privacy
UCP guidance says copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information should be respected and not exported to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services that are not licensed by UCP.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Universidade Católica Portuguesa currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Universidade Católica Portuguesa. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Universidade Católica Portuguesa combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+10-0
11 # Universidade Católica Portuguesa AI policy record
2+privacy: UCP guidance says copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information should be respected and not exported to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services that are not licensed by UCP.
3+Evidence (pt, 5670a767386b): Respeito pelo material protegido por direitos de autor, dados pessoais e informacoes confidenciais (incluindo propriedade intelectual nao protegida), nao os exportando para plataformas geridas por entidades externas (servidores e servicos cloud nao licenciados pela UCP).
4+academic_integrity: For theses, essays, or other documents submitted for evaluation or discussion, UCP guidance says the work should result from personal work and that text entirely produced by AI from simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.
5+Evidence (pt, 5670a767386b): Os documentos (teses, ensaios ou outros) apresentados para avaliacao ou discussao devem resultar do trabalho pessoal, apresentando as suas ideias, argumentos e pontos de vista. E evidente que um texto que e inteiramente produzido pela IA atraves de uma simples serie de instrucoes nao pode ser considerado como trabalho proprio.
6+ai_tool_treatment: UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.
7+Evidence (pt, 5670a767386b): Os professores, estudantes e investigadores tem a obrigacao de serem transparentes quanto a utilizacao que fazem da IA generativa na producao de materiais academicos, por exemplo, em materiais utilizados para efeitos de avaliacao e progressao academica.
8+academic_integrity: UCP guidance states that professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce with AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources used in those materials are reliable and true.
9+Evidence (pt, 5670a767386b): Os professores, estudantes e investigadores sao responsaveis pelos materiais que produzem utilizando ferramentas de IA e, por conseguinte, tem a obrigacao de verificar se as informacoes e as fontes utilizadas nos seus materiais sao fiaveis e verdadeiras.
10+teaching: In teaching contexts, UCP guidance says students should explain, in an appendix to written work, the process that produced AI-induced elements or reasoning; if that is not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as a complementary assessment element.
11+Evidence (pt, 5670a767386b): No contexto do ensino os estudantes devem, em apendice ao trabalho escrito, explicar o processo que deu origem aos elementos ou raciocinios induzidos pela IA. Caso nao seja possivel incluir esta explicacao no proprio texto, recomenda-se uma discussao oral do texto como elemento complementar de avaliacao.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
5 claim records
academic_integrity
For theses, essays, or other documents submitted for evaluation or discussion, UCP guidance says the work should result from personal work and that text entirely produced by AI from simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
UCP guidance states that professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce with AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources used in those materials are reliable and true.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
In teaching contexts, UCP guidance says students should explain, in an appendix to written work, the process that produced AI-induced elements or reasoning; if that is not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as a complementary assessment element.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
1 source attribution
Politica de integridade academica e cientifica: Carta de Principios no uso de IA
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 2:00 AM