Do
- Read student Article 158 and the source year.
- Present your case to the relevant committee.
- Check the decision receipt and appeal window.

Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Student guide · Task scope and procedure
Captured 2023 student Article 158 differs from staff discipline. Its minimum sanctions and receipt-based appeal remain dated; EJE AI guidance applies to manuscript authors only.
A complete student policy summary is not available yet; see the collected claims and sources.
Captured 2023 student Article 158 differs from staff discipline. Its minimum sanctions and receipt-based appeal remain dated; EJE AI guidance applies to manuscript authors only.



Supplement collected: 2026-10-09 · Current applicability not independently confirmed
Site interpretation
The captured Senate Legislation identifies itself as 2023. Student Article 158 prohibits intentional unauthorised aids, fabrication and plagiarism. These general student rules are not AI-specific permission; staff Article 67 must not be substituted for the student code, and exhaustive present applicability is not certified.
Scope: Students under captured 2023 Senate Legislation Article 158 · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Scope: Students under captured 2023 Senate Legislation Article 158 · university
Dated 2023 source; no institutional GenAI policy acquired.
158.2. Prohibited Acts
158.2.1. Subject to the provisions of relevant aarticles, hereof, the
following acts are prohibited and constitute grounds for disciplinary
action: academic dishonesty means any of the following or a
combination thereof:
158.2.2. Cheating which means intentionally using or attempting to use
unauthorized materials, information, or study aids in academic exercise
such as exams and assignments or
158.2.3. fabrication which means intentional and unauthorized
falsification or invention of any information or citation in an academic
exercise or
158.2.4. plagiarism that means intentionally or knowingly representing
the words or ideas of another as one’s own in any academic exercise or
158.2.5. academic negligence that means willfully, with or without
malice, abrogating one’s academic duty and responsibility through
indifference, apathy and disregard of the prevailing rules and practices
of the University or
158.2.6. facilitating academic dishonesty which means intentionally or
knowingly helping or attempting to help another to commit any of the
above acts of academic dishonesty.View official source ↗Collected: 2026-10-09 · 4161–4180
SHA-256: 4559d3eaa6edd8f89fb13af677c5403164cf6dc3831095335eb5fb0eaae6a590
Site interpretation
The captured student code prescribes at least one academic year of suspension for undergraduate academic dishonesty and at least two for graduate students, plus XF/XO counted as F/zero. These are the source’s mandatory minimums after established dishonesty, not automatic outcomes for any AI use or a verified current penalty schedule.
Scope: Students under captured 2023 Article 158 · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Scope: Students under captured 2023 Article 158 · university
Requires established academic dishonesty; undergraduate/graduate minimum academic years distinguished.
158.3. Sanctions on Violations of the rules
158.3.1. The sanctions for violations of any one of the offences provided
for in this Article shall be prescribed by the Dean of Student Affairs.
158.3.2. A student who commits an act of academic dishonesty shall be
suspended for a minimum of one academic year where he is an
undergraduate student and a minimum of two academic years where he
is a graduate student. In addition to such suspension, such student shall
receive an `XF`` grade where his academic unit uses a letter grade or an
`XO` grade where his academic unit uses a number grade. These
notations shall be entered into the student`s transcript. The notation `XF`
or `XO` shall be considered as a grade of "F" or zero for calculating his
GPA.View official source ↗Collected: 2026-10-09 · 4213–4224
SHA-256: 4559d3eaa6edd8f89fb13af677c5403164cf6dc3831095335eb5fb0eaae6a590
Site interpretation
The captured 2023 student code provides an opportunity to present a case before the relevant inter- or intra-college committee. A student may appeal to the President within two weeks of receiving the committee decision; it is final within this described institutional route. Additional unit rules require Senate approval and consistency.
Student · Required when using this procedure
Within the stated period. Check the source summary and original text for the starting point, scope and exceptions.
Scope: Student disciplinary route under captured 2023 Article 158, not staff discipline · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Scope: Student disciplinary route under captured 2023 Article 158, not staff discipline · university
158.3.3. Disciplinary cases with an inter-college element shall be subject
to due process of law in which the concerned student shall get the
opportunity to present his case and such hearings shall be conducted by
a discipline committee established for this purpose by the Office of the
Dean of Students Affairs. The membership of such committee shall
include the Dean of Student Affairs or his representative as a
chairperson, an officer in charge of student services or his representative,
one academic staff member, two student union representatives of whom
one is a female student, a representative of Campus Security as well as a
representative of the relevant college administration. Where the
98
disciplinary case is of intra-college in nature, it shall be considered by an
ad hoc committee composed of two academic staff members to be
assigned by the Dean of the College , two student representatives of
whom one is a female student and a representative of the college
administration.
158.3.4. A student aggrieved by the decision of a discipline committee
may appeal to the President within two weeks as of the date of receipt by
him of the decision of the committee. The decision of the President shall
be final.
158.3.5 Authority to Supplement the Provisions of this Article with the
approval of the Senate, the SACs of the various academic units may issue
additional rules consistent with this Legislation to add to or elaborate on
the provisions of this Legislation. Unless specified otherwise, a violation
of such additional rules shall be treated as a violation of this Code of
Conduct.View official source ↗Collected: 2026-10-09 · 4225–4251
SHA-256: 4559d3eaa6edd8f89fb13af677c5403164cf6dc3831095335eb5fb0eaae6a590
Site interpretation
Ethiopian Journal of Education authors must not list AI as a co-author or use it to write manuscripts. Research-tool/data-analysis use and language improvement may be allowed with transparent description. These are journal-submission rules for authors, not AAU student assessment permission.
Scope: Authors submitting manuscripts to Ethiopian Journal of Education; journal-only scope · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Scope: Authors submitting manuscripts to Ethiopian Journal of Education; journal-only scope · university
Journal authors, not generic student audience.
All submissions are screened for plagiarism using tools like Turnitin. Manuscripts with clear evidence of plagiarism will be rejected, and if detected post-publication, the Editorial Board will notify the author's institution and funding agencies.
Use of Generative AI
The EJE recognises that Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly used in academic research and writing. However the following statements outlines acceptable use of AI technologies in the preparation of manuscripts submitted to the journal.
When submitting their manuscript, authors should not list AI tools as a co-author, as AI tools cannot assume responsibility for authorship.
Authors may use AI technologies as research tools in the preparation of their manuscripts including data analysis. Authors should describe any use of AI technologies as research tools in the methods section of their manuscript in the interest of transparency, reliability, and integrity.
Authors should NOT use AI tools to write their manuscript, but they may use AI tools to help improve the language and readability of their manuscript. Authors should describe any use of AI technologies to help improve the language and readability of their manuscript in the interest of transparency, reliability, and integrity.View official source ↗Collected: 2026-10-09 · 54–59
SHA-256: c0fcfcf7519a2e5a7da3f06e12bf71a99e491a16e1edddaef19a2f613f7a51fe
Published source-based additions. English summaries and original-language quotations are shown separately from the reviewed record. These are possible processes and outcomes, not automatic penalties for AI use. Present applicability has not been independently confirmed; check the source scope and version.
Source-text comparison; not an official translation
Hashes allow comparison of saved content; they do not certify current validity or immutability. These topics are not a mandatory sequence.
Tool access is not permission to use AI in an assessment. Check your assignment rules, eligible users and data restrictions.
No source-backed tool record has been established for this university yet. This does not mean AI tools are unavailable or prohibited.
Reviewed record
3 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: orientation_ai_research_preparation_prohibited
Original evidence
Evidence 1He also reminded the students that the use of Artificial Intelligence in the preparation of research is strictly prohibited, emphasizing the need for academic integrity and urging them to exercise utmost caution.
Privacy
Normalized value: alumni_portal_collects_contact_device_and_analytics_data
Original evidence
Evidence 1All personally identifiable information provided by alumni is strictly reserved for use by individual alumni and Alumni Affairs & Development (AA&D) for personal and University-related purposes only.
Privacy
Normalized value: transform_portal_comments_collect_ip_ua_and_support_export_erasure_requests
Original evidence
Evidence 1If you have left feedback, you can request to receive an exported file of the personal data we hold about you, including any data you have provided to us. You can also request that we erase any personal data we hold about you.
Source record
3 sources
aau.edu.et
transform.aau.edu.et
alumni.aau.edu.et
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Addis Ababa University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 21, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/addis-ababa-university
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Open change logSaved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.