University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Eindhoven, Netherlands

Eindhoven University of Technology

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: =140UpdatedJul 19, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

11 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise is listed for Eindhoven University of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise","description":"Protected Microsoft Copilot/Bing Chat Enterprise service for TU/e account holders.","howToObtain":"Sign in to the protected version with a TU/e account; follow the linked university intranet guide for information and prompting tips.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Last checked
Jul 16, 2026
Last changed
Jul 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
TU/e's official Education Guide invites users to explore Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise as a safe alternative to ChatGPT and states that the protected version is readily available using a TU/e account as login.

Localized display only

TU/e's official Education Guide invites users to explore Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise as a safe alternative to ChatGPT and states that the protected version is readily available using a TU/e account as login.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
5557b6bd…
Retrieved
Jul 16, 2026

Academic Integrity

TU/e classifies AI-tool use as fraud if submitted work is no longer sufficiently the student's own or if the student has not included a correct statement about the AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: ai_use_fraud_if_work_not_own_or_statement_missing

Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Using AI tools counts as fraud if... The submitted work is no longer sufficiently the student's own... [or] The student has not included a correct statement about the AI use.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
6e8c594a…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 4

Ai Tool Treatment

TU/e allows AI tools as aids for general study and teaching functionalities unless an examiner explicitly forbids them, while keeping students and staff responsible for submitted work and educational activities.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: general_ai_tool_use_allowed_unless_examiner_forbids

Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The use of AI tools is allowed as an aid for general functionalities... unless explicitly forbidden by the examiner... Staff is always responsible... Students are always responsible for the work they submit.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
6e8c594a…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 1

Academic Integrity

TU/e requires a complete statement when GenAI is used in a way that partially replaces or outsources the student's own work and learning process.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: genai_use_beyond_general_functions_requires_statement

Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
When using GenAI functionalities... complete statements about the use are required... when GenAI partially replaces or outsources the student's own work and learning process.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
6e8c594a…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 2

Research

TU/e states that generating quantitative or qualitative research data with GenAI is fundamentally prohibited unless the examiner gives explicit consent.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: genai_research_data_generation_prohibited_without_examiner_consent

Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The generation of quantitative and qualitative research data with GenAI is fundamentally prohibited, unless explicit consent is given by the examiner.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
6e8c594a…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 2

Teaching

TU/e does not permit automated decision-making or grading based on a GenAI model without human oversight over the assessment process.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: genai_grading_requires_human_oversight

Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Teachers are encouraged to use tools in teaching and assessment... However, automated decision-making/grading based on a GenAI model without human oversight over the assessment process is not permitted.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
6e8c594a…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 7

Privacy

TU/e warns AI users not to enter sensitive information or data and to follow the GDPR because AI tools carry privacy, security, storage, copyright, NDA, intellectual property, and data-processing risks.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: do_not_enter_sensitive_data_follow_gdpr

Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The use of tools also comes with risks... data processing... privacy, security, and storage of personal, corporate, and research data. Therefore, do not enter sensitive information or data. Follow the GDPR.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
6e8c594a…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 5

Source Status

TU/e's public Education Guide identifies the AI Rules_TUe.pdf as outlining the key policies for AI use in students' studies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: central_public_ai_rules_linked_from_education_guide

Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
TU/e aims to equip students with the skills and knowledge to use GenAI tools competently and responsibly... TU/e Most Urgent Rules for AI Use in Education outlines the key policies regarding AI in your studies.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
d72d4287…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Rules for AI use in education

Procurement

TU/e's public Canvas AI-in-education guidance says students cannot be required to use ChatGPT because TU/e has no processor agreement or contract for ChatGPT, and points to Microsoft Copilot as a protected alternative available with a TU/e account.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: chatgpt_not_required_copilot_protected_alternative

Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
TU/e has no processor agreement or contract for use of ChatGPT. So, students cannot be required to use it. We do offer an alternative for ChatGPT, named Microsoft Copilot.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
50c3cee9…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
ChatGPT / Microsoft Copilot section

Academic Integrity

For TU/e Industrial Design, a reference list showing typical generative-AI faulty-reference patterns is treated as a Category 2 infringement, with repeat offences treated as Category 3.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: industrial_design_genai_faulty_references_category_2_repeat_category_3

Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The presence of a reference list with the typical patterns of generative AI will be considered a Category 2 infringement. A repeat offence will be considered a Category 3 infringement.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
5dca90f2…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Generative AI and referencing

Academic Integrity

For TU/e Industrial Design students, the department-level Academic Fraud page says AI tools should not be used unless the current semester project Canvas guidelines are followed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%

Normalized value: industrial_design_ai_tools_follow_canvas_guidelines

Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The department of Industrial Design's position is that these tools should not be used unless the guidelines are followed... the latest version of the guidelines can be found in your current semester's project Canvas page.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
5dca90f2…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Use of AI tools

Source record

Official sources

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence97%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Eindhoven University of Technology AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/eindhoven-university-of-technology

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log