University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

Erasmus University Rotterdam

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Claims6Sources4
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Erasmus University Rotterdam currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Erasmus University Rotterdam current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+12-0
11 # Erasmus University Rotterdam AI policy record
2+privacy: EUR's central GenAI guidelines say users should not share personal or confidential information with GenAI tools and may use publicly available or published university information if use also follows the Acceptable Use Policy.
3+Evidence (en, 90261c66eeae): Do not mention personal information about yourself, others or the EUR in a question to GenAI. You should not share personal or confidential information with GenAI tools. Data that is publicly available or defined as published university information can be freely used in GenAI tools.
4+academic_integrity: EUR's central GenAI guidelines state that students must create and submit their own work, that GenAI-generated work submitted as one's own is fraud, and that GenAI use in exams or evaluations where it is not permitted is fraud.
5+Evidence (en, 90261c66eeae): The basic principle is that you always create and submit your own work. You bear full responsibility for your work. If it is not your own work, or generated by a GenAI tool, then that is fraud. Any use of GenAI during exams on-campus or other evaluations where it is indicated that the use of Generative AI is not permitted is fraud and is not permitted.
6+ai_tool_treatment: EUR's central GenAI guidelines tell staff, faculty, and students to use GenAI as a supplementary tool, remain responsible for delivered work, and be transparent when GenAI has been used.
7+Evidence (en, 90261c66eeae): Use GenAI as a supplement and not as a replacement. Stay critical. Always check and edit the text before sharing it with others. Ultimately, you remain responsible for the work you deliver and share. If you have used GenAI somewhere, be transparent about it.
8+teaching: EUR's teacher-facing GenAI guidance says instructors need to communicate whether and how GenAI is allowed for a course or assignment, and it frames unpermitted student GenAI use as comparable to ghostwriting.
9+Evidence (en, 6d04dc59b39d): Generative AI is not allowed, but the student still makes use of these tools. You can compare this to ghostwriting. You will need to communicate to students if and what use of generative AI is allowed for your course/assignment.
10+research: EUR's PhD trajectory GenAI policy allows PhD research use of GenAI systems when its principles are followed, prefers licensed or EUR language-model systems, and advises consulting a privacy officer before using another program.
11+Evidence (en, 0ead338f8cab): If the other principles are adhered to it is allowed to use (Gen)AI systems in the PhD-trajectory for research purposes or as a support tool. It is highly recommended that either the licensed GenAI system or the own EUR language model is used. If another program is used it is advised to consult with the privacy officer.
12+source_status: EUR's AI@EUR page states that the university engages with AI responsibly through Responsible AI by Design, complies with EU AI Act rules, and routes staff and students to MyEUR pages for AI Act and AI-system action guidance.
13+Evidence (en, 1e0c146e6607): At EUR, we are committed to engaging with AI responsibly. We follow the principles of Responsible AI by Design. Erasmus University Rotterdam complies with these regulations and applies additional guidelines grounded in Erasmus values. A key requirement of the AI Act is that everyone in the organisation has sufficient knowledge of AI.

Claim changes

6 claim records

privacy

EUR's central GenAI guidelines say users should not share personal or confidential information with GenAI tools and may use publicly available or published university information if use also follows the Acceptable Use Policy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

EUR's central GenAI guidelines state that students must create and submit their own work, that GenAI-generated work submitted as one's own is fraud, and that GenAI use in exams or evaluations where it is not permitted is fraud.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

EUR's central GenAI guidelines tell staff, faculty, and students to use GenAI as a supplementary tool, remain responsible for delivered work, and be transparent when GenAI has been used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

EUR's teacher-facing GenAI guidance says instructors need to communicate whether and how GenAI is allowed for a course or assignment, and it frames unpermitted student GenAI use as comparable to ghostwriting.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

research

EUR's PhD trajectory GenAI policy allows PhD research use of GenAI systems when its principles are followed, prefers licensed or EUR language-model systems, and advises consulting a privacy officer before using another program.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

EUR's AI@EUR page states that the university engages with AI responsibly through Responsible AI by Design, complies with EU AI Act rules, and routes staff and students to MyEUR pages for AI Act and AI-system action guidance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions