Policy presence
University of Lisbon has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Lisbon, Portugal
University of Lisbon
University of Lisbon is listed as QS 2026 rank =230. University of Lisbon has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
University of Lisbon is listed as QS 2026 rank =230. University of Lisbon has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Lisbon as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 15, 2026 and last changed on May 15, 2026. The record contains 3 source-backed claims, including 3 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-lisbon.json. The entity-level confidence is 90%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Lisbon has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
University of Lisbon has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Lisbon has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
Approved tools
University of Lisbon has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Named AI services
University of Lisbon has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Teaching guidance
University of Lisbon has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of Lisbon has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
At Instituto Superior Técnico, a Pedagogical Council deliberation was reported as saying there should not be a general prohibition on AI tools in teaching processes or assessment methods.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: school_level_no_general_ban
Original evidence
Evidence 1não deverá ser adotada nenhuma medida geral de proibição relativamente ao uso de ferramentas que usem IA nos processos de ensino ou em métodos de avaliação
Localized display only
No general prohibition should be adopted regarding AI tools in teaching processes or assessment methods.
Ai Tool Treatment
At Instituto Superior Técnico, an official AI guide is described as setting guidance for students, faculty, and researchers on informed use of AI in academic life.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: school_level_ai_guidance
Original evidence
Evidence 1estabelece orientações para estudantes, docentes e investigadores, procurando apoiar uma integração informada da IA na vida académica.
Localized display only
Sets guidance for students, faculty, and researchers, seeking to support informed integration of AI in academic life.
Teaching
At Instituto Superior Técnico, the reported deliberation called for assessment methods to make explicit whether AI tools are permitted.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: school_level_assessment_permission_disclosure
Original evidence
Evidence 1Apelou também a que fique explícita, no método de avaliação, a permissão (ou não) do recurso a ferramentas de IA.
Localized display only
The assessment method should make explicit whether use of AI tools is permitted.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
Inteligência artificial no ensino - Técnico apresenta deliberação sobre o uso de ferramentas como o ChatGPT
tecnico.ulisboa.pt
Técnico apresenta Guia para a utilização responsável da Inteligência Artificial
tecnico.ulisboa.pt
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.