Policy presence
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Lisbon, Portugal
Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
Universidade Católica Portuguesa has 2 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
UCP guidance says copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information should be respected and not exported to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services that are not licensed by UCP.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_export_personal_or_confidential_data_to_unlicensed_external_ai_platforms
Original evidence
Evidence 1Respeito pelo material protegido por direitos de autor, dados pessoais e informacoes confidenciais (incluindo propriedade intelectual nao protegida), nao os exportando para plataformas geridas por entidades externas (servidores e servicos cloud nao licenciados pela UCP).
Localized display only
Respect copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information, without exporting them to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services not licensed by UCP.
Academic Integrity
For theses, essays, or other documents submitted for evaluation or discussion, UCP guidance says the work should result from personal work and that text entirely produced by AI from simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: submitted_academic_work_must_be_personal_not_entirely_ai_generated
Original evidence
Evidence 1Os documentos (teses, ensaios ou outros) apresentados para avaliacao ou discussao devem resultar do trabalho pessoal, apresentando as suas ideias, argumentos e pontos de vista. E evidente que um texto que e inteiramente produzido pela IA atraves de uma simples serie de instrucoes nao pode ser considerado como trabalho proprio.
Localized display only
Documents submitted for evaluation or discussion should result from personal work; a text entirely produced by AI through simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.
Ai Tool Treatment
UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: transparent_disclosure_required_for_academic_materials
Original evidence
Evidence 1Os professores, estudantes e investigadores tem a obrigacao de serem transparentes quanto a utilizacao que fazem da IA generativa na producao de materiais academicos, por exemplo, em materiais utilizados para efeitos de avaliacao e progressao academica.
Localized display only
Professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including assessment and academic progression materials.
Academic Integrity
UCP guidance states that professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce with AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources used in those materials are reliable and true.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_outputs_sources_must_be_verified
Original evidence
Evidence 1Os professores, estudantes e investigadores sao responsaveis pelos materiais que produzem utilizando ferramentas de IA e, por conseguinte, tem a obrigacao de verificar se as informacoes e as fontes utilizadas nos seus materiais sao fiaveis e verdadeiras.
Localized display only
Professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce using AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources are reliable and true.
Teaching
In teaching contexts, UCP guidance says students should explain, in an appendix to written work, the process that produced AI-induced elements or reasoning; if that is not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as a complementary assessment element.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_should_explain_ai_induced_elements_or_reasoning
Original evidence
Evidence 1No contexto do ensino os estudantes devem, em apendice ao trabalho escrito, explicar o processo que deu origem aos elementos ou raciocinios induzidos pela IA. Caso nao seja possivel incluir esta explicacao no proprio texto, recomenda-se uma discussao oral do texto como elemento complementar de avaliacao.
Localized display only
In teaching contexts, students should explain the process behind AI-induced elements or reasoning in an appendix; if not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as complementary assessment.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
1 source attribution
Politica de integridade academica e cientifica: Carta de Principios no uso de IA
ucp.pt