主题

哪些大学提及 AI 隐私或数据录入规则?

可见声明或原始证据提及隐私、个人数据、机密信息、敏感数据、数据录入、FERPA、GDPR、安全或信息保护规则的已发布声明记录。 此页面展示现有的公开声明文本和证据上下文。它不添加新的政策声明,也不推断链接记录中不可见的规则。

主题隐私与数据录入匹配记录567公开 JSON/api/public/v1/universities.json
567

匹配的大学记录

1176

匹配的有据可查声明

1223

证据记录

2498

匹配记录的官方来源

可供引用的摘要

研究人员、记者和 AI 答案引擎的简短回答。

University AI Policy Tracker 目前索引了 567 条公开大学记录s,包含 1176 个有来源支持的声明s,与 隐私与数据录入 相关,并由 1223 条证据记录s 和 2498 个官方来源归属s 提供支持。本页是从已推广的声明/证据记录生成的公开数据集切片;它不创建新的政策结论。原始语言证据仍为权威版本,每个链接的大学记录均展示审核状态、置信度、来源 URL、快照哈希值以及公开 JSON。

主题页面是针对推广的公开记录的搜索和引用辅助工具。它们不是官方大学声明、法律建议、学术诚信建议,也不是新的审核决定。

匹配声明记录

来自公开大学记录的可见声明和来源上下文。

University of Chicago

51 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Azure AI is listed for University of Chicago in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

BoxAI is listed for University of Chicago in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT 3.5 is listed for University of Chicago in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of British Columbia

10 匹配声明s from 13 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The use of applications to detect AI-generated content is strongly discouraged at UBC due to concerns about effectiveness, accuracy, bias, privacy, and intellectual property. Turnitin AI detection is not enabled.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UBC says instructors or teaching assistants cannot require students to use GenAI or any other technology tool that requires sharing personal information unless the tool has undergone a UBC Privacy Impact Assessment review and been approved for use with personal information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Do not enter personal information into any generative AI tool that has not been through UBC's FIPPA compliance assessment (PIA), as to do so may be a breach of privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

10 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Illinois ChatGPT is listed for University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

GitHub Copilot is listed for University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Illinois Chat is listed for University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Australian National University (ANU)

8 匹配声明s from 12 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

ANU approved six institutional AI principles via Academic Board in June 2023, covering excellence/integrity, research engagement, clear guidance, AI literacy, access/privacy/security, and collaborative policy development.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

ANU academic staff are not permitted to upload student data or academic work to generative AI platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

ANU prohibits using AI to collect, use, store, or disclose personal information without express consent from the individual(s).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

8 匹配声明s from 10 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Azure OpenAI Service is listed for KTH Royal Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for KTH Royal Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

KTH teacher guidance says teachers should remove personal data from material given to generative AI tools and ask students to do the same.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

8 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AWS Bedrock models is listed for University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise is listed for University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Anthropic is listed for University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Oxford

8 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Codex is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Wisconsin-Madison

8 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AWS Bedrock is listed for University of Wisconsin-Madison in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Azure AI Services is listed for University of Wisconsin-Madison in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Cloud Platform AI Services is listed for University of Wisconsin-Madison in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Texas at Austin

7 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for University of Texas at Austin in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UT Sage is listed for University of Texas at Austin in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for University of Texas at Austin in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Washington

7 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UW general GenAI guidance says only UW-approved services and applications may be used with University data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UW-IT says users must sign into Copilot with a UW Microsoft 365 account to receive the commercial data protection benefit.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UW Medicine COMP.308 says use of any AI within its scope must comply with UW Medicine patient-information privacy policies and IT security standards.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Colorado State University

6 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CSU-GPT is listed for Colorado State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for Colorado State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

CSU's AI Tools page says other AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or Anthropic Claude may be used for non-sensitive public information only.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Columbia University

6 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

CUIMC restricts sensitive data (PHI, RHI, PII) use with AI to HIPAA-compliant platforms only (ChatGPT Education, approved Microsoft Copilot, CHAT with compliant models); research use requires IRB approval.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Columbia University has a university-wide Generative AI Policy from the Office of the Provost governing use by staff, faculty, students, and researchers, covering information security, data privacy, copyright, academic integrity, and bias.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Columbia University requires researchers to avoid uploading unpublished research data or confidential information into generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Emory University

6 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Emory Responsible AI guidance says public-facing AI platforms create disclosure risks for Sensitive Information and directs users to use Emory-approved secure AI tools when handling such information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Emory Responsible AI guidance says AI tools that have not gone through the EASAT review process may not be suitable for handling Confidential or Restricted data, and users should consult the EASAT website for approved tools and use scope.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Emory Responsible AI guidance says users should use only Emory-approved secure AI tools for content workflows.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Harvard University

6 匹配声明s from 13 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Harvard AI Sandbox is listed for Harvard University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

University-wide: Level 2 and above confidential data (including non-public research data, finance, HR, student records, medical information) should not be entered into publicly-available generative AI tools. Such data may only be entered into generative AI tools that have been assessed and approved by Harvard's Information Security and Data Privacy office.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

University-wide: All vendor generative AI tools not currently offered by HUIT must be assessed for risk by Harvard's Information Security and Data Privacy office prior to use in Harvard work. Contact HUIT before procuring any generative AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Iowa State University

6 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for Iowa State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Iowa State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Iowa State guidance says confidential data classified as moderate or above may not be entered into any generative AI product unless assessed and approved under ISU data classification and applicable compliance processes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Northeastern University

6 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Claude for Education is listed for Northeastern University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for Northeastern University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Northeastern Policy 125 says faculty or staff seeking to use an AI system in University Operations must submit the system and use case for AI Review Committee and Office of Information Security approval when the system processes confidential information, personal information, restricted research data, or may affect legal rights or physical safety.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Texas A M University

6 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Amazon Bedrock is listed for Texas A&M University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Azure AI Services is listed for Texas A&M University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Azure AI Foundry is listed for Texas A&M University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Auckland

6 匹配声明s from 11 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for University of Auckland in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for University of Auckland in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Notebook LM is listed for University of Auckland in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Western Australia

6 匹配声明s from 10 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月7日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UWA’s 2026 student AI guide now states that UWA staff and students must not use DeepSeek in any way, that UWA has blocked DeepSeek on University-managed networks and devices, and that students should avoid using DeepSeek on their personal devices.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UWA's 2026 student AI guide says students should not enter personal data or information into public AI systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UWA has blocked DeepSeek services on UWA-managed devices and networks because of concerns about the safety and security of data shared with DeepSeek's online services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tufts University

6 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Tufts Technology Services states that faculty and staff must not use unapproved AI tools for Tufts business, instruction, research, or administration without review and approval, especially when institutional data is involved.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Tufts Technology Services states that, unless an AI tool has been explicitly approved for the data type, users must not enter restricted or regulated data, confidential or proprietary institutional data, or contract-restricted or licensed content into AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Tufts' Spring 2026 generative AI usage guidelines state that AI use must comply with applicable laws, institutional policies, and contractual agreements, including privacy, confidentiality, security, accessibility, intellectual property, and academic integrity requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Berkeley (UCB)

6 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

UC Berkeley requires users to use UC-licensed AI tools rather than individual consumer accounts to benefit from UC's contractual data protections when working with information more sensitive than Protection Level P1.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

UC Berkeley prohibits entering personal, confidential, proprietary, or otherwise sensitive information classified as Protection Level P2, P3, or P4 into generative AI tools, unless specifically allowed under UC's negotiated contracts with AI providers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

UC Berkeley prohibits entering FERPA-protected student records, non-public instructional materials, and proprietary or unpublished research into generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Cambridge

6 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Staff must avoid inputting confidential, sensitive or personal information into GenAI tools unless warranted and only in accordance with guidance. Inputting data into a free or unlicensed GenAI tool could be considered equivalent to putting it into the public domain, signifying a potential personal data breach.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

The University's standard licensed GenAI tools are Microsoft 365 Copilot, Google Gemini, and Google NotebookLM. Use of other licensed GenAI tools is not prohibited but must be procured in accordance with applicable procurement policy, including completion of risk assessments such as DPIAs and/or ISRAs. The public, free versions of Copilot, Gemini and NotebookLM must not be used for University activities.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Staff must consider the purpose for which data was collected before inputting it into GenAI tools. Data must be collected, held and used for only that purpose. It is not appropriate to use personal data collected for a different purpose with a GenAI tool. Automated decision-making involving GenAI requires human involvement in the decision-making process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Manitoba

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Bing Chat Enterprise is listed for University of Manitoba in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Manitoba discourages instructors from using AI-detection software on student work, citing unreliability and privacy, intellectual property, and ethical concerns.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Manitoba states that it has not formally approved specific Generative AI software; even GenAI tools within its M365 A3 license should be considered with the caution applied to third-party applications that ingest personal data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Notre Dame

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT EDU is listed for University of Notre Dame in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Notre Dame in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

NotebookLM is listed for University of Notre Dame in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Pennsylvania

6 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Penn provides several licensed AI tools to its community, including Copilot Chat (Basic, free), Adobe Express (free), ChatGPT-EDU (purchase required), M365 Copilot Premium (purchase required), Gemini for Google Workspace (purchase required), Google NotebookLM (purchase required), Grammarly Pro (purchase required), Snowflake Data Analytics (purchase required), and Zoom AI Companion (free).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Penn users should not input moderate or high-risk Penn data (per the Penn Data Risk Classification) or intellectual property into AI tools without careful consideration of data use policies, a protective contract, and review by Penn's Privacy Office and Office of Information Security.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Penn's Office of Audit, Compliance & Privacy mandates that users of publicly available (unlicensed) AI tools must not enter any information that could identify a student, including names, ID numbers, email addresses, or detailed descriptions of student work or engagement that could be identifiable to others.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Arizona State University

5 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

ASU's AI tools page says tools not listed on that page are not approved for enterprise use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

ASU Digital Trust guidelines instruct users not to share information that is internal, sensitive, or highly sensitive to university policies and rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

ASU Research Compliance guidance says not to place any US export-controlled data into any generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Michigan State University

5 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for Michigan State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

MSU guidelines say third-party generative AI tools, especially those operated outside the United States, may be used only with non-sensitive public information unless MSU IT Information Security gives prior approval.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

MSU IT standards say only AI platforms formally evaluated and recommended by MSU IT Governance, Risk, and Compliance may be used with institutional data, and no AI tool should be assumed safe for confidential or regulated data unless explicitly approved.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Purdue University

5 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Purdue requires prior approval before Sensitive or Restricted Data is entered into AI tools, including training or testing AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Purdue's AI Use policy treats AI tools and university data used with them as IT Resources and Information Assets subject to Purdue acceptable-use and security/privacy policy controls.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should commit to never sharing personally identifiable student information with third-party AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Seoul National University

5 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

SNU's AI Guidelines for research require cross-verification of AI outputs for errors/bias, protection of research data and confidential information, and documentation of AI use for research reproducibility.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

SNU's AI Guidelines require transparent disclosure of AI use, fact and source verification, copyright/privacy/information security compliance, bias correction, and awareness of accountability.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

SNU Library states that most e-resource subscription agreements only permit viewing, downloading, and printing; using resources for AI training/analysis or uploading to third-party AI services requires separate authorization.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Sheffield

5 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The PGR guidance says researchers must ensure confidential, proprietary, or personally identifiable information is never uploaded to any GenAI platform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

IT Services productivity principles say only University-approved AI tools should be used for official University business, and staff have access to Google Gemini as the institutionally supported GenAI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

IT Services productivity principles say AI use must comply with GDPR and University data-protection policies, and sensitive or confidential information must not be entered into public or unregulated AI models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Tokyo

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月9日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UTokyo warns students to never input confidential information, personal information, or unpublished research results into AI tools, as the information might be leaked or used for AI training.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UTokyo requires instructors who allow AI use to explain associated risks to students: information leakage, data concentration in few companies, copyright concerns, and potential bias.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UTokyo instructs faculty not to input exam questions directly into generative AI tools, as exams are highly confidential documents.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Warwick

5 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Warwick's AI Information Compliance Policy covers everyone with a contractual or implied relationship with the University and all information processed by the University.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Warwick's AI Information Compliance Policy says certain data, including personal or confidential material, University intellectual property, and some copyrighted or third-party data, must not be put into AI software without prior approval.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Warwick's AI in research guidance says its principles apply to all researchers and researchers must consider AI-related research risks including integrity, information security, and accountability risks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Birmingham

5 匹配声明s from 11 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Birmingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

The University states that generative AI detection tools are not currently allowable and that student work should not be uploaded to generative AI detection software.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The research AI guidance says personal, confidential, or sensitive data must not be entered into AI tools without clear justification, data minimisation, and a Data Protection Impact Assessment where applicable.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Davis

5 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UC Davis guidance says users should not enter sensitive UC Davis data, including student, personnel, patient, confidential research, or financial account information, into AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The UC Davis School of Medicine policy says medical students are not permitted to use external generative AI tools for patient care documentation except as allowed under UC Davis Health policy, and PHI must not be entered into a generative AI tool outside a secure institutionally supported system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UC Davis Health guidance says generative AI tools should not be used with patient information or other sensitive data unless the tool is specifically approved by UC Davis Health.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Maryland, College Park

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UMD guidance tells researchers not to input federal, state, or UMD data into externally sourced GenAI tools and not to upload unpublished research data or other confidential information into tools that have not undergone proper review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For administrative work, UMD guidance says administrative staff should not input non-public institutional data into externally sourced GenAI platforms and faculty or staff should not put moderate-risk Level 2 or higher data into public external GenAI platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UMD's AI services page lists DIT AI services and states that listed DIT tools have gone through SRM review and are approved for university community members to use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tromsø The Arctic University of Norway

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatUiT is listed for University of Tromsø The Arctic University of Norway in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Copilot Chat is listed for University of Tromsø The Arctic University of Norway in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UiT advises that personal information should not be entered in Microsoft Copilot or other tools that are not approved by UiT, and sensitive information should not be input into such tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vanderbilt University

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Vanderbilt University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Amplify is listed for Vanderbilt University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Vanderbilt University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Aalto University

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Aalto AI Assistant is listed for Aalto University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Aalto AI Assistant guidance says public, internal, and confidential data may be used in Aalto AI Assistant, but secret content and special-category or otherwise sensitive personal data are not permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Aalto University AI Services describes Aalto AI Assistant as an official productized AI service available to all Aaltonians, with GPT models that can be applied to public, internal, and confidential information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Aarhus University

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Aarhus University student guidance says students should never upload confidential or sensitive personal data covered by GDPR rules to a GAI application.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Aarhus University staff guidance says staff may not use GAI for trade secrets, confidential or sensitive data or copyrighted material; staff are responsible for the accuracy and quality of GAI-generated content they use or share; and GAI use should be credited where relevant.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

AU Library guidance for students says many library-provided materials such as e-books and articles may not be shared with AI tools, students should never upload confidential information to AI, and AI text mining of a larger text corpus is only permitted in an academic context if the library agreement with the publisher allows it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Cairo University

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Cairo University's 2025 responsible AI policy states objectives to raise awareness of AI applications, protect data confidentiality and security, and ensure responsible use that upholds academic values.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Cairo University's responsible AI policy identifies academic-staff risks that include plagiarism or failing to attribute AI tools, privacy-compromising data sharing, hallucinations and biases, and over-reliance on AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Cairo University's responsible AI policy tells students that AI can support time management, research brainstorming, learning activities, and skills development, while flagging privacy breaches, over-reliance, hallucinations, and biases as risks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Dartmouth College

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Claude for Education is listed for Dartmouth College in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Dartmouth staff guidance says only approved generative AI tools are authorized for handling DISC 2 or higher data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

Dartmouth staff guidance directs generative AI procurement questions or planned purchases through ITC Rapid Review and risk assessment by Information Security and Data Protection.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Macquarie University (Sydney, Australia)

4 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for Macquarie University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Macquarie's AI policy says University-provided AI tools and systems are subject to privacy, security, intellectual-property, intended-use, and risk-assessment controls.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Macquarie's research guidance says researchers using generative AI should mitigate sensitive-data risks, keep oversight and control, critically review outputs, and disclose or acknowledge generative AI use in research.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

McMaster University

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

McMaster's operational excellence generative AI guidelines tell employees not to upload confidential, personal, personal health, or proprietary information to a generative AI tool unless required security/privacy assessments have been completed, while noting an enterprise Microsoft Copilot exception when logged in with McMaster credentials.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

McMaster's Provost academic integrity page says McMaster has not activated Turnitin's AI Detector, while privacy/security and reliability assessment work is underway and activation may allow retroactive submissions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

McMaster's privacy considerations page says that for tools including automated functions, including artificial intelligence, the university must conduct an Algorithmic Impact Assessment, with the Privacy Office responsible for the AIA process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Monash University

4 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Thesis examiners are not permitted to use Generative AI technologies (such as ChatGPT) during the thesis examination process to support, prepare, or write their examiners' report.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Students should not upload personal, sensitive, copyrighted, or licensed material to AI tools, as many AI tools cannot guarantee privacy, strong data security, or the protection of intellectual property.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Monash enterprise systems such as Copilot have enterprise data protections identified under the green shield in Monash Copilot. Students should use their Monash email address to access Microsoft Copilot which provides data protection for Monash.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

North Carolina State University

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

NC State guidance says NC State credentials must be used for approved AI tools and personal accounts are not allowed to be used with university data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

NC State guidance says several AI tools are available for use with university data at approved sensitivity levels, and use of university data with unapproved AI tools requires an IT Purchase Compliance request.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

NC State research AI guidance says researchers must handle data used with AI responsibly under applicable privacy laws, university policies, and NC State data management regulation, and AI use for research with specific compliance control plans needs approval before use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Northwestern University

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Northwestern guidance states that faculty, staff, students, and affiliates should not enter institutional data into any generative AI tools that have not been validated by the University for appropriate use and have explicit permission of the data provider.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Northwestern classifies data into four levels. Only Level 1 (non-confidential, public) data may be uploaded to publicly available generative AI tools. Data above Level 1 requires tools approved through Northwestern IT procurement and security review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is Northwestern's primary approved generative AI tool. All students, faculty, and staff have access to free Copilot Chat, with full Copilot for Microsoft 365 available as a paid subscription.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Queen's University at Kingston

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot with Single Sign-On is listed for Queen's University at Kingston in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Queen's guidance directs users working with internal or confidential data to use only Queen's-approved AI tools such as LibreChat and Microsoft Copilot with Queen's single sign-on.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Queen's AI Applications page states that the university has conducted security and privacy assessments for generative AI software and uses those assessments to identify risks and inform use guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

RWTH Aachen University

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

KI:connect is listed for RWTH Aachen University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

RWTH's scenario catalog states that assessment of examination work using AI systems is not permissible at the present time, while limited help drafting feedback may be conceivable if it gives the AI no decision-making role, transfers no personal data, and is finally checked by humans.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

RWTH's scenario catalog says external AI systems may be used for university tasks only with attention to legal conditions, and that deployment or procurement of external services requires data-protection and other legal clarifications plus staff co-determination where employee services are involved.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Stevens Institute of Technology

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Stevens AI data-classification guidance treats public data as permissible for AI use, non-public Stevens data as permissible only with licensed AI tools while logged in with a Stevens account, and restricted data as prohibited for AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Stevens IT guidance says that, effective May 1, 2025, Fireflies.ai and Otter.ai were disabled from joining Zoom meetings hosted by Stevens users, and strongly recommends not using third-party AI bots in Zoom meetings.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Stevens guidance says new AI uses in work should align with Stevens security, privacy, and relevant policies, and should seek prior approval from a supervisor or department chair.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Texas A&M University

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Texas A&M guidance says everyone must follow data privacy and security guidelines when using generative AI to protect personal and institutional data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Texas A&M publishes official recommendations and guidance for responsible generative AI use at the university, scoped to benefits and risks including academic integrity, privacy, and ethical use considerations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Texas A&M Technology Services describes TAMU AI Chat as a secure, university-approved platform open to all students and employees, with support for content classified as University-Confidential or lower.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Edinburgh

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

At the University of Edinburgh, staff presenting AI-generated content as their own original work, uploading personal data or confidential information to external AI tools, and relying on AI detection tools are listed as unacceptable uses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Edinburgh states that ELM chat histories are private to the individual user and are not accessible to lecturers for checking student work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Edinburgh says using an AI agent within Learn or any university learning or assessment platform requiring login is not permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tilburg University

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Tilburg University's Privacy & Security framework says users should not enter personal data, confidential information, or commercially sensitive information into GenAI tools, and should have tools assessed first if they want to process sensitive data with GenAI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Tilburg University's Privacy & Security framework states that GenAI output may contain errors, fabrications, or biases and that generated information should always be verified before being used or shared.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Tilburg University's GenAI guidance says users should adhere to the university Privacy & Data Protection Policy and Information Security Policy and should not use GenAI for illegal or fraudulent purposes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Trinity's teaching and learning guidance says private student or staff information must not be used in GenAI queries or instructions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Trinity's College Statement treats AI and GenAI as relevant to teaching, learning, assessment and research while identifying risks including academic integrity, ethics and privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Trinity's research guidance says researchers remain responsible for scientific output, should cite GenAI usage in outputs, and should attend to privacy, confidentiality and intellectual-property issues when sharing sensitive information with AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Concepción

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The [genIA] ethics guide says practical AI use should clearly define what is allowed, ask for declaration and citation of tool use when appropriate, verify student understanding and original contribution, and avoid entering sensitive information into external services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UdeC's [genIA] ethics page presents institutional guidelines and interactive tools for deciding how to incorporate generative AI in teaching and research while safeguarding transparency, authorship, privacy, and equity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

[genIA] offers formative spaces for the UdeC university community, including basic and intermediate workshops on generative AI tools in teaching with objectives covering ethics, academic integrity, advanced tool use, and educational-material design.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Cincinnati

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for University of Cincinnati in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Cincinnati guidance says users should verify information is classified as Public before using AI or Generative AI tools and says AI use should not involve confidential, sensitive, or restricted information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Cincinnati guidance strongly recommends logging into UC-licensed AI tools with UC credentials to help protect individual and institutional privacy and security.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Idaho

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Idaho's OIT and AI Execution Group memo tells university employees not to put identifiable student, employee, or regulated data into public AI models like ChatGPT and to remain vigilant about FERPA, HIPAA, GLBA, and other compliance requirements when using AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

University of Idaho OIT guidance says agentic AI tools should not receive credentials to university systems, should not be installed on systems with moderate- or high-risk data access, and should be tested in a sandboxed workflow.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Idaho OIT guidance says data uploaded to or downloaded from AI, including prompts, is subject to APM 30.11 data classification, and that listed AI services are approved only for the indicated data classifications.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Liverpool

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Liverpool lists unacceptable uses of generative AI in education, including unreviewed copying of AI-generated content into assessment materials or feedback, using AI for grades or final assessment decisions, uploading protected student or confidential information to public AI platforms without required review, and creating or modifying official policy documents without appropriate review and approval.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Liverpool's legal, security, and data-protection guidance says GenAI use must comply with UK GDPR and that personal information should not be uploaded or shared with AI tools unless necessary and appropriate safeguards are in place.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Liverpool has a central AI policies and guidance hub that collates generative AI guidance covering golden rules, legal/security/data protection, learning/teaching/assessment, and research.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

4 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

U-M requires using approved ITS AI Services for university data. Only data classified as Low may be used with AI services lacking a U-M contract or data agreement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

U-M requires that AI-generated computer code is always reviewed by a human, with professionally trained peer code reviews for applications handling Restricted or High data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

U-M ITS AI Services include HIPAA safeguards and may be used with Protected Health Information (PHI).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Oslo

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

GPT UiO is listed for University of Oslo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UiO's teacher guidance says that when teachers allow AI use, they should provide clear AI-use guidelines and communicate academic integrity, accuracy, and source-use requirements to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UiO describes GPT UiO as a UiO-developed service for using AI models within UiO privacy requirements, and says GPT UiO can generally be used in teaching, research, and administrative tasks with data up to yellow (limited).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Technology Sydney

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UTS states that use of AI systems must comply with its Privacy, Procurement, Information Security, and Acceptable Use of Information Technology Resources policies as appropriate.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UTS's AI Operations Procedure requires a six-stage identification, assessment, approval, implementation, and management process before developing, deploying, procuring, or activating AI systems or AI capabilities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UTS research guidance tells researchers to check confidentiality, licence, and agreement restrictions before uploading data to GenAI tools, and to follow relevant IT, Acceptable Use, and Data Governance policies when a GenAI tool accesses UTS IT or network resources or is deployed on a UTS device.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

VU Amsterdam's framework says students cannot be required to use AI tools for which VU has no license, and students, lecturers, and support staff do not process personal data or other confidential data in AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

VU Amsterdam's framework says AI detectors are not permitted because they are unreliable and do not meet VU privacy requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Washington University in St. Louis

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

WashU IT guidance says users should not enter Washington University or secure data, including deidentified healthcare data, into publicly accessible non-protected AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

WashU IT AI purchasing guidance says an Office of Information Security Vendor Security Review is required when an AI tool has not yet been approved and the user intends to use or purchase it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

WashU identifies specific secure AI tools as reviewed and approved for use with sensitive information, including HIPAA- or FERPA-covered data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Wayne State University

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Wayne State's generative AI guidelines state that AI tools must first be approved by C&IT and that third-party AI bots are not approved for use at this time, with exceptions following the technology purchasing process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Wayne State C&IT publishes a list of generative AI tools that have been reviewed and approved for secure use at Wayne State, while noting that the list may change as tools evolve and undergo security review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Wayne State's generative AI guidelines state that research documentation should not be uploaded to unapproved AI technology because doing so may violate the confidentiality or integrity of the research.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yale University

4 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Yale guidance says confidential, legally restricted, moderate-risk, and high-risk Yale data should not be entered into AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Yale Poorvu Center guidance says classroom AI use must comply with FERPA and instructors cannot require students to create external accounts for tools Yale does not directly license.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Yale describes Copilot Chat as not using conversations to train AI models or sharing data with OpenAI, while limiting high-risk data to Work search.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Adelaide University

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Adelaide University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance tells graduate research students not to upload sensitive, copyrighted, or confidential information, or unprotected intellectual property, into AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Adelaide University's Cyber Security Policy states that AI systems are part of its digital environment and are subject to the same cyber security, data protection, and compliance requirements as other information systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

American University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

American University guidance says not to enter sensitive, Confidential, or Official Use data into an AI platform unless approved by a university official, and not to upload, input, or analyze university data in an AI tool that OIT has not approved.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

American University publishes responsible-use guidance for AI tools that applies general principles of transparency, accountability, human oversight, data protection, privacy, teaching, research, staff, and student use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

American University research guidance says researchers should be transparent about AI use, verify AI-generated content against trusted sources, protect data privacy, and not list AI systems as co-authors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Brown University

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Brown OIT guidance says users should not enter Level 2 or 3 Brown data into publicly available or vendor-enabled AI tools unless Brown has a contract for a specific service that protects the data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Brown OIT guidance says AI tool use is subject to the same policies as other information technology resources, including acceptable use, copyright, conduct, and contract review policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Brown University Communications guidance for Brown communicators says not to input identifying personal information or proprietary information into AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Carnegie Mellon University

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

CMU Computing Services guidance says public AI tools should not be used with student data, confidential research, or sensitive administrative tasks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CMU Computing Services lists protected AI tools available at CMU and states that when users sign in with Andrew ID and password, each listed tool is FERPA-compliant and will not use data to train AI models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CMU Eberly Center guidance identifies a growing list of CMU-vetted generative AI tools that are FERPA compliant for teaching and learning when used as instructed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Cornell University

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Cornell's committee report states that any information educators are obligated to keep private under FERPA or HIPAA should not be shared with generative AI tools or uploaded to third-party AI vendors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Cornell's IT guidelines prohibit entering any confidential, proprietary, federally or state regulated, or otherwise sensitive or restricted Cornell information into public generative AI tools, as such information becomes public and may be stored and used by anyone.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Cornell's AI course policy icons include a 'PP' (Privacy Protecting) icon indicating that generative AI use is permitted but no copyrighted or proprietary class materials should be uploaded unless otherwise specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Cyprus University of Technology

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Cyprus University of Technology's AI guide says the university encourages modern technological tools for education, research, and learning while also recognizing risks, misuse, privacy, and personal data concerns.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The CUT AI guide says students must submit their own work and disclose any use of AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The CUT Data Security guide advises users to avoid sharing confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable information in AI prompts and to check AI tool privacy practices.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Duke University

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Duke AI tool guidance describes ChatGPT as available to Duke University faculty, staff, and students, with sensitive-data use excluding PHI and governed by institutional agreement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Duke research guidance says researchers should document and publish AI decision-making alongside research and should not cite chatbot-summarized information they have not authenticated.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Duke CTL assignment-design guidance advises that personal information should not be shared when using AI in assignments, to minimize privacy threats to students and instructors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Essex, University of

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Essex staff guidance says generative AI tools may not be used as a sole decision maker, to process or analyse confidential or personal information, or through unapproved personal accounts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Essex staff guidance for business operations says staff using generative AI in their work must comply with the University's Information Security Policy, IT Acceptable Use Policy, and relevant legal requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Essex Zoom AI Companion guidance says hosts should inform attendees when AI Companion will be used, review and edit AI-generated meeting summaries before sharing, and check errors before sharing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Freie Universitaet Berlin

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月13日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Freie Universität Berlin describes KI.Assist@FU as its central data-protection-compliant chatbot for study and teaching, available free to FU members through single sign-on; the chatbot page says entered data is not used to train the models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

The KI.Assist@FU terms prohibit use of the chatbot to process personal data and exclude use for correcting or evaluating student work or otherwise assessing students' abilities and knowledge.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For students using AI, FU's Eckpunkte prohibit uploading copyrighted or personal content into AI systems and state that KI.Assist@FU may be used only for university purposes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ghent University

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Ghent University has a university-wide framework for responsible AI use that guides the Ghent University community with principles including accountability, honesty, respectful use, careful and sustainable use, privacy and confidentiality, and exemplary behaviour.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Ghent University teaching guidance says lecturers and students should protect personal, privacy-sensitive, or copyright-protected data and should never upload personal or confidential information without clear permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Ghent University research guidance says GDPR applies when developing AI based on personal data or processing personal data with AI in research, and that AI applications must ensure privacy and data protection throughout their lifecycle.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Griffith University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Griffith University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Griffith eResearch guidance says Microsoft Copilot is approved for Unofficial, Official (Public), Official (Internal), and Sensitive data classifications when users log in with a Griffith account, while Protected data is not approved for Microsoft Copilot.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Griffith's student generative AI guidance warns that many open or public tools do not guarantee confidentiality and advises users not to enter personal information, information about others, or course materials such as assessment tasks or marking rubrics.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Imperial College London

3 匹配声明s from 15 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Imperial's dAIsy AI platform uses University SSO authentication with auditing. Prompts and metadata are logged for operational monitoring, and AI model providers are configured not to train on user data. Users' prompts and responses are not used to train external AI models. dAIsy is approved for use with unrestricted data within Imperial's secure infrastructure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Breaches of Imperial's dAIsy Use Policy may lead to action under Academic Misconduct procedures for students and HR/disciplinary processes for staff, as well as under Information Security and Data Protection policies. Sanctions may include removal of access, grade penalties, or formal disciplinary measures.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Research at Imperial that involves people, personal data, or sensitive topics may require ethics approval, a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA), and data-governance controls before using any AI tool. Researchers must verify whether their use of AI in research requires special approval, particularly when uploading private or confidential research data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Justus-Liebig-University Giessen

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

kiChat is listed for Justus-Liebig-University Giessen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

JLU HRZ guidance says external AI services such as chatgpt.com outside JLU kiChat require review or approval for personal, non-public, or confidential data, and states that chatgpt.com must not be used for personal or non-public information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

JLU presents central AI offers for its members, including HRZ-provided JLU kiChat and API services described as secure and privacy-compliant AI solutions for research, teaching, and administration.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Keio University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Keio's generative AI usage guideline tells users not to input personal or sensitive information through prompts or file attachments into AI services outside Keio's corporate contracts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Keio's guideline warns that Google AI Studio is outside Keio's official covered services and asks users to refrain from entering important information such as personal or confidential data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Keio's guideline classifies Gemini and NotebookLM under Keio's contract as corporately contracted AI services available through Keio.jp accounts in a trial standard-feature implementation as of July 2025.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

KU Leuven

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

KU Leuven identifies Copilot logged in with a KU Leuven account as its recommended GenAI tool, citing contractual data protection, Enterprise technical security, and Microsoft not using entered data for further training.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

KU Leuven guidance says strictly confidential data should use only Copilot logged in with a KU Leuven account, and confidential or strictly confidential data require a security check if another AI tool is needed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

KU Leuven safe-use guidance warns users to be careful with unsupported AI tools and not to enter personal data, confidential information, IP-sensitive data, or copyrighted material.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lehigh University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Lehigh tells faculty, staff, students, and affiliates that institutional, restricted, or critical data may not be submitted to online systems including generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Lehigh says community members who learn of a potential data protection or confidentiality breach through generative AI tools or otherwise are required to report it to the Office of Information Security.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Lehigh says AI services acceptable for Class II data may be used in human-subjects research upon IRB approval, while unapproved services should be reviewed with LTS for data-security requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Leibniz University Hannover

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The LUH KI-Richtlinie prohibits processing personal data in AI systems without explicit KI-Rat approval and prohibits entering trade secrets or sensitive research data into AI systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

LUH says centrally provided AI systems should be used preferentially; mandatory use of decentralized AI systems in teaching requires KI-Rat approval and is allowed only if no personal data are processed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

LUH provides LUHKI2 as a free, WebSSO-accessible, ChatGPT-based AI platform for university members without external registration, with stated anonymized GDPR-compliant processing and operational caveats about OpenAI chat-history retention and current file-upload storage.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Leiden University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Leiden University's Dutch staff guidance says staff should use only AI tools marked green in the university toolpicker, should not process personal data or confidential information with AI tools, and should verify AI output.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Leiden University states that ChatGPT is not supported because data security and privacy are not guaranteed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Leiden University tells staff to check confidentiality labels before using AI with documents.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lund University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

Lund University's Swedish policy says generative AI use is to comply with privacy and security laws and that procured tools or existing licensing agreements should be used in the first instance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Lund University's staff AI page says users may not write or upload sensitive material or sensitive personal data to ChatGPT, and may never upload medical information regardless of confidentiality status.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Lund University's student guidance says students should primarily use Lund-licensed tools such as Microsoft Copilot Chat and Google Gemini, and must not upload other students' work, sensitive personal data, or copyright-protected material.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Use of generative AI tools at MIT must comply with all applicable federal and state laws and orders (including FERPA, HIPAA, Massachusetts Data Protection Standards, export control laws, and the Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of AI), Institute policies (including 10.1 Academic and Research Misconduct, 11.0 Privacy and Disclosure of Personal Information, and 13.0 Information Policies), Information Protection guidelines, and the Institute's Written Information Security Program (WISP), plus any additional policies established by the user's department, lab, center, or institute (DLCI).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Open AI ChatGPT is listed for Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

MIT departments, labs, centers, and institutes (DLCIs) already using a generative AI tool or service must ensure that the tool complies with all Institute policies and Information Protection guidelines, and must contact [email protected] for consultation or assessment if needed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

McGill University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

McGill explicitly rejects DeepSeek AI for McGill-managed or research-funded devices, rejects Read.AI and other AI meeting bots for McGill use, and says tools not mentioned in the available AI tools list are automatically considered rejected.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

McGill guidance says users should mitigate potential privacy concerns by removing personally identifying information when using AI tools, be careful with sensitive or restricted material, and avoid using Personal Health Information (PHI) or Payment Card Industry (PCI) data with AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Commercial Data Protection is listed for McGill University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech)

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT is listed for National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Copilot is listed for National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Taiwan Tech's Computer Center tells teachers and staff not to provide generative AI tools with official confidential information, personal information, or information not approved by the university for public disclosure, and not to ask AI questions that may involve confidential business or personal data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pennsylvania State University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月13日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Penn State's AI Studio user agreement permits Level 1 and Level 2 data in AI Studio and prohibits Level 3 and Level 4 data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Penn State guidance tells users not to use free personal AI accounts for Penn State-related teaching, learning, research, or work and never to input Level 3 or Level 4 information into any AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Penn State ORP guidance says identifiable or restricted human-subjects data should not be input into generative AI systems unless IRB and data agreements explicitly approve it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Politecnico di Milano

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Politecnico di Milano's regulation prohibits users from providing sensitive data to AI systems hosted outside the university, including credentials, personal identifying information, non-anonymized data, copyrighted data, university intellectual property, or data that could harm the university's reputation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Politecnico di Milano's regulation says users must be informed and made aware that data supplied to commercial AI tools may be visible and recorded by third parties, creating potential security risks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Politecnico di Milano's personal-data and ICT security regulation treats AI-system use in academic, research, and administrative activities as subject to ethical, responsible, legally compliant use aligned with the university's values.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Queen Mary University of London

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Queen Mary staff guidance says open-access GenAI tools are not secure for institutional data, and directs staff to use institutional Microsoft Copilot for sensitive, confidential, or internal-use-only information while not sharing internal-use Queen Mary data with external AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Queen Mary IT FAQs say staff using built-in Copilot with a Queen Mary account get Microsoft 365 environment protections, and inputs are not stored or used for external model training.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

Queen Mary IT FAQs say staff intending to use Queen Mary data with a free AI tool must submit the tool for approval through the Ideas portal before using it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Queen's University Belfast

3 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Queen's research AI guidance says AI use in projects involving human participants, personal data, or sensitive information must be outlined in ethics applications.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Queen's responsible-use guidance tells users to make an ethical judgment about the information submitted to AI tools and whether they have permission to submit it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Queen's tools guidance says the AI tools listed on the page are for exploration and exclusively with publicly available data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Radboud University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Radboud University advises users not to input sensitive or critical business information or personal data when using AI, and says not to share personal data without consent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Radboud University requests that staff and students who wish to use AI choose Copilot Chat.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Radboud University says free tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini are not recommended because they pose privacy and security risks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

RMIT University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Before RMIT initiates its AI Governance Framework for an AI initiative, existing governance assessments include Privacy Impact Assessment, Security Risk Assessment, and Third-Party Risk Assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

RMIT's Val guidance says data shared with Val is kept private, secure and confidential, is not shared with OpenAI or other external organisations outside RMIT, and should not include personal, sensitive, or health information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

RMIT tells students to verify AI outputs and treat public AI tools as privacy, security, and reputation risks because inputs could be shared.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ruhr-Universität Bochum

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

GPT@RUB is listed for Ruhr-Universität Bochum in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

RUB's GPT@RUB usage directions say third-party personal data and sensitive third-party personal data may not be used as GPT@RUB input, and GPT@RUB or other AI systems may not be used for automated decision-making in examinations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The GPT@RUB privacy notice says RUB IDs are stored on the server and not transmitted to OpenAI, chat entries are forwarded to OpenAI without identifiers and IP addresses visible to OpenAI, and personal data from third parties should not be used in chat.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Rutgers University–Newark

3 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Rutgers OIT guidance says only Rutgers-approved AI tools should be used at the university to protect university data and ensure appropriate use; Rutgers-approved versions include security and privacy safeguards and do not use Rutgers data to train underlying models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

Rutgers OIT guidance says anyone considering purchase of an AI application for use at Rutgers must follow the same security processes and risk assessments as other software purchases, as well as Rutgers digital-accessibility standards.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Rutgers OIT guidance says confidential information, protected health information, and other proprietary Rutgers information may not be appropriate for use in AI applications and systems, and directs users to Rutgers data-classification and IT policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Stanford University

3 匹配声明s from 15 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Stanford School of Medicine MD and MSPA programs strictly prohibit entering confidential research data, patient data, or protected health information (PHI) into public AI platforms. Use of patient-identifying information or PHI in public AI tools is strictly forbidden. Students must use Stanford-approved AI platforms (e.g., Stanford Healthcare Secure GPT, Stanford AI Playground) when handling sensitive data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Stanford University IT (UIT) advises users to avoid inputting Moderate or High Risk Data into third-party AI platforms or tools not covered by a Stanford Business Associates Agreement, whether using a personal or Stanford account. Users should opt out of sharing chat data with third-party AI providers when possible.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Stanford University Communications (UComm) has issued AI guidelines for marketing and communications staff requiring: human oversight of all AI-generated content (non-delegable personal responsibility), adherence to university policies, prohibition on inputting confidential or legally privileged information into generative AI tools, prohibition on using AI to promote for-profit organizations or engage in political advocacy, and prohibition on using high-risk data in prompts. Stanford AI Playground is recommended as the primary platform. These guidelines apply to all regular staff, interns, casual employees, and consultants in marketing and communications functions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

TIET's IT Policy & Guidelines state that authorized users may use only authorized IT resources, are accountable for assigned resources, should not enable unauthorized network access, and must not attempt to access restricted systems without authorization.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

TIET's IT Policy & Guidelines apply to all users of TIET IT resources and establish institute-wide responsibilities for protecting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Thapar's B.E. CSE scheme includes an Ethics and Risk Mitigation in AI course covering responsible AI principles, data privacy and governance, AI governance frameworks, and AI policy case-resolution exercises.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The American University in Cairo

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for The American University in Cairo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for The American University in Cairo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

AUC student AI resources warn that ChatGPT or similar AI tools may produce unreliable content and may infringe on privacy, so students should use them with caution when permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CUHK provides Microsoft Copilot Chat (Basic) free to all students and staff under the Microsoft 365 license, with enterprise data protection when signed in with CUHK account.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

CUHK's student AI guide establishes ethical principles of accountability, transparency, and acknowledgement for AI tool use. Users are accountable for AI-generated outputs and must fact-check all outputs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

CUHK Library advises users to be aware of privacy policies of AI platforms, to opt out of data being used for model training where possible, and to avoid inputting confidential information into external AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

LSE research guidance tells researchers not to share personal, sensitive, or confidential data with third-party AI tools unless the tools meet LSE privacy and security standards, and it strongly encourages Microsoft Copilot for privacy and security.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

LSE legal and regulatory guidance tells users not to put personal data, confidential or commercially sensitive data, or certain copyrighted content into external AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

LSE Claude for Education guidance says use is optional, student and staff data will not be used to train Anthropic models, and personal, operational, or confidential data must not be shared through Claude.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The New School, New York City and Paris

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For Marketing & Communications AI use, the New School guidance says consent must be obtained from all participants before AI technology is used to summarize and record meetings or other proceedings.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

The New School M&C AI guidance says AI tools should never be used in a way that violates university standards or policies, and specifically points users to the Acceptable Use Policy and the Standard for Information and System Classification.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The New School M&C AI guidance identifies uploading check-in data or sensitive contact and personal information to AI-powered platforms for audience prediction as unapproved usage.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Ohio State University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Ohio State teaching guidance says data entered in AI applications using a personal account will not be protected, and users must log in to an approved AI tool with Ohio State credentials before entering institutional data above S1.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Ohio State OTDI guidance says unvetted AI tools should not receive institutional data above S1, and users should enter only the data necessary when using approved AI tools with institutional data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Ohio State responsible-use guidance says public GenAI prompts should be considered public and used to train AI models, while prompts and results in Ohio State-provided Copilot Chat, Gemini, and Microsoft 365 Copilot are protected inside OSU's environment and not used to train public AI models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney)

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月4日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

UNSW only authorises the use of Turnitin's AI Writing Detection Tool for detecting improper AI use in student work; UNSW IT has not approved other detection tools due to privacy and accuracy concerns.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

UNSW advises students not to include any personal or sensitive information in AI prompts, including addresses, names, emails, zID, or intellectual property, and recommends using Microsoft Copilot with a UNSW account for data privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

UNSW activated Microsoft Copilot with Commercial Data Protection for all staff and students with a zID in May 2024, providing a secure platform where sensitive information is stored and accessed only by authorised staff.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Toronto Metropolitan University (formerly Ryerson University)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TMU's Google AI Tools Help Centre says only public or low-sensitivity information should be entered into TMU's Google AI tools, and sensitive or confidential information should not be used in prompts, uploads, or activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TMU's GenAI learning and teaching guidance tells users not to submit anyone's personal information into GenAI models without consent or an ability to opt out.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

TMU states that privacy and AI impact assessments and a security risk assessment were conducted before releasing the Gemini App and NotebookLM at TMU.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Hamburg

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UHHGPT is listed for Universität Hamburg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The UHH orientation framework says personal data must not be used in generative AI, including UHHGPT, while German supervisory authorities are still examining the lawfulness of personal-data processing in the underlying ChatGPT model.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The public UHHGPT page says UHHGPT uses an institutional access to OpenAI's ChatGPT API; prompts are sent to the ChatGPT API, login or other usage data are not transferred to ChatGPT or OpenAI, and prompts are not stored.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Mannheim

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

HAWKI-GPT is listed for Universität Mannheim in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

In the service context, Universität Mannheim's directive allows members and affiliates to develop, procure, use, operate, place on the market, or put high-risk AI systems into operation only after the Rectorate has been informed and has expressly consented.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For service-context use, Universität Mannheim requires AI systems to be entered in the central AI register before development, procurement, operation, or market launch; confidential or personal data may be processed only in systems explicitly released for that purpose in the AI register, and systems marked not approved may not be used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya · BarcelonaTech (UPC)

3 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UPC states a commitment not to introduce personal, sensitive, confidential, or intellectual-property data into AI systems without express authorization, an established criterion, or adequate anonymization.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UPC IT guidance recommends not sending legally protected or confidential data to external AI applications; for non-institutional tools it says not to enter protected or confidential data and to consult ATIC.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UPC IT’s Microsoft Copilot Chat page tells users not to share confidential or personal information, to authenticate with a UPC account, and to use Copilot only when the green shield indicates data will not be used for AI training.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Potsdam

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

GPT.UP is listed for Universität Potsdam in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The position paper says students and teaching staff cannot be obliged or asked to use ChatGPT unless technical and organizational measures prevent OpenAI from processing their personal data, and prompts must not contain personal or confidential university information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The ZfQ AI-in-teaching page says GPT.UP is available to University of Potsdam members and that its use ensures AI providers do not process students' personal data and student data is processed only for university-defined teaching purposes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Stuttgart

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Stuttgart tells students not to enter copyrighted material into AI systems that store or train on inputs, and not to enter confidential, internal, or personal data unless an explicit university rule allows it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Stuttgart's AI-tool whitelist permits RAI with GWDG models for C1, C2, and C3 information with documented C3 approval, and permits RAI with OpenAI models over Azure only for C1 and C2 information.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Stuttgart's AI-tool whitelist says unreviewed public AI systems such as ChatGPT Free or Grammarly Free may be used only for public C1 information and must not receive internal, personal, or confidential information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Montréal

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UdeM Directive 10.70 tells administrative staff that confidentiality level 3 and 4 information must never be entered into a generative AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UdeM's graduate-studies guidance says graduate students working with human-participant research data must not submit personal or identifying participant information, or information that could identify an individual or group, to generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UdeM's TI page for administrative staff says some generative AI tools are permitted if Directive 10.70 principles are respected, but identifies READ.AI and DeepSeek as proscribed tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Basel

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University Library Basel guidance on licensed e-resources says third-party use includes uploading licensed content or data to external platforms, specifically ChatGPT and other AI platforms, where storage and future use are controlled by third parties.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

In its AI teaching scenarios, the University of Basel identifies compliance with data protection and copyright law, including assessing tools from those perspectives, as part of productive AI-tool integration in learning and teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For regulating AI use in exams and assessments, the University of Basel lists task adaptation, preventing tool access, and declaration-of-independent-authorship restrictions as measures.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Belgrade

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Faculty of Organizational Sciences guidance lists prohibited generative AI uses including academic-integrity violations, generating or spreading false content, copyright violations, and entering business or official secrets or other sensitive content into prompts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Faculty of Organizational Sciences guidance states that generative AI use is permitted only with respect for academic integrity principles, copyright and intellectual property, personal-data protection, ethical principles, and confidentiality obligations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The Faculty of Organizational Sciences journal AI policy requires authors to disclose generative AI use in both the cover letter and a manuscript statement, forbids authors from including personal, confidential, or proprietary material in prompts, and says GAI must not be used to generate peer-review reports.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bern

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bern IT Services says organization units may procure AI services themselves, but for AI systems not listed on the Generative KIs page, personal data, official or professional-secret data, and especially sensitive personal or research data must not be entered; only information intended for the public or otherwise without legal protection requirements is allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bern IT Services says that if an organization unit needs to enter and process covered data in AI systems, it must prepare an ISDS concept in advance and have it reviewed by the University of Bern CISO, legal service, and the Canton of Bern data protection supervisory authority; this also applies before processing official/professional-secret data or especially sensitive personal or research data in listed systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The University Library Bern GenAI step-by-step guide frames responsible GenAI use as a 14-question decision process that includes checking whether GenAI use is allowed for the task, whether confidential data are protected, whether use is documented for transparent disclosure, whether UniBE procurement and data-protection guidance has been read, and whether the user remains responsible for research output.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Calgary

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UCalgary IT guidance says a secure version of Microsoft Copilot Chat is available for users with a UCalgary IT account; users must sign in with UCalgary credentials, and personal or Level 3 or 4 business information must not be entered into other large language model tools unless reviewed and approved through the Software Acquisition Process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Calgary teaching-and-learning guidance says student, faculty, and staff use of generative AI should adhere to existing academic integrity policies, and instructors using generative AI must follow privacy laws for student data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For graduate studies, the Faculty of Graduate Studies guidelines say graduate students remain fully accountable for work produced with GenAI and are expected to be aware of privacy, confidentiality, and intellectual-property risks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, San Diego (UCSD)

3 匹配声明s from 11 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Zoom AI Companion is listed for University of California, San Diego (UCSD) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UC San Diego Blink says the university evaluates and supports AI services integrated into supported platforms using criteria that reflect University of California data protection and security policies, including Electronic Information Security, Electronic Communication, Export Control, and FERPA standards.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

A 2025 UC San Diego Senate-Administration Workgroup report says researchers should understand UC San Diego data classification policies, including which protected health information, human subjects data, student work, intellectual property, and similar data may not be used with non-secure GenAI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB)

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UCSB's AI technical and security guidance calls for assessing AI third-party applications, consulting the Office of Information Security on AI use cases and implementations, and contacting the Chief Information Security Officer's office for P3/P4 data use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCSB Information Technology guidance says ChatGPT should be treated as potentially unprotected for personal, confidential, or otherwise sensitive information and should not be used with sensitive or confidential information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCSB guidance says instructors using AI to identify patterns in student work by uploading that work should obtain student permission and use only campus-approved AI platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Copenhagen

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Enterprise is listed for University of Copenhagen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Copenhagen employee guidance says employees may not enter personal data or confidential or copyrighted information into generative AI tools and should use only the licensed Copilot Enterprise tool for UCPH work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Copenhagen researcher tools page says staff and students may use Microsoft Copilot, and that work needing a generative AI tool should primarily use Microsoft Copilot Enterprise because it is security-approved and licensed by the university.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Geneva

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNIGE's generative AI principles require respecting applicable laws and paying particular attention to data protection, intellectual property, official secrecy, and confidentiality.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, sensitive data such as personal data must not be disclosed to a public AI tool that does not guarantee confidentiality.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNIGE's Digital University practical guide warns that content submitted to generative AI may be accessible to the tool owner or exposed in a data breach, so users need to understand what can and cannot be shared.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Glasgow

3 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

University of Glasgow IT guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as the only AI service approved for use with University data and says users must be logged in with UofG credentials for approved use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Glasgow IT guidance says confidential or sensitive information belonging to the university or a third party should not be put into AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Glasgow's PGR GenAI checklist advises PGR students to avoid uploading confidential or sensitive information, including research data and peer review content, to AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Granada

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UGR guidance recommends avoiding sensitive information in public AI tools, using secure institutional tools, and prioritizing tools provided or contracted by UGR because they undergo privacy and security review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UGR research guidance recommends declaring AI use with technical and methodological details, verifying and supervising AI outputs, assuming authorship responsibility, and protecting data privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CEPRUD says it evaluates market AI tools for university uses and tells users to review privacy terms and conditions before using any listed tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Hohenheim

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Hohenheim guidance warns that third-party data may not be passed into AI systems without consent and says personal, confidential, or otherwise sensitive data generally must not be fed into AI systems.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Hohenheim KIM describes GPTalk as a university-internal AI chat service for university members that provides browser-based access to modern language models, including OpenAI ChatGPT and open-source models, without requiring an external account.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

The GPTalk guide tells students not to use GPTalk as their sole source, to enter no personal data, to remain responsible for the content as authors, and to make AI use transparent; it also says lecturers may not use GPTalk to correct or assess student work.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Kansas

3 匹配声明s from 10 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

KU data-use guidance says only public information should be entered into public third-party AI tools unless an enterprise-approved protected environment is used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

KU data-use guidance says Microsoft Copilot is approved for public, sensitive, and confidential university data only when users sign in with the relevant KU account and Enterprise Data Protection is active; restricted data requires additional consultation or review for KU Lawrence users.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

KU researcher guidance says researchers should comply with sponsor, publisher, institutional, and disciplinary rules when using GenAI and should consider confidentiality, privacy, intellectual property, and disclosure requirements.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Maryland, Baltimore

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UMB says Sensitive/Restricted Data, including PII and PHI, should not be uploaded into public AI systems, and confidential or sensitive UMB data should only be uploaded into approved secure UMB-sponsored AI systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UMB states that AI tools must be reviewed and approved before use on university devices, networks, or with university data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UMB's AI Toolkit organizes AI tools by data classification level and identifies Level 2 enterprise AI tools as approved for highly sensitive and confidential data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Minnesota (System)

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UMN OIT guidance says University users should safeguard data by uploading only allowed University data into appropriately licensed AI tools, and it distinguishes UMN-licensed tools from an individual ChatGPT license.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UMN OIT guidance says AI outputs should be closely reviewed and verified by a human, and AI-generated code for institutional IT systems and services should not be used unless reviewed by a qualified technologist.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

University Marketing Communications guidance, scoped to marketing and communications work, says AI output should be reviewed, verified, and modified, and that AI use should comply with University data privacy and information security policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Münster

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

uniGPT internal models is listed for University of Münster in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UniGPT terms distinguish local and external models: local models may process confidential V3 information but not strictly confidential V4 information, while external models may receive only public V1 information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The UniGPT privacy page states that user-generated chat data is not used to train models; logs and metrics are automatically deleted after 14 days, and other data is automatically deleted after six months without login.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Nebraska - Lincoln

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Enterprise via OpenAI Impact Program is listed for University of Nebraska - Lincoln in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Copilot Chat is listed for University of Nebraska - Lincoln in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for University of Nebraska - Lincoln in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Nevada - Reno

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNR strongly advises users not to share sensitive, confidential, or regulated data with AI tools, because tool data-sharing practices may compromise confidentiality.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UNR's OIT AI usage policy applies to students, employees, contractors, and third parties using AI platforms on behalf of the University, and frames responsible AI use around information security, data privacy, copyright, and academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UNR directs users to initiate an OIT Compliance vendor risk management assessment before integrating an AI tool into daily tasks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of New Hampshire

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

The USNH Artificial Intelligence Standard, which applies to USNH component institutions, says users of AI tools must not share or enter non-public Tier 2 or higher data, including PII or non-public research data, and that any AI implementation is subject to USNH policies, standards, and security review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNH Provost syllabus guidance says generative-AI detection tools should not be used to make definitive academic-integrity judgments, and says uploading documents containing student names, emails, or ID numbers violates FERPA; faculty using AI-enabled tools to evaluate student work must disclose that use and keep student data protections in mind.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

USNH's AI chatbot KB identifies DeepThought and Microsoft Copilot as USNH-provided AI options, recommends signing into Copilot with a USNH account for enterprise data protection, says public chatbots such as ChatGPT and Bard are not secure, and says alternative AI solutions must complete the Security Assessment Review process before purchase or implementation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UNC-Chapel Hill's administrative generative AI guidance says sensitive information should not be entered into generative AI tools unless the Information Security Office has completed a risk assessment and the Data Governance Oversight Group has approved the tool for sensitive information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNC-Chapel Hill's research guidance treats entering private or confidential information, research data, grant proposals, or analytical results into public generative AI tools as a public disclosure of that information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNC-Chapel Hill's faculty grading and assessment guidance says AI systems used for grading or feedback must be institutionally approved and compliant with data security and privacy standards; faculty using GenAI for grading retain full responsibility for evaluative decisions and feedback.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Pittsburgh

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

PittGPT is listed for University of Pittsburgh in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Pittsburgh Teaching Center guidance says free GenAI tools should not be considered private or secure, and information that is not already public should not be put into a free GenAI platform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Pittsburgh Teaching Center guidance says generative AI should not be used to grade student work and directs instructors to review data privacy implications before inputting data into generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Regina

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Regina policy treats data used to develop, operate, share, manage, or record GenAI systems as institutional data that must align with the University's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and data handling standards.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

For GenAI projects or systems, University of Regina employees are directed to identify, assess, and analyze risks including privacy and security, and University-wide GenAI projects, tools, systems, or intended enterprise-data uses require approval through established IT project approval processes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Saskatchewan

3 匹配声明s from 11 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

USask administrative AI guidance strongly recommends not inputting personal information or confidential data into AI tools and says administrators should prioritize USask-approved AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

USask student AI guidance says students should use AI to support, not replace or misrepresent, their learning, follow instructor rules, and avoid inputting personal information or confidential data into AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

USask research AI guidance says researchers are accountable for output integrity and should consider tool security, protect confidential or sensitive information, and be transparent about AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Southern California

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

USC’s Generative AI General Policy says Internal Use Only, Confidential, and Restricted Confidential Data may not be entered into Individual AI Tools, and Restricted Confidential Data may not be entered into any AI Tool, including USC Enterprise AI Tools, unless the Office of Ethics and Compliance gives written approval.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

USC’s Generative AI General Policy says departments, schools, and units may not acquire Individual AI Tools without first consulting the Office of Cybersecurity, Office of Ethics and Compliance, and Office of the General Counsel.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

USC ITS says Codex is available to users who meet approval criteria, and that only Public and Internal Use data may be used in Codex at the time of the guidance; Confidential data must not be entered into ChatGPT or Codex.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of St Andrews

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of St Andrews in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

St Andrews GenAI information policy says University information classified as internal, confidential, or strictly confidential must not be input into publicly available generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

St Andrews GenAI information policy says selection and procurement of generative AI tools should follow existing University procurement policies and procedures.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Twente

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UT's AI dossier tells users not to include personal, student, research, confidential, or sensitive data in public AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UT's AI dossier says the university is developing an AI Compliance Framework and instructs staff and researchers to report AI applications via the AI Office for appropriate measures under the AI Act.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UT's AI and assessment guidance warns that AI detection software has limits and may raise privacy, confidentiality, and trustworthiness issues.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Vermont

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UVM's approved AI tools page says approved AI applications are approved by data risk level, and a tool approved for one risk level is not approved for higher-risk data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UVM's approved AI tools page lists general AI tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini as public-information-only unless another use case goes through Contract Review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UVM Graduate College AI guidance tells graduate researchers not to share confidential, proprietary, or IP-sensitive data or information with an open-source AI engine.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Victoria (UVic)

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For UVic administrative or operational work, University Systems states that Microsoft Copilot is the GenAI tool approved for use with UVic Data, while publicly available tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity are not approved for highly confidential, confidential, or internal UVic Data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UVic's Systems notice states that DeepSeek web and mobile applications do not meet UVic information security standards and that UVic will restrict DeepSeek applications on the UVic network, UVic-owned devices, and UVic-owned or personal devices used for university business.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UVic's OVPRI research guidelines endorse following the Tri-agency AI guidance for research grant proposal development and review, and tell researchers to be transparent about GenAI use while avoiding upload of personal information or private or confidential research data except in few exceptions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Virginia

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UVA ITS terms say University Data classified as Highly Sensitive may not be included in GenAI Tools chat prompts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UVA Provost guidance says that if an assignment involves students uploading original work into a GenAI tool, instructors must provide alternative ways to complete the assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UVA ITS says appropriately licensed UVA GenAI tools keep prompt data in a UVA-specific tenant and do not share it with others or use it for AI model training.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Waterloo

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Waterloo IST tells users to confirm whether an AI tool is listed and approved for the intended type of University data before using it with University data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Waterloo IST says review processes assess AI tools used with University data for security, privacy, and contractual risks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

For units or individuals deploying AI-enabled systems that process University data, Waterloo IST says projects must undergo an Information Risk Assessment and receive Information Steward approval before using University data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Wollongong

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UOW's Assessment and Feedback Policy says staff are not permitted to upload student work to third-party tools, including GenAI or misconduct detection software, in the context of privacy and data policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UOW's student guidance recommends Microsoft Copilot when students use GenAI and says Copilot's Enterprise Data Protection means prompts and responses are encrypted and not retained by Microsoft to train its products.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Wollongong warns that uploading personal, sensitive, or confidential information to generative AI may compromise privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of York

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For University data, York's IT guidance says staff and students must only use GenAI tools that are provided and licensed by the University.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of York says students must sign into Gemini with University credentials to ensure data protection.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of York tells students not to upload personal, sensitive, or copyrighted material to generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Utrecht University

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

For employees, Utrecht University says it is not permitted to create an AI-tool account using a UU email address or SolisID unless the AI system or tool is university supplied and considered safe.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Utrecht University tells students not to use a UU student email address for AI-tool verification or account creation and notes that teachers cannot force students to create an AI-tool account while UU lacks secure AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Utrecht University's researcher guidance says personal or sensitive data should not be used as GenAI input unless the user is certain data protection law is respected.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Victoria University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Victoria University says users who want to use alternative AI tools must assess them using the AI Risk Classification Model, follow AI Steering Committee guidance, and register AI tools in the planned AI Registry.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Victoria University's AI Governance and Responsible Use Policy restricts access to AI training data or AI outputs involving sensitive or identifiable data to authorised users with a legitimate business purpose.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

A Victoria University library guide identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat with enterprise data protection as an AI tool recommended by VU for students signed in with a VU account, while cautioning that confidential information should not be shared with AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

York University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

York UIT states that York University data must not be entered into public AI platforms such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, or similar services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

York's administrative AI chatbot and meeting-assistant guidelines state that only approved AI meeting assistants can be used for internal York virtual meetings, and meeting participants must be notified and consent before use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

York University's administrative and operational use guidelines state that staff GenAI use is subject to management approval and that use cases requiring oversight should be reviewed before use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Abo Akademi University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Duck AI is listed for Abo Akademi University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 4。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Åbo Akademi University's research data guidance says personal data and confidential information must never be entered into an open AI tool, and that data protection must be considered when using closed tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Addis Ababa University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The AAU alumni site privacy policy says the site may collect user contact details and device information, uses analytics and service-related contact information, and reserves alumni personally identifiable information for alumni and Alumni Affairs & Development use for personal and University-related purposes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The AAU reform documents feedback portal privacy notice says visitor comments collect form data, IP address, and browser user agent for spam detection, and says users who left feedback can request export or erasure of personal data subject to administrative, legal, or security retention needs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

ABU's Research Policy assigns responsibility for research data collection, management, storage, and retention in research projects; the source does not state AI-tool-specific privacy or security rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The crawl found official ABU pages discussing AI strategies and teaching/learning context, but did not find a public official ABU generative-AI use policy, approved/prohibited AI tools list, or AI-tool data/security policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Alexandria University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Alexandria University's AI governance strategy discussion included ensuring safe and responsible AI use through regulatory and ethical frameworks while adhering to data protection and privacy standards.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Alexandria University's Faculty of Education AI research framework identifies privacy, result falsification, plagiarism, and overreliance on AI technologies as ethical and legal risks in research use of AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

American University of Beirut (AUB)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

AUB's research GenAI guidance says confidential data must not be shared with AI systems unless appropriate data protection agreements support that sharing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

For research data management and security, AUB's guidance limits GenAI use to secure AUB servers or approved encrypted clouds and directs sensitive research data away from public GenAI APIs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

AUTH's GenAI principles advise users not to enter institutional, copyrighted, confidential, personal, or sensitive data into GenAI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AUTH Library's academic-writing AI tools page frames AI tools as assistants for search, analysis, and writing, while advising responsible use, source verification, academic-integrity respect, disclosure when required, and avoidance of confidential data uploads.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Australian Catholic University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ACU's AI principles say AI must supplement rather than replace human decision-making, with humans retaining responsibility, and require privacy risks to be assessed and mitigated for AI-related activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

ACU research guidance says HDR candidates should declare GenAI use for thesis copyediting/proofreading, discuss intended research use with supervisors, record and acknowledge tool usage and prompts, and should not input sensitive or confidential information into GenAI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

BITS Pilani's Data Privacy Policy says that when Personal Data is used as input for generative AI models, safeguards must prevent the Personal Data from being used to train the model unless prior written consent is obtained from the Data Principals, and the use must comply with applicable privacy laws.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

BITS Pilani's Data Privacy Policy says AI tools such as ChatGPT or CoPilot should not be used wherever personal, sensitive, or confidential data is involved without explicit approval from the relevant Institute information security team or the BITS Pilani IT team.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Boston University

2 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Boston University faculty and staff guidance says users should avoid inputting or sharing private or sensitive information through commercial GenAI tools because this could violate privacy laws or university policy, and says TerrierGPT is recommended for institutional use but is not approved for restricted use data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Boston University's TerrierGPT page says data entered into TerrierGPT is not used to train external models and that the platform is approved for confidential, but not restricted-use, data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Brandeis University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Brandeis AI use guidance requires AI applications to comply with Brandeis data governance and cybersecurity policies, and says regulated, restricted, or confidential information in AI tools requires authorization and safeguards.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Brandeis provides GenAI tools with data protection to students, faculty, and staff, and distinguishes those tools from other tools that may not offer the same protection.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chalmers University of Technology

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For thesis work, Chalmers tells students to consult a Chalmers supervisor or relevant collaborator before using AI tools when there are uncertainties, particularly around data privacy and ethical issues.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Chalmers Library's ethical-use guidance says users should not upload sensitive or private information, copyright-protected material, or text intended for a thesis, dissertation, or scientific publication to chatbots.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chandigarh University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Chandigarh University's Research Policy says research techniques must not violate established professional ethics relating to health, safety, privacy, personal rights, or injury or pain to animals.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Chandigarh University's Student Code of Conduct instructs students to use digital platforms responsibly and ethically and to refrain from cyber bullying, hacking, or misuse of institutional systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Charles Darwin University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

CDU prohibits employees and students from putting confidential or sensitive information or intellectual property into GenAI platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

CDU staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes, but must not enter confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable University information unless it is appropriately de-identified or redacted; tools with unclear hosting, ownership, or data handling must not be used with University information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Charles University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Charles University advises users not to put sensitive data, personal data, or internal university data into commonly available chatbots; it limits protected/internal-data use to Microsoft Copilot under the university license or specific local-model cases.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Charles University leadership does not recommend deploying or using DeepSeek for work and academic purposes and recommends Microsoft Copilot for Education for broad university use because its security risks are contractually and technically treated.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

China Agricultural University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For undergraduate graduation theses/designs, China Agricultural University's Undergraduate School notice says the university encourages reasonable AI use for efficiency and idea expansion but prohibits direct writing of core thesis content, falsifying research data or processes with AIGC tools, whole-paper ghostwriting, and uploading confidential theses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For confidential, delayed-publication, or unpublished graduate thesis/practice成果 content, China Agricultural University's Graduate School warns students to protect content and prohibits uploading confidential content or misusing generative AI in ways that endanger data security, infringe intellectual property, or leak personal privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Concordia University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Concordia CTL guidance says Concordia has not approved or acquired online AI detectors and therefore staff or faculty use of them is not permitted because of privacy laws and regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Concordia's educational technology guidelines say a Privacy Impact Assessment is required whenever third-party technology uses, shares, or stores personal information, and that a written agreement with Concordia is required after a successful PIA.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Czech Technical University in Prague

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot for Education is listed for Czech Technical University in Prague in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

CTU's AI framework identifies sharing sensitive research data, personal data, and contractually concealed data with AI tools as significant cyber risks and states that AI cannot keep confidentiality or protect personal data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Deakin University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Deakin research guidance says commercial genAI platforms may store data externally and researchers should use only non-sensitive, non-confidential content suitable for public or external use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Deakin identifies a set of approved genAI and digital learning tools for learning, including Deakin GEM, Studiosity+, Microsoft Copilot for web, and FeedbackFruits.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Dublin City University

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

DCU Graduate Studies guidance tells research students not to submit research data, personal data, or sensitive information to free AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

DCU's AI position statement tells staff to act legally, ethically and transparently, disclose generative AI use for university-related work, and avoid sharing personal, confidential, institutional or strategic data with AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

EPFL advises students not to input confidential, private or personal information into generative AI tools. When using generative AI tools, students are sharing data with private companies and lose control over it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

EPFL guidance says enterprise licenses such as Microsoft 365 Copilot via EPFL account are currently not a secure solution for processing regulated data because EPFL has not signed a data processing agreement guaranteeing aligned data protection measures.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Erasmus University Rotterdam

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

EUR's central GenAI guidelines say users should not share personal or confidential information with GenAI tools and may use publicly available or published university information if use also follows the Acceptable Use Policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

EUR's PhD trajectory GenAI policy allows PhD research use of GenAI systems when its principles are followed, prefers licensed or EUR language-model systems, and advises consulting a privacy officer before using another program.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

ETH Zurich

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ETH Zurich recommends Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, and NotebookLM for teaching purposes, as they offer data-protected access via ETH accounts where personal data is not used for training models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Students must refrain from disclosing copyrighted, private, or confidential information to commercial GenAI clients unless expressly permitted, and must respect privacy and copyright of content they work with.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Georgetown University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for Georgetown University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Georgetown's AI privacy guidance says personally identifiable information should be used only with university-evaluated and approved systems or with consent, unless another approved legal or university process applies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Georgia Institute of Technology

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Georgia Tech OIT guidance says faculty, staff, and students shall not submit PII, Protected Data, Regulated Data, or Georgia Tech Organizational Data into any AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Georgia Tech OIT says Institute technology services and tools must undergo comprehensive review, and third-party AI plugins are disabled pending comprehensive risk review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Georgia State University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Georgia State guidance says faculty, staff, and students may not submit directly identifying data or university Sensitive or Confidential data into AI tools that are not supported by Georgia State.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Georgia State guidance says tools used for processes involving Sensitive or Confidential university data should not be used without contract review of data processing, privacy, and security before use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Graz University of Technology

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TU Graz guidance requires transparent labelling of AI-supported tool use where applicable and cautions against entering personal, confidential, trade-secret, or NDA-protected data into AI applications.

证据记录: 3。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

TU Graz states that Academic AI is available to all TU Graz employees and is intended to provide a secure AI environment respecting data protection and information security.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hasselt University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UHasselt's AI-tools page recommends using AI tools critically and says highly sensitive or personal information should not be entered even in paid versions; it recommends Gemini Pro for general AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UHasselt's research guidance for generative AI tells researchers to remain responsible, use GenAI transparently, pay attention to IPR and privacy, respect existing regulations, and avoid GenAI for sensitive activities such as peer review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hiroshima University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be told that using AI output as-is may amount to copyright infringement or plagiarism, and that any use or quoted output should be made clear in reports and similar assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be warned that AI use can lead to leakage of personal or confidential information and that generated outputs may be incorrect.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For HU employees, the central AI guide says confidential data and non-public research data must not be entered into publicly accessible generative-AI tools, and personal data must be removed or anonymized unless using HU internal CMS AI offerings configured for data protection.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

HU Berlin advises that generative-AI tools should be checked for data-protection and IT-security risks before use, and that AI-tool procurement should consider a preliminary review, especially where personal data may be processed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indiana University Bloomington

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Indiana University guidance says public generative AI tools are not approved for IU institutional data, even when the data are anonymized.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Indiana University states that it does not currently have specific generative AI policies apart from policies related to data security and privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

INSA Lyon's generative AI charter says use of generative AI tools to process personal, strategic, or confidential data is conditioned on prior institutional validation, and that uncontracted online generative AI services are prohibited for processing personal data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For INSA Lyon research and innovation activities, the generative AI charter says confidential peer-review documents require vigilance around strategic information and that, when confidentiality applies, generative AI use is prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

IPB guidance says AI use must consider IPB security and confidentiality rules; AI use must not disclose or store personal information of students, lecturers, or education staff without permission, and must protect academic data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

IPB guidance identifies LMITD, DRI, and DTPTP as bodies authorized to regulate AI use supporting IPB academic activities; IPB academic community members must comply with established AI-use rules and consult the relevant body where required.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Istanbul University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Istanbul University Press policy says reviewers and editors cannot upload submitted work, in whole or in part, to a generative AI application.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An Istanbul University EBS syllabus for 'Sahne Sanatlarinda Yapay Zeka Uygulamalari II' includes generative AI, verification, bias, hallucination analysis, copyright, student data/privacy, institutional policy, and risk management as course content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kansas State University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

K-State's employee guidance says users should not enter Protected Information into any AI system that has not been approved by Kansas State University.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

K-State's employee guidance identifies several AI services as approved when accessed through Single Sign-On and identifies DeepSeek as prohibited from use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Korea University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Korea University tells instructors not to enter personal information, academic records, assessment questions, or other sensitive or non-public materials into AI tools, with special caution for external AI services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Korea University tells learners not to enter personal information, non-public learning materials, or assessment questions into external AI tools, and to remember that AI inputs may be stored or reused.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kyoto University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Kyoto University states that highly confidential information that must not leave the university should not be entered into generative AI services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Kyoto University warns students not to casually enter privacy-related information, confidential information, or copyrighted works into generative AI prompts or uploaded data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

La Trobe University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

La Trobe University policy says staff, students, contractors, honorary and adjunct staff must not disclose University information into publicly accessible or open-source AI systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

La Trobe University policy requires an AI Adoption Risk Assessment for procurement or acquisition of all new AI systems/tools and for new use cases of existing university-approved AI systems/tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Maastricht University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For research, Maastricht University says researchers hold final accountability for ethical use of GenAI tools and must act in accordance with research integrity, personal-data, and UM policy rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For operations, Maastricht University says GenAI tools are never used to process personal or organisation-sensitive data unless transparency and applicable safeguards are in place.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Murdoch University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Murdoch University Library says AI functionality in its databases and systems is tested by a Library Generative AI working group against criteria that include functionality, accessibility, technical requirements, privacy, data protection, rights, and ethics.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Murdoch University Library guidance says uploading copyrighted materials or Murdoch intellectual property to AI tools without an existing Murdoch University agreement is against its generative-AI guiding principles and copyright requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Taiwan University (NTU)

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

NTU Health Policy and Management conduct rules allow AI tools according to teaching and research needs, but require users to clearly explain the content and scope of use, respect privacy, disclose assistance sources, verify AI output, and take responsibility for results.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

NTU Social Work journal publication ethics says reviewers must not input manuscript content or review-related material into generative AI tools to help write review comments, in order to protect manuscript confidentiality and author rights.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

KPI supports rational experimentation with generative AI tools for academic activity when information security, data confidentiality, copyright, and academic integrity are considered.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

KPI's AI guidance tells users not to enter personal or confidential information into AI tools because AI stores those data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT)

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

NJIT says university-wide licensed AI tools go through a security and data vetting process within Information Services and Technology, and departments or instructors seeking an AI tool are recommended to contact IST for vetting assistance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

NJIT guidance says confidential information should not be shared with AI if the AI is being trained on submitted content, including in student use contexts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Oregon State University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Oregon State University guidance says instructors may not input student work into GenAI tools or applications that are not approved by OSU.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Oregon State University says AI tools under review may only be used with unrestricted, publicly available data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Oxford Brookes University

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for Oxford Brookes University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Oxford Brookes guidance says students and staff have access to Microsoft Copilot through an academic institutional licence, but does not recommend uploading confidential or protected data to Copilot because it does not meet Brookes' information-security good-practice expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (UC)

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

When instructors allow generative AI use, UC guidance tells them to promote personal-data protection by avoiding feeding AI tools names, grades, or other private or sensitive information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UC's Docencia con IA guidance frames AI-supported teaching around deep learning, human dignity, inclusion, academic integrity, ethical responsibility, and data security/privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

PNU students must not enter personal data or confidential data from restricted records into generative AI tools and must protect that data when using generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

PNU researchers must not use generative AI to misrepresent research, fabricate data, plagiarize, present AI-generated content as human-created content, or use generative AI in sensitive activities such as peer reviews or evaluations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Princeton University

2 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Princeton University requires that only University-licensed generative AI tools should be used with University Information classified as Internal or Confidential, and the use of publicly available generative AI tools in conjunction with such Princeton Information is not permitted by the University.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Princeton University's OIT guidance states that non-public Princeton data should not be used in public generative AI tools, and that University Information classified as Restricted must not be used with any AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Qatar University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Qatar University instructs users to avoid entering personal, confidential, and sensitive data into AI tools or platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For Qatar University AI Research and Innovation Hub resources, the terms state that requested resources are for specified research projects, required IRB or ethics approvals must be obtained before use, and project data must follow Qatar University data protection, privacy, research governance, IT security, acceptable-use, and data-handling policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ritsumeikan University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Ritsumeikan University's student-facing generative-AI guidance cautions against casually entering personal information, highly confidential information, unpublished papers, drafts, or research data into generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Ritsumeikan University's IT support page identifies generative-AI information leakage and intellectual-property risks as dangers to consider when using generative-AI services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Saint Joseph University of Beirut (USJ)

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

USJ's CINIA guidance warns that free AI tools may carry privacy-related risks and should be used with awareness of secure and responsible-use considerations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

USJ's CINIA training catalog includes student training on proper use of AI tools, with ethical questions such as data confidentiality, AI-error responsibility, and possible discrimination from biased training data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Shanghai University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Shanghai University's technology ethics notice states that university units and individuals conducting AI, big-data, and related teaching or research activities involving people, animals, or other technology-ethics matters should apply in advance for ethics review related to technology safety, including bioinformation security and data security, and may proceed only after approval.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Shanghai University's academic committee meeting report says the draft temporary generative AI use guide was intended to guide responsible use of generative AI tools in teaching and research, uphold academic integrity, protect data security, and support AI-enabled education reform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech)

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

SUSTech's CS114 Introduction to Generative Artificial Intelligence course specification is course-level curriculum material that says the course covers generative AI history, principles, deployment, interdisciplinary applications, and ethical, security, and privacy discussions; it is not an institutional AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

SUSTech's CS114 course calendar includes lessons on GAI privacy and security, GAI ethics, AI hallucination in large models, GAI-assisted programming, and AI agent engineering; this is course-level curriculum evidence rather than an institutional AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sunway University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

A Sunway University Explore teaching article says academics should prioritise ethical considerations when integrating AI, including safeguarding student data privacy, mitigating algorithmic bias, and ensuring transparency and accountability.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

A Sunway Online article advises postgraduate students to critically evaluate AI-generated information and to take care to attribute AI-generated work, understand content risks, and consider privacy and intellectual-property laws.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Swansea University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Swansea University's AI assessment policy says staff and students should not enter identifiable information into any AI application, and are not permitted to upload student assessment or identifiable data without explicit written consent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Swansea University's student AI framework asks students to apply University policies on data protection, privacy, and academic integrity when selecting and using approved academic work, and to follow assessment instructions around permitted AI use and disclosure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Swinburne University of Technology

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Swinburne's AI usage procedures require AI use to align with its Data Classification and Privacy Frameworks, including restrictions on entering sensitive or restricted data into AI systems without enterprise data protection.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Swinburne has official AI usage procedures that apply to staff, students, researchers, contractors and affiliates using AI tools in Swinburne-related operations and commercial or academic activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech)

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TalTech permits AI technologies in teaching and learning only when they comply with personal data processing, data privacy, and cybersecurity regulations and their use does not violate regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

TalTech's ChatGPT Edu usage rules say users should use ChatGPT primarily for ideas, drafts, and helper text, must not delegate critical decisions to the model, and must not upload sensitive personal, confidential, security-critical, or unauthorized copyrighted content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technical University of Denmark

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

DTU says content subject to GDPR or otherwise critical for DTU or individuals should use Copilot for the web.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

DTU's tool guidance says an AI tool should go through DTU's official channels before use when a responsible person would impose it on others at DTU.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technion - Israel Institute of Technology

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Technion CIS says that when users handle personal or confidential information, only organizational AI tools must be used, and personal or confidential information should not be entered into external tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Technion CIS compares its ChatGPT Education store license with Plus by saying the Education license provides high-level data privacy, encryption, data-retention controls, and a commitment not to use user data for system training unless explicitly authorized by the researcher.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The URZ ChatAI page states that, compared with commercial providers, no data is stored at GWDG or elsewhere or used for training, and open-source models are hosted directly by GWDG.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

A TU Freiberg news item says DeepSeek R1 is available to university members through a GWDG agreement for privacy-compliant testing via AcademicCloud services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technische Universität Berlin (TU Berlin)

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TU Berlin's living AI guidelines say personal data may be entered into generative AI tools only when the operator neither makes the data accessible to third parties nor uses it as training data; confidential information, sensitive research data, and internal documents are not permitted inputs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TU Berlin's data-protection blog recommends limiting personal data in ChatGPT, not sharing confidential information, avoiding personal data especially about third parties, and disabling chat history because otherwise communication is stored long term and may feed training data depending on settings.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technische Universität Dresden

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Chat AI is listed for Technische Universität Dresden in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TU Dresden's public AI-use guidance tells users of external text-generating AI systems not to enter personal data and to use anonymous or anonymized data where possible.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technological University Dublin

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TU Dublin's GenAI teaching and learning guidance says personal data should not be entered into GenAI systems that are not supported or approved by the University, and that students should not collect, store, or upload personal data to a GenAI system without permission or consent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

For sensitive, confidential, intellectual-property, or peer-review research contexts, TU Dublin guidance says only GenAI systems that do not retain data by default or allow retention to be disabled, or systems on closed or bespoke University hardware platforms, should be used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Arizona

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for The University of Arizona in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Arizona AI Tools & Data Use Guide lists free or paid AI tools without an enterprise license, including ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, as allowed for public data and not allowed for internal, restricted, FERPA, HIPAA, PII, PCI, ITAR/EAR, IRB, CUI, or GLBA data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Manchester

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Copilot Chat is available to everyone with a University of Manchester account. The university has a contractual agreement with Microsoft ensuring prompts and uploaded files are private, protected by the same security and encryption as emails and OneDrive. The AI system does not learn from user prompts or data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University recommends Microsoft Copilot for AI-related work. It is GDPR-compliant and protects University and personal data. Staff should always carefully consider whether adding personal information into an AI tool is necessary.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Melbourne

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月6日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Melbourne advises researchers that they should not share confidential information or information about an innovation in a generative AI prompt, as that may mean the IP is no longer owned by the researcher or by the University.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

University of Melbourne students must not upload personal information (full name, date of birth, address, or other confidential/sensitive/private information) to GenAI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Sydney

2 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Sydney has adopted a 'two-lane approach' to assessment: Lane 1 comprises secure, in-person supervised assessments to assure learning, and Lane 2 comprises open assessments that support and scaffold the use of all available and relevant tools including generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Sydney's generative AI guardrails state that confidential, personal, proprietary, or otherwise sensitive information should not be entered into AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tsinghua University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Tsinghua University prohibits teachers and students from using sensitive information, classified data, or unauthorized data to train or operate AI models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Tsinghua University's Guiding Principles establish five core principles for AI in education: principal responsibility (AI as auxiliary tool, teachers and students as primary agents), compliance and integrity, data security, prudence and critical thinking, and fairness and inclusiveness.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tulane University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Tulane guidance says Level 2 Internal, Level 3 Confidential, and Level 4 Restricted data should not be entered into publicly available generative AI tools, and the IT guide separately warns against entering Medium or High Risk Tulane information into public tools not covered by university licensing.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Tulane says procured generative AI tools or systems using generative AI require a security and risk review by the Information Security Office, and the IT guide says high-risk activities such as hiring, student assessments, or legal matters should not use generative AI without first consulting Tulane IT and Information Security.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

UNESP

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Resolution 13/2025 says UNESP AI use should respect Brazil's LGPD, protect personal and sensitive data, and employ security practices to avoid undesired results and damage risks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Resolution 13/2025 says UNESP should implement at least area-specific AI conduct guides, AI/ethics/privacy training for teachers, staff, and students, and an Ombuds channel for reports of violations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

United Arab Emirates University

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UAEU states that students must complete a training session as part of orientation to comply with the GenAI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UAEU requires students to handle personal or sensitive data used with GenAI responsibly and to take precautions to secure GenAI tools and related data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNAM's 2025 education recommendations advise faculty using generative AI in teaching to avoid entering personal or sensitive information into AI platforms and to orient students and colleagues about data privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNAM's 2025 recommendations advise designing strategies for undeclared generative-AI use and caution against indiscriminate use of AI detectors because their effectiveness is questioned and they raise privacy concerns.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Nacional de Colombia

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá guidance recommends AI literacy, ethical and responsible use, reflective integration, clear disclosure of AI use, redesign of tasks and assessments, human supervision, critical reflection, transparency about consequences of misuse, and attention to data security and privacy for teaching activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá AI-use guidance flags data security and privacy for teaching activities and management of sensitive data and privacy for research activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universit de Bretagne Occidentale

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UBO's generative AI charter says generative AI must not be used to process sensitive data, and non-sovereign generative AI must not be used to process confidential data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UBO's generative AI charter says only institution-validated generative AI tools identified as sovereign may be freely used, while respecting the charter principles.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Duisburg-Essen

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UDE tells users of Chat AI that prompts must not contain sensitive or personal data and that uploading copyrighted content is not permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UDE advises ChatGPT and related integration users to consider that interactions with ChatGPT may be logged and used in the referenced court process; it also notes OpenAI models are available in UDE Chat AI and logs are stored by Microsoft for 30 days.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Innsbruck

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Innsbruck offers employees with an active employment relationship access to Academic AI in a protected environment, recommends the in-house Academic AI model, and says staff use of Microsoft Copilot is expressly prohibited for data-protection reasons.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Innsbruck's FAQ advises prompts should be formulated without personal data where possible, confidential data entered into AI generators may no longer be treated as confidential, and freely accessible AI tools should not receive personal or copyright-protected data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Konstanz

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The guidance states that if active use of an AI tool in a course requires registration with personal data, that use must be voluntary because GDPR must be observed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

KIM identifies Chat AI via Academic Cloud as an AI chat service available to university members in Germany through federated login and presents internally hosted models as suitable for sensitive data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Lille

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Universite de Lille's SIAG charter advises users not to transmit sensitive documents or personal data to externally hosted generative AI systems and to check confidentiality policies and GDPR compliance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universite de Lille's SIAG charter says teachers should specify SIAG-use instructions in their courses, inform students how SIAG use is or is not integrated into learning situations and assessments, and cannot require students to use SIAG tools that need personal data or payment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universite libre de Bruxelles

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

ULB's 2025-2026 general study regulations tell students not to disclose to AI personal or confidential data other than their own, and not to implicitly grant AI use rights over copyrighted or confidential productions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ULB's 2025-2026 general study regulations state that student use of personal data contrary to the AI-related confidentiality rules is subject to disciplinary sanction.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Paris Cité

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The official Université Paris Cité GEN-IAS course catalogue states that the DIU covers generative AI in health, including organizational, regulatory, economic and ethical aspects, and targets competencies such as preventing risks, respecting the legal and regulatory environment, ethics, and human guarantee.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An official Université Paris Cité innovation-pedagogy announcement describes the IA-QUEST project as studying an LLM-assisted assessment workflow for medical ECOS, with local open-source LLM deployment framed as enabling RGPD-compliant use for sensitive ECOS data.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Malaya (UM)

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Universiti Malaya guidance warns students not to upload confidential academic materials, research data, or university documents to public AI platforms without permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Universiti Malaya's AI policy includes increasing awareness of ethical risks, copyright issues, data security including data privacy, and algorithmic bias in AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University at Buffalo SUNY

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UBIT guidance says individuals should not enter Category 1 or Category 2 data, including non-public research data, into Gen AI tools that the university has not contracted with.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

A UBIT advisory says UB aligns with SUNY and New York State restrictions on DeepSeek AI, prohibiting its download, access, or use on UB-owned devices or UB networks, and says all AI tools must be reviewed and approved by the UB Software Review team.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University College Dublin

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University College Dublin in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCD guidance directs staff and students toward institutionally supported AI tools that meet University privacy and IT security standards, and warns against entering personal data into external or non-UCD licensed tools.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Aberdeen

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Student guidance says learning materials and assessment information must not be entered into GenAI tools without explicit permission from the author, and students should never enter personal and sensitive data into GenAI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Staff guidance says staff should not enter University data, including student work, research data, or lecture materials, into GenAI tools without appropriate permissions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Alberta

2 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

University of Alberta identifies Gemini via CCID as the institutionally approved generative AI tool for University of Alberta data, while other generative AI tools are not currently authorized for University data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Alberta's AI Data Safety Guidelines are designed to help users determine what data can be safely shared with AI while complying with university Information Security policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bath

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bath staff guidance says confidential or commercially sensitive data should never be shared with AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bath staff guidance says Microsoft Copilot accessed through a university login does not collect chat logs or data or train the wider model, and it advises using Copilot in preference to other tools when handling student data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bergen

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bergen says ChatGPT can only be used for green data and UiBchat can be used for green and yellow data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bergen tells teachers they cannot require students to use services for which UiB does not have a data processing agreement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Irvine

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCI Information Security lists UCI ZotGPT Chat, UCI Microsoft Copilot Chat, and UCI Google Gemini as appropriate for P1, P2, and P3 data, while non-UCI ChatGPT, non-UCI Copilot, and non-UCI Gemini are listed for P1 data only.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UCI Information Security says AI chatbot services involving third-party access to University information need approved-vendor and use-case review for security, privacy, legal, and risk before use, and that high-risk use cases need contracts including UC Appendix DS.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Riverside

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UCR's Provost guidelines state that generative AI tools that have not passed a campus security review may be used with public data only; for other data classifications, UCR points to secure tools including Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

UCR's public generative-AI guidance for instructional settings places course-level use decisions with the Instructor of Record rather than setting one universal student-use rule in the evidence reviewed here.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Cape Town

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCT advises administrative and support staff to treat AI inputs as public and not share personal, confidential, or UCT intellectual property with publicly available AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Before procuring generative AI tools, UCT staff or departments should consult ICTS and the tools must undergo information security and privacy risk assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Colorado Boulder

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Zoom AI is listed for University of Colorado Boulder in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

CU Boulder OIT states that AI tools and integrations are evaluated through the Information Technology Accessibility and Security Review Process and that tools or services not completing campus review breach campus guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Cyprus (UCY)

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCY input-safety guidance says users must exercise great caution with AI-tool inputs and avoid entering personal, confidential, unpublished research, or copyrighted content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UCY research-facing AI guidance tells researchers to anonymize data before using AI for analysis and to confirm approval for AI use involving sensitive data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Engineering & Technology (UET) Lahore

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UET Lahore's admissions privacy policy says the university collects personal, educational, financial, and technical information to provide services, conduct research, and communicate with stakeholders.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UET Lahore's admissions privacy policy says sensitive information is encrypted during transmission, access to personal data is restricted to authorized personnel, personal data is stored securely, and regular audits are conducted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Florida

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UF AI guidance says users should use UF-approved or UF-provided tools for sensitive or restricted data and says restricted or sensitive data is not permitted with cloud models tagged External in NaviGator Chat.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

University of Florida AI guidance says users should not use unapproved AI applications that have not gone through UF risk assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Groningen

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Groningen's AI policy and regulations page tells UG users not to share personal or organizational details with AI systems, to keep human intervention for decisions about other people, and to follow GDPR and related laws.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UG says the Le Chat Enterprise licence is only active on @rug.nl accounts, other external AI tools may only process public information, and medium-confidentiality use requires disabling several tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Guelph

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for University of Guelph in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Guelph information-security guidance says staff and faculty should not enter Internal, Confidential, or Restricted University data into public AI tools, and should avoid entering PII into generative AI tools not reviewed and approved by Information Security.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Helsinki

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

aTrain is listed for University of Helsinki in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Helsinki IT guidance says Copilot may only be used for public or open data and not personal data, while CurreChat may process internal data but not confidential or secret data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Illinois Chicago (UIC)

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UIC College of Medicine policy prohibits students from generating patient care notes with AI applications except EHR-supported applications explicitly permitted by course leadership, and says protected health information should never be entered into outside generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UIC states that students, staff, faculty, and researchers who need to enter high-risk or sensitive data into a generative AI tool or service should submit a ticket to [email protected], and that high-risk or sensitive data in any generative-AI solution must have appropriate contracts and data-use agreements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Isfahan

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

For New Educational Approaches, reviewers may not upload manuscript text to AI tools or prepare reviews with AI, and editors may not use AI tools to analyze, evaluate, or decide on manuscripts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

New Educational Approaches instructs authors to review AI-tool terms for data privacy and intellectual-property implications before use, and forbids tools that may gain unauthorized access to article content or use it for model training.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Kent

2 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Kent in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Kent's public AI data-privacy guidance tells users not to enter personal information, confidential information, sensitive data, or other people's work into AI tools, and specifically says personal or sensitive data should never be put into ChatGPT Edu.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Kentucky

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UK ADVANCE research guidance says data privacy review is needed before Protected Data is entered into a generative AI tool; it also says not to put PHI into such tools unless UKHC InfoSec has confirmed HIPAA compliance and PHI support, and not to place other non-public or proprietary research data into open-source AI without UK ITS GRC approval.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Kentucky CELT guidance frames student generative AI use as a course-level instructor decision and recommends communicating allowed uses, tool restrictions, citation or acknowledgement expectations, and alternatives where privacy concerns exist.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Leeds

2 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Leeds data-restriction guidance says certain data, including passwords, usernames, PII, sensitive or confidential material, University IP, and some copyright-protected or third-party data, must never be put into AI software.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

University of Leeds GenAI tools guidance says Copilot should be used for work purposes, including assessed work, unless there is a good reason why it cannot be used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Limerick

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UL GenAI principles state that any tool used within the university must comply with UL data protection, IT security, and acceptable usage policies, and that cloud tools must be approved through the Cloud Governance process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UL student guidance says Microsoft Copilot accessed through UL staff or student accounts is currently the preferred GenAI platform from a security and data integrity standpoint when GenAI is used by staff or students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Louisville

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Louisville Delphi Center says current AI detection tools are unreliable, raise data privacy, FERPA, and student-consent risks, and should never be the sole basis for an academic integrity decision.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UofL ITS AI guidance states that federal privacy regulations and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework should be followed, and that users are individually responsible for misuse of systems and data mishandling involving student data, intellectual property, and protected personal information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Maryland, Baltimore County

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For administrative AI use, UMBC's DoIT guidance says that unless a user is using a tool from the GenAI Tools page, only public data may be used with a generative AI service and use of UMBC proprietary data is forbidden.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UMBC's DoIT GenAI Tools guidance says UMBC content that is not public should not be used with a GenAI service unless UMBC has verified that the service is safe to use, and says UMBC has several tools verified as safe for Level 1 and FERPA data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Messina (UniME)

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UniME published a 2025 technical-administrative staff training course on privacy, GDPR, and artificial intelligence that references responsible and transparent AI use, privacy protection, the AI Act, and AgID guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UniME published a 2025 technical-administrative staff training course on artificial intelligence in workplace contexts, focused on conscious, secure, ethical use and compliance with privacy, security, and responsibility rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Milan

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For AI use in research, the University of Milan guidance emphasizes data protection, operation traceability and regulatory compliance during AI-supported data analysis, and cautions against entering sensitive information into AI systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

For administrative activities, the University of Milan says its AI adoption follows AGID public-administration guidelines and uses a methodology that considers AI Act compliance, data quality, personal data protection and cybersecurity requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Pending university AI-use guidelines, Unimore recommended verifying sources, keeping human control by using AI only as assistance, requesting source citations in prompts, protecting sensitive data, and documenting AI use in proceedings.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For ChatGPT Edu licenses, Unimore stated that inserted data would not be used to train models and that users remain owners of inputs and outputs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Murcia

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月24日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Murcia library AI page frames responsible AI use as including privacy, intellectual property, ethics, and confidentiality considerations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Murcia library AI page summarizes European research guidance saying researchers should abstain from using generative AI tools in sensitive activities such as peer review or evaluations, and should use generative AI respecting privacy, confidentiality, and intellectual property rights.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Namur

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For students, unless course objectives or explicit instructor authorization allow it, UNamur says they cannot introduce non-anonymized or non-pseudonymized personal data into prompts addressed to generative-AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Namur frames generative AI use around five guiding principles: transparency, training, critical reflection, respect for protected materials/personal data/confidential information, and responsibility for final outputs and consequences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Navarra

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Navarra's AI policy says AI systems must be developed and used in accordance with applicable privacy, personal data protection, and European AI Act requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Navarra's AI policy says confidential information and any personal data should not be entered into some AI dialogue interfaces because the information may become training data or appear in outputs for others.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of New England Australia

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月24日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNE's HDR generative AI guidance warns that failure to reference generative AI content may be considered academic or research misconduct, and lists risks including unacknowledged AI output, inaccurate AI-generated references, substantive AI-generated thesis or publication content, peer review or ethics-clearance use, and disclosure of sensitive or confidential material to generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNE's HDR generative AI guidance cautions that inputting research data into AI can risk loss of copyright or intellectual property control and can have serious implications if sensitive or highly sensitive data is inadvertently released.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of New Mexico

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNM AI Resources guidance says AI tools should only be used with identifiable UNM data classified as public data unless approved by the appropriate UNM Data Steward or other appropriate office.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNM AI Resources guidance directs users to contact their office or department IT Officer before using identifiable FERPA data in AI platforms so a risk assessment can be initiated.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNC Charlotte OneIT's AI security checklist instructs users not to enter confidential or legally restricted data, including FERPA, HIPAA, PCI, or Level 3 data, into an AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UNC Charlotte OneIT rates some campus AI tools as approved for use with data handling guidelines, while AI detection software and AI grading software are listed as Do Not Use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Rochester

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Rochester Provost guidance says non-public or sensitive University information should not be uploaded into external AI tools unless there is a university agreement with the vendor approved by an AI governance group.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

University of Rochester research guidance frames responsible GenAI use in research around data protection, verification, and transparency, including only considering low-risk data generally suitable for GenAI and using appropriate internal review for medium- or high-risk data.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of South Carolina

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of South Carolina Division of IT guidance for students says conversations and files in USC's ChatGPT Edu environment stay private within USC's secure system and are not used to train external AI models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

University of South Carolina Division of IT guidance says unauthorized third-party AI bots compromise USC network security and that proposed software, including add-ins or add-on apps, should be reviewed and approved by the Technical Review Board after the IT Purchasing process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of South Florida

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of South Florida in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

USF guidance tells users not to share student data, employment data, or other protected or sensitive information when using publicly available AI tools, and to continue complying with FERPA and HIPAA.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tabuk

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tabuk's official privacy policy covers electronic services and personal-data processing under Saudi personal-data law and SDAIA; this is general data-governance context, not AI-tool guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tabuk's official policies-and-regulations page lists data, privacy, and security policies as adjacent governance context; the verified official-source search did not identify a public university-wide AI or generative-AI policy item.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Texas at Dallas

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UT Dallas OIT guidance says users should not enter confidential data into publicly available generative AI tools and that no FERPA or HIPAA information may be used in generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

For official UT Dallas duties, Information Security guidance recommends faculty and staff use AI tools provided by UT Dallas rather than personal access to public or vended platforms that have not been approved or evaluated for security.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Toronto

2 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Toronto teaching guidance says Microsoft Copilot is the recommended generative AI tool to use at U of T and, when signed in with University credentials, conforms to U of T privacy and security standards for use with up to level 3 data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Toronto Information Security guidelines state that no data should be provided to generative AI if any part of that data should not be included in results produced by that system, and users must verify AI tools have been assessed by the university as suitable for the data classification level before sharing personal information or university data classified as level 2, 3 or 4.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Westminster

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Westminster's academic research GenAI guidance tells researchers and academic staff not to enter confidential or sensitive data into public or commercial generative AI tools, and to have specialist tools assessed by ISS when confidential data is involved.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

University of Westminster's GenAI policy requires GenAI-related data to be handled in line with data protection and security requirements, and says high-risk GenAI systems should not go into production without remediation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Zilina

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Zilina prohibits employees and students from entering sensitive data into publicly available GenAI tools, including non-public university data, non-public study materials, test assignments, intellectual-property-protected materials, personal data without explicit written consent, preliminary research results, and trade-secret data of partners.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

If University of Zilina provides paid licenses for GenAI tools, employees and students are directed to prefer them over unverified free tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Uppsala University

2 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Uppsala University's central guidelines say sensitive personal data may only be transferred to a university-approved generative AI system, and student material may not be transferred without the student's permission to a generative AI system that might use it to train the system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Uppsala University's research AI introduction states that it is practical support rather than a rulebook; its quickstart guidance tells researchers to use Copilot Chat via UU login, never share sensitive or confidential information in an AI tool, double-check AI-generated material, and document how AI tools are used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Utah State University

2 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Utah State University's AI Use & Compliance guidance says sensitive, restricted, or confidential data should not be uploaded or processed in AI tools unless the university has an established privacy agreement with the provider.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Utah State University's research compliance guidance strongly encourages faculty to consider confidentiality when deciding whether AI use is appropriate for research and says researchers should not input confidential, proprietary, or restricted human-subjects data into a generative AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Verona University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Verona University's AI guidelines prohibit entering personal data without a suitable legal basis, special-category personal data except as allowed by applicable rules, or confidential/secret information into AI systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Verona University's AI guidelines say important decisions cannot be entrusted entirely to AI, and decisions with legal effects or significant rights impacts require human supervision and validation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vilnius University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Vilnius University's AI guidelines say confidential information, personal data, sensitive information, and unpublished research data must not be uploaded to generative AI models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Vilnius University Business School guidelines say public or free AI tools must not receive research data, study materials, work drafts, notes, or personal information, and Level 2-5 data must not be entered unless approved by the University and explicitly permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Virginia Tech provides access to vetted AI tools and states that AI tools not explicitly approved may only be used with low-risk, public data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Virginia Tech's Division of Information Technology asks community members not to share personal, sensitive, or high-risk university data in publicly available AI platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

VSB - Technical University of Ostrava

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

VSB-TUO's AI rules prohibit entering sensitive data, trade-secret data, unpublished research results, intellectual-property-protected data, or sensitive contractual partner data into AI tools, and say all inputs must comply with EU GDPR law.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For teachers, VSB-TUO's AI rules list impermissible uses including automated grading of professional papers, essays, projects, and qualification theses, correcting tests, and entering students' personal data such as names, results, or health status into AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Wageningen University & Research

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

WUR's student GenAI rules warn that content fed into external GenAI tools may be stored indefinitely and tell students never to put others' personal data, intellectual-property-infringing information, or sensitive or confidential research data into a public GenAI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

WUR Library guidance says AI use should be documented, AI should not be cited as a source or author, publisher policies should be checked for writing and publishing, and peer reviewers should not upload non-published manuscripts into externally hosted tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Washington State University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

WSU Provost AI-related policy guidance says Executive Policy 8 prohibits putting legally protected or regulated data, including proprietary, personally identifiable, HIPAA, or FERPA data, into generative AI platform queries.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

WSU Office of Research guidance says researchers should generally not input sensitive data into externally sourced generative AI tools because such tools are unlikely to meet WSU data security policy requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Western Sydney University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Western Sydney University's AI policy commits the University to security-by-design, protecting sensitive data and personal information, educating users about AI application risks and requirements, and using data consistently with cybersecurity, privacy, and safety commitments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Western Sydney University's Study Smart guidance identifies Microsoft Co-Pilot and Adobe Firefly as tools available to students where generative AI use is permitted, and advises caution against entering personal or confidential information even with commercial data protection.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For the XIPU AI platform, XJTLU's strategic framework sets an objective to establish ethical-use guidelines focusing on data privacy, bias mitigation, and transparency.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

XJTLU's official teaching resource on AI chatbots identifies reliability and accuracy problems, data privacy, potential bias, and academic integrity risk as challenges that need to be addressed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yeshiva University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Yeshiva University's faculty and staff AI acceptable use policy says faculty and staff must not input Internal or Restricted Information, or information identifiable to a person, third party, or the University, into Generative AI tools except when expressly permitted by ITS after contract and security-control review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Yeshiva University's faculty and staff AI acceptable use policy says all users of AI are required to complete a training program on ethical use of AI covering responsible use, ethical considerations, privacy, data protection, and policy compliance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

AMU research guidance warns that using online generative AI usually sends prompt information to the service provider, and recommends anonymizing content such as names, places, dates, and other person-identifying fragments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Aix-Marseille University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The AMU-hosted ObsiaFormation guide frames responsible educational AI use as including verification of tool reliability and attention to ethics, including data protection.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Freiburg Rechenzentrum says that, when Open WebUI internal models are used, all data remains within the secured university environment, while external-model requests go through the university central API access.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bologna community members covered by the teaching and research GenAI policy are responsible for not entering third-party personal data or confidential/protected information into online GenAI systems unless an appropriate legal basis, consent, or confidentiality assurance exists.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ataturk University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Ataturk University's journal AI policy says confidential patient data, ethics-committee-requiring data, or copyrighted works cannot be uploaded to generative AI systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Auburn University

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Auburn guidance says operational or confidential data should never be shared with AI tools unless specific legally binding data security protection agreements and procedures are in place.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

BUET Registrar Office describes its mission as including security and privacy for the university's academic records, including advice and training for faculty and staff on privacy issues.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bar-Ilan University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Bar-Ilan University guidance instructs users not to disclose personal or sensitive information to generative AI platforms and says generative AI tools must adhere to Bar-Ilan data security guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Beijing University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Beijing University of Technology's 2025 undergraduate thesis detection notice said all 2025 undergraduate theses had to undergo plagiarism checking, content review, AIGC detection, and formatting-standard checks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ben-Gurion University of The Negev

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

BGU Library AI guidance warns that information entered into a language model is used for future learning and is exposed to some extent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bilkent University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Bilkent's GenAI guideline advises students to avoid sharing personal, confidential, or sensitive information with AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bogaziçi Üniversitesi

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Bogaziçi University's accessible official ethics source provides general institutional ethics principles, including learning and teaching freedom, protection of confidential information, and careful use of institutional resources; this staged run did not locate an accessible official AI-specific use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Brno University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

VUT warns users to ensure they are authorized to share data with generative-AI tools and to pay special attention to personal and other sensitive data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Brunel University of London

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Brunel's student GenAI guidance advises students to avoid entering personal details, confidential records, identifiable information, or personal documents into generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ca' Foscari University of Venice

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Ca' Foscari's administrative AI guidelines tell technical administrative staff not to input personal data, contract data, or protected copyright or confidentiality-restricted data into AI tools unless the relevant permission exists.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Carleton University

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Carleton instructor guidance says confidential, sensitive, or institutional data should use only Carleton-approved AI tools, and discourages adopting third-party tools that have not been cleared for privacy and security by the university.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Case Western Reserve University

1 匹配声明 from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

CWRU University Technology advises users not to put sensitive university information into an AI service unless CWRU has a vendor contract with appropriate privacy and security safeguards.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Catania University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

DMI's student guide says AI use should be avoided when it involves sharing personal or sensitive data of students or faculty.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chang Gung University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Chang Gung University general generative AI guidance warns users not to enter sensitive information into public AI platforms and to follow privacy and security rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chiba University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Chiba University's guideline tells students not to enter personal information or confidential information into generative AI and notes the information-leakage risk of entering unpublished research plans or research results.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

China Medical University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

China Medical University's Academic Affairs guidance cautions teachers and students to pay attention to privacy and information security and avoid entering personal or other people's private information into generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chonnam National University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Chonnam's generative-AI writing assignment guideline cautions learners that information entered into generative AI may be stored on servers and used to improve performance, so they should be careful about security and information leakage.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chulalongkorn University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Chulalongkorn guidance prohibits uploading organizational confidential information or personal information into AI systems without consent from the concerned individuals.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

City St George’s, University of London

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

City St George's provides Microsoft Copilot Chat free for students and recommends logging in with University credentials for data security, while warning students not to enter personal, sensitive, confidential, or copyrighted material into generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

City University of Hong Kong (CityUHK)

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CityUHK Chatbot is listed for City University of Hong Kong (CityUHK) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutional ai service.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

City University of New York

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

CUNY's AI Academic Hub lists Privacy & Data Protection, including FERPA compliance, among its guiding AI principles and advises avoiding sensitive or identifiable data when working with AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Comillas Pontifical University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Comillas prohibits entering restricted data into any generative AI tool or service without the corresponding approval, including protected or personal data not authorized by the DPO or not meeting security measures.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For FAPPZ CZU final theses, the 2026 dean's instruction says unpublished data, sensitive or personal data, and confidential information must not be entered into AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

De La Salle University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

DLSU's policy says personal and highly sensitive information, internal university documents, proprietary research, and confidential information should never be shared with generative AI services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Diponegoro University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy tells reviewers and editors not to upload confidential manuscript or review materials into AI tools and not to use generative AI to evaluate manuscripts or make editorial judgments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Dongguk University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

The official Dongguk generative AI service guide says custom chatbots can be made public through store registration, but store registration requires an administrator approval process; private chatbots are usable only by their creator.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Durham University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月7日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Durham staff may choose whether and how to use GenAI in teaching, but must be open and transparent about this and operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

East China Normal University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The ECNU-published student AIGC guide states that students should self-check AIGC-generated content for disputed issues including accuracy, intellectual property, and data privacy, and remain responsible for submitted work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Edinburgh Napier University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Edinburgh Napier University's generative AI position says academic staff should never require students to sign up for or use Gen AI tools, citing privacy, ethical, and environmental concerns, and should provide an alternative means of engaging with the task.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Eindhoven University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TU/e warns AI users not to enter sensitive information or data and to follow the GDPR because AI tools carry privacy, security, storage, copyright, NDA, intellectual property, and data-processing risks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Eötvös Loránd University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

ELTE's rector instruction prohibits using sensitive or non-public research data, personal data or special categories of personal data, and NDA-covered or business-secret information as inputs to AI systems, except in the authorization cases described by the instruction.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Flinders University

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Flinders University's AI position statement says AI should be used responsibly, ethically, and transparently, with attention to privacy, security, stakeholder needs, and ongoing evaluation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Florida International University

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

FIU Libraries' student AI guide advises caution about supplying sensitive, personal, confidential, or proprietary information or data when interacting with AI models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

FAU guidance tells users to choose AI tools with data-protection compliance and not to enter personal, confidential, copyright-protected, or personal data into AI systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Fudan University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

复旦大学学生工作部公开页面援引《复旦大学关于在本科毕业论文(设计)中使用 AI 工具的规定(试行)》称,本科毕业论文写作中使用 AI 工具辅助需经老师同意并披露使用情况,数据收集、核心观点提炼等创新工作不可依赖 AI,涉密和隐私内容禁止使用 AI。

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Gadjah Mada University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

PCD Journal's publication policy prohibits AI-generated arguments, substantive text, intellectual conclusions, literature reviews, bibliographies, fabricated data, and sensitive un-anonymized human-subject data entered into public AI platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Gazi Üniversitesi

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Gazi Üniversitesi's generative AI guide recommends that users not enter personal and important institutional data into generative AI systems because data disclosure may occur.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

German Jordanian University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

GJU's AI principles require disclosure of AI tool use in academic and research tasks and say sensitive data should not be entered into AI tools without consent from the relevant authorities and individuals concerned.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Goethe University Frankfurt's general Lehre virtuell guidance tells users not to enter personal or sensitive information when using AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For the NRF-scoped guidance relayed by GIST, the listed recommendations include not uploading evaluation materials to AI tools, indicating AI tool use, verifying reliability and validity, and caution about research-data leakage.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hanyang University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Hanyang University's AI@Hanyang guidance advises users not to enter personal information, confidential information, or other sensitive information into AI, and to use generative AI carefully because of security limits.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hokkaido University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

When generative AI is used to assist with grading submitted assignments, Hokkaido University's notes warn faculty not to enter students' personal or private information because entered data may be stored and output to other users.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Holy Spirit University of Kaslik

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For the Arab Economic and Business Journal, reviewers and editors must never upload, share, or input submitted manuscript material or peer review reports into publicly available generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hong Kong Metropolitan University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

HKMU's generative-AI guidelines say users must never input confidential, sensitive, or personal data into generative-AI tools, especially tools not supported by HKMU.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Huazhong Agricultural University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月22日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Huazhong Agricultural University's AI agent norm requires data-security and privacy protections, content review, filing with the Information Technology Center for all on-campus AI agents, and a prohibition on putting confidential information into AI agent systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

HUFS - Hankuk (Korea) University of Foreign Studies

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

HUFS describes its AI Data Convergence curriculum as including AI ethics and philosophy, and the broader AI Data Convergence program page also names privacy, security, and AI ethics lecture areas.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

IAU tells students not to use university email to register for AI tools and not to enter personal, confidential, restricted, or university-owned data into AI tools without permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Science

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

IISc faculty-facing AI guidance says entering data into an open AI tool should be treated like posting it publicly unless there are strong reasons to trust the tool, and says not to input sensitive, confidential, or restricted information into open AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says users must not feed non-public, institutional, sensitive, or personally identifiable information into AI platforms, and it says AI transcription of interview and survey data is not permissible when confidentiality, anonymity, consent, or DPDP Act obligations would be affected.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IIT-KGP)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

IIT Kharagpur's B.Tech. in AI curriculum includes a core course titled Responsible and Trustworthy AI covering responsible AI, bias and risk assessment, privacy-aware learning, model safety, and accountability.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

FITB guidance says students are prohibited from entering personal, sensitive, and confidential data into GenAI and are prohibited from using deepfakes for disinformation or manipulation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

IIUM's AI policy requires AI systems to comply with Malaysia's PDPA 2010, restricts sharing data with third-party AI platforms without consent and proper agreements, and requires AI-training data to be anonymized and securely stored.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

INTI International University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

INTI's official Privacy Policy states that personal information provided to INTI will be processed under Malaysia's Data Protection Act 2010 and other relevant legislation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Jilin University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Official JLU News articles report university-leader statements that teachers and students should follow academic norms, truth-seeking scientific spirit, disclose use of AI tools when using AI-generated content, and retain user responsibility.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

JGU library guidance warns AI-tool users to check legal and privacy conditions, avoid disclosing private or sensitive data, and consider server location, publisher restrictions, rights, and upload permissions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Johannes Kepler University Linz

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

JKU's scientific-work agreement prohibits entering real collected datasets into AI systems for the covered bachelor-work data-analysis use case.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Johns Hopkins University

1 匹配声明 from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The Johns Hopkins Teaching @ JHU generative AI guidance hub includes dedicated topics for FERPA guidelines, HIPAA guidelines, ownership of data, and ethical considerations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Jouf University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月22日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Jouf University says the adopted AI course gives special attention to ethical and social aspects, including algorithmic bias, privacy, data protection, and legal and regulatory challenges linked to AI technologies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

JMU guidance warns users not to enter personal, sensitive, unpublished personal, or confidential data into AI tools or prompts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kaohsiung Medical University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kaohsiung Medical University's student generative AI guidance says students must not use generative AI tools for plagiarism or ghostwriting, cheating during exams, or privacy leakage.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Keele University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Keele's framework identifies Microsoft Copilot as the institutional GenAI tool available free to staff and students as part of Microsoft Office 365, and says other AI tools must consider accessibility, equitable access, GDPR, and data privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The university's official regulations index lists an information security policy, ҚС-ХҚТУ-01-2020 - Ахмет Ясауи университетінің ақпараттық қауіпсіздік саясаты.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

King Faisal University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

King Faisal University's Arabic privacy policy states that the university protects beneficiary data when users access its electronic services and systems, preserving privacy through administrative controls and technical measures under relevant regulations and policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

King Saud University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Students may not use generative AI tools to process confidential King Saud University information, such as student records or internal policies, without official university authorization.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

KIT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

KIT's KI-Toolbox terms allow personal data only through locally hosted KIT models and prohibit processing personal data through Azure OpenAI models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kobe University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Kobe University warns students that entering highly confidential information or personal information into generative AI may lead to information leakage or disclosure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kuwait University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For employees, Kuwait University's GenAI policy says employees have the right to use GenAI to support work, but should not upload sensitive data to GenAI tools because it might be published for others.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kyung Hee University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Kyung Hee's ChatKHU guide instructs members not to enter or upload personal information, unpublished important data, research data, evaluation materials, or confidential university documents into ChatKHU or external AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kyushu University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Kyushu University's basic stance cautions users not to carelessly enter personal, privacy-related, or confidential information into generative AI, and not to carelessly use outputs containing such information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The eLUT AI tools guideline says use of AI applications must not compromise data protection, information security, or privacy, and gives health, confidential, and sensitive personal information as examples of data not to enter into AI applications.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

LMU IfKW guidance says material containing personal information must not be entered into AI systems without consent and unless German or EU data-protection standards are met.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Mahidol University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Mahidol University's GenAI policy states that Generative AI use must consider data security and privacy, and that related data collection, storage, and use must comply with applicable laws and regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Manchester Metropolitan University.

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Manchester Metropolitan University's teaching guidance says it has opted out of enabling AI-generated text detection software for the foreseeable future and tells colleagues not to upload student work into online AI detection services because they are unreliable and the uploaded data is not secure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The MLU-KI usage terms state that entering personal data is not permitted, including third-party data and special categories of personal data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Masaryk University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

CSIRT-MU warns that DeepSeek products pose risks to university environments and says Masaryk University does not recommend using DeepSeek products for work or personal use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Maynooth University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Maynooth University student GenAI guidance says Microsoft Copilot is accessible to all MU students and that MU currently has a data agreement with Microsoft making its Copilot use GDPR-compliant; the same protection does not apply to free or paid tools not supported by MU.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Memorial University of Newfoundland

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Memorial CIO guidance says university data should be handled with AI tools that are approved or recommended by the university, and users should avoid uploading sensitive or confidential data to unsecured AI platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Michigan Technological University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Michigan Tech Policy 1.20 tells university affiliates to avoid submitting tier 1 confidential or restricted MTU data to AI tools, with limited use only when explicit contractual protections exist and written consent is obtained from the CIO, CISO, or General Counsel.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Middlesex University

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Middlesex copyright guidance flags GDPR infringement as a legal and ethical issue where personal data is included in AI-sourced, uploaded, or generated content, and notes that AI tool terms may require users to own or have permission for uploaded content and grant retention and reuse permissions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Missouri University of Science and Technology

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Missouri S&T's Information Technology AI best practices caution users not to use AI with sensitive data unless approved, including student information, restricted grant information, unpublished research, or other works in progress.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nagasaki University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月22日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Nagasaki University's student notice warns that entering unpublished papers or confidential information, including personal or privacy information, into generative AI may cause unintended information outflow or leakage.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nagoya University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Nagoya University states that students must not enter personal information or other confidential information into generative AI because information entered as prompts may leak.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nanjing University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Nanjing University undergraduate guidance says students should use nationally registered AI services and forbids uploading data, images, or other sensitive information from confidential papers or reports to AI platforms unless specially approved by relevant departments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For 2025 undergraduate graduation design/thesis work, NUAA says text and data involving privacy or confidentiality must not be uploaded to AI platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nankai University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Nankai University's undergraduate AI tool norm prohibits AI use for confidential or sensitive-content creation, uploading confidential content to AI platforms, generating or altering core arguments or research data, academic misconduct such as ghostwriting, plagiarism, or copying, and AI use in listed midterm and final assessment formats unless a teacher explains a special-use case in advance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月5日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

NTU prohibits uploading confidential, sensitive, or personal data to external generative AI platforms unless specific conditions are met: legal compliance, restricted access, no data retention, and written permission from data owners.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Library publishes a Greek guidance page on artificial intelligence and research that describes AI as supporting research and education while flagging issues such as privacy and intellectual property.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Central University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

National Central University's Computer Center announcement advised that generative AI use should avoid disclosing non-public official information or personal private information and should not completely trust generated information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Cheng Kung University (NCKU)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

NCKU guidance tells faculty, students, and researchers not to provide unpublished research or sensitive content to generative AI, notes that shared data may be retained as training data, and says generative AI should be avoided in confidential research activities such as peer review or research-proposal review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Chengchi University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

NCCU's generative AI principles tell students to avoid involving personal privacy data when using generative tools, and tell administrative staff not to provide confidential official content, personal privacy information, or non-public unit information to generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Sun Yat-sen University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NSYSU's student generative AI guidance says students may not use generative AI tools for plagiarism or ghostwriting, cheating on exams, or privacy disclosure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Taipei University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

NTUT guidance cautions generative AI users to avoid entering personal data, unpublished documents, or confidential information into generative AI tools to reduce leakage risk and protect information security.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

NTNU's guideline cautions that content entered into GAI may be recorded and used for training, and advises users not to input unpublished documents or personal information unless necessary.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU Taiwan)

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

NYCU's GenAI statement tells teachers and students to pay attention to privacy and information security when using GenAI for teaching or learning, and to avoid entering their own or others' private information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

New York University (NYU)

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

NYU institutional accounts for Gemini and NotebookLM do not train AI models on user data and do not log queries or answers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For undergraduate theses and designs involving confidential content, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University prohibits using any AI tool and prohibits uploading any data to AI platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Norwegian University of Life Sciences

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

NMBU's Norwegian student guidance tells students not to use AI to process personal data or sensitive matters.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Norwegian University of Science And Technology

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

GPT NTNU guidance permits use with open and internal data, but says GPT NTNU must not be used to assess, process, or analyze information about people.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Osaka University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Osaka University's student-facing generative AI message warns that prompts and input content may be stored or learned by the system and tells students to avoid providing personal or confidential information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

PIEAS states on its website privacy policy that it collects the least personally identifiable information required for its duties or transactions and intends to take reasonable steps against unauthorized access or disclosure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Palacký University Olomouc

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UP's recommendations warn that personal data, sensitive information, and potential UP intellectual property entered into AI systems must be handled responsibly because such data is usually made available to a third party and control over it may be lost.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Paris Lodron University of Salzburg

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The guide advises against entering personal or copyright-protected data into freely accessible free AI tools and recommends the University of Salzburg licensed tools Microsoft Copilot in M365 or Academic AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Philipps-Universität Marburg

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The HRZ AI services page says the university offers generative AI services via GWDG KI-Cloud and lists usage rules including no prompt/file input of personal, confidential, or security-relevant data and transparent disclosure when the service is used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pohang University of Science And Technology (POSTECH)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

POSTECH says it discussed data security, data sovereignty, operating structure, scalability, and governance before later implementation tasks including POSTECH AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Politecnico di Bari

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Politecnico di Bari states that ZoE conversations are not directly associated with the user's personal identity, are managed with a technical session identifier, may be retained anonymously for technical monitoring and improvement, and do not involve automated decisions with legal effects.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

PUCV teaching-development guidance warns that improper use of AI tools such as ChatGPT can expose personal and institutional data without protection guarantees.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana's CAE+E guidance says research use of generative AI should consider protocols for handling sensitive or personal participant information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

PUC-Rio publishes an official personal-data processing and website privacy policy covering PUC-Rio and websites under the puc-rio.br domain.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd university

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

PMU's IT policy states that IT resources are primarily for university work and that PMU may monitor IT resource use and disclose necessary information for law, regulation, or government requests.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University's ITDL Policies page lists official data-related policy documents including Open Data, Data Classification, Data Sharing, and Personal Data Protection policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Quaid-i-Azam University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The official QAU Department of Computer Sciences BS page lists Artificial Intelligence as a focus area and includes AI Assisted Programming among elective courses; this is curriculum evidence, not a university-wide AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Queensland University of Technology (QUT)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

QUT Library guidance says staff must not require students to use GenAI for learning and assessment outside tools provided by QUT because of data security, intellectual property and privacy concerns.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For the FALKO teaching project, the central VND page says model training and implementation are to be data-protection-compliant under the EU AI Act.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Rice University

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Rice Technology Solutions and Services AI Usage Guidelines say sensitive or confidential information covered by University Policy 808 should not be used with consumer-focused or publicly available AI services, and generative AI services should be reviewed by the Information Security Office before licensing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Royal Holloway, University of London

1 匹配声明 from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance says postgraduate researchers should not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party AI tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

RUDN University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education editorial AI policy says reviewers should not enter manuscript content into publicly available or cloud-based AI services without explicit editor permission and compliance with confidentiality rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Rutgers University–New Brunswick

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Rutgers states that confidential information, protected health information, and proprietary Rutgers information may not be appropriate for use in AI applications and systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Saarland University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Saarland University guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat and HAWKI as available platforms, says HAWKI meets the university's data-protection requirements, and states that ChatGPT is not provided by the university so users are responsible for considering data-protection aspects themselves.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sabanci University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Sabancı University Information Center guidance warns users not to share sensitive or personal information with AI tools because generative AI tools collect and store user data and may be vulnerable to data breaches.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sejong University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Sejong University's 2026 AI usage guideline tells students not to enter sensitive personal information into AI systems and not to upload undisclosed research data or internal assignment materials because of leakage risk.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Shandong University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

To avoid copyright, privacy, security, and confidentiality risks, the journal notice states that the journal will not use publicly available generative-AI platforms to review papers during initial, re-review, or final-review stages.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sharif University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Sharif University's accessible official privacy statement is a general website privacy source: it says the university considers users' privacy binding, collects only information sufficient to provide services, and says it does not publish or provide that information to others; it is not AI-specific guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Shenzhen University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Shenzhen University guidance prohibits uploading confidential content to AI tools unless otherwise specified and prohibits uploading personal information, privacy, and other sensitive data to AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Simon Fraser University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

SFU guidance for faculty and staff says personal or confidential information should not be entered into AI tools that have not completed an SFU Privacy Impact Assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sorbonne University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations say not to transmit non-public or unpublished content, personal data, confidential data, or sensitive data to a generative AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Southeast University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For AI+ graduate course project applications, the Graduate School notice says proposed course content must comply with national laws, policies, correct orientation requirements, confidentiality restrictions, and intellectual property requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Stockholm University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Stockholm University's AI resources page says employees signed in to Microsoft 365 with a university account have data protection for Copilot, but it also says information at confidentiality level 3 or 4 should not be entered into Copilot.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Stony Brook University, State University of New York

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Stony Brook guidance warns users not to enter sensitive, personal, or proprietary information into generative AI tools without understanding the protections provided by the tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Taif University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The same Taif University page says the AI guiding manual focuses on general principles for using AI to support education and research quality, protect academic integrity and data, and guide universities on internal policies, optimal use, digital security, and digital skills.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

KNU's AI regulation says AI use should respect confidentiality and protect personal data, and it prohibits sending personal, confidential, or official information to AI systems without proper legal grounds.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technical University of Darmstadt

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TU Darmstadt's data protection page says personal data may be used in AI-related teaching only under data protection rules and identifies prompt submitters as responsible for AI-generated data protection violations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technische Universität Wien

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TU Wien's teacher handout tells instructors to raise awareness that data entered into AI models requires caution and compliance with data-protection rules, and warns not to enter personal or identifying data in prompts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tel Aviv University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TAU student guidance advises students to avoid sharing personal or sensitive information with AI tools and to check data-use settings.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Texas Tech University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Texas Tech faculty guidance states that the university does not hold institutional agreements with generative AI providers and cautions faculty not to input private or sensitive data into AI platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

1 匹配声明 from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

HKUST advises users not to input confidential, sensitive, or personal data into generative AI tools unless data is desensitized.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Hong Kong

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月5日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

HKU states that input data used with generative AI should comply with data protection laws and university policies, and that users should avoid sharing sensitive, confidential, or proprietary information with GenAI platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Melbourne

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

SparkAI is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Newcastle, Australia (UON)

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UON's GenAI research guideline says researchers are responsible for protecting unpublished or sensitive work by not uploading it into online AI systems without assurance that the data will not be reused to train future models or for untraceable data use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Queensland

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is UQ's enterprise AI tool, available to UQ staff and students, and the UQ Library says it provides a higher level of data security and privacy than other AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Tennessee system AI policy says protected university data must not be entered into AI technology that has not been reviewed by the University CIO or designee and authorized for use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tohoku University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Tohoku University's generative AI guidance cautions that unpublished research results, confidential information, entrance-exam information, and student or staff personal information can be exposed to service providers or other users through generative AI and translation services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月13日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Science Tokyo's guideline says users should not enter required-confidential information, personal information, or similar data into terms-of-service external generative AI services; it states that entering required-confidential or personal information into free external generative AI services is prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ton Duc Thang University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TDTU Library's responsible AI guide cautions AI Corner users not to enter personal information or sensitive data into AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tongji University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Tongji University's information-system construction standard says projects involving artificial intelligence services should register with the Informatization Office in advance, ensure related filing is completed, and in principle use the school standard platform designated by the managing unit for agent design and development.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

TU Dortmund University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TU Dortmund's ChatGPT handout warns against using AI tools to check examination work and says uploading student names or matriculation numbers would implicate GDPR requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

UCSI University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For thesis and dissertation preparation, UCSI's postgraduate guidelines state that confidential or sensitive data must not be entered into third-party AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ulster University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Ulster University's student guidance tells students to be very careful about what they upload to GenAI tools and says never to input personal information, confidential or sensitive data, placement, patient or client scenarios, draft assignments or reflective work, unpublished research data, or copyrighted material.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Umea University

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Umeå University's IT strategy says university-wide AI services have undergone necessary controls, and that AI services should be managed like other IT services under the university's system or cloud-service acquisition instructions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Umm Al-Qura University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For Umm Al-Qura University journals, reviewers are told not to use AI tools to generate, summarize, or draft confidential peer-review reports, and to avoid uploading confidential research content to third-party AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UAM's guide recommends that students avoid providing generative AI tools with personal or sensitive information that could be used to train or feed the tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UC3M states that personal data for which the university is responsible must not be entered into external-provider AI platforms without Data Protection Officer approval for an exception.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The CITEP/UBA guidance says AI use in education should consider personal-data protection and digital security, noting that not all AI tools safeguard entered information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Chile

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The FCFM guidance warns teaching teams that inadequate use of generative AI can create ethics risks such as plagiarism and copyright issues, and security/privacy risks such as insufficient data protection or data use without consent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Costa Rica

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCR's institutional AI governance framework identifies personal-data protection as a guiding principle for AI decisions and secure information handling.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de los Andes

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The Uniandes guidance recommends that users avoid entering personal, third-party, or confidential information into generative AI prompts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Sevilla

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The Universidad de Sevilla Decálogo warns that free AI tools may use submitted data for learning and improvement, and says personal or confidential data should only be used with corporate tools that guarantee data protection and privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade Católica Portuguesa

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCP guidance says copyright-protected material, personal data, and confidential information should be respected and not exported to externally managed platforms, servers, or cloud services that are not licensed by UCP.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade de Brasília

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The UnB-hosted Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Americas instructs reviewers not to use generative AI to analyze or summarize submitted articles, and prohibits importing unpublished manuscripts, proposals, files, images, or related information into generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade de São Paulo

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A FDUSP generative AI governance report recommends mitigation measures including training and disclosure, review of generated content, transparency about use, and avoiding prompts containing personal data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Unicamp's generative AI deliberation says AI use must observe information security, personal-data protection, confidentiality, intellectual property, and ethical standards, and it forbids entering personal, sensitive, or confidential information into tools that are not institutionally offered or recommended by Unicamp or that do not meet the university's information-security guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

CRIA/UFRJ recommends warning researchers about risks of uploading or processing confidential or proprietary third-party data through generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università degli Studi di Pavia

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UniPV's 2024-2026 ICT plan describes AI and machine-learning modules as part of security appliances used to help prevent or contain latest-generation cyberattacks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università degli Studi di Perugia

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UniPG says users may not insert or process copyright-covered materials, sensitive or confidential personal information, or other intellectual property on third-party AI platforms unless the legitimate owners have explicitly authorized it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università degli Studi di Udine

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Udine PIAO 2026-2028 provides official source-status evidence that the university planned staff training and process integration around AI, including responsible generative AI in administrative processes, but this source is not a student AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università di Padova

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The guidance says personal data and confidential information should not be entered into GenAI tools unless explicitly authorized by the university.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Official UniSR discovery found AI-related public-engagement and course-offering material, but did not locate a central AI-specific student, teaching, assessment, privacy, or research policy in the searched official sources.

证据记录: 3。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitaet Stuttgart

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

DeepL Pro EDU is listed for Universität Stuttgart in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitas Indonesia

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For scientific writing, UI academic community members using Generative AI must acknowledge its use, verify each writing stage including references, paraphrase, run similarity checks to prevent plagiarism, and maintain confidentiality.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UAB Libraries' responsible-use guidance for AI says privacy and data security require reviewing service terms, avoiding leakage of institutional information, and ensuring compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat de Barcelona

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UB's good-practices document says only verified generative AI tools or tools hosted on servers meeting UB security standards may be used, and personal, sensitive, identifying, or institutionally confidential information should not be entered into them.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Heidelberg

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Heidelberg University's AI guideline advises instructors and students not to enter sensitive, personal, confidential, or copyrighted text into AI systems that could store or process it outside Heidelberg University infrastructure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Jena

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Jena guidance says generative AI tools must not be used as the basis or final decision for person-related decisions, including student examination assessments and researcher grant assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Politecnica de Valencia

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The UPV-hosted PoliPapers journal policy says AI use in evaluation may support verification of texts and data, but full content should not be shared with AI tools, and AI use should respect text confidentiality and personal data principles.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UPF's BibTIC guide says using Gemini and NotebookLM with a UPF Google Workspace account provides confidentiality and prevents entered information from being used to train the same AI model.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain)

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCLouvain describes Piccolo as a free generative-AI interface for staff and students and says it does not train models or monitor conversations based on users' conversations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Fribourg

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UniFR's Data Protection Officers recommend not uploading sensitive data, named personal documents or data, confidential or secret materials, or documents whose exclusivity should be preserved into generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Montpellier

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UM's AI-in-training principles say confidentiality, privacy, personal data, and intellectual property protections should be guaranteed, and no nominative, confidential, or sensitive data should be used in a public AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Rennes

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Université de Rennes' 2025 internal regulations state that the precautionary principle applies to generative AI tools and prohibit using a non-validated generative AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Strasbourg

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Unistra's AI guidelines say users must not send personal data, professional documents, or confidential documents to AI systems hosted outside the university when confidentiality cannot be systematically guaranteed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université du Québec

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Université du Québec's principles state that public generative AI prompts must not include confidential information or non-public personal information unless competent authorities expressly authorize it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Grenoble Alpes

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UGA's AI reference framework says that before transmitting personal data, users must ensure GDPR and European rules are respected, and any transmission of professional data must be approved by the institution after analysis.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Laval

1 匹配声明 from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Université Laval's AI principles say personal-information protection and copyright must be ensured and that confidential information must not be used in a public AI system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Lumière Lyon 2

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Lyon 2 SPS guidance cautions that public generative-AI tools often give little regard to copyright and personal data, including data found online and data uploaded by users.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne AI FAQ advises never to entrust personal data, especially sensitive data, to a third party AI service, noting data appropriation risks and that ChatGPT retains submitted information on U.S. servers for an officially stated 30 days.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The charter warns users to provide only public, non-confidential data to generative AI tools and says not to use names, personal data, or strategic data that could identify the university.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université PSL

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月11日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

PSL-affiliated guidance advises that personal data should not be shared with third parties when generative AI is used, and that generated text should be checked so it does not constitute plagiarism or contain personal data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Toulouse 1 Capitole

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The Toulouse Law School AI guidelines strongly discourage using institutional professional email addresses with commercial, foreign, or paid AI services; they invite users to use personal/dedicated accounts or university-secured AI tools, and prohibit depositing sensitive documents on external AI systems.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Brunei Darussalam (UBD)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UBD official news describes the GenAI policy as addressing ethical dilemmas and privacy concerns while supporting effective AI use in pedagogy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UMS's student AI guide instructs students to use AI with suitable ethics and to respect individual data privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UPM's postgraduate thesis generative AI guideline requires students, and reminds examiners to ensure, ethical handling of any data used in research or when interacting with generative AI models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UTM says reliable GAI tools should have data privacy management and protection systems and be safe to use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University College Cork

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCC's GenAI academic integrity toolkit advises educators not to run student work through external AI detector tools that have not been institutionally approved.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Alabama at Birmingham

1 匹配声明 from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UAB's practical AI guidance tells users not to upload Sensitive or Restricted UAB data, PHI/HIPAA-protected information, or confidential, internal-only, or unpublished materials into generative AI systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Alicante

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For Gemini with a @gcloud.ua.es account, the University of Alicante IT Service reports Google's statement that user chats and uploaded files will not be reviewed by human reviewers or used to improve generative-AI models; it says NotebookLM has the same terms when using @gcloud.ua.es.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Arkansas Fayetteville

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Arkansas advisory says employees or students who want to use an AI tool that is not approved need to complete a tool exception request form.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Balamand

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Balamand Ethical Use of Information Technology Policy applies to every member of the UOB community and says data mining on campus networks must follow ethical guidelines, respect user privacy, and receive proper approvals when researchers use university resources.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bari

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bari lists a transversal course, "Intelligenza artificiale, mercati, diritti," that teaches AI's effects on society, economy, fundamental rights, privacy, personal-data protection, non-discrimination, algorithmic transparency, GDPR, and the European AI Regulation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bayreuth

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bayreuth ITS advises that official Copilot login provides commercial data protection and no model-training assurance, but Copilot for Web/Edge is not recommended for personal or confidential data and prompts should not contain personal data or disclose confidential content.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Calcutta

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Calcutta IP Policy strongly discourages the university fraternity from uploading sensitive and confidential documents into generative AI tools to prevent leakage of proprietary information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月11日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCLA DTS guidance says users may not input FERPA-protected student information, HIPPA/HIPAA-protected health data, employee personnel/performance data, unpublished research/IP/grant proposals, or export-controlled or restricted data into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Santa Cruz

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCSC ITS says users should never enter P4 data into any AI tool, and that P3 or P4 data is prohibited in unlicensed AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Canberra

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Canberra says it provides students with free and protected access to Microsoft Copilot and Dall-E, with access through UC credentials.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Colombo

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Colombo prohibits students and staff from uploading or sharing sensitive, confidential, or personally identifiable information into AI tools or online platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Denver

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Denver University Writing Program tells writers not to input private, proprietary, or protected data into a third-party website without understanding the relevant EULAs, privacy policies, and data-use terms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Deusto

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Deusto's AI principles state that faculty, students, researchers, and management staff must communicate their use of AI, understand and assume AI-use risks, and respect privacy, confidentiality, and data-protection criteria when using AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Dhaka

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Dhaka Research Integrity Framework sets expectations for researchers to follow ethical and legal criteria and protect participant information where appropriate.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Dundee

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Dundee student guidance warns students not to share personal data, confidential university material, research data, or intellectual property in GAI platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of East Anglia (UEA)

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UEA's research and innovation policy says researchers are currently prohibited from entering personal, confidential, third-party, or UEA business-critical data into a generative AI tool without prior approval from information compliance and IT.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of East London

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Eastern Finland

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Eastern Finland says material containing personal data must not be exported to AI applications unless the university has an agreement covering personal-data processing, and that confidential information must not be entered into external AI applications.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Exeter

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Exeter in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Florence

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For teaching purposes, the University of Florence guidance says personal or confidential data must never be supplied or disseminated through prompting, file uploads, or credential sharing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Galway

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Galway's Academic Integrity FAQ says the university does not authorise or advocate AI detectors for checking student work and says staff should never upload student work to third-party AI detection software because it may be an improper use of personal data or intellectual property.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Gothenburg

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Gothenburg PIL guidance advises caution with services not offered through the university because they have not been reviewed for legal or security issues, and says users should not share personal data or sensitive information; the page says this also applied to Microsoft Bing Chat/Copilot at the time of publication.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Göttingen

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Göttingen AI ethics and law guidance tells users not to enter personal data into AI applications unless it has first been securely and completely anonymized, and says students may not be required by lecturers to use or register for such systems in courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Greenwich

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For students who opt to use Studiosity, University of Greenwich says it processes personal data including name, email, course, student ID, and content of interactions with Studiosity tutors, and that Studiosity is an independent data controller based in Australia.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Hradec Kralove

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UHK tells students using AI tools to observe personal-data protection principles, avoid misuse of UHK or partner-owned information, and recommends not entering personal data or non-public information into external AI tools unless consent/legal basis and provider terms support it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Iceland

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Iceland's AI strategy says AI system use, development, and implementation will comply with applicable privacy law and that clear requirements will be made for handling university data by third parties.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Latvia

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Latvia's 2026 AI regulations prohibit students and teaching staff from uploading restricted-access information or study materials to AI tools without a UL-purchased licence or official university implementation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Lausanne

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNIL's AI FAQ says sensitive data under Swiss legislation must not be entered into Copilot and requires specifically approved systems, such as local models, for such processing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Leicester

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Leicester policy states that staff and students must not use generative AI in ways that collect, store, access, or share personal data without explicit consent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Macau

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UM guidance tells academic staff to exercise caution and avoid sharing confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable information when using GenAI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Malta

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Malta academic-staff guidelines warn staff to be especially careful not to include sensitive information in prompts to Generative AI tools because of privacy and data-protection concerns.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Massachusetts Amherst

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UMass Amherst guidance warns users not to enter personal information, copyrighted material, or protected information about others into generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Miami

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Miami AI at The U guidance says patient, student, regulated, internal, and confidential data are not permitted in public AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Minho

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

University of Minho Open Science guidance summarizes responsible generative-AI use in research, including human responsibility for research outputs, reporting generative-AI use, avoiding import of sensitive information into AI tools, and not using these tools for tasks with direct impact on third parties such as peer review or proposal evaluation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Mississippi

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Mississippi CETL guidance warns instructors that AI detection tools are unreliable and that AI detection software not protected by FERPA may violate student privacy or intellectual property rights.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Missouri, Kansas City

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UMKC tells instructors not to upload or copy and paste student work into generative AI products for assessment because doing so may violate FERPA.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Mumbai

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A University of Mumbai digital-ethics syllabus includes responsible use of Artificial Intelligence in research alongside data privacy, digital plagiarism, plagiarism-check tools, and reliability of digital information; this is course-level teaching content, not a university-wide AI-use rule.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Naples - Federico II

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The guidelines state that AI systems used within the university must include contractual guarantees that user-provided data are not used to train LLMs except with specific authorization, and they prohibit entering special categories of personal data in prompts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Nizwa

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Nizwa's Privacy Policy states that the university collects personal information through website/service interactions and uses collected information for purposes such as personalization, website improvement, customer service, transactions, site features, and periodic emails.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Nottingham

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For study support outside assessments, University of Nottingham guidance recommends Microsoft Copilot with a Nottingham login and says logged-in Copilot will not record prompts, inputs, or uploads as training data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Oklahoma

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

OU IT guidance says public versions of generative AI tools are not appropriate for OU institutional or sensitive data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Oregon

1 匹配声明 from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UO Information Services guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot with Data Protection as UO's most secure generative AI option and cautions users because UO lacks enterprise contracts covering ChatGPT, DALL-E, and most other AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Oulu

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

When AI use is permitted in education, the University of Oulu guidelines say data protection requirements and the university's personal-data-processing guidelines must be followed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Parma

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The guidelines tell teachers and students to use AI tools safely and appropriately, avoiding confidential information, unpublished research data, and third-party personal data unless confidentiality, consent, or another suitable legal basis is in place.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Pecs

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Pecs guideline advises students who enter data into AI systems to consider personal-data protection, classified-data protection, cybersecurity rules, and applicable external and university restrictions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Pisa

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Pisa IT system supports centralized acquisition of ChatGPT Education for teachers and researchers who want to use generative AI tools in academic contexts, with an advanced service level and stronger confidentiality guarantees.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Porto

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UPDIGITAL states that U.Porto users can access Microsoft Copilot and IAedu with institutional credentials with data protection, and says the referenced Copilot enterprise use and IAedu inputs/outputs are not used to train models.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Pretoria

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

A University of Pretoria student guide states that personal or confidential data should not be included when using generative AI technologies in the classroom.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Reading

1 匹配声明 from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Reading staff guidance says Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat should not be used for any data set containing personal or personal sensitive data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Rhode Island

1 匹配声明 from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

URI ITS preliminary responsible-AI standards direct users to follow URI data classification guidance, avoid entering private or restricted data into public AI tools, and be cautious that data may be transmitted to third-party servers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Salerno

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Salerno has an official 2024/2025 course page for a master's course titled International Law, Cybersecurity and Ethics of Artificial Intelligence; the course objectives describe AI, cybersecurity, governance, data protection, and trustworthy AI topics. This is course-level teaching evidence, not a university-wide AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Sfax

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

An official University of Sfax terms-of-reference PDF for capacity-building and certification includes artificial intelligence among training/certification domains for teachers and students. This is AI training/capacity-building evidence, not a student or staff AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Sharjah

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Within the covered graduate policy context, University of Sharjah prohibits uploading confidential, unpublished, or sensitive data to publicly accessible AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University Of Sheffield

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for University of Sheffield in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Siena

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Siena's guidelines tell university community members using AI technologies such as ChatGPT or other LLMs for lawful purposes to pay particular attention when processing personal data so that outputs do not give a distorted image of the data subject.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

For AI tools used in student work, Rector Measure R 567 forbids students from reusing their university-system passwords for AI-tool registration and forbids providing sensitive personal data or confidential, internal, protected, sensitive, or other non-public information, including university intellectual property, to AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Southampton

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Southampton Library guidance warns students to check GenAI privacy settings because prompt data may be incorporated into training data, including personal or confidential data; before using a GenAI tool, students should also consider privacy and copyright and ensure they have rights for content they input.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Southern Denmark (SDU)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For the SDU Artificial Intelligence bachelor's programme page, SDU warns that generative AI tools are not necessarily GDPR compliant and that prompts must never contain sensitive personal or confidential information, including research or business secrets.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Strathclyde

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Strathclyde guidance warns that Gen-AI tools may collect user data and tells users to read privacy policies carefully and avoid sharing personal, sensitive, or copyright-protected information with Gen-AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Surrey

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Surrey's GenAI procedure says personal, confidential, and commercially sensitive information, including intellectual property, must not be entered into GenAI tools unless those tools are approved by IT Services and meet security and compliance requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Sussex

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Sussex staff guidance says staff and students can access a data-protected Microsoft Copilot with Sussex credentials, and says university data such as learning and teaching content should be used in Copilot rather than less protected AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Szeged

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Szeged student guidance warns users not to enter sensitive, personal, or institutionally confidential data into AI systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tartu

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tartu guidance says that if personal data or other sensitive information needs to be processed with AI applications, users logging in with a UT account should use AI application versions approved by the university IT department and ensure the application is on an authorized computer.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tehran

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tehran's Journal of Entrepreneurship Development says confidentiality of authors' and reviewers' information is strictly maintained during the use of AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of the Basque Country

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

EHU guidance lists prohibited generative AI uses including presenting AI-generated content as one's own, using AI-generated content in work without declaring it, entering student or research-subject personal data, and uploading confidential or sensitive personal or institutional information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of the Free State

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UFS lists respect and awareness as an AI guiding principle, including respect for individuals' privacy and data security and awareness of potential social and environmental harm.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of the Philippines

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UP's responsible AI principles state that AI systems must incorporate privacy-by-design principles and that UP stakeholders involved in AI development, deployment, and use must take responsibility for the consequences of their actions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Trento

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UniTrento states that use of generative-AI tools in the university must respect personal-data protection, confidentiality, and protection of reserved research or administrative data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tsukuba

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tsukuba instructs generative AI users not to include confidential work information or nonpublic research plans and results in prompts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University Of Tuebingen

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

bwGPT is listed for Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Turku

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Turku's chatbot privacy notice states that the chatbot does not require authentication, stores queries automatically for 365 days, and does not use service information for automatic decision-making or profiling.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Vienna

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Vienna says u:ai is the official AI access point in a secure cloud, processes data within the EU, and does not use entered content to train AI models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Waikato

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Waikato's Generative AI page warns that uploading work to non-institutional generative AI platforms poses significant privacy and ethical risks, including potential personally identifiable information and external tools that may lack safeguards aligned with privacy laws such as the NZ Privacy Act.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UWM-hosted Acta Neophilologica author guidance permits GenAI use for grammar, language, or style improvement, requires manuscript disclosure of any GenAI use with tool and purpose, and says reviewers and editors should not share confidential manuscript content with public GenAI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University Of Warwick

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for The University of Warwick in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Witwatersrand

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Wits University's AI Framework advises staff and students to be mindful of data security, confidentiality, privacy, and intellectual property risks, and says sensitive or personal data should not be entered into public AI systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Zurich

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UZH guiding principles say members are transparent about AI-tool use, users bear sole responsibility for AI-assisted content and products, and AI tools must be used in accordance with statutory provisions including data protection and copyright law.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

USI - Università della Svizzera italiana

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

USI recommendations say GenAI use should account for data protection and that confidential documents and sensitive data should not be shared with GenAI tools.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The Radio Physics and Electronics journal AI usage policy says interaction with public AI systems should exclude transferring unpublished research data unless the data have first been fully depersonalized.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

VILNIUS TECH (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

VILNIUS TECH tells community members to use university-acquired or verified AI tools where possible and requires uploaded data to be anonymized and free of confidential, non-disclosure, or third-party information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers should not enter personal data into AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vytautas Magnus University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

VMU's Senate strategic position says AI tools should be validated in relevant units before being implemented and used in university activities to ensure safety and compatibility with EU and Lithuanian law.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Wake Forest University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Wake Forest's administrative generative AI guidance says not to input confidential, non-public, or internal-use-only information into AI tools that are not approved for WFU institutional use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Warsaw University of Life Sciences SGGW (WULS-SGGW)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

SGGW says a learner may not submit personal data, legally protected secrets, third-party copyrighted works, or SGGW commercialization-related creative-result data to publicly available generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Warsaw University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

WUT recommendations say users may not provide personal data, sensitive data, or other non-public information in prompts to GenAI systems, except for systems that do not share information with third parties, and should ensure generated-content use does not infringe third-party copyright.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Waseda University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Waseda University's university-wide April 2023 statement warns that careless generative-AI use may leak confidential information from the university or companies and may also lead to personal-information leakage when prompts include a person's name or similar details.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

West Virginia University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

WVU guidance says PII, confidential information, or other sensitive data must not be entered into a generative AI tool unless explicitly approved through the IT Purchase Request process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Xiamen University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Xiamen University's AI teaching guideline says students should strictly observe data protection principles and must not enter sensitive data into generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yarmouk University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Yarmouk's policy says researchers must obtain approval from the university human research ethics board or animal research ethics committee when using generative AI applications in research involving generated data about human or animal subjects.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yildiz Technical University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The YTU generative AI guide says personal, confidential, unpublished, student, patient, participant, or trade-secret information must not be entered into generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yokohama City University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Yokohama City University tells students not to input personal information or confidential information learned through student life into generative AI because entered content may unintentionally leak.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yokohama National University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Yokohama National University warns students not to input personal information or confidential off-campus/internal information into generative AI because entered information may be used for AI learning or leak unintentionally.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yonsei University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Yonsei University Research Ethics Center guidance warns users not to enter confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable information into generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yuan Ze University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Yuan Ze University's guidance tells administrative staff to follow data security and privacy rules and prohibits entering sensitive information such as student personal data or unpublished plans into public AI platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

ZHAW states that personal data, data requiring heightened protection, and legally or contractually confidential data may not be processed with generative AI systems unless ZHAW has reviewed and approved those systems for data-protection compliance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

数据与建议边界

主题页面展示索引切片,而非新结论。

  • 公开页面与公开 JSON 应保持一致,因为二者均基于已推广的公开发布数据集构建。
  • 原始语言证据为标准版本。翻译和显示摘要为辅助内容。
  • 置信度独立于 reviewState;reviewState 描述工作流状态。
  • Tracker metadata is open licensed. Official source documents, page text, PDFs, and other source materials retain their original rights and terms.
  • This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
  • 主题匹配基于可见的公开声明和证据文本;它并非新的审核决定。

浏览所有记录于 /universities 或在以下位置查看数据集 /api/public/v1/universities.json.