Porto, Portugal

University of Porto

University of Porto is listed as QS 2026 rank =237. University of Porto has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Short answer

v1 public contract

University of Porto is listed as QS 2026 rank =237. University of Porto has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Porto as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-porto.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage4 reviewedSource languageptPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-porto.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • Evidence includes Privacy claims.
  • Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
  • Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources2

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence79%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Privacy and data entry

University of Porto has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

University of Porto has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

University of Porto has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

University of Porto has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

University of Porto has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

The University of Porto Ethics Code says AI or similar resources may be used as support tools in research and academic work if their use is explicitly disclosed and does not replace critical thinking, creativity, and human authorship.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: ai_support_allowed_with_disclosure_human_authorship

Original evidence

Evidence 1
A Inteligência Artificial, ou recursos similares, pode ser utilizada como ferramenta de apoio, desde que devidamente explicitada, sem substituir o pensamento crítico, a criatividade e a autoria humana.

Teaching

The University of Porto Ethics Code lists, among teachers' duties in teaching and assessment, discussing the use or non-use of AI or similar resources with students and giving clear guidance on good use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: teachers_discuss_ai_use_or_nonuse_with_clear_guidance

Original evidence

Evidence 1
A discussão com os estudantes sobre o uso, ou não, da Inteligência Artificial, ou recursos similares, com orientações claras sobre a sua boa utilização;

Academic Integrity

The University of Porto Ethics Code identifies improper use of AI or similar tools, without indicating their contributions to research activities or academic work, as improper conduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: undisclosed_ai_contribution_improper_conduct

Original evidence

Evidence 1
O uso indevido de ferramentas de Inteligência Artificial, ou de natureza similar, sem indicação dos seus contributos para as atividades de investigação e para a realização de trabalhos académicos;

Privacy

UPDIGITAL states that U.Porto users can access Microsoft Copilot and IAedu with institutional credentials with data protection, and says the referenced Copilot enterprise use and IAedu inputs/outputs are not used to train models.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: institutional_credentials_copilot_iaedu_data_not_used_for_training

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Utilizando esta versão do Copilot com as credenciais institucionais da U.Porto, o utilizador beneficia igualmente da proteção de dados comerciais.

Original evidence

Evidence 2
Os dados não são utilizados para treinar modelos. Os inputs e outputs dos modelos são tratados com o mesmo nível de proteção de outros dados sensíveis, como documentos e emails.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities