Eindhoven, Netherlands

Eindhoven University of Technology

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Affirmations révisées

11 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise is listed for Eindhoven University of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance97%

Valeur normalisée: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise","description":"Protected Microsoft Copilot/Bing Chat Enterprise service for TU/e account holders.","howToObtain":"Sign in to the protected version with a TU/e account; follow the linked university intranet guide for information and prompting tips.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
TU/e's official Education Guide invites users to explore Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise as a safe alternative to ChatGPT and states that the protected version is readily available using a TU/e account as login.

Affichage localisé only

TU/e's official Education Guide invites users to explore Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise as a safe alternative to ChatGPT and states that the protected version is readily available using a TU/e account as login.

Academic Integrity

TU/e classifies AI-tool use as fraud if submitted work is no longer sufficiently the student's own or if the student has not included a correct statement about the AI use.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance96%

Valeur normalisée: ai_use_fraud_if_work_not_own_or_statement_missing

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Using AI tools counts as fraud if... The submitted work is no longer sufficiently the student's own... [or] The student has not included a correct statement about the AI use.

Ai Tool Treatment

TU/e allows AI tools as aids for general study and teaching functionalities unless an examiner explicitly forbids them, while keeping students and staff responsible for submitted work and educational activities.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%

Valeur normalisée: general_ai_tool_use_allowed_unless_examiner_forbids

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The use of AI tools is allowed as an aid for general functionalities... unless explicitly forbidden by the examiner... Staff is always responsible... Students are always responsible for the work they submit.

Academic Integrity

TU/e requires a complete statement when GenAI is used in a way that partially replaces or outsources the student's own work and learning process.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%

Valeur normalisée: genai_use_beyond_general_functions_requires_statement

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
When using GenAI functionalities... complete statements about the use are required... when GenAI partially replaces or outsources the student's own work and learning process.

Recherche

TU/e states that generating quantitative or qualitative research data with GenAI is fundamentally prohibited unless the examiner gives explicit consent.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%

Valeur normalisée: genai_research_data_generation_prohibited_without_examiner_consent

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The generation of quantitative and qualitative research data with GenAI is fundamentally prohibited, unless explicit consent is given by the examiner.

Enseignement

TU/e does not permit automated decision-making or grading based on a GenAI model without human oversight over the assessment process.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%

Valeur normalisée: genai_grading_requires_human_oversight

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Teachers are encouraged to use tools in teaching and assessment... However, automated decision-making/grading based on a GenAI model without human oversight over the assessment process is not permitted.

Confidentialité

TU/e warns AI users not to enter sensitive information or data and to follow the GDPR because AI tools carry privacy, security, storage, copyright, NDA, intellectual property, and data-processing risks.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%

Valeur normalisée: do_not_enter_sensitive_data_follow_gdpr

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The use of tools also comes with risks... data processing... privacy, security, and storage of personal, corporate, and research data. Therefore, do not enter sensitive information or data. Follow the GDPR.

Source Status

TU/e's public Education Guide identifies the AI Rules_TUe.pdf as outlining the key policies for AI use in students' studies.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance91%

Valeur normalisée: central_public_ai_rules_linked_from_education_guide

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
TU/e aims to equip students with the skills and knowledge to use GenAI tools competently and responsibly... TU/e Most Urgent Rules for AI Use in Education outlines the key policies regarding AI in your studies.

Appels d'offres

TU/e's public Canvas AI-in-education guidance says students cannot be required to use ChatGPT because TU/e has no processor agreement or contract for ChatGPT, and points to Microsoft Copilot as a protected alternative available with a TU/e account.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance88%

Valeur normalisée: chatgpt_not_required_copilot_protected_alternative

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
TU/e has no processor agreement or contract for use of ChatGPT. So, students cannot be required to use it. We do offer an alternative for ChatGPT, named Microsoft Copilot.

Academic Integrity

For TU/e Industrial Design, a reference list showing typical generative-AI faulty-reference patterns is treated as a Category 2 infringement, with repeat offences treated as Category 3.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance86%

Valeur normalisée: industrial_design_genai_faulty_references_category_2_repeat_category_3

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The presence of a reference list with the typical patterns of generative AI will be considered a Category 2 infringement. A repeat offence will be considered a Category 3 infringement.

Academic Integrity

For TU/e Industrial Design students, the department-level Academic Fraud page says AI tools should not be used unless the current semester project Canvas guidelines are followed.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance85%

Valeur normalisée: industrial_design_ai_tools_follow_canvas_guidelines

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The department of Industrial Design's position is that these tools should not be used unless the guidelines are followed... the latest version of the guidelines can be found in your current semester's project Canvas page.

Source record

Sources officielles

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Révisionagent reviewedConfiance97%Snapshot statusNon publiéJSONJSON public

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Eindhoven University of Technology AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/eindhoven-university-of-technology

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Journal des modifications ouvert