University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPLESNLMSJAKOPTARRUDEITCSTRFISVDANBHULTIDVITHFAHEHIURBNUKELZH-HANT

Enschede, Netherlands Last checked

University of Twente

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities
Can I use AI for my coursework?Conditional in this scopeDo I need to disclose AI use?Required in this scopeCan I upload sensitive data?Restrictions in this scopeWhich tools can I access?Conditional in this scope
Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautionsRecord updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Conditional in this scope

AI permission depends on the course. The 2026 education policy asks programmes to specify permitted uses; example levels are not assigned permissions for every course.

Official source ↗

Exams

Evidence gap or scope limits

Programme and examination-board instructions determine the actual assessment restrictions; the general AI framework is not an exam-wide permission.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Required in this scope

When AI use is permitted, disclosure is mandatory. Substantive use records the tool/version, purpose and contribution; interaction details are required where the course asks.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Restrictions in this scope

Do not enter personal, student, research or confidential data in public AI tools; assume inputs may be stored externally.

Official source ↗

Institutional tools

Conditional in this scope

UT’s portal lists standard Firefly features with monthly credits. Premium features or additional licence terms require contact with contract management.

Official source ↗

Research and publication

Evidence gap or scope limits

Published research guidance calls for disclosure of substantial AI use and explicitly excludes teaching and AI-tool development from its scope. Its formal adoption status remains unverified.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Evidence gap or scope limits

UT warns that AI-generated-text detection remains unreliable. An allegation and a detector output do not establish a finding; programme procedures still need checking.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Required in this scope

Teachers must clearly specify permitted AI use in assignments; students remain responsible for authenticity and course-specific compliance.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Required in this scope

Do not accept licences binding UT without prior approval, whether paid or free. AI applications must be reported through the AI Office.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • Disclose AI use when it is permitted; keep the course-required detail.
    Requirement in this scope

Don’t

  • Do not accept a licence binding UT without prior approval.
    Requirement in this scope
AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

AI use questioned?

University of Twente

Use the source-specific audience, assessment and publication limits below. Institution-wide policy review remains PARTIAL.

Investigation & response

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Possible outcomes

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Review & appeal

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

AI tools & access

  • Adobe Firefly (standard features)Official recommendationConditions apply

    Service-portal description; actual account entitlement, price and assessment permission were not tested. UT’s portal lists standard Firefly features with monthly credits. Premium features or additional licence terms require contact with contract management.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 1

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

6

Historical and pending public Claims (2)

These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.

claim-utwente-ai-education-disclosure · excluded_pending_review

Original public Claim retained in its source-specific scope; institution audit remains PARTIAL.

Excluded from current conclusions pending source, temporal or normative review; original text and evidence retained.

Record history

claim-utwente-ai-license-approval · excluded_pending_review

Original public Claim retained in its source-specific scope; institution audit remains PARTIAL.

Excluded from current conclusions pending source, temporal or normative review; original text and evidence retained.

Record history

Official sources

5 official URLs; 5 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

AI and assessment

www.utwente.nl

University official source

utwente.nl

Hash and captured version

AI and assessment · 2026-05-15T13:03:20Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

d2c50a3a06282e2cf3394afd1c154c3211781760f612a0217837e8d77c0cd6d4

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

AI in education, research and administration

www.utwente.nl

University official source

utwente.nl

Hash and captured version

AI in education, research and administration · 2026-05-15T13:03:00Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

de0cb0858c11a8c8a2208852a20d081620006d62c93a69252cfaa56126666bce

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Generative AI

www.utwente.nl

University official source

utwente.nl

Hash and captured version

Generative AI · 2026-05-15T13:04:15Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

b44fc861a1b76115f44bbe3606bb7a8fc9b04156f492ba0d16015e79ebeb4514

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Use of AI in Education at the University of Twente

www.utwente.nl

University official source

utwente.nl

Hash and captured version

Use of AI in Education at the University of Twente · 2026-05-15T13:04:00Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

8426f526e3e668052c52805f6e712044b2685f1cb93e40cf88ec92556fd35af8

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

UT takes first step toward a shared vision on artificial intelligence

www.utwente.nl

University official source

utwente.nl

Hash and captured version

UT takes first step toward a shared vision on artificial intelligence · 2026-05-15T13:04:30Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

e339eacf3d7eff4f7b8155865846023e9ddcf72c252753724172471483bf476e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
v6-reading-rankings-ten-20261027
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · All record history

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • Institution-wide semantic audit remains PARTIAL. Private historical objects and every new requirement are not automatically accepted by public-Claim review.
  • New evidence retains original bytes where obtained; other items are reviewer excerpts or historical snapshots and do not establish full original documents.
  • Unchanged public APIs, snapshots, MCP, history and tool records do not adopt this local candidate.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        AI permission depends on the course. The 2026 education policy asks programmes to specify permitted uses; example levels are not assigned permissions for every course.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        When AI use is permitted, disclosure is mandatory. Substantive use records the tool/version, purpose and contribution; interaction details are required where the course asks.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        Do not enter personal, student, research or confidential data in public AI tools; assume inputs may be stored externally.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        UT’s portal lists standard Firefly features with monthly credits. Premium features or additional licence terms require contact with contract management.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        Programme and examination-board instructions determine the actual assessment restrictions; the general AI framework is not an exam-wide permission.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        Published research guidance calls for disclosure of substantial AI use and explicitly excludes teaching and AI-tool development from its scope. Its formal adoption status remains unverified.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        UT warns that AI-generated-text detection remains unreliable. An allegation and a detector output do not establish a finding; programme procedures still need checking.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        Teachers must clearly specify permitted AI use in assignments; students remain responsible for authenticity and course-specific compliance.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        Do not accept licences binding UT without prior approval, whether paid or free. AI applications must be reported through the AI Office.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        6 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →