Change log

University of Lisbon

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Lisbon currently has 3 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

University of Lisbon current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+6-0
11 # University of Lisbon AI policy record
2+teaching: At Instituto Superior Técnico, a Pedagogical Council deliberation was reported as saying there should not be a general prohibition on AI tools in teaching processes or assessment methods.
3+Evidence (pt, d2ea95973251): não deverá ser adotada nenhuma medida geral de proibição relativamente ao uso de ferramentas que usem IA nos processos de ensino ou em métodos de avaliação
4+ai_tool_treatment: At Instituto Superior Técnico, an official AI guide is described as setting guidance for students, faculty, and researchers on informed use of AI in academic life.
5+Evidence (pt, 1d631ec2a9fc): estabelece orientações para estudantes, docentes e investigadores, procurando apoiar uma integração informada da IA na vida académica.
6+teaching: At Instituto Superior Técnico, the reported deliberation called for assessment methods to make explicit whether AI tools are permitted.
7+Evidence (pt, d2ea95973251): Apelou também a que fique explícita, no método de avaliação, a permissão (ou não) do recurso a ferramentas de IA.

Claim changes

3 claim records

teaching

At Instituto Superior Técnico, a Pedagogical Council deliberation was reported as saying there should not be a general prohibition on AI tools in teaching processes or assessment methods.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagespt

ai_tool_treatment

At Instituto Superior Técnico, an official AI guide is described as setting guidance for students, faculty, and researchers on informed use of AI in academic life.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%Evidence1Languagespt

teaching

At Instituto Superior Técnico, the reported deliberation called for assessment methods to make explicit whether AI tools are permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagespt

Source snapshots

2 source attributions