Coursework
Read scoped evidence; review pending
Submitting GenAI-generated content as your own is plagiarism under the assessment guidance. Disclosing use does not itself establish permission for a particular task.
Dublin, Ireland Last checked
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin
Compare universities
Selected universities1/4
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin
Independent · Open access · Not an official university page
What would you like to check?
Explore the current record by topic
Exams
Read scoped evidence; review pending
The retained Claims do not establish permission for a specific exam. Check its instructions; assessment disclosure rules are not a blanket authorisation.
Disclosure
Read scoped evidence; review pending
Specific assessment uses must be disclosed, acknowledged and referenced. Explain what, when and how; library guidance also specifies an Appendix or Methods acknowledgement.
Privacy and data
Read scoped evidence; review pending
Teaching and learning guidance prohibits private student or staff information in GenAI queries or instructions.
Tools and eligibility
Read scoped evidence; review pending
No specific tool entitlement is established by the retained Claims. Teaching guidance on equitable access does not grant every student a licence or assessment permission.
Research and publication
Read scoped evidence; review pending
Researchers remain responsible for scientific output and should transparently cite GenAI use. This research guidance is distinct from coursework requirements.
More reviewed record topics
Academic integrity
Read scoped evidence; review pending
Passing off generated assessment content as your own is plagiarism. The retained Claims do not establish a sanction, investigation procedure or appeal deadline.
Teaching guidance
Read scoped evidence; review pending
Staff embedding GenAI should make parameters clear, support practice and ensure equitable access at no additional cost, aligned with learning outcomes.
Security and procurement
Read scoped evidence; review pending
The IT page flags security and data protection; it is a historical 2024 notice, not proof of current procurement or tool-specific approval.
Before you submit
Do
- Disclose, acknowledge and reference the specific ways you used GenAI in an assessment.
- Acknowledge functional GenAI use in an Appendix or Methods section as the library guidance requires.
- In research outputs, cite GenAI use transparently and retain responsibility for the output.
Don’t
- Do not submit GenAI-generated content as though it were your own work.
- Do not include private student or staff information in GenAI queries or instructions.
- Do not treat compliance with disclosure rules as permission for every assessment.
Tool discovery records: scope pending review
Tool discovery information and cited sources are retained. Current account eligibility, cost, endorsement and assessment permission are not confirmed.
Record updates
Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.
Other records · Page update
View revision
Loading revision…
Other records · Record maintenance
View revision
Loading revision…
Other records · Record maintenance
View revision
Loading revision…
Reviewed claims
8
Academic Integrity 3 reviewed claims
Trinity's GenAI assessment guidance states that submitting GenAI-generated content as a student's own work is considered plagiarism.
Reviewed
Scope: Read each original source audience and year; currentness and completeness remain unverified.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1If a student generates content from a GenAI tool and submits it as their own work, it is considered plagiarismLocalized display only
The assessment page treats submitting GenAI output as one's own work as plagiarism.
Evidence locator: What does Plagiarism mean in the context of GenAI?
Trinity Library guidance says GenAI use as a functional tool in academic work must be acknowledged in an Appendix or Methods section, with minimum details including the system name and version, publisher, URL and context of use.
Reviewed
Scope: Read each original source audience and year; currentness and completeness remain unverified.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1The use of GenAI must be acknowledged in an Appendix or Methods section of any piece of academic workLocalized display only
The Library guide requires acknowledgement of functional GenAI use in academic work.
Evidence locator: Acknowledging the use of generative AI in academic work
Trinity College Dublin says specific uses of GenAI in an assessment must be disclosed, properly acknowledged, and referenced; students should explain what, when, and how they used GenAI.
Reviewed
Scope: Read each original source audience and year; currentness and completeness remain unverified.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1To maintain academic integrity when using GenAI in an assessment, the specific uses of GenAI must be disclosed, properly acknowledged and referenced. Students should explain in detail what, when, and how they used GenAI in their assignment.Evidence locator: Assessment and Academic Integrity / disclosure guidance
Teaching 1 reviewed claim
Trinity's teaching and learning guidance says staff embedding GenAI should set clear parameters, support prompting practice, align use with learning outcomes, and ensure equitable access at no additional cost.
Reviewed
Scope: Read each original source audience and year; currentness and completeness remain unverified.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1students have equitable access to tools at no additional costs; students are given opportunities to practice using GenAI tools; parameters... are clearLocalized display only
The teaching page says staff should address access, practice opportunities, clear parameters and alignment.
Evidence locator: Using GenAI to enhance and support learning
Privacy 1 reviewed claim
Trinity's teaching and learning guidance says private student or staff information must not be used in GenAI queries or instructions.
Reviewed
Scope: Read each original source audience and year; currentness and completeness remain unverified.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1you are NOT allowed to use private student or staff information as part of your queries or instructions when using GenAI toolsLocalized display only
The teaching page says private student or staff information must not be used in GenAI prompts.
Evidence locator: Frequently asked questions when using GenAI for teaching > What should you NOT do with GenAI?
Security Review 1 reviewed claim
Trinity IT Services says AI tools such as ChatGPT raise information-security and data-protection considerations.
Reviewed
Scope: Read each original source audience and year; currentness and completeness remain unverified.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1important considerations to keep in mind, including information security and data protection, when using AI tools such as ChatGPTLocalized display only
IT Services flags information security and data protection considerations for AI tools.
Evidence locator: Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Research 1 reviewed claim
Trinity's research guidance says researchers remain responsible for scientific output, should cite GenAI usage in outputs, and should attend to privacy, confidentiality and intellectual-property issues when sharing sensitive information with AI tools.
Reviewed
Scope: Read each original source audience and year; currentness and completeness remain unverified.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Researchers remain ultimately responsible for scientific output. Researchers should use GenAI transparently, i.e. by citing usage in outputs.Localized display only
The research page emphasizes researcher responsibility and transparent citation of GenAI use.
Evidence locator: Responsible use of GenAI in Research
AI tool use 1 reviewed claim
Trinity's College Statement treats AI and GenAI as relevant to teaching, learning, assessment and research while identifying risks including academic integrity, ethics and privacy.
Reviewed
Scope: Read each original source audience and year; currentness and completeness remain unverified.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI and GenAI offer new opportunities for teaching, learning, assessment and research... challenges and risks, including to academic integrity, ethics, privacyLocalized display only
The central statement frames AI/GenAI as both an opportunity and a risk area.
Evidence locator: AI and GenAI in Trinity
Historical and pending public Claims (1)
These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.
claim-tcd-genai-policy-under-development · historical_only
Historical webpage wording only; College Statement v2 June 2026 and October policy inventory require distinct current evidence.
Undated old webpage may retain under-development wording but cannot establish absence of adopted 2026 policy.
Record historySource Status 1 reviewed claim
Trinity's Centre for Academic Practice states that policies on ethical and appropriate use of generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment are currently under development.
Reviewed
Scope: Historical webpage wording only; College Statement v2 June 2026 and October policy inventory require distinct current evidence.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Policies are currently under development relating to the ethical and appropriate use of generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessmentLocalized display only
Trinity says GenAI-related teaching, learning and assessment policies are under development.
Evidence locator: Academic Integrity Policies & Supports at Trinity
Official sources
8 official URLs; 8 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
Academic Integrity Policies & Supports at Trinity
www.tcd.ie
University official source
tcd.ie
Hash and captured version
Academic Integrity Policies & Supports at Trinity · 2026-05-13T05:03:38.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
21ec9f3f9a2211f503bfbfae617c7b442959cff928f01d8feab2a24d87bab8ec
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Acknowledging & Referencing Gen AI - Generative AI - Library Guides at Trinity College Dublin
libguides.tcd.ie
University official source
libguides.tcd.ie
Hash and captured version
Acknowledging & Referencing Gen AI - Generative AI - Library Guides at Trinity College Dublin · 2026-05-13T05:03:38.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
23a950167e55d8ca60c9bf5dfab8ed2c68b14670604687b914e9ec753e7ac76f
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) - IT Services
www.tcd.ie
University official source
tcd.ie
Hash and captured version
Artificial Intelligence (AI) - IT Services · 2026-05-13T05:03:38.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
9181e6c67cfe97a00f544d0069cdd5a72d96728cd143f6d6cea230dba0b612a3
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
College Statement on Artificial Intelligence and Generative AI in Teaching, Learning, Assessment & Research
www.tcd.ie
University official source
tcd.ie
Hash and captured version
College Statement on Artificial Intelligence and Generative AI in Teaching, Learning, Assessment & Research · 2026-05-13T05:03:38.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
67b2a1c29ae6b790fd9f51f7f5cd468f0b4fab0bd07ff3cef405c442e8f81859
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Gen AI Hub - Centre for Academic Practice, Trinity Teaching & Learning
www.tcd.ie
University official source
tcd.ie
Hash and captured version
Gen AI Hub - Centre for Academic Practice, Trinity Teaching & Learning · 2026-05-13T05:03:38.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
ea8893c2f0eb81e5e6c0a674e10ad041d318b5536497e8ccafc8978921dd11bb
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
GenAI and Assessment
www.tcd.ie
University official source
tcd.ie
Hash and captured version
GenAI and Assessment · 2026-05-24T22:34:45.440Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
1f4fa97613d43d96619a03f59d6f0682ac168d021e2d01da5f4b0d340c8ec3c4
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
GenAI in Research
www.tcd.ie
University official source
tcd.ie
Hash and captured version
GenAI in Research · 2026-05-13T05:03:38.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
f05d1e69e2465c782b0de6eed2c74a370e7935b46e3d815d01251ef308f51be0
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Using GenAI in Teaching and Learning
www.tcd.ie
University official source
tcd.ie
Hash and captured version
Using GenAI in Teaching and Learning · 2026-05-13T05:03:38.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
bda88d18355cfb359d20565741158b795ad4d3c188ba0557e2a8d9a73e8bc4d3
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Explore
Related university AI policy records
4 records
Record information, JSON & citation
Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.
- Claim review state
- agent_reviewed
- Analysis review state
- machine_candidate
- Record revision
- qs71-90-v6-completeness-r3-20261025
- Dataset release
- public-release-20260924-002
- Correction published
- Student snapshot
- Not published
Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.
- Institution audit PARTIAL. Official raw HTML/PDF originals and full version/context verification remain incomplete.
- Original public records remain unchanged. Excluded records are historical or pending scope review, not current permissions.
- New corrections, tools, student interpretations and snapshots remain unapproved.
Questions students ask
Questions students ask
Can I use AI for my coursework?
Submitting GenAI-generated content as your own is plagiarism under the assessment guidance. Disclosing use does not itself establish permission for a particular task.
View evidence →Do I need to disclose AI use?
Specific assessment uses must be disclosed, acknowledged and referenced. Explain what, when and how; library guidance also specifies an Appendix or Methods acknowledgement.
View evidence →Can I upload sensitive data?
Teaching and learning guidance prohibits private student or staff information in GenAI queries or instructions.
View evidence →Which tools can I access?
No specific tool entitlement is established by the retained Claims. Teaching guidance on equitable access does not grant every student a licence or assessment permission.
View evidence →What are the examination rules?
The retained Claims do not establish permission for a specific exam. Check its instructions; assessment disclosure rules are not a blanket authorisation.
View evidence →What rules apply to research and publication?
Researchers remain responsible for scientific output and should transparently cite GenAI use. This research guidance is distinct from coursework requirements.
View evidence →What counts as academic misconduct?
Passing off generated assessment content as your own is plagiarism. The retained Claims do not establish a sanction, investigation procedure or appeal deadline.
View evidence →What guidance applies to teaching?
Staff embedding GenAI should make parameters clear, support practice and ensure equitable access at no additional cost, aligned with learning outcomes.
View evidence →What security and procurement requirements apply?
The IT page flags security and data protection; it is a historical 2024 notice, not proof of current procurement or tool-specific approval.
View evidence →