Eindhoven, Netherlands

Eindhoven University of Technology

Name: Eindhoven University of Technology AI Policy Tracker record
Creator: University AI Policy Tracker
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: =140Updated19 lip 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Zrecenzowane twierdzenia

11 reviewed claims

Wartość znormalizowana: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise","description":"Protected Microsoft Copilot/Bing Chat Enterprise service for TU/e account holders.","howToObtain":"Sign in to the protected version with a TU/e account; follow the linked university intranet guide for information and prompting tips.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Ostatnio sprawdzono: 16 lip 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono: 16 lip 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1

TU/e's official Education Guide invites users to explore Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise as a safe alternative to ChatGPT and states that the protected version is readily available using a TU/e account as login.
Źródło: Discover Microsoft Copilot | TU/e Education Guide

Widok lokalny only

TU/e's official Education Guide invites users to explore Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise as a safe alternative to ChatGPT and states that the protected version is readily available using a TU/e account as login.

Język źródła: English (en)
Skrót migawki: 5557b6bd…
Pobrano: 16 lip 2026

Wartość znormalizowana: ai_use_fraud_if_work_not_own_or_statement_missing

Ostatnio sprawdzono: 14 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono: 14 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1

Using AI tools counts as fraud if... The submitted work is no longer sufficiently the student's own... [or] The student has not included a correct statement about the AI use.
Źródło: TU/e Basic Rules for AI Use in Education

Język źródła: English (en)
Skrót migawki: 6e8c594a…
Pobrano: 14 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów: Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 4

Wartość znormalizowana: general_ai_tool_use_allowed_unless_examiner_forbids

Ostatnio sprawdzono: 14 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono: 14 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1

The use of AI tools is allowed as an aid for general functionalities... unless explicitly forbidden by the examiner... Staff is always responsible... Students are always responsible for the work they submit.
Źródło: TU/e Basic Rules for AI Use in Education

Język źródła: English (en)
Skrót migawki: 6e8c594a…
Pobrano: 14 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów: Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 1

Wartość znormalizowana: genai_use_beyond_general_functions_requires_statement

Ostatnio sprawdzono: 14 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono: 14 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1

When using GenAI functionalities... complete statements about the use are required... when GenAI partially replaces or outsources the student's own work and learning process.
Źródło: TU/e Basic Rules for AI Use in Education

Język źródła: English (en)
Skrót migawki: 6e8c594a…
Pobrano: 14 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów: Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 2

Wartość znormalizowana: genai_research_data_generation_prohibited_without_examiner_consent

Ostatnio sprawdzono: 14 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono: 14 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1

The generation of quantitative and qualitative research data with GenAI is fundamentally prohibited, unless explicit consent is given by the examiner.
Źródło: TU/e Basic Rules for AI Use in Education

Język źródła: English (en)
Skrót migawki: 6e8c594a…
Pobrano: 14 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów: Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 2

Wartość znormalizowana: genai_grading_requires_human_oversight

Ostatnio sprawdzono: 14 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono: 14 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1

Teachers are encouraged to use tools in teaching and assessment... However, automated decision-making/grading based on a GenAI model without human oversight over the assessment process is not permitted.
Źródło: TU/e Basic Rules for AI Use in Education

Język źródła: English (en)
Skrót migawki: 6e8c594a…
Pobrano: 14 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów: Working Agreement for AI-use in TU/e Education, rule 7

Wartość znormalizowana: central_public_ai_rules_linked_from_education_guide

Ostatnio sprawdzono: 14 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono: 14 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1

TU/e aims to equip students with the skills and knowledge to use GenAI tools competently and responsibly... TU/e Most Urgent Rules for AI Use in Education outlines the key policies regarding AI in your studies.
Źródło: Testing and assessment

Język źródła: English (en)
Skrót migawki: d72d4287…
Pobrano: 14 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów: Rules for AI use in education

Wartość znormalizowana: chatgpt_not_required_copilot_protected_alternative

Ostatnio sprawdzono: 14 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono: 14 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1

TU/e has no processor agreement or contract for use of ChatGPT. So, students cannot be required to use it. We do offer an alternative for ChatGPT, named Microsoft Copilot.
Źródło: Artificial intelligence in Education: Online Learning & Education

Język źródła: English (en)
Skrót migawki: 50c3cee9…
Pobrano: 14 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów: ChatGPT / Microsoft Copilot section

Wartość znormalizowana: industrial_design_genai_faulty_references_category_2_repeat_category_3

Ostatnio sprawdzono: 14 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono: 14 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1

The presence of a reference list with the typical patterns of generative AI will be considered a Category 2 infringement. A repeat offence will be considered a Category 3 infringement.
Źródło: Academic Fraud

Język źródła: English (en)
Skrót migawki: 5dca90f2…
Pobrano: 14 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów: Generative AI and referencing

Wartość znormalizowana: industrial_design_ai_tools_follow_canvas_guidelines

Ostatnio sprawdzono: 14 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono: 14 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1

The department of Industrial Design's position is that these tools should not be used unless the guidelines are followed... the latest version of the guidelines can be found in your current semester's project Canvas page.
Źródło: Academic Fraud

Język źródła: English (en)
Skrót migawki: 5dca90f2…
Pobrano: 14 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów: Use of AI tools

Source record

Oficjalne źródła

5 sources

Academic Fraud

studiegids.tue.nl

URL źródła: https://studiegids.tue.nl/opleidingen/bachelor-college/majors/industrial-design/regulations/academic-fraud
Suma kontrolna migawki: 5dca90f2…

Artificial intelligence in Education: Online Learning & Education

canvas.tue.nl

URL źródła: https://canvas.tue.nl/courses/17391/pages/artificial-intelligence-in-education
Suma kontrolna migawki: 50c3cee9…

Discover Microsoft Copilot | TU/e Education Guide

educationguide.tue.nl

URL źródła: https://educationguide.tue.nl/news-events/news/29-04-2024-discover-microsoft-copilot
Suma kontrolna migawki: 5557b6bd…

Testing and assessment

educationguide.tue.nl

URL źródła: https://educationguide.tue.nl/programs/testing-and-assessment
Suma kontrolna migawki: d72d4287…

TU/e Basic Rules for AI Use in Education

assets.w3.tue.nl

URL źródła: https://assets.w3.tue.nl/w/fileadmin/Education_Guide/Content/Programs/Testing%20and%20assessment/AI%20Rules_TUe.pdf
Suma kontrolna migawki: 6e8c594a…

Record information, JSON & citation

Recenzjaagent reviewedPewność97%Snapshot statusNieopublikowaneJSONPubliczne JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Eindhoven University of Technology AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/eindhoven-university-of-technology

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Otwórz dziennik zmian

Eindhoven University of Technology

No reviewed summary yet

Zrecenzowane twierdzenia

Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise is listed for Eindhoven University of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

TU/e classifies AI-tool use as fraud if submitted work is no longer sufficiently the student's own or if the student has not included a correct statement about the AI use.

TU/e allows AI tools as aids for general study and teaching functionalities unless an examiner explicitly forbids them, while keeping students and staff responsible for submitted work and educational activities.

TU/e requires a complete statement when GenAI is used in a way that partially replaces or outsources the student's own work and learning process.

TU/e states that generating quantitative or qualitative research data with GenAI is fundamentally prohibited unless the examiner gives explicit consent.

TU/e does not permit automated decision-making or grading based on a GenAI model without human oversight over the assessment process.

TU/e's public Education Guide identifies the AI Rules_TUe.pdf as outlining the key policies for AI use in students' studies.

TU/e's public Canvas AI-in-education guidance says students cannot be required to use ChatGPT because TU/e has no processor agreement or contract for ChatGPT, and points to Microsoft Copilot as a protected alternative available with a TU/e account.

For TU/e Industrial Design, a reference list showing typical generative-AI faulty-reference patterns is treated as a Category 2 infringement, with repeat offences treated as Category 3.

For TU/e Industrial Design students, the department-level Academic Fraud page says AI tools should not be used unless the current semester project Canvas guidelines are followed.

Oficjalne źródła

Academic Fraud

Artificial intelligence in Education: Online Learning & Education

Discover Microsoft Copilot | TU/e Education Guide

Testing and assessment

TU/e Basic Rules for AI Use in Education