academic_integrity
TU/e classifies AI-tool use as fraud if submitted work is no longer sufficiently the student's own or if the student has not included a correct statement about the AI use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Eindhoven University of Technology
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Eindhoven University of Technology currently has 10 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
10 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
TU/e allows AI tools as aids for general study and teaching functionalities unless an examiner explicitly forbids them, while keeping students and staff responsible for submitted work and educational activities.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
TU/e requires a complete statement when GenAI is used in a way that partially replaces or outsources the student's own work and learning process.
Review: Agent reviewed
research
TU/e states that generating quantitative or qualitative research data with GenAI is fundamentally prohibited unless the examiner gives explicit consent.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
TU/e does not permit automated decision-making or grading based on a GenAI model without human oversight over the assessment process.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
TU/e warns AI users not to enter sensitive information or data and to follow the GDPR because AI tools carry privacy, security, storage, copyright, NDA, intellectual property, and data-processing risks.
Review: Agent reviewed
source_status
TU/e's public Education Guide identifies the AI Rules_TUe.pdf as outlining the key policies for AI use in students' studies.
Review: Agent reviewed
procurement
TU/e's public Canvas AI-in-education guidance says students cannot be required to use ChatGPT because TU/e has no processor agreement or contract for ChatGPT, and points to Microsoft Copilot as a protected alternative available with a TU/e account.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
For TU/e Industrial Design, a reference list showing typical generative-AI faulty-reference patterns is treated as a Category 2 infringement, with repeat offences treated as Category 3.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
For TU/e Industrial Design students, the department-level Academic Fraud page says AI tools should not be used unless the current semester project Canvas guidelines are followed.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
Academic Fraud
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:14 PM
Artificial intelligence in Education: Online Learning & Education
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:22 PM
Testing and assessment
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:18 PM
TU/e Basic Rules for AI Use in Education
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:19 PM