建议做

Quezon City, Philippines
本站使用指南
UP 治理原则保护隐私、人工控制及学习目标;预期后续规则与设施,不作本评估许可或工具许可证明。
本站解读;官方证据保留原文。
尚无完整的学生政策摘要;可先查看已收录条款及来源。
UP 治理原则保护隐私、人工控制及学习目标;预期后续规则与设施,不作本评估许可或工具许可证明。

补充资料采集: 2026-10-08 · 现行适用性未独立确认
本站解读
UP 采用负责任、可信 AI 原则作为开发及使用护栏;原则本身不规定某项评估的许可,并预期后续政策、项目及协议。
适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
UP adopts Responsible and Trustworthy AI principles as guardrails for development and use. These institutional principles do not state permission for a particular assessment; the document anticipates further policies, programmes and protocols.
适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
For a national university that is committed to developing Al in the country, the challenge remains: how to promote positive and responsible use of AI and mitigate its negative consequences. It is therefore adopting the following Principles for Responsible and Trustworthy AI in order to provide guardrails and indicate the way forward on the development and use of AI in the University and the country.
It is also hoped that the adoption of these principles shall intensify the national discourse on the role of AI in national development.
University of the Philippines Principles for Responsible and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence
1. COMMON GOOD. AI should benefit the Filipino people in particular, and humanity, in general by fostering inclusive economic growth, effective governance, sustainable development, and enhanced well-being while protecting the environment. AI systems should further the rule of law, human rights, and democracy.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 42–45
SHA-256: 15e12a554980019b054b978faf74a5d1de6c3f15c1647ca40c11c8a675f06eb0
These Principles for Responsible and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence shall serve as guardrails for our community and stakeholders.
Tensions are anticipated between these principles; hence, there is a need for policies, programs, and protocols that balance innovation and regulation.
Towards this, a multidisciplinary UP AI Advancement Committee (AIAC) is established.
The ultimate goal of the AIAC is to create an empowering environment where members of the UP community can continue to openly discuss the benefits and concerns associated with using AI and continue to come up with better policies and guidelines. This environment should also encourage the development and co-creation of AI tools among stakeholders. The AIAC shall also create a culture of cooperation, trust, and transparency among the university community, private sector, civil society, government, international organizations, and other stakeholders.
Immediately, the AIAC shall draft, for approval of the UP President, issuances to operationalize the development, deployment, and use of responsible and trustworthy AI. These issuances include, but are not limited to, the development of the following:
AI code of conduct based on the above-mentioned principles;
AI development program to accelerate AI research and development in the University;
Implementing framework for AI in UP education, including an Al literacy program, a faculty and staff upskilling program, and a research and teaching program on AI in
society; and,
AI and digital infrastructure development to support the use of Al in teaching, research, and use. This includes providing equitable access to AI by members of the UP community查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 62–71
SHA-256: 15e12a554980019b054b978faf74a5d1de6c3f15c1647ca40c11c8a675f06eb0
本站解读
UP 原则要求 privacy by design、知情同意及个人信息保密,涵盖用户提供及系统收集;开发、部署及使用者与机构单位须负责。不把治理原则当作向任意 chatbot 上传个人数据的许可。
适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
The UP principles require privacy by design, informed consent and confidentiality of personal information when users provide information or the system collects it. Accountability extends to individuals and institutional units developing, deploying and using AI. This is a governance principle, not clearance to upload personal data to any chatbot.
适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
4. PRIVACY. AI systems must incorporate privacy-by-design principles. Informed consent from users and maintaining the confidentiality of personal information must be upheld, when users provide information and when the system collects information about the users.
5. ACCOUNTABILITY. Individuals, groups, departments, institutes, colleges, and constituent universities involved in the development, deployment, and use of AI must take responsibility for the consequences of their actions. UP shall put into place mechanisms to hold the relevant stakeholders accountable for the AI systems actions and outcomes.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 48–49
SHA-256: 15e12a554980019b054b978faf74a5d1de6c3f15c1647ca40c11c8a675f06eb0
本站解读
研究开发部分要求实质人工控制、说明 AI 工具、尽可能可解释、公平及安全;透明原则不是课程引用模板,也不是申诉提交程序。
适用范围: Research and Development principles · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
In research and development, UP calls for meaningful human control, transparency about AI-enabled tools, explainable methods where possible, fairness and safety. The transparency principle is not a prescribed coursework citation template or an appeal-filing procedure.
适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
In Research and Development
6. MEANINGFUL HUMAN CONTROL. Humans should have decision-making authority over the AI ‘s actions, decisions, and behaviors. AI systems should not operate in an unpredictable or unmanageable manner.
7. TRANSPARENCY. People should be able to understand how AI systems work. Individuals should be informed if AI-enabled tools are used. To the extent possible, the methods should be explainable. Finally, users should be able to understand AI-based outcomes and identify ways to seek remedies to harms that they may cause.
8. FAIRNESS. AI should be evaluated for gender bias, other forms of unfairness, and all forms of discrimination, especially in the data, models, and algorithms that are used. Collaborative procedures should be in place to actively identify, mitigate, and remedy these harms. AI developers should be mindful of its unintended consequences.
9. SAFETY. AI should never endanger lives. AI systems must function securely and safely. AI systems must be robust. In this context, robustness refers to the capacity of AI systems to endure and surmount adverse circumstances, including digital security threats. Compromising safety and security is unacceptable.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 50–54
SHA-256: 15e12a554980019b054b978faf74a5d1de6c3f15c1647ca40c11c8a675f06eb0
本站解读
教育原则优先学习目标、全校 AI 素养及教师培训,并关注常被排除群体。这是机构承诺,未验证学生培训账号、个别合理调整或许可 AI 服务。
适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
The education principles prioritize learning goals, AI literacy for the UP community and training faculty, including programmes targeting groups often excluded. These are institutional commitments; this review did not verify a student training account, an accommodation decision or a licensed AI service.
适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
In Education
11. PRIMACY OF LEARNING GOALS. Decisions on the use of AI in teaching should start with the educational needs and priorities of learners, UP shall adopt AI systems that promote learner-centered pedagogy and foster collaborative and social learning. AI shall be used to improve the assessment of multiple dimensions of competencies and outcomes.
12. HUMAN CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT, UP shall strengthen existing programs and develop new ones to ensure that the country’s Al workforce is highly skilled and ethical. These programs shall target women and other groups that are often excluded.
13. CAPACITY BUILDING. All members of the UP community must be AI literate. Additionally, faculty members must be trained in effectively using and integrating AI into teaching and learning practices. These two initiatives are necessary if faculty and students are to jointly innovate and benefit from the new technology as it further evolves.
14. EDUCATION MANAGEMENT AND DELIVERY. AI should improve university decision-making; make for more efficient administration, including admissions, enrollment, registration, human resource management, procurement, and inventory; and enable prompt regulatory compliance.
15. COLLABORATION. UP shall work with other universities, colleges, and research institutions to share best practices, co-develop AI courses and programs, undertake joint research and development, and advocate for responsible and trustworthy AI.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 56–61
SHA-256: 15e12a554980019b054b978faf74a5d1de6c3f15c1647ca40c11c8a675f06eb0
本站解读
保存原则要求 AI Advancement Committee 起草后续 AI 行为准则及公平访问数字设施;本文件不能证明后续文件已经实施或学生已获某项工具许可。
适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
The captured principles assign the AI Advancement Committee to draft future issuances, including an AI code of conduct and digital infrastructure for equitable access. They do not establish that these later issuances or a specific student tool licence have been implemented.
适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
Immediately, the AIAC shall draft, for approval of the UP President, issuances to operationalize the development, deployment, and use of responsible and trustworthy AI. These issuances include, but are not limited to, the development of the following:
AI code of conduct based on the above-mentioned principles;
AI development program to accelerate AI research and development in the University;
Implementing framework for AI in UP education, including an Al literacy program, a faculty and staff upskilling program, and a research and teaching program on AI in
society; and,
AI and digital infrastructure development to support the use of Al in teaching, research, and use. This includes providing equitable access to AI by members of the UP community查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 66–71
SHA-256: 15e12a554980019b054b978faf74a5d1de6c3f15c1647ca40c11c8a675f06eb0
已发布的来源补充。英文摘要与原语言引文和已审核记录分开展示。这里列出可能的程序与结果,不是使用 AI 的自动处罚;现行适用性尚未独立确认,请核对来源的适用范围和版本。
按所存原文核对;不是官方译文
哈希仅用于核对所存内容,不证明现行有效性或不可篡改。这些主题不表示每个学生都会经历的流程。
能获取工具不等于获准在作业中使用。请同时核对任务规则、适用人员和数据限制。
尚未建立这所大学的可靠工具记录。这不代表工具不存在,也不代表禁止使用 AI。
Reviewed record
4 条已审核条款
教学
标准化值: learner_centered_ai_in_teaching
原始证据
证据 1PRIMACY OF LEARNING GOALS. Decisions on the use of AI in teaching should start with the educational needs and priorities of learners, UP shall adopt AI systems that promote learner-centered pedagogy and foster collaborative and social learning.
隐私
标准化值: privacy_by_design_and_accountability_principles
原始证据
证据 1PRIVACY. AI systems must incorporate privacy-by-design principles. Informed consent from users and maintaining the confidentiality of personal information must be upheld. ACCOUNTABILITY. Individuals, groups, departments, institutes, colleges, and constituent universities involved in the development, deployment, and use of AI must take responsibility for the consequences of their actions.
其他
标准化值: adopted_responsible_ai_principles
原始证据
证据 1It is therefore adopting the following Principles for Responsible and Trustworthy AI in order to provide guardrails and indicate the way forward on the development and use of AI in the University and the country.
其他
标准化值: aiac_to_draft_ai_issuances_for_presidential_approval
原始证据
证据 1Immediately, the AIAC shall draft, for approval of the UP President, issuances to operationalize the development, deployment, and use of responsible and trustworthy AI.
Source record
3 个来源
up.edu.ph
itdc.up.edu.ph
itdc.up.edu.ph
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of the Philippines AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-the-philippines
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
打开变更日志Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.