University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Bristol, United Kingdom

University of Bristol

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: 51Updated2026年5月12日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

4 reviewed claims

University of Bristol guidance for taught degree programmes uses a four-category system for AI use in assessments, from Category 1 (prohibited) to Category 4 (integral, AI required). Using AI or translation tools for more than generating occasional short phrases or checking basic grammar and spelling is treated as cheating unless assessment instructions allow more comprehensive use. For research degrees, generative AI tools may not be used to write any text used in theses or APM reports.

Summary of the 4 agent-reviewed claims in this record, with their original scope. No student policy snapshot has been published for this university yet, and this summary is not an official university statement.

Academic Integrity1 reviewed claim

Academic Integrity

University of Bristol considers the use of AI or translation tools to be cheating if used for more than generating the occasional short phrase within a sentence or checking basic grammar and spelling, unless assessment instructions allow more comprehensive use.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: AI use beyond occasional phrases and grammar checking is considered cheating

最后检查时间
2026年5月12日
最后更改时间
2026年5月12日

原始证据

证据 1
We consider the use of AI or translation tools to be cheating if used for more than: generating the occasional short phrase within a sentence, checking basic grammar and spelling. Some assessments may allow more comprehensive use of these tools, but this will be detailed in your assessment instructions.

本地化显示 only

AI use beyond occasional phrases and grammar checking is cheating

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
a6de8d5d…
已检索
2026年5月12日
证据定位器
Section: Academic integrity, paragraph on AI and translation tools

Teaching2 reviewed claims

教学

University of Bristol has published official guidance on generative AI use in taught degree programmes, stating that generative AI should not replace activities that develop intellectual rigour, student agency, and students' capacity to work through complex problems themselves.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: University has official generative AI guidance for taught programmes

最后检查时间
2026年5月12日
最后更改时间
2026年5月12日

原始证据

证据 1
This guidance sets out the University of Bristol's approach to using generative AI on taught degree programmes. The responsible use of generative AI is foundational to our educational vision to inspire students, and to equip well-rounded graduates with skills for the future. Generative AI should not replace activities that develop intellectual rigour, student agency, and students' capacity to work through complex problems themselves.

本地化显示 only

University guidance for generative AI on taught degree programmes

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
37b0e7d3…
已检索
2026年5月12日
证据定位器
Section: University guidance on Generative AI in Education, paragraphs 1-2

教学

University of Bristol uses a four-category system for AI use in assessments: Category 1 (prohibited - no AI use), Category 2 (minimal - spelling/grammar only, default), Category 3 (selective - certain tasks as specified), and Category 4 (integral - AI required for assessment).

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: Four-category AI assessment system: prohibited, minimal, selective, integral

最后检查时间
2026年5月12日
最后更改时间
2026年5月12日

原始证据

证据 1
Category 1: prohibited (not allowed) - You cannot use AI tools at all, including spelling and grammar checkers. Category 2: minimal (a little) - You can use AI tools for spelling and grammar check. You can use it for rewording occasional phrases, but not sentences, large parts of text or paragraphs. Category 3: selective (certain tasks) - AI tools can be used in certain ways. Your lecturer will tell you what you can use it for. Category 4: integral (important) - AI tools are needed for the assessment.

本地化显示 only

Four AI assessment categories: prohibited, minimal, selective, integral

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
076c72c3…
已检索
2026年5月12日
证据定位器
Section: Artificial intelligence (AI) assessment categories

Research1 reviewed claim

研究

PGR students at University of Bristol are not permitted to use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to write any text used in their thesis or APM reports, as research degree students must demonstrate ability to write about research in their own words.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: PGR students prohibited from using generative AI to write thesis or APM report text

最后检查时间
2026年5月12日
最后更改时间
2026年5月12日

原始证据

证据 1
To be awarded a research degree, you must meet several key standards in your research training. One of these is the ability to write about your research in your own words. This critical research skill is tested through your thesis and through your annual progress monitoring (APM) reports. For this reason, you are not permitted to use generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, to write any text that is used in your thesis or in your APM reports.

本地化显示 only

PGR students not permitted to use generative AI to write thesis or APM text

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
e7650f61…
已检索
2026年5月12日
证据定位器
Section: Introduction

Source record

官方来源

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Bristol AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 12, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-bristol

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志