privacy
UCP guidance says copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information should be respected and not exported to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services that are not licensed by UCP.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Universidade Católica Portuguesa currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Universidade Católica Portuguesa current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+10-0
11 # Universidade Católica Portuguesa AI policy record
2+privacy: UCP guidance says copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information should be respected and not exported to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services that are not licensed by UCP.
3+Evidence (pt, 5670a767386b): Respeito pelo material protegido por direitos de autor, dados pessoais e informacoes confidenciais (incluindo propriedade intelectual nao protegida), nao os exportando para plataformas geridas por entidades externas (servidores e servicos cloud nao licenciados pela UCP).
4+academic_integrity: For theses, essays, or other documents submitted for evaluation or discussion, UCP guidance says the work should result from personal work and that text entirely produced by AI from simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.
5+Evidence (pt, 5670a767386b): Os documentos (teses, ensaios ou outros) apresentados para avaliacao ou discussao devem resultar do trabalho pessoal, apresentando as suas ideias, argumentos e pontos de vista. E evidente que um texto que e inteiramente produzido pela IA atraves de uma simples serie de instrucoes nao pode ser considerado como trabalho proprio.
6+ai_tool_treatment: UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.
7+Evidence (pt, 5670a767386b): Os professores, estudantes e investigadores tem a obrigacao de serem transparentes quanto a utilizacao que fazem da IA generativa na producao de materiais academicos, por exemplo, em materiais utilizados para efeitos de avaliacao e progressao academica.
8+academic_integrity: UCP guidance states that professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce with AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources used in those materials are reliable and true.
9+Evidence (pt, 5670a767386b): Os professores, estudantes e investigadores sao responsaveis pelos materiais que produzem utilizando ferramentas de IA e, por conseguinte, tem a obrigacao de verificar se as informacoes e as fontes utilizadas nos seus materiais sao fiaveis e verdadeiras.
10+teaching: In teaching contexts, UCP guidance says students should explain, in an appendix to written work, the process that produced AI-induced elements or reasoning; if that is not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as a complementary assessment element.
11+Evidence (pt, 5670a767386b): No contexto do ensino os estudantes devem, em apendice ao trabalho escrito, explicar o processo que deu origem aos elementos ou raciocinios induzidos pela IA. Caso nao seja possivel incluir esta explicacao no proprio texto, recomenda-se uma discussao oral do texto como elemento complementar de avaliacao.
Claim changes
5 claim records
academic_integrity
For theses, essays, or other documents submitted for evaluation or discussion, UCP guidance says the work should result from personal work and that text entirely produced by AI from simple prompts cannot be considered one's own work.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
UCP guidance states that professors, students, and researchers are responsible for materials they produce with AI tools and are obliged to verify that information and sources used in those materials are reliable and true.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
In teaching contexts, UCP guidance says students should explain, in an appendix to written work, the process that produced AI-induced elements or reasoning; if that is not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as a complementary assessment element.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
1 source attribution
Politica de integridade academica e cientifica: Carta de Principios no uso de IA
official_pdf checked May 20, 2026