Policy presence
Erasmus University Rotterdam has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Erasmus University Rotterdam has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Erasmus University Rotterdam has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Erasmus University Rotterdam has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Erasmus University Rotterdam has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Erasmus University Rotterdam has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Erasmus University Rotterdam has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Erasmus University Rotterdam has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Erasmus University Rotterdam has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Erasmus University Rotterdam has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Normalized value: no_personal_or_confidential_information_in_genai_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1Do not mention personal information about yourself, others or the EUR in a question to GenAI. You should not share personal or confidential information with GenAI tools. Data that is publicly available or defined as published university information can be freely used in GenAI tools.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: own_work_required_and_unpermitted_exam_use_is_fraud
Original evidence
Evidence 1The basic principle is that you always create and submit your own work. You bear full responsibility for your work. If it is not your own work, or generated by a GenAI tool, then that is fraud. Any use of GenAI during exams on-campus or other evaluations where it is indicated that the use of Generative AI is not permitted is fraud and is not permitted.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: genai_as_supplement_with_user_responsibility_and_transparency
Original evidence
Evidence 1Use GenAI as a supplement and not as a replacement. Stay critical. Always check and edit the text before sharing it with others. Ultimately, you remain responsible for the work you deliver and share. If you have used GenAI somewhere, be transparent about it.
Teaching
Normalized value: course_assignment_genai_policy_should_be_communicated
Original evidence
Evidence 1Generative AI is not allowed, but the student still makes use of these tools. You can compare this to ghostwriting. You will need to communicate to students if and what use of generative AI is allowed for your course/assignment.
Research
Normalized value: phd_genai_research_allowed_under_principles_with_preferred_systems
Original evidence
Evidence 1If the other principles are adhered to it is allowed to use (Gen)AI systems in the PhD-trajectory for research purposes or as a support tool. It is highly recommended that either the licensed GenAI system or the own EUR language model is used. If another program is used it is advised to consult with the privacy officer.
Source Status
Normalized value: responsible_ai_by_design_and_ai_act_guidance_routing
Original evidence
Evidence 1At EUR, we are committed to engaging with AI responsibly. We follow the principles of Responsible AI by Design. Erasmus University Rotterdam complies with these regulations and applies additional guidelines grounded in Erasmus values. A key requirement of the AI Act is that everyone in the organisation has sufficient knowledge of AI.
0 machine or needs-review claim
4 source attribution
eur.nl
eur.nl
eur.nl
eur.nl