teaching
At Instituto Superior Técnico, a Pedagogical Council deliberation was reported as saying there should not be a general prohibition on AI tools in teaching processes or assessment methods.
Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Lisbon currently has 3 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
3 claim records
At Instituto Superior Técnico, a Pedagogical Council deliberation was reported as saying there should not be a general prohibition on AI tools in teaching processes or assessment methods.
At Instituto Superior Técnico, an official AI guide is described as setting guidance for students, faculty, and researchers on informed use of AI in academic life.
At Instituto Superior Técnico, the reported deliberation called for assessment methods to make explicit whether AI tools are permitted.
2 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 2:09 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 2:08 PM