建议做

Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
本站使用指南
所取2023学生第158条不同于员工纪律。最低处分与收到起算上诉保留日期;EJE AI指导只适用投稿作者。
本站解读;官方证据保留原文。
尚无完整的学生政策摘要;可先查看已收录条款及来源。
所取2023学生第158条不同于员工纪律。最低处分与收到起算上诉保留日期;EJE AI指导只适用投稿作者。

补充资料采集: 2026-10-09 · 现行适用性未独立确认
本站解读
所取Senate Legislation自称2023版。学生第158条禁止故意使用未获准辅助、伪造及抄袭。这是一般学生规则,不是AI许可;不能以员工第67条代替,也未全面认证现行适用性。
适用范围: Students under captured 2023 Senate Legislation Article 158 · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
The captured Senate Legislation identifies itself as 2023. Student Article 158 prohibits intentional unauthorised aids, fabrication and plagiarism. These general student rules are not AI-specific permission; staff Article 67 must not be substituted for the student code, and exhaustive present applicability is not certified.
适用范围: Students under captured 2023 Senate Legislation Article 158 · university
Dated 2023 source; no institutional GenAI policy acquired.
158.2. Prohibited Acts
158.2.1. Subject to the provisions of relevant aarticles, hereof, the
following acts are prohibited and constitute grounds for disciplinary
action: academic dishonesty means any of the following or a
combination thereof:
158.2.2. Cheating which means intentionally using or attempting to use
unauthorized materials, information, or study aids in academic exercise
such as exams and assignments or
158.2.3. fabrication which means intentional and unauthorized
falsification or invention of any information or citation in an academic
exercise or
158.2.4. plagiarism that means intentionally or knowingly representing
the words or ideas of another as one’s own in any academic exercise or
158.2.5. academic negligence that means willfully, with or without
malice, abrogating one’s academic duty and responsibility through
indifference, apathy and disregard of the prevailing rules and practices
of the University or
158.2.6. facilitating academic dishonesty which means intentionally or
knowingly helping or attempting to help another to commit any of the
above acts of academic dishonesty.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 4161–4180
SHA-256: 4559d3eaa6edd8f89fb13af677c5403164cf6dc3831095335eb5fb0eaae6a590
本站解读
所取学生守则规定:认定学术不诚实后,本科至少停一学年,研究生至少两学年,并记XF/XO按F或零计。这里保留原文强制最低值,不是任何AI使用的自动后果,也不认证现行处罚表。
适用范围: Students under captured 2023 Article 158 · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
The captured student code prescribes at least one academic year of suspension for undergraduate academic dishonesty and at least two for graduate students, plus XF/XO counted as F/zero. These are the source’s mandatory minimums after established dishonesty, not automatic outcomes for any AI use or a verified current penalty schedule.
适用范围: Students under captured 2023 Article 158 · university
Requires established academic dishonesty; undergraduate/graduate minimum academic years distinguished.
158.3. Sanctions on Violations of the rules
158.3.1. The sanctions for violations of any one of the offences provided
for in this Article shall be prescribed by the Dean of Student Affairs.
158.3.2. A student who commits an act of academic dishonesty shall be
suspended for a minimum of one academic year where he is an
undergraduate student and a minimum of two academic years where he
is a graduate student. In addition to such suspension, such student shall
receive an `XF`` grade where his academic unit uses a letter grade or an
`XO` grade where his academic unit uses a number grade. These
notations shall be entered into the student`s transcript. The notation `XF`
or `XO` shall be considered as a grade of "F" or zero for calculating his
GPA.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 4213–4224
SHA-256: 4559d3eaa6edd8f89fb13af677c5403164cf6dc3831095335eb5fb0eaae6a590
本站解读
2023学生守则给予在跨学院或院内相应委员会陈述机会。学生可在收到委员会决定起两周内向校长上诉,该路线中校长决定为最终。单位补充规则须Senate批准且一致。
学生 · 采用此程序时须遵守
学生 · 起算:student receipt of discipline committee decision
Source unit retained; no invented day exclusions or automatic date calculation.;Dated student route; no external remedy or automatic stay inferred.
适用范围: Student disciplinary route under captured 2023 Article 158, not staff discipline · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
The captured 2023 student code provides an opportunity to present a case before the relevant inter- or intra-college committee. A student may appeal to the President within two weeks of receiving the committee decision; it is final within this described institutional route. Additional unit rules require Senate approval and consistency.
适用范围: Student disciplinary route under captured 2023 Article 158, not staff discipline · university
158.3.3. Disciplinary cases with an inter-college element shall be subject
to due process of law in which the concerned student shall get the
opportunity to present his case and such hearings shall be conducted by
a discipline committee established for this purpose by the Office of the
Dean of Students Affairs. The membership of such committee shall
include the Dean of Student Affairs or his representative as a
chairperson, an officer in charge of student services or his representative,
one academic staff member, two student union representatives of whom
one is a female student, a representative of Campus Security as well as a
representative of the relevant college administration. Where the
98
disciplinary case is of intra-college in nature, it shall be considered by an
ad hoc committee composed of two academic staff members to be
assigned by the Dean of the College , two student representatives of
whom one is a female student and a representative of the college
administration.
158.3.4. A student aggrieved by the decision of a discipline committee
may appeal to the President within two weeks as of the date of receipt by
him of the decision of the committee. The decision of the President shall
be final.
158.3.5 Authority to Supplement the Provisions of this Article with the
approval of the Senate, the SACs of the various academic units may issue
additional rules consistent with this Legislation to add to or elaborate on
the provisions of this Legislation. Unless specified otherwise, a violation
of such additional rules shall be treated as a violation of this Code of
Conduct.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 4225–4251
SHA-256: 4559d3eaa6edd8f89fb13af677c5403164cf6dc3831095335eb5fb0eaae6a590
本站解读
Ethiopian Journal of Education投稿作者不得将AI列为共作者或用其写稿。研究工具/数据分析及语言改善可在透明说明下使用。这是作者投稿规则,不是AAU学生评估许可。
适用范围: Authors submitting manuscripts to Ethiopian Journal of Education; journal-only scope · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Ethiopian Journal of Education authors must not list AI as a co-author or use it to write manuscripts. Research-tool/data-analysis use and language improvement may be allowed with transparent description. These are journal-submission rules for authors, not AAU student assessment permission.
适用范围: Authors submitting manuscripts to Ethiopian Journal of Education; journal-only scope · university
Journal authors, not generic student audience.
All submissions are screened for plagiarism using tools like Turnitin. Manuscripts with clear evidence of plagiarism will be rejected, and if detected post-publication, the Editorial Board will notify the author's institution and funding agencies.
Use of Generative AI
The EJE recognises that Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly used in academic research and writing. However the following statements outlines acceptable use of AI technologies in the preparation of manuscripts submitted to the journal.
When submitting their manuscript, authors should not list AI tools as a co-author, as AI tools cannot assume responsibility for authorship.
Authors may use AI technologies as research tools in the preparation of their manuscripts including data analysis. Authors should describe any use of AI technologies as research tools in the methods section of their manuscript in the interest of transparency, reliability, and integrity.
Authors should NOT use AI tools to write their manuscript, but they may use AI tools to help improve the language and readability of their manuscript. Authors should describe any use of AI technologies to help improve the language and readability of their manuscript in the interest of transparency, reliability, and integrity.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 54–59
SHA-256: c0fcfcf7519a2e5a7da3f06e12bf71a99e491a16e1edddaef19a2f613f7a51fe
已发布的来源补充。英文摘要与原语言引文和已审核记录分开展示。这里列出可能的程序与结果,不是使用 AI 的自动处罚;现行适用性尚未独立确认,请核对来源的适用范围和版本。
按所存原文核对;不是官方译文
哈希仅用于核对所存内容,不证明现行有效性或不可篡改。这些主题不表示每个学生都会经历的流程。
能获取工具不等于获准在作业中使用。请同时核对任务规则、适用人员和数据限制。
尚未建立这所大学的可靠工具记录。这不代表工具不存在,也不代表禁止使用 AI。
Reviewed record
3 条已审核条款
Academic Integrity
标准化值: orientation_ai_research_preparation_prohibited
原始证据
证据 1He also reminded the students that the use of Artificial Intelligence in the preparation of research is strictly prohibited, emphasizing the need for academic integrity and urging them to exercise utmost caution.
隐私
标准化值: alumni_portal_collects_contact_device_and_analytics_data
原始证据
证据 1All personally identifiable information provided by alumni is strictly reserved for use by individual alumni and Alumni Affairs & Development (AA&D) for personal and University-related purposes only.
隐私
标准化值: transform_portal_comments_collect_ip_ua_and_support_export_erasure_requests
原始证据
证据 1If you have left feedback, you can request to receive an exported file of the personal data we hold about you, including any data you have provided to us. You can also request that we erase any personal data we hold about you.
Source record
3 个来源
aau.edu.et
transform.aau.edu.et
alumni.aau.edu.et
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Addis Ababa University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 21, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/addis-ababa-university
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
打开变更日志Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.