University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Eindhoven, Netherlands

Eindhoven University of Technology

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: =140Updated2026年7月19日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

11 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise is listed for Eindhoven University of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise","description":"Protected Microsoft Copilot/Bing Chat Enterprise service for TU/e account holders.","howToObtain":"Sign in to the protected version with a TU/e account; follow the linked university intranet guide for information and prompting tips.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

最后检查时间
2026年7月16日
最后更改时间
2026年7月16日

原始证据

证据 1
TU/e's official Education Guide invites users to explore Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise as a safe alternative to ChatGPT and states that the protected version is readily available using a TU/e account as login.

本地化显示 only

TU/e's official Education Guide invites users to explore Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise as a safe alternative to ChatGPT and states that the protected version is readily available using a TU/e account as login.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
5557b6bd…
已检索
2026年7月16日

Academic Integrity

TU/e classifies AI-tool use as fraud if submitted work is no longer sufficiently the student's own or if the student has not included a correct statement about the AI use.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: ai_use_fraud_if_work_not_own_or_statement_missing

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
Using AI tools counts as fraud if... The submitted work is no longer sufficiently the student's own... [or] The student has not included a correct statement about the AI use.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
6e8c594a…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 4

Ai Tool Treatment

TU/e allows AI tools as aids for general study and teaching functionalities unless an examiner explicitly forbids them, while keeping students and staff responsible for submitted work and educational activities.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: general_ai_tool_use_allowed_unless_examiner_forbids

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
The use of AI tools is allowed as an aid for general functionalities... unless explicitly forbidden by the examiner... Staff is always responsible... Students are always responsible for the work they submit.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
6e8c594a…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 1

Academic Integrity

TU/e requires a complete statement when GenAI is used in a way that partially replaces or outsources the student's own work and learning process.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: genai_use_beyond_general_functions_requires_statement

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
When using GenAI functionalities... complete statements about the use are required... when GenAI partially replaces or outsources the student's own work and learning process.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
6e8c594a…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 2

研究

TU/e states that generating quantitative or qualitative research data with GenAI is fundamentally prohibited unless the examiner gives explicit consent.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: genai_research_data_generation_prohibited_without_examiner_consent

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
The generation of quantitative and qualitative research data with GenAI is fundamentally prohibited, unless explicit consent is given by the examiner.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
6e8c594a…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 2

教学

TU/e does not permit automated decision-making or grading based on a GenAI model without human oversight over the assessment process.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: genai_grading_requires_human_oversight

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
Teachers are encouraged to use tools in teaching and assessment... However, automated decision-making/grading based on a GenAI model without human oversight over the assessment process is not permitted.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
6e8c594a…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 7

隐私

TU/e warns AI users not to enter sensitive information or data and to follow the GDPR because AI tools carry privacy, security, storage, copyright, NDA, intellectual property, and data-processing risks.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: do_not_enter_sensitive_data_follow_gdpr

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
The use of tools also comes with risks... data processing... privacy, security, and storage of personal, corporate, and research data. Therefore, do not enter sensitive information or data. Follow the GDPR.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
6e8c594a…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 5

Source Status

TU/e's public Education Guide identifies the AI Rules_TUe.pdf as outlining the key policies for AI use in students' studies.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%

标准化值: central_public_ai_rules_linked_from_education_guide

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
TU/e aims to equip students with the skills and knowledge to use GenAI tools competently and responsibly... TU/e Most Urgent Rules for AI Use in Education outlines the key policies regarding AI in your studies.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
d72d4287…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Rules for AI use in education

采购

TU/e's public Canvas AI-in-education guidance says students cannot be required to use ChatGPT because TU/e has no processor agreement or contract for ChatGPT, and points to Microsoft Copilot as a protected alternative available with a TU/e account.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%

标准化值: chatgpt_not_required_copilot_protected_alternative

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
TU/e has no processor agreement or contract for use of ChatGPT. So, students cannot be required to use it. We do offer an alternative for ChatGPT, named Microsoft Copilot.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
50c3cee9…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
ChatGPT / Microsoft Copilot section

Academic Integrity

For TU/e Industrial Design, a reference list showing typical generative-AI faulty-reference patterns is treated as a Category 2 infringement, with repeat offences treated as Category 3.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度86%

标准化值: industrial_design_genai_faulty_references_category_2_repeat_category_3

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
The presence of a reference list with the typical patterns of generative AI will be considered a Category 2 infringement. A repeat offence will be considered a Category 3 infringement.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
5dca90f2…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Generative AI and referencing

Academic Integrity

For TU/e Industrial Design students, the department-level Academic Fraud page says AI tools should not be used unless the current semester project Canvas guidelines are followed.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度85%

标准化值: industrial_design_ai_tools_follow_canvas_guidelines

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
The department of Industrial Design's position is that these tools should not be used unless the guidelines are followed... the latest version of the guidelines can be found in your current semester's project Canvas page.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
5dca90f2…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Use of AI tools

Source record

官方来源

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Eindhoven University of Technology AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/eindhoven-university-of-technology

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志