal, apresentando as suas ideias, argumentos e pontos de vista. E evidente que um texto que e inteiramente produzido pela IA atraves de uma simples serie de instrucoes nao pode ser considerado como trabalho proprio.
Localized display only
Documents submitted for evaluation or discussion should result from personal work; a text entirely produced by AI through simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.
Ai Tool Treatment
UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: transparent_disclosure_required_for_academic_materials
Original evidence
Evidence 1Os professores, estudantes e investigadores tem a obrigacao de serem transparentes quanto a utilizacao que fazem da IA generativa na producao de materiais academicos, por exemplo, em materiais utilizados para efeitos de avaliacao e progressao academica.
Localized display only
Professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including assessment and academic progression materials.
Academic Integrity
UCP guidance states that professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce with AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources used in those materials are reliable and true.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_outputs_sources_must_be_verified
Original evidence
Evidence 1Os professores, estudantes e investigadores sao responsaveis pelos materiais que produzem utilizando ferramentas de IA e, por conseguinte, tem a obrigacao de verificar se as informacoes e as fontes utilizadas nos seus materiais sao fiaveis e verdadeiras.
Localized display only
Professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce using AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources are reliable and true.
Teaching
In teaching contexts, UCP guidance says students should explain, in an appendix to written work, the process that produced AI-induced elements or reasoning; if that is not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as a complementary assessment element.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_should_explain_ai_induced_elements_or_reasoning
Original evidence
Evidence 1No contexto do ensino os estudantes devem, em apendice ao trabalho escrito, explicar o processo que deu origem aos elementos ou raciocinios induzidos pela IA. Caso nao seja possivel incluir esta explicacao no proprio texto, recomenda-se uma discussao oral do texto como elemento complementar de avaliacao.
Localized display only
In teaching contexts, students should explain the process behind AI-induced elements or reasoning in an appendix; if not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as complementary assessment.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
1 source attribution
Politica de integridade academica e cientifica: Carta de Principios no uso de IA
ucp.pt
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.