Lisbon, Portugal

Universidade Católica Portuguesa

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Zrecenzowane twierdzenia

5 reviewed claims

Prywatność

UCP guidance says copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information should be respected and not exported to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services that are not licensed by UCP.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%

Wartość znormalizowana: do_not_export_personal_or_confidential_data_to_unlicensed_external_ai_platforms

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Respeito pelo material protegido por direitos de autor, dados pessoais e informacoes confidenciais (incluindo propriedade intelectual nao protegida), nao os exportando para plataformas geridas por entidades externas (servidores e servicos cloud nao licenciados pela UCP).

Widok lokalny only

Respect copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information, without exporting them to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services not licensed by UCP.

Academic Integrity

For theses, essays, or other documents submitted for evaluation or discussion, UCP guidance says the work should result from personal work and that text entirely produced by AI from simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%

Wartość znormalizowana: submitted_academic_work_must_be_personal_not_entirely_ai_generated

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Os documentos (teses, ensaios ou outros) apresentados para avaliacao ou discussao devem resultar do trabalho pessoal, apresentando as suas ideias, argumentos e pontos de vista. E evidente que um texto que e inteiramente produzido pela IA atraves de uma simples serie de instrucoes nao pode ser considerado como trabalho proprio.

Widok lokalny only

Documents submitted for evaluation or discussion should result from personal work; a text entirely produced by AI through simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.

Ai Tool Treatment

UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność93%

Wartość znormalizowana: transparent_disclosure_required_for_academic_materials

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Os professores, estudantes e investigadores tem a obrigacao de serem transparentes quanto a utilizacao que fazem da IA generativa na producao de materiais academicos, por exemplo, em materiais utilizados para efeitos de avaliacao e progressao academica.

Widok lokalny only

Professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including assessment and academic progression materials.

Academic Integrity

UCP guidance states that professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce with AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources used in those materials are reliable and true.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność93%

Wartość znormalizowana: ai_outputs_sources_must_be_verified

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Os professores, estudantes e investigadores sao responsaveis pelos materiais que produzem utilizando ferramentas de IA e, por conseguinte, tem a obrigacao de verificar se as informacoes e as fontes utilizadas nos seus materiais sao fiaveis e verdadeiras.

Widok lokalny only

Professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce using AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources are reliable and true.

Nauczanie

In teaching contexts, UCP guidance says students should explain, in an appendix to written work, the process that produced AI-induced elements or reasoning; if that is not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as a complementary assessment element.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność91%

Wartość znormalizowana: students_should_explain_ai_induced_elements_or_reasoning

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
No contexto do ensino os estudantes devem, em apendice ao trabalho escrito, explicar o processo que deu origem aos elementos ou raciocinios induzidos pela IA. Caso nao seja possivel incluir esta explicacao no proprio texto, recomenda-se uma discussao oral do texto como elemento complementar de avaliacao.

Widok lokalny only

In teaching contexts, students should explain the process behind AI-induced elements or reasoning in an appendix; if not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as complementary assessment.

Source record

Oficjalne źródła

1 source

Record information, JSON & citation
Recenzjaagent reviewedPewność94%Snapshot statusNieopublikowaneJSONPubliczne JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universidade Católica Portuguesa AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 20, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universidade-catolica-portuguesa

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Otwórz dziennik zmian