University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Lexington, United States

University of Kentucky

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: 781-790Updated2026年7月19日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

5 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Kentucky in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"University of Kentucky provides or institutionally supports Microsoft Copilot.","howToObtain":"Use the official university access path.","costToUser":"No individual price is stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

最后检查时间
2026年7月19日
最后更改时间
2026年7月19日

原始证据

证据 1
Microsoft Copilot licenses are now available to all students, faculty and staff

本地化显示 only

Microsoft Copilot licenses are now available to all students, faculty and staff

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
98d27148…
已检索
2026年7月19日

隐私

UK ADVANCE research guidance says data privacy review is needed before Protected Data is entered into a generative AI tool; it also says not to put PHI into such tools unless UKHC InfoSec has confirmed HIPAA compliance and PHI support, and not to place other non-public or proprietary research data into open-source AI without UK ITS GRC approval.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: protected_data_privacy_review_phi_and_nonpublic_research_data_restrictions

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
Data privacy review is needed before any Protected Data (AR 10.7) is entered into a generative AI tool. Unless the UKHC InfoSec Data Sharing Committee has confirmed the AI tool is HIPAA compliant and supports PHI input, do not put research data containing PHI into a generative AI tool or other software.

本地化显示 only

UK ADVANCE requires data privacy review before Protected Data enters a generative AI tool and restricts PHI input unless compliance/support is confirmed.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
16cd4b62…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Research recommendations PDF, privacy concerns section

研究

UK ADVANCE research guidance says generative AI tools may enhance research when used responsibly, generated content should be verified or validated, generative AI cannot be designated as an author, and researchers remain responsible for content and accuracy.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%

标准化值: responsible_research_use_verification_no_ai_authorship_human_accountability

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
When using a generative AI tool, it is best practice to verify or validate all generated content using additional factors and reliable resources. Generative AI cannot be designated authorship as it cannot be held accountable.

本地化显示 only

UK ADVANCE advises validating generated research content and does not allow generative AI to be treated as accountable authorship.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
16cd4b62…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Research recommendations PDF, FAQs on research use and authorship

教学

UK ADVANCE provides instructional generative AI guidance that includes creating and clearly communicating course policies, responding to misuse, and designing learning experiences aligned with those policies.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: instructional_guidance_course_policy_recommended

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
UK ADVANCE provides the following guidance and recommendations: Understanding Capabilities and Risks; Developing Course Policies: Creating and clearly communicating course policies regarding the use of generative AI; Responding to Misuse; Designing Aligned Learning Experiences.

本地化显示 only

UK ADVANCE recommends understanding risks, creating and communicating course AI policies, responding to misuse, and aligning learning experiences.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
7c2e4686…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Summary section, Guidance and Recommendations from UK ADVANCE

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Kentucky CELT guidance frames student generative AI use as a course-level instructor decision and recommends communicating allowed uses, tool restrictions, citation or acknowledgement expectations, and alternatives where privacy concerns exist.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%

标准化值: course_level_instructor_discretion_with_citation_privacy_guidance

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
It is up to the instructor to decide whether student use of generative AI (GenAI) is appropriate for their courses and to what extent. Instructors might also consider an assignment-by-assignment approach to identifying when generative AI is allowed.

本地化显示 only

CELT frames student GenAI use as an instructor decision, including assignment-by-assignment communication of allowed uses.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
30818b94…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Course Policy Overview

Source record

官方来源

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Kentucky AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-kentucky

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志