privacy
UCP guidance says copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information should be respected and not exported to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services that are not licensed by UCP.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Tracker history: 0 release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
5 current claims; 1 official sources.
This page combines all public release diffs for Universidade Católica Portuguesa. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No recorded updates are available in this tracker history.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Recorded text comparisons
Only recorded comparisons with an exact Claim ID match are shown.
No recorded updates are available in this tracker history.
Release history
Tracker history: 0 release records.
Current claim records
Current claim records: 5.
academic_integrity
For theses, essays, or other documents submitted for evaluation or discussion, UCP guidance says the work should result from personal work and that text entirely produced by AI from simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
UCP guidance states that professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce with AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources used in those materials are reliable and true.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
In teaching contexts, UCP guidance says students should explain, in an appendix to written work, the process that produced AI-induced elements or reasoning; if that is not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as a complementary assessment element.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
Official source records: 1.
Politica de integridade academica e cientifica: Carta de Principios no uso de IA
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 2:00 AM