Policy presence
Johannes Kepler University Linz has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Linz, Austria
Johannes Kepler University Linz has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 16, 2026.
v1 public contract
Johannes Kepler University Linz has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 16, 2026. Discovery context: Johannes Kepler University Linz is listed as QS 2026 rank =473.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Johannes Kepler University Linz as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/johannes-kepler-university-linz.json. The entity-level confidence is 92%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
Johannes Kepler University Linz has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Johannes Kepler University Linz has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Johannes Kepler University Linz has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Johannes Kepler University Linz has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Johannes Kepler University Linz has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Johannes Kepler University Linz has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Johannes Kepler University Linz has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
Johannes Kepler University Linz has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Johannes Kepler University Linz has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Normalized value: real_collected_datasets_ai_input_prohibited
原始证据
Evidence 1Datenanalyse und Interpretation: KI kann zur Generierung synthetischer Datensätze für Testzwecke genutzt werden. Diese müssen auf ihre Repräsentativität und mögliche Verzerrungen geprüft werden. Die Eingabe real erhobener Datensätze in KI-Systeme ist strikt untersagt und kann rechtliche Konsequenzen nach sich ziehen.
本地化显示 only
For data analysis and interpretation, AI may be used to generate synthetic test datasets, but entering real collected datasets into AI systems is strictly prohibited.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: academic_integrity_responsibility_and_ai_documentation
原始证据
Evidence 1Die Verantwortung für wissenschaftliche Redlichkeit bleibt auch bei KI-Einsatz bestehen! Die verwendeten dokumentationspflichtigen KI-Anwendungen sind zu protokollieren und bei der Abgabe der Bachelorarbeit der betreuenden Person zu übergeben.
本地化显示 only
Responsibility for academic honesty remains when AI is used, and documentation-required AI applications must be recorded and submitted to the supervisor.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: allowed_with_supervision_and_documentation_categories
原始证据
Evidence 1Bei der Erstellung Ihrer Arbeit dürfen Sie die erlaubten Anwendungen nutzen. Diese sind mit der Betreuung zu vereinbaren. Diese Anwendungen werden in dokumentationspflichtige und nicht dokumentationspflichtige Kategorien unterteilt.
本地化显示 only
For the work covered by the agreement, students may use allowed applications agreed with supervision; applications are divided into documentation-required and non-documentation-required categories.
Teaching
Normalized value: teaching_ai_tools_overview
原始证据
Evidence 1Ziel des Zentrums für Hochschuldidaktik und AI-kompetente Hochschullehre (ZHD) ist es, Ihnen eine fundierte Grundlage zu bieten, um Potenziale von KI-Technologien besser zu verstehen und gezielt in Ihren Lehr- und Arbeitsalltag zu integrieren.
本地化显示 only
The ZHD says its goal is to provide a foundation for understanding AI technologies and integrating them into teaching and work routines.
Source Status
Normalized value: official_guidance_found_no_single_central_policy_page
原始证据
Evidence 1Liebe Kolleg*innen, in diesem Dokument finden Sie eine Übersicht zahlreicher praktischer Werkzeuge Künstlicher Intelligenz. Diese Tools sollen helfen, das Lehren und Lernen an unserer Universität zu unterstützen.
本地化显示 only
The ZHD PDF is framed as an overview of AI tools to support teaching and learning at the university.
原始证据
Evidence 2Dieses Dokument legt die Rahmenbedingungen für die Anfertigung Ihrer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit fest. Es beinhaltet sowohl den formalen Ablauf des Arbeitsprozesses als auch die zulässigen Formen der Unterstützung durch Künstliche Intelligenz (KI).
本地化显示 only
The agreement is framed as setting the framework for a scientific work process and the permitted forms of AI support.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
2 source attribution
jku.at
jku.at
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.