University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Lisbon, Portugal

Universidade Católica Portuguesa

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: 781-790UpdatedMay 20, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

5 reviewed claims

Privacy

UCP guidance says copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information should be respected and not exported to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services that are not licensed by UCP.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: do_not_export_personal_or_confidential_data_to_unlicensed_external_ai_platforms

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Respeito pelo material protegido por direitos de autor, dados pessoais e informacoes confidenciais (incluindo propriedade intelectual nao protegida), nao os exportando para plataformas geridas por entidades externas (servidores e servicos cloud nao licenciados pela UCP).

Localized display only

Respect copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information, without exporting them to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services not licensed by UCP.

Source language
pt
Snapshot hash
5670a767…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Orientacoes gerais para a utilizacao de ferramentas generativas na UCP, p. 2

Academic Integrity

For theses, essays, or other documents submitted for evaluation or discussion, UCP guidance says the work should result from personal work and that text entirely produced by AI from simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: submitted_academic_work_must_be_personal_not_entirely_ai_generated

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Os documentos (teses, ensaios ou outros) apresentados para avaliacao ou discussao devem resultar do trabalho pessoal, apresentando as suas ideias, argumentos e pontos de vista. E evidente que um texto que e inteiramente produzido pela IA atraves de uma simples serie de instrucoes nao pode ser considerado como trabalho proprio.

Localized display only

Documents submitted for evaluation or discussion should result from personal work; a text entirely produced by AI through simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.

Source language
pt
Snapshot hash
5670a767…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Orientacoes especificas para a utilizacao de ferramentas generativas na escrita academica, p. 3

Ai Tool Treatment

UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: transparent_disclosure_required_for_academic_materials

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Os professores, estudantes e investigadores tem a obrigacao de serem transparentes quanto a utilizacao que fazem da IA generativa na producao de materiais academicos, por exemplo, em materiais utilizados para efeitos de avaliacao e progressao academica.

Localized display only

Professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including assessment and academic progression materials.

Source language
pt
Snapshot hash
5670a767…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Orientacoes gerais para a utilizacao de ferramentas generativas na UCP, p. 2

Academic Integrity

UCP guidance states that professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce with AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources used in those materials are reliable and true.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: ai_outputs_sources_must_be_verified

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Os professores, estudantes e investigadores sao responsaveis pelos materiais que produzem utilizando ferramentas de IA e, por conseguinte, tem a obrigacao de verificar se as informacoes e as fontes utilizadas nos seus materiais sao fiaveis e verdadeiras.

Localized display only

Professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce using AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources are reliable and true.

Source language
pt
Snapshot hash
5670a767…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Orientacoes gerais para a utilizacao de ferramentas generativas na UCP, p. 2

Teaching

In teaching contexts, UCP guidance says students should explain, in an appendix to written work, the process that produced AI-induced elements or reasoning; if that is not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as a complementary assessment element.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: students_should_explain_ai_induced_elements_or_reasoning

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
No contexto do ensino os estudantes devem, em apendice ao trabalho escrito, explicar o processo que deu origem aos elementos ou raciocinios induzidos pela IA. Caso nao seja possivel incluir esta explicacao no proprio texto, recomenda-se uma discussao oral do texto como elemento complementar de avaliacao.

Localized display only

In teaching contexts, students should explain the process behind AI-induced elements or reasoning in an appendix; if not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as complementary assessment.

Source language
pt
Snapshot hash
5670a767…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Explicabilidade, p. 4

Source record

Official sources

1 source

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence94%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universidade Católica Portuguesa AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 20, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universidade-catolica-portuguesa

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log