Universiti mana yang menyebut AI dalam peperiksaan atau penilaian?

UNSW uses a Levels of AI Assistance framework with six categories for assessments: No Assistance, Simple Editing Assistance, Planning or Design Assistance, Assistance with Attribution, Generative AI Software-based Assessments, and Not Applicable.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNSW defines six high-level categories for permitted AI use in assessments: No Assistance, Simple Editing Assistance, Planning/Design Assistance, Assistance with Attribution, Generative AI Software-based Assessments, and Not Applicable.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Under UNSW's 'No Assistance' level, students are not permitted to use any generative AI tools, software, or service to search for or generate information or answers.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ANU approved six institutional AI principles via Academic Board in June 2023, covering excellence/integrity, research engagement, clear guidance, AI literacy, access/privacy/security, and collaborative policy development.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Submitting AI-generated content as one's own work constitutes a breach of ANU's academic integrity rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ANU academic staff are not permitted to upload student data or academic work to generative AI platforms.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Auckland's Assessment of Courses Procedures state that AI use in assessment tasks may only be restricted when the task is a controlled assessment, identified as Lane 1; AI may be used without restriction in other assessment tasks, identified as Lane 2.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Auckland's Assessment of Courses Procedures require courses to use the two-lane nomenclature, including telling students which assessments align with Lane 1 or Lane 2, and require courses and programmes to implement the two-lane approach in assessment design by 2027.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Auckland's student AI advice states that AI has no agency, treats the student prompting an AI tool as the author, and says students are ultimately responsible for work submitted for assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Common Awards summative assessments, Durham guidance says students must not use generative AI to create substantive content that they present as their own creation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Durham Common Awards AI academic-misconduct policy is scoped to students' use of generative AI in summative assessments on Common Awards modules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Durham University categorises student assessments into four GenAI-use tiers: No GenAI Allowed, Selective (specified how GenAI may be used), Allowed (students may choose whether and how to use GenAI), and Embedded (using GenAI is required).

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Wollongong in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UOW's Subject Delivery Policy requires assessment information in each Subject Outline to include a statement indicating whether and how generative artificial intelligence tools can be used in the subject, including for each assessment task.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UOW's Assessment and Feedback Policy says staff are not permitted to upload student work to third-party tools, including GenAI or misconduct detection software, in the context of privacy and data policies.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students may only use GenAI for assessed work (assignments, exams, projects, theses) if expressly permitted by their instructor, supervisor, or program.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UBC says instructors or teaching assistants cannot require students to use GenAI or any other technology tool that requires sharing personal information unless the tool has undergone a UBC Privacy Impact Assessment review and been approved for use with personal information.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Do not enter personal information into any generative AI tool that has not been through UBC's FIPPA compliance assessment (PIA), as to do so may be a breach of privacy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Sheffield PGR guidance says postgraduate researchers' use of generative AI must align with the University's expectations for responsible research and academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Student academic-integrity guidance tells students to check school or department guidance and module assessment criteria before using GenAI, because use may be prohibited on some modules or assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Sheffield says every undergraduate programme integrates GenAI literacy through structured teaching activities and formal assessment, while giving staff and students clarity about acceptable AI use across assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For assessments and assignments, students should assume generative AI use is not permitted unless the assessment or assignment explicitly states otherwise.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University states that generative AI detection tools are not currently allowable and that student work should not be uploaded to generative AI detection software.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The research AI guidance says personal, confidential, or sensitive data must not be entered into AI tools without clear justification, data minimisation, and a Data Protection Impact Assessment where applicable.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Nottingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Nottingham Quality Manual includes unpermitted generative-AI-generated or AI-improved assessment work within false authorship.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Nottingham student guidance says AI use for assessed work is assessment-specific: module or assessment information should say whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited, and students should not assume permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Staff setting summative assessment must: declare whether/how students can use AI; review assessment design for alignment with permitted AI use; ensure equality of baseline AI tool provision where authorised; specify declaration forms for student AI use; only identify suspected unauthorised AI use through marking or university-endorsed detection tools (none currently endorsed); and handle misconduct under usual disciplinary regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students undertaking summative assessment must: complete assessment in line with the AI use declaration for each assignment; acknowledge their AI use via a formal declaration in the prescribed format; and understand that submitting work breaching AI specifications constitutes cheating and may constitute plagiarism, handled under usual disciplinary regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University's policy on AI use in summative assessment is based on three principles endorsed by Education Committee in Trinity term 2025: (1) educational practice must be grounded in values of integrity, honesty and transparency, which must be clearly articulated and frequently discussed; (2) every discrete unit of assessment must be carefully designed to be fit for its specific purposes, clearly articulated to students; (3) every summative assessment must be accompanied by a clear explanation of what appropriate assistance is permitted and what is forbidden, specifying how students should report assistance received.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At the University of Melbourne, using GenAI tools to produce work submitted for assessment without acknowledgement constitutes academic misconduct under cl. 4.13 of the Student Academic Integrity Policy (MPF1310).

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students must check with their Subject Coordinator before using GenAI for assessment-related work at the University of Melbourne.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Melbourne assessment materials and teaching materials constitute University IP and should never be tested on third-party external GenAI platforms such as ChatGPT; any such testing must be done only within the University's secure SparkAI platform.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

From Semester 1 2025, the default position in the University of Sydney Academic Integrity Policy has been reversed: except for supervised examinations and supervised in-semester tests, students may use automated writing tools or generative AI to complete assessments unless expressly prohibited by the unit coordinator.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Sydney's Academic Integrity Policy 2022 states it is an academic integrity breach to inappropriately generate content using artificial intelligence to complete an assessment task, and submitting an assessment generated by AI may be considered contract cheating.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Sydney has adopted a 'two-lane approach' to assessment: Lane 1 comprises secure, in-person supervised assessments to assure learning, and Lane 2 comprises open assessments that support and scaffold the use of all available and relevant tools including generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

A student using any unacknowledged content generated by artificial intelligence within a summative assessment as though it is their own work constitutes academic misconduct, unless explicitly stated otherwise in the assessment brief.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Examiners are not permitted to upload, copy, or share student work with Generative AI tools and Large Language Models. Examiners may not use tools such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google Bard, or Microsoft Copilot to analyse student work or provide written feedback. Examiners may use these tools to support their own writing in documenting feedback (e.g. consolidating personal notes and rephrasing comments).

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University's standard licensed GenAI tools are Microsoft 365 Copilot, Google Gemini, and Google NotebookLM. Use of other licensed GenAI tools is not prohibited but must be procured in accordance with applicable procurement policy, including completion of risk assessments such as DPIAs and/or ISRAs. The public, free versions of Copilot, Gemini and NotebookLM must not be used for University activities.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Uppsala University's central guidelines say sensitive personal data may only be transferred to a university-approved generative AI system, and student material may not be transferred without the student's permission to a generative AI system that might use it to train the system.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Uppsala University's central generative AI guidelines say that any restriction on generative AI use in teaching or assessment, and any requirement to report AI use, must be clearly stated in written information; restrictions must be justifiable by learning outcomes, the nature of the task, or pedagogical considerations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

When students are expected to use generative AI in teaching or assessment, Uppsala University's central guidelines say the course coordinator or examiner must be able to ensure the tools are provided at no cost to the student; if doctoral students are expected to use generative AI, the principal supervisor has responsibility for ensuring suitable tools are available at no cost.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Columbia Law School prohibits generative AI use in exams, final papers, and for drafting any part of work submitted for credit, even if fully documented.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Columbia University has a university-wide Generative AI Policy from the Office of the Provost governing use by staff, faculty, students, and researchers, covering information security, data privacy, copyright, academic integrity, and bias.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CUIMC requires a formal IT Risk Assessment review before deploying any locally installed AI models (LLM, NLP, ML) to evaluate security, privacy, and compliance risks.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At King's College London, submitting AI-generated text as one's own without written departmental permission is considered misconduct under third-party involvement or text manipulation offences.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

King's College London supports considered use of generative AI and is open to evolving teaching, assessment and feedback practices according to need and disciplinary differences.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

King's College London subscribes to the Russell Group's five principles on generative AI in education, including supporting AI literacy, adapting teaching and assessment, and ensuring academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Swansea University's AI assessment policy says staff and students should not enter identifiable information into any AI application, and are not permitted to upload student assessment or identifiable data without explicit written consent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Swansea University's AI assessment policy says staff and students are not permitted to present work completed by AI applications as their own without acknowledgement.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Swansea University has a policy for responsible use of AI applications, including generative AI, in assessment, applying to faculty staff, students, and professional service staff involved in assessment or AI use within the University.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At CUHK, improper or unauthorized use of AI tools in learning activities and assessments constitutes academic dishonesty and is subject to penalties including failure grade, suspension, or termination of studies.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CUHK defines four approaches to AI use in courses: (1) prohibit all use, (2) use only with prior permission, (3) use only with explicit acknowledgement, and (4) free use without acknowledgement requirement.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

CUHK penalties for academic dishonesty involving AI tools may include reviewable/permanent demerits, failure grade, suspension, lowering degree classification, and termination of studies.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UQ course profiles must clearly state if, when, and how AI (including Machine Translation) is allowed. Two options exist: Option 1 prohibits AI in in-person assessment; Option 2 permits AI use with mandatory referencing.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UQ has disabled the Turnitin AI writing indicator functionality for all assessments from Semester 2, 2025, citing that AI detection tools are flawed and unreliable.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UQ says students must acknowledge where they used AI in assessment, including direct quotes or paraphrases of AI-generated content and use of AI tools for summarising, brainstorming, planning, editing, or proofreading.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For each examination, the UHH orientation framework says the relevant examiner or examination board must decide whether generative AI systems are permitted as aids, and unauthorized aids are governed by examination regulations and usually lead to a failing mark.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The UHH orientation framework says personal data must not be used in generative AI, including UHHGPT, while German supervisory authorities are still examining the lawfulness of personal-data processing in the underlying ChatGPT model.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The UHH orientation framework says teachers and students should use generative AI reflectively and responsibly, check AI-generated content for correctness, and use generative AI only within legal, exam, data-protection, copyright, and good-scientific-practice requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Regulation 32 states that assessed student work should not contain content produced by another person, website, software, or AI tool except where AI use is explicitly permitted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Regulation 32 says use of websites or generative AI software that generates answers or references is prohibited, while some Schools may allow AI tools for specific purposes and any AI use must be referenced.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Glasgow student guidance says using AI or other computational aids in university work without acknowledging the input counts as academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Gothenburg study-rules PDF states that, for take-home examinations, written tasks, or equivalent, AI-generated content may not be presented as one’s own work and examiners should specify the limits for permitted use of generative AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not prohibit generative AI in education; teachers and examiners decide whether, when, and how it may be used in coursework and examinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Gothenburg student guidance says generative-AI guidelines vary between courses, programmes, departments, and faculties, and that teachers and examiners are responsible for communicating those guidelines to students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini is listed for University of Malta in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Malta student FAQ guidance tells students to check with their tutor before using Generative AI tools to produce answers in summative assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Malta academic-staff guidelines say lecturers decide if and how Generative AI is permitted in a study-unit; if assessment instructions do not mention Generative AI, use is assumed not allowed except for listed support uses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aston University's 2024/25 student discipline regulations define misusing AI tools as an academic offence where AI use is not permitted and a student uses AI tools to generate assessment content submitted as their own original work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aston University staff guidance says each assessment brief must explicitly state whether generative AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aston University's 2025/26 general regulations update identifies unreferenced use of artificial intelligence in an assessment in contravention of the relevant assessment brief as an academic offence category.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Edinburgh Napier University's Assessment Policy states that inappropriate use of Generative AI in assessment, including presenting generated content as a student's own work, is cheating and a breach of the Academic Integrity Regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Edinburgh Napier University's generative AI position states that the university does not permit Gen AI detection tools on student assessment submissions, and academic staff are not permitted to use external detection tools on student work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Edinburgh Napier University's Assessment Policy says every assessment will use the Assessment Declaration Cover Sheet for students to declare that the submission is their own work and acknowledge other-source contributions, including Generative AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU/e allows AI tools as aids for general study and teaching functionalities unless an examiner explicitly forbids them, while keeping students and staff responsible for submitted work and educational activities.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU/e states that generating quantitative or qualitative research data with GenAI is fundamentally prohibited unless the examiner gives explicit consent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU/e does not permit automated decision-making or grading based on a GenAI model without human oversight over the assessment process.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Macquarie student guidance categorises assessment tasks as Open or Observed: Open tasks allow generative AI with acknowledgement and student responsibility, while Observed tasks may restrict or prohibit AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Macquarie's AI policy says University-provided AI tools and systems are subject to privacy, security, intellectual-property, intended-use, and risk-assessment controls.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Macquarie student assessment guidance says Unit Guides are the definitive source for whether a task is Open or Observed, with iLearn providing more detailed assessment information.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Queen's assessment guidance says module staff will clarify if and how AI can be used in assessment, and students should consult their tutor if in doubt.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Queen's AI position page says its staff and student AI guidance is based on RAISE principles: responsible use, AI best practice, integrity, support, and equitable access.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Queen's assessment guidance says students who misuse AI will be subject to the University's academic misconduct regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

RMIT academic integrity guidance says students cannot use AI to complete or contribute to an assessment task unless specifically allowed, pass off unreferenced AI-produced ideas as their own, or submit AI-produced content they cannot understand or explain.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Before RMIT initiates its AI Governance Framework for an AI initiative, existing governance assessments include Privacy Impact Assessment, Security Risk Assessment, and Third-Party Risk Assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

RMIT assessment guidance tells students to review and fact-check AI outputs and acknowledge AI tools when those tools contribute ideas, text, images, or other content to assessment work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For UWA assessments assigned Tier 1, students are not permitted to use AI in any way to complete the assessment, and any AI use during that Tier 1 assessment is treated as academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For UWA coursework assessments, AI tools may only be used where the Unit Coordinator explicitly permits them; permitted use must be cited, referenced, and clearly acknowledged.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UWA student assessment guidance describes three AI-use tiers that lecturers may apply to assessment tasks: Tier 1 no AI, Tier 2 AI assistance or collaboration, and Tier 3 fully embedded AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Student guidance says students must not use GenAI to do their critical thinking, analysis, evaluation, synthesis, or to generate essays, poems, or creative works.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Course Coordinators must provide students clear guidance on what GenAI tool use is permitted for work submitted for assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Student guidance says learning materials and assessment information must not be entered into GenAI tools without explicit permission from the author, and students should never enter personal and sensitive data into GenAI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Basel says it is not planning a general ban on AI-based tools, and that lecturers can decide case by case whether to integrate AI-based tools into teaching, exams, and assessments or restrict their use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Basel AI citation guidelines say AI-supported tools may only be used in a supporting role for work submitted for credit, with students retaining a controlling role and responsibility for their own work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In its AI teaching scenarios, the University of Basel identifies compliance with data protection and copyright law, including assessing tools from those perspectives, as part of productive AI-tool integration in learning and teaching.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Bath Academic Integrity Statement requires students submitting assessment to confirm they have not presented content created by generative AI tools as though it were their own work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Bath assessment guidance uses ABC GenAI categories: Type A means GenAI is not permitted, Type B means optional assistive use for specific defined processes, and Type C means GenAI is integral to the assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Bath teaching guidance says that from 2026/27 it will move to a two-lane approach, with a closed lane where GenAI must not be used and an open lane where GenAI engagement is necessary or optional.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Dundee student guidance says GAI tools should not be used to generate essays or assessment answers that are then submitted as the student's own work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Dundee guidance states that submitting work that is not one's own, including unauthorised use of GAI, is considered academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Where lecturers permit GAI sources in assessment work, University of Dundee student guidance says students must transparently acknowledge, describe, and reference how they used GAI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Exeter follows a four-tier GenAI assessment model from 2025-26: AI-integrated, AI-assisted, AI-minimal, and AI-prohibited.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For AI-integrated and AI-assisted assessments, Exeter requires students to include AI prompts and, where possible, hyperlinks to outputs in their references.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Exeter says AI-minimal assessments allow AI only for spelling and grammar checking, and AI-prohibited assessments do not allow GenAI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Leeds assessment guidance says students can use generative AI to help learning but cannot use AI to generate or falsify work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Leeds assessment guidance uses a red, amber, and green traffic-light system to indicate how GenAI should be used in taught student assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Leeds postgraduate researcher guidance says PGRs must not use GenAI to write their thesis, transfer report, or other work, falsify work, or breach research assessment and examination guidance.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Leicester's Generative AI policy provides a university-level framework for appropriate AI use in learning, teaching, and assessment activities.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Leicester policy states that staff and students must not use generative AI in ways that collect, store, access, or share personal data without explicit consent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For assessment, the University of Leicester uses three categories for generative AI use: red where AI must not be used, amber where AI may support assessment but not generate submitted content, and green where AI may generate assessment content within the brief.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for University of Liverpool in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Liverpool lists unacceptable uses of generative AI in education, including unreviewed copying of AI-generated content into assessment materials or feedback, using AI for grades or final assessment decisions, uploading protected student or confidential information to public AI platforms without required review, and creating or modifying official policy documents without appropriate review and approval.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Liverpool has a central AI policies and guidance hub that collates generative AI guidance covering golden rules, legal/security/data protection, learning/teaching/assessment, and research.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Strathclyde Student Discipline Procedure lists unauthorised use of Generative Artificial Intelligence tools and services as an example of behaviour that may give an unfair academic advantage.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Strathclyde guidance tells students to check module or department guidance to determine whether AI tools may be used in a specific assessment and to what extent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Strathclyde guidance says use of Gen-AI in learning and assessment is not necessarily or automatically academic misconduct; context determines whether misconduct is a concern.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Western Sydney University's Use of Artificial Intelligence Policy guides responsible and ethical AI and generative AI use for learning, teaching, assessment, research, and administrative functions, and applies to all students and staff.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Western Sydney University's Academic Integrity Guidelines say inappropriate use of generative AI in assessment tasks may lead to penalties under the Student Misconduct Rule.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Western Sydney University's student guidance says generative AI rules differ by assessment task and students are responsible for reading Subject Outlines, checking vUWS, or asking the Subject Coordinator rather than assuming the same advice applies across tasks or subjects.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

DMI's student guide cautions students that sources proposed by an LLM should always be verified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

DMI's student guide says AI use should be avoided when it involves sharing personal or sensitive data of students or faculty.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

DMI's student guide says AI should not be used to replace personal study, critical reflection, or autonomous production of assessed work such as essays, reports, or exercises.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for Concordia University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Concordia CTL guidance says Concordia has not approved or acquired online AI detectors and therefore staff or faculty use of them is not permitted because of privacy laws and regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Concordia CTL assessment guidance says all staff and students have access to Copilot Chat through an institutional Microsoft 365 license, with Concordia authentication and Enterprise Data Protection.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot Chat with Enterprise Data Protection is listed for Flinders University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Flinders states that students are responsible for using AI consistently with University, course, topic, assessment, and academic integrity requirements, including acknowledging generative AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Flinders provides staff with AI assessment scale template instructions that range from no AI permitted through prompted, assisted, task-completion, and full AI use, with acknowledgement expectations attached to permitted use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FAU's central exams page states that if AI is not expressly permitted in exams, especially written papers, it is an unauthorized aid and can lead to the exam being failed for deception.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FAU describes its AI-in-teaching guidelines as orientation and inspiration and states that they do not have Satzungscharakter; teaching and exam-related rules remain part of the individual study and examination regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

FAU guidance says instructors are responsible for clear AI-use rules in teaching activities, especially exams, and that students must disclose generative AI use according to the relevant course rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HU Berlin’s recommendations allow examiners to use AI to create exam materials, but say examiners remain responsible for suitability and that sole use of AI to grade exams or study work is prohibited.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HU Berlin’s exam and study-work AI recommendations are explicitly non-binding; they say AI use is generally allowed, while faculties and examination boards may make subject-specific binding decisions that restrict or prohibit AI use for particular assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HU Berlin’s recommendations advise documenting student AI use so examiners can account for the tool use during assessment, while leaving the concrete documentation requirement to the relevant subject and examination context.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Unless explicitly authorised, using generative AI to create assessed work may be treated as an academic offence such as contract cheating under Imperial's Plagiarism, Academic Integrity & Exam Offences regulations. Improper use of AI can be investigated under the University's Academic Misconduct procedures.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Individual departments at Imperial may allow or prohibit the use of generative AI for specific assessments. Local (team/department/faculty) instructions take precedence over university-wide guidance. Students should check their department's current policy on using and disclosing generative AI in academic work and follow their module leader's instructions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Research at Imperial that involves people, personal data, or sensitive topics may require ethics approval, a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA), and data-governance controls before using any AI tool. Researchers must verify whether their use of AI in research requires special approval, particularly when uploading private or confidential research data.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

IS&T recommends that MIT community members consult with IS&T before purchasing or using generative AI tools, and recommends using tools already licensed by IS&T for the MIT community.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MIT maintains a list of approved generative AI tools licensed by IS&T for use by the MIT community. Only these tools are approved for use with low- and medium-risk information, and any tool not on the list requires contacting [email protected] for assessment before use or purchase. No generative AI tools are approved for use with High Risk MIT information.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MIT prohibits the use of generative AI for purposes that may require in-depth risk assessments without prior consultation with [email protected]. Such purposes include recruitment and hiring of employees, evaluating student academic performance, making investment decisions, and complaint and dispute resolution.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

When allowed or required to use AI in an assessment, students must follow all instructions and restrictions on its use, clearly document the type of AI used and how it contributed, and provide written acknowledgment of the use of AI and its extent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chief Examiners have overarching responsibility for designing and setting assessment conditions, including communicating and verifying the responsible use of AI within assessment tasks.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Thesis examiners are not permitted to use Generative AI technologies (such as ChatGPT) during the thesis examination process to support, prepare, or write their examiners' report.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NMBU's generative AI guidelines require students to clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used, and to account for AI use in assignments or other work submitted for assessment or compulsory activity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs are permitted in accordance with the guidelines, while individual course descriptions may state that AI-based programs are not permitted for exams or other assessed work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs will normally not be permitted in written examinations on campus; for take-home exams, students must follow the AI-use specifications in the exam paper and course description.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google Gemini is listed for Oxford Brookes University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Oxford Brookes University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Oxford Brookes describes its university-wide position on generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment as a progressive embrace-and-adapt approach, with module leaders having discretion to advise on AI use in module assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

QUT's Academic Integrity Policy treats unauthorised or inappropriate technology use as a breach when it replaces or obscures a student's own effort, misrepresents authorship or understanding, or undermines assessment validity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

QUT's Assessment and Feedback Procedure requires unit outlines to include a statement about the use of technology such as artificial intelligence tools in assessment-item descriptions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

QUT student guidance says a unit coordinator will tell students whether GenAI can be used in preparing or completing assessment tasks.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Saarland University guidance says unauthorized use of generative AI in coursework or examinations, or failure to document it when required, is deception and may invalidate coursework or examinations and, in serious cases, lead to loss of examination entitlement.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Saarland University guidance says using generative AI as an aid for coursework and examinations is generally allowed, but instructors or examiners may restrict it to certain functions or prohibit it entirely.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Saarland University guidance says generative AI should have the status of an aid and must not replace students' own work; assessment requirements should ensure significant student contribution.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Stockholm University's central chatbot guidance says suspected unauthorized AI-chatbot use in an examination should be investigated and, if there is well-founded suspicion of cheating, reported in the same way as other cheating cases.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Stockholm University's central chatbot guidance recommends that teachers and examiners decide what AI-chatbot use is allowed or impermissible, noting that this may differ from course to course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Stockholm Business School says use of generative AI in examinations or mandatory assignments is prohibited unless explicitly allowed in the study guide or examination instructions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Berlin examination guidance states a general documentation duty when AI is used for assignments: students should identify the tools, extent, purpose, marked AI content, prompts, and their own contribution.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Berlin's living AI guidelines say fully automated assessment of study or examination performance is not permissible; AI output may not be adopted one-to-one and digital tools such as AI may serve only as aids.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Berlin examination guidance tells students they remain fully responsible for all AI-generated content; errors or inaccuracies in AI output count as the student's errors, and AI may support work but may not take over the actual work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For student assessment, TU Dublin guidance says generative AI can only be used in ways approved in advance by the lecturer, and that failure to follow the guidelines or inappropriate AI use may result in disciplinary action as a breach of academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Dublin recommends using the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale when designing assessments and communicating with students about how generative AI may be used in a specific assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Dublin's GenAI teaching and learning guidance says personal data should not be entered into GenAI systems that are not supported or approved by the University, and that students should not collect, store, or upload personal data to a GenAI system without permission or consent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PolyU takes an open and forward-looking stance on the use of GenAI tools as a positive and creative force in education, and expects that the usage of generative AI will become a normal part of learning, teaching, and assessment from 2023/24 Semester One.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PolyU guidelines state that work submitted for assessment must be the student's own work and must not be a copy or version of other people's work or AI-generated material.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PolyU states that while it embraces the use of GenAI tools in education, students must adhere to high standards of academic integrity in all forms of assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for The University of Newcastle, Australia (UON) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For assessments, UON's GenAI teaching, learning and assessment policy says students should follow teaching-staff directions about GenAI use and appropriately disclose and reference GenAI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UON's GenAI teaching, learning and assessment policy says use of GenAI in assessment does not automatically constitute academic misconduct, but may do so where lecturers or course coordinators have explicitly prohibited it.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Trinity's GenAI assessment guidance states that submitting GenAI-generated content as a student's own work is considered plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Trinity's College Statement treats AI and GenAI as relevant to teaching, learning, assessment and research while identifying risks including academic integrity, ethics and privacy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Trinity College Dublin says specific uses of GenAI in an assessment must be disclosed, properly acknowledged, and referenced; students should explain what, when, and how they used GenAI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Universität Jena's exam-law page states that if AI is used in examinations, the examiner must expressly allow AI as an aid and students must state the use of tools such as ChatGPT for the assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For study and teaching contexts, Universität Jena guidance says AI use in scientific work or examinations may be used only as a supporting aid and only after consultation with the examiner.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Universität Jena guidance says generative AI tools must not be used as the basis or final decision for person-related decisions, including student examination assessments and researcher grant assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HAWKI-GPT is listed for Universität Mannheim in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Copilot Chat is listed for Universität Mannheim in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Mannheim AI FAQ says AI use in study is possible depending on context, but for each exam students should clarify with the responsible teacher whether and under what conditions AI-system use is permitted; serious non-compliance may lead to final failure of an exam component.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Toulouse Law School students, the AI guidelines permit study-support uses such as summaries, explanations, plans, practice QCMs, and reformulation, but say AI must not be used to fabricate all or part of graded work and list generation of exam papers, homework, case comments, or dissertations as prohibited uses.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Toulouse Law School teaching, training, and assessment activities, the AI guidelines say AI use by a student or teacher must be declared when it contributes to work that is submitted, published, or evaluated.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Toulouse Law School guidelines say homework may be corrected for pedagogical purposes but should not count toward continuous-assessment grades except where AI use itself is evaluated; in that case students must explain their method, describe AI use, and correct or analyze results.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCSB-managed AI platform on AWS Bedrock is listed for University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

GitHub Copilot is listed for University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Google AI Pro for Education is listed for University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

DALL·E is listed for University of Canberra in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Canberra in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For teaching periods commencing after 1 February 2026, the University of Canberra says its GenAI assessment position uses three assessment-use categories: Permitted, Guided, and Restricted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UEA's plagiarism and collusion policy permits AI to help students understand material and expression, but says using AI to complete an assessment, or part of it, is plagiarism and may reach contract cheating.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UEA's teaching and learning policy does not prohibit generative AI use, and says each School of Study should meet at least annually to discuss generative AI's impact on assessment design and set School-level expectations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UEA's research and innovation policy requires a self-assessment process when generative AI will be used, built, or developed in UEA research, subject to listed exceptions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Greenwich 2025 Assessment and Feedback Policy says staff will provide students with the university guide on referencing generative AI, a video on using AI effectively, and the Declaration of AI use via the VLE to support understanding of acceptable AI usage in assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Greenwich 2025 Assessment and Feedback Policy says assessment will be designed to maintain integrity and standards where students have access to generative AI, and encourages staff to incorporate generative AI as a learning tool while facilitating responsible student use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Greenwich student AI guidance encourages students to use AI to aid learning, while telling students to acknowledge AI use in assignments by adding a declaration and not to copy and paste directly from an AI tool for submitted English-language work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kent's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy defines unauthorised AI use as using generative AI beyond the scope permitted for a specific assessment, or failing to acknowledge permitted use appropriately.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kent's AI principles say academic judgement about student work remains with academic staff, and AI will not be used to make marking or academic-outcome decisions unless explicitly authorised, clearly communicated, pedagogically justified, and subject to human oversight.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kent's student AI academic-integrity guidance says that, unless specifically instructed otherwise, submitted assessment content must always be the student's own work and students should not include AI-generated material in submissions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNC-Chapel Hill's administrative generative AI guidance says sensitive information should not be entered into generative AI tools unless the Information Security Office has completed a risk assessment and the Data Governance Oversight Group has approved the tool for sensitive information.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNC-Chapel Hill's faculty grading and assessment guidance says students must be able to request a full instructor-led review if they disagree with an AI-generated grade or have concerns about automated feedback.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNC-Chapel Hill's faculty grading and assessment guidance says AI systems used for grading or feedback must be institutionally approved and compliant with data security and privacy standards; faculty using GenAI for grading retain full responsibility for evaluative decisions and feedback.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for University of Reading in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Reading assessment guidance uses a three-category GenAI framework: Category 1 prohibits GenAI use, Category 2 permits GenAI as a tool to aid development of the assessment, and Category 3 actively encourages and evaluates GenAI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Reading student guidance tells students to assume Category 1 when an assignment brief says nothing about GenAI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Sussex staff guidance says module convenors determine and communicate AI-use permissions via module Canvas sites and choose one of three assessment-level permissions: AI use prohibited, AI in an assistive role, or AI with an integral role.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Sussex student misconduct guidance includes unauthorized or inappropriate use of digital technologies including AI, and gives examples including AI use where prohibited and submitting permitted AI-generated work without required acknowledgement.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Sussex staff guidance provides a prohibited-use assessment statement saying generative AI tools must not be used to generate materials or content for that assessment, while allowing other assistive technology for registered reasonable adjustments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UZH guiding principles say faculties should ensure equal opportunities and fair assessment conditions whether AI tools are permitted or prohibited, and that UZH will uphold academic integrity and penalize violations of its disciplinary or integrity rules.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UZH recommendations say faculties and study program directors are responsible for specific generative-AI guidelines and should ensure students know whether and how generative AI may be used in assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UZH recommendations say a declaration of authenticity can address generative-AI tools, that the person completing it should confirm only permitted aids or tools were used, and that any generative-AI use must always be indicated.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aarhus University student guidance says students who use GAI in an exam project must submit a declaration naming the applications and explaining how they were used, and unchanged GAI output used in an exam project must be cited like other secondary-source quotations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aarhus University student guidance says that when GAI is not allowed for an exam, students are not allowed to use GAI for proofreading or feedback on the exam text, and for internet-allowed exams where GAI is not allowed students may do regular web searches but may not actively use AI functions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

AU Educate guidance for teaching staff says that from fall 2024 students are allowed to use GAI in all AU exams unless academic regulations or the course description explicitly state that they may not, and it advises teachers to read those rules for their courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ADA University's Honor Code treats violating exam, test, and assignment rules, accepting unauthorized help, and using someone else's intellectual work without proper credit as unacceptable behavior.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ADA University's Student Assessment Regulations say assignments are to be designed and conducted to minimize plagiarism and cheating risk, including contract cheating, and that students are to receive clear instructions on avoiding academic-integrity breaches.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ADA University's Student Assessment Regulations require submitted take-home exams to include a signed and dated academic-integrity declaration confirming the work is the student's own and that all sources used were acknowledged.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Adelaide University's Academic Integrity Policy treats inappropriate use of AI that subverts an assignment or gives unfair academic advantage as an example of academic misconduct, including submitting AI-produced work as the student's own or using AI-generated information without acknowledgement.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Adelaide University's invigilated online exam rules state that students may use only tools, software, or materials explicitly approved in exam instructions, and list AI tools such as ChatGPT as not permitted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Adelaide University coursework assessment, the Assessment Procedure states that course coordinators will ensure students are informed about appropriate use of generative AI and similar tools in the course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should use AI tools, including generative AI, only to the extent outlined in the assessment brief, and should not use them where the brief explicitly does not permit them.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Birkbeck's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy includes using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to create assessment content or argument presented as the student's own intellectual work within its description of contract cheating, unless generative AI use is permitted in the assessment brief with guidance.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Caltech admissions prohibits applicants from copying and pasting directly from an AI generator, relying on AI-generated content to outline or draft essays, replacing their unique voice with AI-generated content, or translating essays via AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Caltech admissions permits applicants to use AI tools like Grammarly or Microsoft Editor for grammar and spelling review of completed essays, to generate brainstorming questions or exercises, and to research the college application process.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Caltech HSS generative AI policy applies to all assignments including major papers, exams, discussion board posts, reflections, and problem sets.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students are responsible for the content of work they submit. Performance assessments must be conducted independently and personally; GenAI may serve a supplementary role but not replace student efforts.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lecturers determine whether and how GenAI may be used in their courses and for respective assessments. Teaching materials created with GenAI must be subjected to quality control by the lecturer.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Violations of GenAI guidelines such as use of unauthorised aids or non-disclosure of their use are subject to disciplinary action under existing performance assessment rules and the declaration of originality.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For exams, FU's Eckpunkte state that using AI tools that are not expressly permitted is treated as unauthorized aid or deception about independent performance; when AI tools are permitted, their use must be marked and documented.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The KI.Assist@FU terms prohibit use of the chatbot to process personal data and exclude use for correcting or evaluating student work or otherwise assessing students' abilities and knowledge.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For exams, FU's Eckpunkte urgently advise against mandatory AI use for the time being and state that automated AI assessment of learning outcomes and exams is prohibited until further notice; AI may at most support preparation, with the examiner retaining the final assessment decision.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Goethe University Frankfurt's student-facing Lehre virtuell guidance says students who intend to use AI in an examination context must discuss what is allowed with their instructors and should assume no explicit permission is equivalent to a prohibition.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Goethe University Frankfurt's teacher-facing assessment guidance recommends defining clear rules for AI use, making AI use transparent, and using AI detection software only as supporting evidence rather than as the sole basis for proof.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Goethe University Frankfurt's general Lehre virtuell guidance states that the university generally supports testing and applying generative AI in study and teaching, while noting ethical, legal, and didactic considerations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Griffith's academic integrity page states that uncited content created using generative artificial intelligence software is conduct that always constitutes Academic Misconduct, and that representing AI-generated assessment content as a student's own work is Academic Misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Griffith's student generative AI guidance warns that many open or public tools do not guarantee confidentiality and advises users not to enter personal information, information about others, or course materials such as assessment tasks or marking rubrics.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Griffith's student-facing generative AI guidance says students may use generative AI for self-study without citation, but for assessment tasks they must acknowledge its use and include a short declaration if they use it while completing the task.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Students may not submit content generated with generative AI as their own without disclosure, and using AI in exams, assignments, or academic assessments is treated as cheating unless the course instructor permits it.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

King Saud University's 2025 Student Learning Assessment Policy supports use of generative AI tools in service of the educational process while emphasizing original submitted work, disclosure of AI use, and faculty authority to permit or prohibit generative AI use by assignment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

King Saud University's assessment policy says the university supports using generative AI tools in education while emphasizing knowledge, skills, and awareness needed to regulate use and understand AI-generated information or data.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure defines unacceptable use of generative AI as presenting AI-generated content as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except when the assessment brief explicitly permits it.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kingston University's AG2 guidance says that if generative AI is used as part of the editorial process, the student must acknowledge that use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kingston University's AG2 editorial-help guidance covers software tools including generative AI when students use third-party help in draft or final assessment work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Korea University tells instructors not to enter personal information, academic records, assessment questions, or other sensitive or non-public materials into AI tools, with special caution for external AI services.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Korea University tells learners not to enter personal information, non-public learning materials, or assessment questions into external AI tools, and to remember that AI inputs may be stored or reused.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Korea University recommends designing assignments and assessments to show learners’ critical thinking, creativity, problem-solving process, and their own reasoning even when AI is used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KTH tells students that generative AI use in graded assignments and exams should follow the course-specific information, and that the teacher's course rule takes precedence over general guidance.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KTH teacher guidance says teachers need to assess how possible generative AI use in a course can affect learning and write course-specific information about acceptable use based on that assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KTH teacher guidance tells staff to remind students that, in any assessment, students shall honestly disclose help received and sources used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

When faculty permit student GenAI use, Kuwait University's policy says faculty may require students to identify the GenAI tools used, the assignment parts generated or assisted by GenAI, and the prompt used for each part.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kuwait University's GenAI policy says faculty may use GenAI to create classroom materials, but should always verify GenAI results when grading projects, homework, or exams because GenAI might not be accurate or fair.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Kuwait University's November 2024 GenAI policy says it encourages optimal GenAI use while regulating artificial intelligence use to prevent misuse, and it covers students, faculty, and employees.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

LMU IfKW student guidance says AI may be used in assessments only with explicit teacher permission; if no explicit permission is given, students must assume AI use is not allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

LMU IfKW guidance treats verbatim or minimally changed AI-generated text without proper attribution as plagiarism, and says significant unattributed AI-generated text in assessed work can receive grade 5 (failed).

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

LMU teaching guidance recommends adapting e-exam questions for ChatGPT-era assessment, including tasks that require critical reflection on ChatGPT limitations rather than simple knowledge or comprehension questions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Manchester Metropolitan University's 2025/26 Academic Misconduct Policy treats unauthorised generative AI use in assessment, where a student attempts to gain an unfair advantage by passing it off as their own work, as academic misconduct that may be investigated under the policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Manchester Metropolitan University tells students to check the assessment brief for specific instructions on generative AI, says they should only use AI as directed, and says they cannot use it to create the assessment itself.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Manchester Metropolitan University library guidance says some generative AI uses do not need citation, but documented AI-assisted search strategies, approved research-project AI use, AI-generated media in submitted assessments, and AI-generated code or Excel formulas must be cited or referenced.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Maynooth University assessments, the student GenAI guidance states that if teaching staff or department guidelines do not clearly indicate GenAI use, no GenAI is permitted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Maynooth University student GenAI guidance says GenAI tools will not be used by staff to grade or provide feedback on students' assessed work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Maynooth University student GenAI guidance says GenAI may support learning and assessment when used appropriately and with permission from department lecturers; students should consult department staff about allowed use for each assignment or task.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

McMaster's operational excellence generative AI guidelines tell employees not to upload confidential, personal, personal health, or proprietary information to a generative AI tool unless required security/privacy assessments have been completed, while noting an enterprise Microsoft Copilot exception when logged in with McMaster credentials.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

McMaster's Provost academic integrity page says McMaster has not activated Turnitin's AI Detector, while privacy/security and reliability assessment work is underway and activation may allow retroactive submissions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

McMaster's privacy considerations page says that for tools including automated functions, including artificial intelligence, the university must conduct an Algorithmic Impact Assessment, with the Privacy Office responsible for the AIA process.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Nankai University's undergraduate AI tool norm prohibits AI use for confidential or sensitive-content creation, uploading confidential content to AI platforms, generating or altering core arguments or research data, academic misconduct such as ghostwriting, plagiarism, or copying, and AI use in listed midterm and final assessment formats unless a teacher explains a special-use case in advance.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Nankai University's undergraduate AI tool norm permits students, with course teacher or supervisor consent and where core assessment or innovation is not affected, to use AI tools for literature search and management, grammar and formatting support with marked generated content, chart production from real data, and code assistance subject to author review and testing.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Nankai University's trial undergraduate teaching AI tool use norm applies to undergraduate teaching, learning, examination, evaluation, and management activities, while encouraging teaching units, teachers, and students to use AI tools reasonably in specified teaching and learning contexts.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NUS states that instructors should be transparent about where and how they deploy AI in courses, including for generating content, virtual tutoring, and assessment feedback.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NUS requires prior approval from Head of Department or relevant Deanery before using AI tools to provide instruction, feedback, or marks to students, submitted via an AI Risk Assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NUS policy sets the default assumption that AI tool use is permitted for unsupervised (take-home) assessments, provided use is duly acknowledged; assessments forbidding AI must be conducted in-person and instructor-supervised.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For exams, the guide says AI-tool use is at the discretion of teachers; if no corresponding rule has been made, AI tools are unauthorized aids and are not permitted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Salzburg guide says teachers and thesis supervisors set, for each course, assessment, exam, or supervised thesis, whether and to what extent AI technologies may or should be used, and that these requirements for assessed work should be communicated transparently and in writing in advance.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Senate recommendation says curriculum commissions may identify exams to be taken in secure environments or by analog means to prevent AI use, and may identify exams where AI instruments are useful or desired, especially using the university-licensed Academic AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For the Philosophical Faculty, the page says use of AI without examiner approval is treated as attempted deception and graded 5.0.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Philosophical Faculty examinations, the page says AI may be used by students only when explicitly and uniformly permitted for all examinees in a cohort or seminar.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Bonner Zentrum für Lehrer*innenbildung written work, the page says use of AI applications such as ChatGPT is prohibited unless explicitly allowed by examiners, and otherwise is an unauthorized aid.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NotebookLM is listed for Rutgers University–Newark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Rutgers OIT guidance says anyone considering purchase of an AI application for use at Rutgers must follow the same security processes and risk assessments as other software purchases, as well as Rutgers digital-accessibility standards.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Rutgers teaching guidance says GenAI detectors should be treated with caution and cites research indicating they cannot currently be recommended for determining academic-integrity violations because of accuracy limits and false-accusation risk.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

RWTH's scenario catalog states that assessment of examination work using AI systems is not permissible at the present time, while limited help drafting feedback may be conceivable if it gives the AI no decision-making role, transfers no personal data, and is finally checked by humans.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

RWTH's CLS documents hub presents a generative-AI legal guidance package and states that these legal-aspect documents are currently available only in German.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

RWTH's exam-related questions document treats unauthorized use of AI systems in exams as an attempt to deceive, but says suspicion should not primarily be based on automatic AI-detector evaluation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SCAI Education is listed for Sorbonne University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules state that assessment documents must be the student's or assessed group's personal work, AI use is refused unless explicitly authorized, and authorized AI use should mention the source.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules treat unauthorized AI-generated work presented as one's own, or authorized AI use without source mention, as plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Stanford Graduate School of Business (GSB) MBA and MSx courses, instructors may not ban student use of AI tools for take-home coursework, including assignments and exams. Instructors may choose whether to allow AI for in-class work. For PhD and undergraduate courses, GSB follows the university-wide Generative AI Policy Guidance from the Office of Community Standards.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Stanford School of Medicine MD and MSPA programs have a formal AI policy: students may use AI for learning, clarification, and grammar/style editing unless contrary to assignment instructions. AI use for closed-book exams or assignments where internet is restricted is prohibited unless explicitly authorized by faculty. Students are responsible for all AI-generated content they submit, must disclose and cite substantial AI contributions, and violations may result in disciplinary action.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Stanford Law School instructors set their own AI policies; in the absence of a course-specific policy, students may use generative AI to support learning and develop or refine their own ideas, but may not use AI to generate content presented as their own work. Using AI during an exam or to draft/revise submitted work is not permitted unless disclosed in advance and explicitly authorized in writing by the instructor. Unauthorized use may result in an F grade and/or referral to Stanford's Office of Community Standards.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Stellenbosch University requires postgraduate students to declare any use of AI tools and provides internal and examination declaration processes for postgraduate research work.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Stellenbosch University's Senate-approved AI position statement provides governing principles for ethical AI use in research and teaching-learning-assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For assessment, Stellenbosch guidance says AI-generated content may not form a substantial part of an assessment unless permitted, and interim guidelines advise that students should know whether AI use is allowed for each assessment task.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Darmstadt provides a generative AI handreichung as orientation for students and lecturers, covering reflected, transparent use, good scientific practice, and context-specific rules for examinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Darmstadt's HDA guidance says students remain responsible for submitted work, while lecturers decide whether and how AI may be used in an examination task.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Darmstadt's Computer Science department treats AI tools as examination aids under APB section 22(7), says they must be listed in written work when used, and warns that undisclosed or prohibited use can trigger suspected deception under APB section 38.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The URZ ChatAI page states that, compared with commercial providers, no data is stored at GWDG or elsewhere or used for training, and open-source models are hosted directly by GWDG.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

A TU Freiberg news item says DeepSeek R1 is available to university members through a GWDG agreement for privacy-compliant testing via AcademicCloud services.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

A TU Freiberg PDF guide for the Professur für Rohstoffabbau und Spezialverfahren unter Tage states that AI-tool use in student and scientific documents must be clearly identified; unmarked AI use is evaluated as attempted fraud.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCL uses a 3-category assessment framework for GenAI: Category 1 requires own work only; Category 2 permits GenAI with acknowledgement; Category 3 includes essential GenAI use as part of the assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCL defines academic misconduct in the context of GenAI as gaining an unfair advantage over other students; there is no single list of fair and unfair uses as it depends on the assessment category.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCL permits using GenAI to help with spelling, grammar, and language tone in assessments, but it must not change the content and meaning of what the student has written.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UAEU's student GenAI policy applies to all university students and to student work submitted for academic credit.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UAEU prohibits student use of GenAI in specified assessment contexts unless the course instructor states otherwise.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UAEU permits student use of GenAI in an assistive role when the tutor specifies the permitted processes within the assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The 2026 AI-and-examinations handbook states that AI detectors are not reliable and do not provide legally secure proof of deception.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The official e-assessment AI page says using AI such as GPT.UP may not be a condition for passing an assessment, and AI should not be used by instructors for full creation and grading of summative examinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The 2026 AI-and-examinations handbook advises examiners to state early and in writing whether and how AI may be used in a course and assessment, and to use transparency rules when AI is allowed or cannot be explicitly excluded.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UGA's AI reference framework says use of tools mobilizing AI is prohibited by principle for knowledge assessment unless explicitly authorized, with study regulations and assessment modalities specifying the AI-use framework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Outside knowledge assessment, UGA's AI reference framework leaves AI-use instructions to the teacher and teaching team, while stating that an AI tool must not substitute for the student's exercise of the skills used in the assignment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UGA's AI reference framework strongly discourages transmitting unpublished or unpatented research work to a generative AI tool, for example for translation or summarization.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Université Paris-Saclay's 2025-2026 first-cycle exam rules say that, for Licence professionnelle, Licence, and Licence double-diplôme students covered by the rules, use of ChatGPT or another AI tool must be explicitly mentioned when it is not prohibited, and failure to mention AI as a source will be sanctioned.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Université Paris-Saclay's 2025-2026 master exam rules say that use of ChatGPT or another AI tool must be explicitly mentioned when it is not prohibited, like any external source borrowing or citation, and failure to mention AI as a source will be sanctioned.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In the Graduate School Droit context, the Université Paris-Saclay IAG working-group article says a guide of good practices and evaluation support for law teacher-researchers is being drafted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For UCC taught-programme assessments, academic integrity is breached if students submit GenAI products as their own work without acknowledgement and without authorisation to use GenAI for the task.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCC's academic integrity policy says the University does not sanction use of GenAI detection software for detecting or investigating alleged academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCC's Academic Integrity for Examinations and Assessments Policy applies to work presented or submitted by registered students for examination, assessment, or credit in taught programmes.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PGR students at University of Bristol are not permitted to use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to write any text used in their thesis or APM reports, as research degree students must demonstrate ability to write about research in their own words.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Bristol considers the use of AI or translation tools to be cheating if used for more than generating the occasional short phrase within a sentence or checking basic grammar and spelling, unless assessment instructions allow more comprehensive use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Bristol uses a four-category system for AI use in assessments: Category 1 (prohibited - no AI use), Category 2 (minimal - spelling/grammar only, default), Category 3 (selective - certain tasks as specified), and Category 4 (integral - AI required for assessment).

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The UC Berkeley Academic Senate recommends that for assignments where GenAI is not permitted, instructors should adopt enforcement mechanisms such as in-person proctored exams, an additional oral exam component, or a written statement of academic integrity, since no validated GenAI detection tools exist.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UC Berkeley warns that AI use involving highly-consequential automated decision-making requires extreme caution and should not be employed without prior consultation with appropriate campus entities including the responsible unit head. Examples include legal analysis, recruitment/personnel decisions, replacing represented employees, facial recognition security tools, and grading or assessment of student work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UC Berkeley has AI risk assessment pre-screening questions that employees can use to gauge the level of risk involved for an AI use case where AI is integrated into a product, service, or feature at the university. Depending on the risk level determined, the CERC-AIR subcommittee may be engaged for a broader risk assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Cologne Justitiariat says an exam or significant parts of an exam fully generated by AI are not an independent performance and are prohibited as deception.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Cologne Justitiariat says AI use in examinations is not objectionable under examination law when the student still produces their own independent work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For term papers, theses, take-home exams, papers, and similar work, the University of Cologne Justitiariat says AI use is generally possible if independent work remains, and examiners may require disclosure of both the AI use and the related prompts depending on the use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, a formal declaration of generative AI use is required for all bachelor's, master's, or doctoral work and for academic assessment or production leading to a degree or official title.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, teachers are free to allow or prohibit AI use in courses and assessed assignments, and must define the framework and referencing requirements when generative AI is permitted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNIGE guidance says academic work and learning assessment must include clear instructions about whether students may use generative AI tools, and that use of those tools must be supervised.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Hohenheim guidance says generative AI systems are generally permitted as aids in unsupervised written exams such as term papers, seminar papers, and theses when their use does not conflict with the exam purpose; the examiner or module supervisor decides for the specific assessment.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

When generative AI tools are permitted for written work, University of Hohenheim materials say students submit an AI-use declaration in addition to the usual declaration of originality, with the exact contents determined by the examiner.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The GPTalk guide tells students not to use GPTalk as their sole source, to enter no personal data, to remain responsible for the content as authors, and to make AI use transparent; it also says lecturers may not use GPTalk to correct or assess student work.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For educational activities, the University of Milan permits AI-supported self-assessment when explicit, but does not permit delegating learning assessment to AI tools when the assessment contributes to the final exam grade.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In educational settings, the University of Milan advises that students must explicitly declare AI use in assessed work and that teachers must explicitly declare AI use in educational activities.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Milan has an AI governance document intended to promote ethical, legally compliant and conscious use of AI tools, with annexed guidelines for teaching, research, third mission and administrative activities.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Munster central guidance states that whether generative AI systems may be used for examination work depends on the assessed competency and is set by examination regulations and examiners; for work where expression, translation, or code creation is itself assessed, use is generally not permissible.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Faculty 06, the dean's office recommends that generative AI content in examination work be clearly cited, that an explanation of tool use be added, and that full prompts and AI responses be appended; instructors may adapt or reduce these documentation and citation duties for individual exams or courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University and State Library Munster advises users to ask instructors or their university before using generative AI for academic work and warns that AI use in examination documents can be evaluated as attempted deception.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNE's Student Academic Integrity Policy includes artificial intelligence tools in its example of work substantially written by someone else, within the policy's breach framework for undergraduate and postgraduate award and non-award coursework students; the policy states it does not apply to higher degree by research courses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

A UNE School of Education public myLearn information page tells students that computer programs, artificial intelligence tools, or other tools should not be used to write or produce any part of an assessment response unless explicitly referenced and in line with unit coordinator advice for the assessment task.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNE's public Learning Online academic integrity myLearn section states that a Generative AI and Academic Integrity at UNE module exists and lists module topics including general principles for use of generative AI, Turnitin detection and AI, and referencing generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNC Charlotte's Center for Teaching and Learning says its AI syllabus guide provides flexible course-level examples and does not provide or use a university-created AI policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNC Charlotte Student Accountability & Conflict Resolution recommends that faculty clearly communicate what AI use is permitted in courses, academic exercises, or assessments, and identifies written notice about how and when AI tools may be used as a best practice.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNC Charlotte Student Accountability & Conflict Resolution provides assignment and exam sample language stating that, where AI use is permitted, transparency is required and failure to disclose AI use may be considered a Code of Student Academic Integrity violation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Penn researchers should obtain IRB approvals prior to exposing research participant data to AI tools and should exercise caution when research involves high-risk data including PII and health information.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In the absence of other guidance, Penn students should treat the use of AI as they would treat assistance from another person — if it is unacceptable to have another person substantially complete a task like writing an essay, it is also unacceptable to have AI complete the task.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Wharton Academy prohibits students from using AI to complete personal reflection or opinion-based tasks, from using AI to complete group assignments instead of collaborating with peers, and from using AI to cheat on exams or tests.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance says AI tools such as ChatGPT should generally not be used to generate the final version of assessed work, unless the coursework briefing clearly states an exception.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance states that using ChatGPT or similar AI tools to generate assessed work for submission is considered plagiarism and a breach of the university's academic offences regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance describes limited AI uses such as brainstorming, planning, structuring work, proofreading, checking typos, generating example code, and exploring how code works.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Sharjah's AI academic-texts policy applies to master’s and doctoral theses, thesis proposals and research plans, thesis-derived scientific publications, graduate-level courses and programs, and academic texts submitted to Graduate Studies bodies.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For the covered graduate context, University of Sharjah strictly forbids AI-based tools in exams and quizzes and treats extensive use of ChatGPT or other generative AI tools to complete assignments as academically dishonest.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Sharjah states that plagiarism and AI-text detection tools may be used only as supportive instruments and that no disciplinary decision shall be based solely on automated detection output.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ChatGPT is listed for University of Southampton in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Southampton guidance says students are allowed to use GenAI tools like ChatGPT to develop learning and support studies, but should never submit work created or part-created by GenAI for assessments they claim as their own.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Southampton guidance lists acceptable GenAI uses such as arranged assistive technology, study-buddy support, clearly referencing GenAI use, and summarising complex ideas or academic texts; it lists copying GenAI output into work, asking GenAI to write or rewrite work, asking GenAI to answer an assessment question, and sharing module tutor materials in a GenAI tool as unacceptable uses.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of St Andrews in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

St Andrews Good Academic Practice policy treats presenting AI output as a student's own work without acknowledgement as unauthorised use of AI, except where an assessment specifically permits or encourages such tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

St Andrews student guidance says students should not use generative AI for assessed work unless the module coordinator explicitly authorises it, and any AI use should be declared on an assessment coversheet.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Tasmania guidance says unapproved, inappropriate, or unacknowledged use of generative AI may be considered dishonest or unfair behaviour and therefore a breach of academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Tasmania guidance says whether AI is encouraged or not allowed can vary by assessment, and students should check assessment instructions or confirm with the Unit Coordinator if unsure.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Tasmania guidance says generative AI tools should only be used to support learning and assist with assessment completion, while submitted work must be the student's own and follow the assessment task instructions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UToledo's Academic dishonesty policy lists representing the words, ideas, or information of an artificial intelligence program as one's own without proper documentation as an example of academic dishonesty, and says faculty are expected to tell students what materials and procedures, including artificial intelligence programs, are authorized.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Within the University of Toledo College of Law default rule, generative AI may be used for research-like search, grammar correction, and other functions attendant to completing an assignment, but may not compose submitted assignment text and may not be used for any exam purpose unless an instructor deviates in writing with notice.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Toledo maintains a central Office of the Provost AI Policies page that points instructors to optional syllabus language for AI and links to a College of Law generative AI policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For the UniTS 2025/2026 PROGRAMMAZIONE [160IN] course, students must explicitly declare any use of Large Language Model tools such as ChatGPT in exam-related content, including partial use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For the UniTS 2025/2026 PROGRAMMAZIONE [160IN] course, the teacher reserves the right to use an oral exam to further investigate a student's actual contribution to any produced content.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Trieste Department of Humanities page on AI describes several AI tools as useful for preparing learning units, lessons, assessments, and teaching materials, and says ChatGPT can support lesson planning, tests, rubrics, quizzes, and BES/DSA content adaptation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UiT tells students that, when AI use is permitted for exams or assessments, they must describe how they used the tool and cite AI-edited content.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UiT says the course coordinator defines the extent to which AI tools may be used in teaching, assignments, and exams, and exam instructions must specify permitted aids including any allowed AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UiT describes four AI levels for exams and assessments, ranging from human-only work to advanced AI collaboration, with corresponding documentation expectations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Waterloo's Academic Integrity page says instructors should state whether AI tools such as ChatGPT are allowed for assignments, tests, or exams, and that students who do not follow those instructor rules are subject to Policy 71 academic-misconduct processes.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Waterloo IST says review processes assess AI tools used with University data for security, privacy, and contractual risks.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For units or individuals deploying AI-enabled systems that process University data, Waterloo IST says projects must undergo an Information Risk Assessment and receive Information Steward approval before using University data.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Utrecht University uses an AI index for students as a five-level scale for how AI may be used, with teachers able to choose levels for a course or specific assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Utrecht University's researcher guidance says personal or sensitive data should not be used as GenAI input unless the user is certain data protection law is respected.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Utrecht University says AI tools should be allow-listed according to an AI assessment framework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Victoria University's Academic Integrity Policy lists submitting work derived from a generative AI model without permission or correct acknowledgement as a breach of academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Victoria University says users who want to use alternative AI tools must assess them using the AI Risk Classification Model, follow AI Steering Committee guidance, and register AI tools in the planned AI Registry.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Victoria University's Academic Integrity Guidelines say assessment tasks may explicitly allow or disallow text-generating tools, and staff course teams decide and communicate expectations to students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ZHAW has a public university guideline, valid from 1 March 2025, on the use of generative AI systems in assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For ZHAW examinations, specific generative AI systems are not allowed unless they are explicitly stated as permitted aids.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For evaluating assessments, ZHAW says teaching staff may use generative AI only as an aid for open-ended task formats and should refrain from using software to detect AI-generated text for assessment purposes.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Altai State University's official UЦОТ advisory says AI assistants are available to teachers for online-course content, course/test generation, and related educational-material workflows.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Altai State University's official UЦОТ advisory describes ASUProctor as an AI-algorithm proctoring system that records prohibited actions during online testing and gives teachers a report for later decision-making.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ashoka University's Academic Integrity Policy applies to students doing coursework, research, thesis work, partner-university coursework, study-related internships or placements, and work with University Centers; it expects original work, source acknowledgement, independent assignment completion where applicable, and honesty during examinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ashoka University's AI@Ashoka page is an official AI research-initiative page that describes interdisciplinary AI and machine-learning projects; it is not presented in the extracted text as a student AI-use policy, assessment rule, or approved-tools policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Auburn student-facing academic-integrity guidance tells students to review the syllabus and ask the instructor before using AI on coursework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Auburn guidance says instructional faculty may encourage or restrict student AI use in courses and should give students clear expectations and disciplinary-consequence awareness.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For ACU coursework students, unauthorized or undisclosed use of generative AI, paraphrasing or translation tools is listed as academic misconduct unless use is authorized in the assessment requirements and properly acknowledged.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ACU Library guidance tells students that GenAI may be permitted in some contexts, but assessment use should be clearly authorized and acknowledged, and final work should reflect the student's own analysis and understanding.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bournemouth University academic-offences guidance lists using artificial intelligence software to write all or part of an assignment and claiming the work as your own as an example of an academic offence.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Bournemouth University's 6H taught-awards policy defines academic offences as attempts to gain unfair advantage in assessment by deception or fraudulent means and frames academic integrity around responsibility for one's own work, acknowledging others' work, honest reporting, and avoiding unfair advantage.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Cardiff University's 2025/26 Academic Regulations and Policies include a teaching, learning and assessment expectation that providers establish communicated approaches to technologies such as Generative Artificial Intelligence and define misuse of those technologies.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

A Cardiff Learning and Teaching Academy post reports that Cardiff published updated staff guidance on AI in education on the intranet and worked with students on guidance for ethical and responsible generative AI use in learning.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chalmers Library's student guidance says whether and how AI tools may be used in examinations is decided for each course by the coordinator and examiner, so students should ask at the beginning of each course.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Chalmers Library's ethical-use guidance says users should not upload sensitive or private information, copyright-protected material, or text intended for a thesis, dissertation, or scientific publication to chatbots.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

COMSATS regulations on unfair means and academic dishonesty apply to all students of the institute and include copying from any paper, book, note, or electronic device, or using or attempting to use such or other unfair means, during examinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

COMSATS unfair-means regulations treat intentionally or knowingly representing another person's words or ideas as one's own in an academic exercise, and failing to attribute quoted, paraphrased, or borrowed material, as unfair means.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Cornell's committee report states that any information educators are obligated to keep private under FERPA or HIPAA should not be shared with generative AI tools or uploaded to third-party AI vendors.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Cornell's committee report does not recommend the use of generative AI for summative evaluation or grading of student work, stating that evaluation and grading is among the most important tasks entrusted to faculty.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Deakin guidance says students should acknowledge genAI use where it contributed to developing assessment work and should include tool, access date, prompts, output, and where it was used.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Deakin student guidance says genAI may be used as a starting point for some study tasks, but not to write the final assessment or do the work being assessed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The IFÉ Édurevue n°154 discusses generative AI in relation to plagiarism, cheating, assessment design, and academic integrity; it cites examples of other universities' AI charters but does not establish an ENS Lyon AI-use charter.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The ENS-hosted CultureSciences Physique site has a teaching-resource item on generative AI, teaching, and evaluation that points to external resources; the page is a resource pointer and should not be treated as ENS Lyon institutional policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

EPFL requires students to disclose the use of AI tools in assessment work. EPFL rules (Lex 1.3.3, Article 4) require that all assessment material that is not the student's personal and original contribution must be recognizable as such.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

EPFL recommends that teachers make explicit to students what AI use is not legitimate in a course and what rules accompany AI tool use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ewha's class-stage AI-use guidance says course guidance may state that copying generative-AI outputs directly into assignments or exams, fabricating or spreading false information with generative AI, infringing copyright with generative AI, or otherwise harming academic truthfulness and trust may be considered misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Ewha's class-stage AI-use guidance presents course-level generative-AI use as something instructors may define by explaining whether and how AI use is allowed and by asking students to disclose how they used generative AI in assignments.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The MSc Accounting and Finance master thesis guidelines warn that AI outputs may be inaccurate or hallucinated, say students remain responsible for evaluating AI outputs and appropriate use, and state that Turnitin plagiarism checking is mandatory before final manuscript submission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Faculty of Economics and Management bachelor thesis guidelines state that students remain responsible for evaluating AI outputs and warn that AI-generated text may create plagiarism risks; they also say Turnitin plagiarism checking is mandatory before final manuscript submission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Georgia Tech OIT says Institute technology services and tools must undergo comprehensive review, and third-party AI plugins are disabled pending comprehensive risk review.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Georgia Tech OIT academic guidance says courses that wish to embed assessment integrations with AI should directly consult CTL.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Graz treats AI tools in examinations as unauthorized aids unless they are explicitly permitted, and the public teaching page says unpermitted AI use in assessment can make an examination attempt invalid due to cheating.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Graz guidance requires transparent labelling of AI-supported tool use where applicable and cautions against entering personal, confidential, trade-secret, or NDA-protected data into AI applications.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HKBU describes its Principles for the Use of Generative AI Tools in Teaching and Learning, and Assessment as Senate-approved in June 2023 and effective from AY2023/2024.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

HKBU student academic-integrity guidance says academic dishonesty can lead to disciplinary actions, including reduced or failing grades, suspension, or academic dismissal.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Institut Polytechnique de Paris's 2025-2026 Master programs academic regulations prohibit the use of generative AI in assessments for those programs unless explicitly authorized by the instructor in written instructions. Unauthorized use constitutes academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Le règlement des études 2025-2026 des masters de l'Institut Polytechnique de Paris interdit l'utilisation de l'intelligence artificielle générative dans les évaluations de ces programmes, sauf autorisation explicite de l'enseignant dans ses consignes écrites. Tout manquement est considéré comme une fraude.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Iowa State guidance says confidential data classified as moderate or above may not be entered into any generative AI product unless assessed and approved under ISU data classification and applicable compliance processes.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Iowa State Student Conduct guidance says suspected AI-generated coursework referrals will be reviewed similarly to other forms of academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

JGU library guidance says the university is generally open to AI tools, but instructors or institutes may decide whether tools are allowed for a given assessment, and allowed use should be disclosed as an aid.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

JGU's digital teaching guidance encourages integrating AI literacy and transparent use of AI into teaching and, where appropriate, assessment design.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Johns Hopkins guidance describes potential instructional uses of generative AI tools, including course-material generation and adaptive personalized feedback.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Johns Hopkins Teaching @ JHU generative AI guidance hub includes dedicated topics for FERPA guidelines, HIPAA guidelines, ownership of data, and ethical considerations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Keele's Student Academic Misconduct Code of Practice classifies inappropriate GenAI use in assessment as academic misconduct when a student presents work as their own without proper attribution or uses GenAI where it is explicitly prohibited.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Keele's framework says students must be advised on how AI can be used in assessments and that this must be clearly stated; it also says staff should remind students to disclose AI-tool use and cite it properly.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KU Leuven student guidance says clear misuse of GenAI, where output is largely generated by GenAI and the student is not transparent about tool use, can be considered an irregularity under Article 84 of the Education and Examination Regulations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KU Leuven teaching guidance expects teaching staff to clearly inform students whether GenAI may be used for assignments and expects students to be transparent about GenAI use so assessment can be fair and correct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

La Trobe University policy requires an AI Adoption Risk Assessment for procurement or acquisition of all new AI systems/tools and for new use cases of existing university-approved AI systems/tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

La Trobe MyLaTrobe guidance says that when a subject allows AI use in an assessment, students need to submit an AI Acknowledgement, with the LMS indicating whether AI is permitted and what type of use is allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For examinations, LUH limits any mandatory AI use to centrally provided LUH systems, permits student choice of AI systems for independently written work only where exam rules allow and AI-generated content is identified, and prohibits automated correction or full/partial entry of exam work into an AI system.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

LUH student guidance says students should clarify with instructors how AI tools may be used for coursework or exams and remain responsible for lawful, responsible, and transparent use or non-use of AI tools; the ZQS page itself is explicitly non-binding.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lund University's student guidance says students who want to use GenAI for a compulsory assignment or examination must check whether it is permitted and how to report its use; presenting GenAI-generated work as one's own may be treated as cheating.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Lund University's student guidance says students should primarily use Lund-licensed tools such as Microsoft Copilot Chat and Google Gemini, and must not upload other students' work, sensitive personal data, or copyright-protected material.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MLU guidance prohibits automated grading or assessment of student examination work by AI; assessment remains the responsibility of examiners.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

When students use generative AI for study or assessment work, MLU's guideline says the systems and purposes or types of use are to be named and documented.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

McGill guidance says users should mitigate potential privacy concerns by removing personally identifying information when using AI tools, be careful with sensitive or restricted material, and avoid using Personal Health Information (PHI) or Payment Card Industry (PCI) data with AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

McGill's Provost-endorsed principles state that instructors remain responsible for comporting themselves according to the highest standards of academic integrity in their use of generative AI tools. Instructors must be explicit in course outlines about the expectations for use of generative AI tools and may set limits on their use in assessment tasks.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Middlesex states that generative AI tools may be used in assessments only as specified by the module leader, and allowed use requires written acknowledgment, extent of use, generation details including prompts, and citation or referencing where generated material is not adapted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Middlesex guidance says assessment criteria should make clear when and how students can use AI for each assessment, and how to acknowledge AI use appropriately.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Murdoch University Library says AI functionality in its databases and systems is tested by a Library Generative AI working group against criteria that include functionality, accessibility, technical requirements, privacy, data protection, rights, and ethics.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Murdoch University Library guidance says the AI tools listed in its guide have been tested by its Generative AI working group and must pass the listed criteria to be considered for use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NITT's 2024 PG Regulations classify possession of mobile phones, carrying unauthorized notes, communicating with other students, or copying during an assessment as punishable academic dishonesty, with zero marks for offenders.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NITT's 2024 PG Regulations say each course faculty prepares a course plan and that the course plan outlines assessment components, attendance requirements, academic integrity guidelines, and study material information.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

MEPhI lists a 2026 professional-development programme for school teachers and education administrators on AI tools, lesson-material creation, checking assignments, detecting signs of AI use, and legal foundations of AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In an official April 2026 MEPhI news item, Rector Vladimir Shevchenko framed generative AI as a challenge to text- and code-based assessment and pointed to personal professor-student communication as a response; this is rector commentary, not a binding university policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NSYSU's student generative AI guidance says students may not use generative AI tools for plagiarism or ghostwriting, cheating on exams, or privacy disclosure.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NSYSU's student academic integrity guidelines include cheating through unauthorized aids, tools, or electronic devices in coursework, assignments, or examinations when instructor consent has not been given.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NTHU's Chinese AI guideline gives assessment recommendations: depending on the course, AI assistance may be allowed for assignments, but diverse submission formats are recommended; exam questions should emphasize deeper reasoning, creativity, analysis, and critical thinking.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In CTLD's example ethics statements for conditionally open generative-AI use, undisclosed usage may allow instructors, the institution, or relevant units to reevaluate an assignment or report or withhold scores.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

GPT NTNU guidance permits use with open and internal data, but says GPT NTNU must not be used to assess, process, or analyze information about people.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

NTNU provides an official teaching and assessment AI guidance page for instructors, with links to resources on talking with students about AI and exams with AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Osaka University's TLSC assessment guidance says instructors need to choose assessment methods that respond to generative AI, share precautions with students in advance, and clearly state permitted and prohibited AI tool use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Osaka University's TLSC assessment guidance advises instructors to tell students that inappropriate generative AI use may be treated as academic misconduct, AI use should be limited to learning support, and AI use for analysis should be clearly stated.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PUCV's academic-integrity policy frames ChatGPT-style tools as possible support for teaching only when students critically analyze the information before learning activities or assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

PUCV teaching-development guidance says syllabi and virtual classrooms should establish norms, restrictions, and prohibitions for AI tools during assessment instances.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Pusan National University's AI utilization guideline says instructors should communicate permitted or prohibited AI use for assessments, and it warns against deciding a student's grade solely from an AI plagiarism or AI-detection tool result.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Pusan National University's student AI utilization guideline tells students to first check and follow the instructor's AI-use instructions for exams and assignments, and to identify the tool, purpose, and scope when AI use is allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Queen's AI Applications page states that the university has conducted security and privacy assessments for generative AI software and uses those assessments to identify risks and inform use guidelines.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Queen's describes responsible generative AI use through five guiding principles for students, staff, and faculty, including checks for whether a use is prohibited, permitted, encouraged, or required.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Royal Holloway academic misconduct regulations list requesting or engaging an artificial intelligence tool to write or rewrite work for unfair advantage, and presenting AI-generated content as one’s own unless authorised and acknowledged, as examples of assessment offences.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Royal Holloway tells Foundation, undergraduate, and postgraduate taught students that module assessment briefs take precedence for AI use; if a brief says AI is not permitted, students must not use it and must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

RUB's GPT@RUB usage directions say third-party personal data and sensitive third-party personal data may not be used as GPT@RUB input, and GPT@RUB or other AI systems may not be used for automated decision-making in examinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

RUB's ZfW FAQ says generative AI tools can be used at RUB in research, teaching, and study, but that use can be restricted or tied to disclosure requirements in certain contexts such as written examinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Where Sciences Po assessment formats explicitly integrate AI use, the AI doctrine says students must document that use by detailing their work steps, naming the tools used, and adopting a reflective approach.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Sciences Po's official teachers' resources page says its framework for generative AI use by teachers will apply from the September 2026 intake and covers guiding principles, transparency toward students, and AI integration in teaching activities and assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Shanghai University's Qianxue Baike AI Smart Platform AI toolbox lists AI tools by categories including chat, paper writing, office writing, image, video, audio, coding, and other tools; this crawl did not find source text saying these tools are approved for assessed work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Shanghai University's Academic Affairs Department held a generative AI teaching report that discussed course-specific AI-enabled teaching uses such as AI teaching assistants, AI-assisted personalized case analysis, online-course construction, intelligent learning companions, agent collaboration, and literature reading comprehension.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SKKU instructor guidance presents five teaching strategies for using AI such as ChatGPT: creating examples, generating explanation styles, creating low-stakes tests, using GPT for learning diagnostics, and providing distributed practice.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

SKKU instructor guidance says AI cannot replace roles such as guiding discussion direction, providing personalized answers to student questions, and understanding learning level by assessing assignments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Syracuse University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Syracuse University Libraries says it is using, testing, and providing research guidance on generative AI tools in the research process.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TalTech tells lecturers to explain acceptable AI-based software use in assessment, teaching, learning, and homework, and course-level permission or prohibition should be specified in the extended syllabus.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TalTech says substantive AI output must be cited or described as a method, and learners remain responsible for accuracy, quality, analysis results, and references.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Where KNU educational components allow generative AI under levels 2 or 3, the regulation requires students to declare the fact and manner of generative AI use in submitted artifacts for assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

KNU's regulation treats violations of generative AI use rules as academic-integrity violations and lists non-declaration, presenting generated content as one's own result, and using generative AI for unfair advantage among possible violations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

DTU's exam-cheating rules state that use of AI such as ChatGPT or similar artificial intelligence, where the program writes or solves a task, is plagiarism if no source reference is made.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

DTU states that it permits generative AI in teaching and open-internet exams, while current exam use is limited to selected courses and exams.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TUM ProLehre guidance recommends starting AI-use decisions from the intended learning outcomes and whether AI use supports, complements, or hinders those competencies.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TUM ProLehre guidance says reliable control of AI use is difficult to impossible, and recommends designing assessments so unauthorized AI use does not provide a decisive advantage.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Dresden's public AI-use guidance says unlabeled or unauthorized use of aids, including answers or results generated with AI-supported text-generation tools such as ChatGPT, constitutes deception under examination law.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Dresden's public AI-use guidance says teachers and examiners can decide whether and to what extent AI-supported text-generation tools such as ChatGPT are used, including as permitted aids in examinations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Hebrew University Teaching and Learning Unit frames its guidance goal as adapting teaching and assessment for AI use rather than banning AI use outright.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

A Hebrew University Teaching and Learning Unit workshop page says students make broad and frequent use of AI for assignments and academic writing, and frames excessive or unreflective use as a risk to learning goals.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

LSE requires departments or course convenors to classify authorised generative AI use in assessment as no authorised use, limited authorised use, or full authorised use, and to communicate the position to students.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For 2025/26, LSE requested departments to add assessment safeguards, including observed assessment methods, to help assure degree integrity and prevent unfair competitive advantage from generative AI.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At the University of Edinburgh, presenting AI outputs as your own original work, submitting AI-generated text without acknowledgment, and using AI agents within university learning platforms constitute academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Edinburgh says using an AI agent within Learn or any university learning or assessment platform requiring login is not permitted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Tools to detect AI-generated content are unreliable and biased and cannot be relied on to identify academic malpractice in summative assessment at Manchester. Output from such tools cannot currently be used as evidence of malpractice.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Using an AI tool to correct grammar or spelling is acceptable at Manchester, but students should ensure that use of the tool does not result in substantive changes to the content or meaning of their work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UTK Writing Center guidance says instructors may set different GenAI rules for each course, and the sample syllabus page presents open, moderate, and strict AI-use guideline examples.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UTK Libraries guidance says submitting generative-AI-created or rewritten assessment work as one's own is cheating, and advises students to check with professors and instructors about coursework use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UTokyo instructs faculty not to input exam questions directly into generative AI tools, as exams are highly confidential documents.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UTokyo advises faculty to test their own assignments with generative AI tools to understand how well AI can complete them, and use this understanding to inform assessment design.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Warwick's student-facing guidance says students may use AI only within requirements set out in assessment briefs and course handbooks, which may restrict or prohibit AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Warwick's assessment-design guidance says generative AI use in student submissions needs thoughtful support so responsible use and clear demonstration of human achievement are maintained.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences exams, tests, and assignments, Tilburg University states that AI use is not permitted unless a lecturer explicitly states otherwise.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Tilburg University's TSHD fraud guidance includes submitting work that is partially generated by AI without permission among examples of fraud-related conduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Tohoku University's generative AI guidance cautions that unpublished research results, confidential information, entrance-exam information, and student or staff personal information can be exposed to service providers or other users through generative AI and translation services.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Tohoku University's staff-facing guidance suggests instructors consider, according to each class, whether to partially prohibit, warn about, or use generative AI; it presents these as examples rather than a single mandatory rule.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In education, Science Tokyo's guideline says the university does not totally restrict learners' use of generative AI; the permitted degree of use, including whether it is banned, is left to course objectives, course content, and instructor teaching and assessment policies, and students should follow instructor instructions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For courses, Science Tokyo's guideline asks instructors to teach students about generative AI limitations, consider assessment methods, and promptly reflect a course AI-use policy in the syllabus when the policy can be clearly stated.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TMU's Academic Integrity Office says students should assume that using AI to complete assessments is prohibited unless the instructor explicitly states otherwise.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TMU states that privacy and AI impact assessments and a security risk assessment were conducted before releasing the Gemini App and NotebookLM at TMU.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Dortmund's ChatGPT handout warns against using AI tools to check examination work and says uploading student names or matriculation numbers would implicate GDPR requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

TU Dortmund's digitalization strategy includes AI as a dedicated action field and lists integration of AI tools into study, teaching, and assessment practice as a goal.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCSI's postgraduate handbook states that electronic devices are prohibited items in the examination hall, and that open-book examinations do not include internet or computer-device access.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCSI's undergraduate handbook states that students must comply with handbook rules and that electronic devices are prohibited items in final examinations unless the practical examination requires computers.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Umeå University's student cheating and plagiarism page warns that using AI or similar services in examination to produce text and submitting it as one's own without openly disclosing how the material was created can amount to attempted misleading.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Umeå University's AI and examination work area is developing principles, examples, and working methods for sustainable examination practice, including transparent and responsible use of AI as a learning tool.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In teaching contexts, UCP guidance says students should explain, in an appendix to written work, the process that produced AI-induced elements or reasoning; if that is not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as a complementary assessment element.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Unicamp's generative AI deliberation allows students to use generative AI as support for information seeking, study, and learning, but says assessment activities must observe the limits and conditions defined by the course instructor when assessments exist.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Unicamp Scientific Electronic Journals Portal AI-use policy says generative AI use in journal submission, assessment, and editing processes must be declared explicitly at manuscript submission and in the manuscript.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UniPV offers an internal course for university language experts on integrating generative-AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini into language teaching.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UniPV's 2024-2026 ICT plan describes AI and machine-learning modules as part of security appliances used to help prevent or contain latest-generation cyberattacks.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says students should not insert automatically generated scientific text into the thesis, replace bibliographic research with AI, or use AI-generated text without critical and personal reworking.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For the University of Udine Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline, generative AI tools are described as usable for limited support such as grammar/spelling correction, technical-term translation, and orienting summaries, not as a substitute for the student's own thesis work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNIVPM's Research Ethics Committee regulation says the committee provides opinions, assessments, and checks on request for university research projects and governing bodies, and that the committee's opinions are binding for the requester.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNIVPM has official statutes/regulations sources for ethics, conduct, and research integrity; this run did not verify a separate university-wide generative-AI teaching, assessment, or student-use policy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Universitat de Valencia's UVdocencia integrity-focused GenAI course frames GenAI use in relation to academic and research integrity, including guidance on assessment activities, regulation of GenAI use in teaching instruments, and detection of inappropriate student use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Universitat de Valencia's UVdocencia ChatGPT course introduces generative AI tools, including ChatGPT, for producing content and creating materials and tasks in education and scientific research.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For teaching and examinations, Universität Innsbruck's FAQ says course leaders may decide which AI tools are permitted unless a faculty has its own rules, should communicate rules clearly, and should explicitly identify permitted aids including AI tools for examinations; unnamed aids are prohibited.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Universität Innsbruck Faculty of Business and Management guidance says AI-generated content incorporated into a student's own work must be labeled without exception and must not be presented as the student's own work, otherwise plagiarism may occur and later annulment of assessment could result.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For study or examination work, the guidance says instructors must state in writing which aids are permitted and that unauthorized aids, including AI where not allowed, are assessed through the usual deception framework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The central examination-office page lists KI-related self-declaration forms for multiple bachelor and master thesis contexts and links good-scientific-practice materials.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Universität Stuttgart guidance for teachers says examiners decide whether AI is allowed for a given assessment, choose one option for each assessment, document it in the syllabus or ILIAS, and communicate it early and consistently.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For exams, Universität Stuttgart states that the relevant examiners decide the extent to which AI-system use is allowed or desired, and students should ask examiners if uncertain.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Universite de Lorraine's 2025 exam charter states that use of tools, including generative artificial intelligence, is fraud when it is not explicitly authorized.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Universite de Lorraine DACIP teaching guidance recommends favoring sovereign and secure generative AI, training on ethical issues, and transparency with students in pedagogical and assessment processes.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

In assessments where generative AI use is authorized, Université de Rennes' AI charter says students must declare the use of generative AI in the relevant passages and prohibits submitting AI-generated output without saying so in place of the requested work.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For teaching missions, Université de Rennes' AI charter says AI must not substitute for a teacher's act without supervision and verification, and AI tasks affecting student assessment or admission must be human verified in a demonstrable way.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Université Laval guidance says AI-use expectations should be stated in the course plan and clarified in assessment instructions when AI use is authorized.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Université Laval guidance says using AI tools is not automatically an academic offence, but unauthorized use may constitute an academic offence under the student disciplinary regulation.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Universiti Malaya guidance says lecturers specify the permitted level of AI use for each assignment or assessment, using levels from no AI use through integrated AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Universiti Malaya guidance requires students to declare AI tools used in assignments or assessments and says failure to disclose AI use may be considered academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Universiti Teknologi Brunei has a Senate-approved GenAI guidance section for UTB students' usage in module assessments in its Student Report Manual.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For UTB module assessments, the GenAI guidance says the lecturer will specify the permitted level of GenAI usage for each coursework item.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UTHM's Digital Teaching and Learning Policy permits the use of generative artificial intelligence in teaching and learning processes, including learning content, activity implementation, and assessment, subject to suitability, assessment effectiveness, compliance with applicable guidelines, laws and regulations, and good principles, values, and ethics in the course field.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UTHM's Digital Teaching and Learning Policy says assessment should be designed to be contextual, fair, transparent, and personalized while taking into account the risk of generative AI misuse in written assignments, and that continuous assessment involving presentations, question-and-answer, and viva voce should be prioritized to assess students' actual mastery.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UUM's online and take-home assessment guideline states that, for closed-book online final exams, students are not allowed to collaborate, must sign an honour form, and submissions may be checked via Turnitin.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UUM's assessment handbook says it provides guidance for instructors in undergraduate and postgraduate programmes on closed-book, open-book, and 100% coursework assessment options.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University College Dublin publishes University Management Team-approved AI Governance Principles for institutional AI use, including human oversight, fairness, transparency, compliance, ethical design, AI literacy, stakeholder engagement, and risk assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCD Teaching and Learning assessment guidance advises educators to be transparent with students about permitted AI use and to apply more robust approaches for high-stakes graded assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Balamand students are responsible for the integrity of submitted coursework; the Academic Integrity and Copyright Policy says students must do their own work unless the instructor asks otherwise, may collaborate on graded work only if instructed to do so, and must follow course requirements specified in the syllabus.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Balamand Academic Integrity and Copyright Policy treats plagiarism as passing off another person's work as one's own and lists examples including undocumented text, quotations without quotation marks, undocumented paraphrase or summary, untranslated text without citation, and packaged online information or completed papers submitted without acknowledgment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The UC Davis School of Medicine policy says medical students may not use generative AI to directly author submitted assignments or generate answers for closed-book assessments unless faculty or course leadership gives written permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UC Davis IET states that Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is available at no additional cost to UC Davis and UC Davis Health students, faculty, and staff, but sensitive data should not be uploaded without a Vendor Risk Assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCR's student-facing AI announcement says students should discuss generative-AI expectations with professors, use AI to assist or enhance rather than replace original work, avoid generating entire deliverables, and cite AI-generated content or data when used.

Rekod bukti: 3. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCR's public generative-AI guidance for instructional settings places course-level use decisions with the Instructor of Record rather than setting one universal student-use rule in the evidence reviewed here.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UC San Diego's Academic Integrity Policy says students may not let academic work or academic credit be completed for them by another human or by machine/artificial intelligence, and may not use unauthorized aids including artificial intelligence in coursework or assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UC San Diego Academic Integrity Office student guidance says that if an instructor has not said a student can use GenAI for a class or assessment, the student cannot use it; silence does not equal permission.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UCT has published an AI in Education Framework for teaching, learning, and assessment, endorsed by the Senate Teaching and Learning Committee in June 2025, and it frames AI literacies, assessment integrity, and AI-enabled innovation as its roadmap.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Before procuring generative AI tools, UCT staff or departments should consult ICTS and the tools must undergo information security and privacy risk assessment.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Colombo says AI use in assessments is not permitted unless instructions explicitly authorize it, and unauthorized AI use in summative assessment is considered cheating and an examination offence.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For teaching, University of Colombo says AI tools must not be used to mark or grade student work, generate evaluative feedback, or contribute to summative assessment decisions unless institutional review, validation, quality assurance, and meaningful human oversight are in place.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Galway's QA220 Academic Integrity Policy identifies submitting all or part of an assessment item produced using artificial intelligence and claiming it as one's own work as an example of academic misconduct.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Galway's Academic Integrity Office guidance for DSS-related literacy software says excessive or irresponsible use of GenAI-powered literacy software may constitute a breach of academic integrity and advises students to use only DSS-approved literacy software versions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For supervised examinations, University of Göttingen guidance says AI tools are not permitted unless explicitly allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For unsupervised examinations, University of Göttingen guidance says AI models should generally be permissible aids, but use of AI tools must be transparent.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For University of Guelph courses, acceptable student use of AI is determined by the course instructor and may vary by discipline, program, and assessment type.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Guelph library student guide tells students to check the syllabus or ask the instructor before using generative AI for coursework.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Haifa's e-learning unit provides lecturers with a Hebrew resource introducing digital tools for online learning and assessment and AI-based tools for teaching and learning aids.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Haifa Education Technologies master's program page says the program addresses relationships between AI-era technologies and learning, teaching, and assessment, and presents technology and AI as means for human, attentive, socially responsible pedagogy.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Helsinki student guidance treats prohibited use of large language models, or failing to report their use as instructed, as cheating; the cheating and plagiarism guidance also lists presenting AI-generated text or solutions as one's own as plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Helsinki guidance says large language models may generally be used in teaching and writing support, while course teachers can restrict or prohibit use on pedagogical grounds and AI cannot be used in maturity tests.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Idaho OIT guidance says agentic AI tools should not receive credentials to university systems, should not be installed on systems with moderate- or high-risk data access, and should be tested in a sandboxed workflow.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Idaho's OIT and AI Execution Group memo advises faculty to provide clear guidance on AI use in their syllabi in Canvas.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Illinois Enterprise GenAI guidance for service providers includes security controls, audits, MFA, and data privacy compliance for AI systems and sensitive data.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The Illinois Graduate College states it does not have a policy on permissibility of generative AI in doctoral milestones, and encourages programs and committees to communicate their expectations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Limerick assessment guidance states that use of AI in an unauthorized manner is a breach of academic integrity, and that use not permitted by the module leader is a breach of academic integrity.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Limerick guidance says GenAI use in assessment beyond the specifications of the module lead or programme lead is considered academic misconduct and related concerns should be managed under the procedures for academic misconduct allegations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At Instituto Superior Técnico, a Pedagogical Council deliberation was reported as saying there should not be a general prohibition on AI tools in teaching processes or assessment methods.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

At Instituto Superior Técnico, the reported deliberation called for assessment methods to make explicit whether AI tools are permitted.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Manitoba teaching guidance discourages broad or mandatory student use of GenAI systems for learning or assessment until the university is assured that personal data entered into such systems is protected.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Manitoba's AI guiding principles say UM must implement appropriate risk assessments and operational controls so UM data is not compromised, privacy is maintained, and intellectual property is protected.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For coursework, UMD tells students to assume GenAI use for assignments and assessments is not allowed unless the syllabus or assignment instructions specify otherwise.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UMD's TLTC sample syllabus page gives instructors non-binding example AI course-policy language spanning prohibited, limited, and broad AI use, with citation or attribution expectations where applicable.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UMKC tells instructors not to upload or copy and paste student work into generative AI products for assessment because doing so may violate FERPA.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UMKC presents restrictive, supervised, and permissive generative AI syllabus policy examples and tells instructors to determine which category their syllabus may fit under.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNL guidance states that using AI or other technology output as one's own work is an academic-integrity infringement unless the instructor gives explicit permission.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNL Libraries provides citation guidance for ChatGPT and other AI tools, including APA, MLA, and Chicago examples.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UNH's Academic Integrity policy treats unauthorized use or attempted use of AI tools as cheating, and treats computer-generated text or work submitted as one's own without proper citation or attribution as plagiarism.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

USNH's AI chatbot KB identifies DeepThought and Microsoft Copilot as USNH-provided AI options, recommends signing into Copilot with a USNH account for enterprise data protection, says public chatbots such as ChatGPT and Bard are not secure, and says alternative AI solutions must complete the Security Assessment Review process before purchase or implementation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Under the University of Oulu education guidelines, teachers may define course or assignment AI use as required, prohibited, restricted, or allowed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

When AI use is permitted in education, the University of Oulu guidelines say data protection requirements and the university's personal-data-processing guidelines must be followed.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The guidelines treat generative AI as support for teaching, learning, and research, not a replacement for human work; AI-generated content should be examined, approved, modified, and supervised by a human author.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The guidelines list non-appropriate or non-permitted academic uses of AI, including creating entire written content with AI, using unrevised AI-generated code, using AI-generated code in university exams, and using AI to evaluate exam or selection materials.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For student performance assessment, the University of Pecs guideline says the university does not recommend using automated decision-making systems or large language models for substantive qualifying evaluation.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

The University of Pecs AI guideline is scoped to educational and research activities needed to meet study requirements and applies to university citizens when they use AI systems in connection with setting, meeting, or evaluating course and training requirements.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Rector Measure R 567 states that AI outputs are only input material for the author; the author is responsible for using, critically examining, and verifying those outputs, and the author of the student work is the student, not the AI tool.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Rector Measure R 567 says proven use of AI tools contrary to the measure is treated like plagiarism, as unethical conduct with possible disciplinary consequences, and proven unauthorized or undeclared AI use after a successful defense can lead to proceedings on invalidity of the state examination or defense.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UTS's AI Operations Procedure requires a six-stage identification, assessment, approval, implementation, and management process before developing, deploying, procuring, or activating AI systems or AI capabilities.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

UTS Education Express says university misconduct rules apply to AI use in assessments, students must acknowledge AI-tool use, and students should only use AI tools to generate verbatim assessment materials when instructed that this is appropriate.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Waikato assessment guidance says students cannot use an AI tool such as ChatGPT to generate or rewrite assignment or test answers and submit them as their own unless assignment instructions specifically permit or require that use; the page states this exception does not apply to Studiosity, which it identifies as an approved AI tool.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of Waikato academic-integrity guidance tells students to acknowledge their use of generative AI tools for assessment tasks.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

University of York student assessment guidance says false authorship is considered an academic misconduct offence under University policy and is treated very seriously.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For taught teaching and assessment, York staff guidance recommends keeping students informed of expectations at module and assessment level.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

USI's general rule permits use of generative AI tools unless a specific activity explicitly prohibits them, and says use must be correctly acknowledged.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

USI student recommendations say students must follow teachers' instructions for GenAI use in written work; complete drafting of exam papers, dissertations, or final papers with GenAI is generally not permitted, and unauthorised use is academic fraud subject to study-regulation penalties.

Rekod bukti: 2. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Verona University's AI guidelines say AI use must be explicitly declared, including the tool used, for exams, research, administrative documents, or other content.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For students, Verona University's AI guidelines say AI may help with studying but may not be used to complete entire exams or theses without explicit instructor authorization.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

VNU-HCM's 2025 research-integrity regulation lists technical tools, including software that assesses text overlap and checks the percentage of AI assistance, as possible ways to detect research-integrity violations.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

A 2023 official VNU-HCM research page reports that VNU-HCM held a workshop on undergraduate teaching and assessment in the context of ChatGPT and identified risks including inaccurate information, learner overuse, difficulty detecting machine-written text, and assessment challenges.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

VILNIUS TECH students are not allowed to use AI tools during assessments unless the subject specifically requires AI use.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

VILNIUS TECH academic staff must inform or remind students about the university AI rules and subject-specific AI use at the beginning of the semester, and must consider AI-use risks when creating assessment tasks.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

VU Amsterdam's framework says the lecturer or examiner indicates in the study guide, syllabus, or Canvas whether and how use of generative AI is allowed for a course, with course learning objectives remaining leading.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

VU Amsterdam's Dutch academic-integrity page states that work made by generative AI is not the student's own work and lists using an AI writer to write an assignment as an example of fraud.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers must provide the greatest possible degree of transparency on AI tool use in scientific activities.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

VUB's 2025-2026 Education and Examination Regulations classify as an irregularity fraud involving statements or texts produced by generative AI applications without reference to original sources.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

VSB-TUO's AI rules list permissible student AI uses such as study inspiration, concept explanation, presentation preparation, stylistic corrections, and data analysis or modelling within projects unless prohibited; they list impermissible uses including automatic thesis writing, generating exam test materials, and creating deepfake or unethical manipulative content.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

For teachers, VSB-TUO's AI rules list impermissible uses including automated grading of professional papers, essays, projects, and qualification theses, correcting tests, and entering students' personal data such as names, results, or health status into AI tools.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Waseda University's university-wide April 2023 statement warns students that submitting a paper created by generative AI as-is is treated as misconduct similar to cheating, and that plagiarism, inappropriate citation, or fabrication in submitted work can expose the student to disciplinary action.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Waseda's official Support Anywhere page describes its student-support chatbot as powered by generative AI and warns that answers can be inferred and may differ from the latest information or facts, so important procedures and policies should be checked against official Support Anywhere pages and the student's school or graduate school.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

WSU Provost guidance expects every instructor to set clear acceptable-AI-use expectations and to state the AI course policy in every class syllabus.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

WSU Provost guidance states that students are expected to provide accurate and transparent attribution of AI use in classroom assessments.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yeshiva University's undergraduate policy permits faculty to allow Generative AI in courses or assessments if they specify in writing how it may be used; content produced using Generative AI must be cited according to the relevant subject conventions.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Yeshiva University's Academic Integrity Resources page says written assessments must be completed from start to finish in Google Docs, with no written work done outside Google Docs, and students must keep related files for the course duration.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

Aalto University guidance says teachers who restrict AI use must give clear limitations connected to assessment criteria, and teachers may only require student work to be submitted through systems approved by Aalto University.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.

ADU's Academic Integrity Policy treats using AI software to support writing without a clear declaration in the student's paper as a plagiarism example.

Rekod bukti: 1. Bukti asal kekal sebagai kanon pada rekod universiti yang dipautkan dan JSON awam.