Lisbon, Portugal

University of Lisbon

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage3 reviewedEvidence-backed claims3Reviewed3Candidate0Official sources2Source languageptPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-lisbon.json

Policy profile

Coverage score70/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence74%

Policy presence

University of Lisbon has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence74%Evidence1Sources1

AI disclosure

University of Lisbon has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence73%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

University of Lisbon has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence74%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

University of Lisbon has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence74%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

University of Lisbon has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence74%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Teaching

At Instituto Superior Técnico, a Pedagogical Council deliberation was reported as saying there should not be a general prohibition on AI tools in teaching processes or assessment methods.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: school_level_no_general_ban

Original evidence

Evidence 1
não deverá ser adotada nenhuma medida geral de proibição relativamente ao uso de ferramentas que usem IA nos processos de ensino ou em métodos de avaliação

Localized display only

No general prohibition should be adopted regarding AI tools in teaching processes or assessment methods.

Ai Tool Treatment

At Instituto Superior Técnico, an official AI guide is described as setting guidance for students, faculty, and researchers on informed use of AI in academic life.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%

Normalized value: school_level_ai_guidance

Original evidence

Evidence 1
estabelece orientações para estudantes, docentes e investigadores, procurando apoiar uma integração informada da IA na vida académica.

Localized display only

Sets guidance for students, faculty, and researchers, seeking to support informed integration of AI in academic life.

Teaching

At Instituto Superior Técnico, the reported deliberation called for assessment methods to make explicit whether AI tools are permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: school_level_assessment_permission_disclosure

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Apelou também a que fique explícita, no método de avaliação, a permissão (ou não) do recurso a ferramentas de IA.

Localized display only

The assessment method should make explicit whether use of AI tools is permitted.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities