University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPLESNLMSJAKOPTARRUDEITCSTRFISVDANBHULTIDVITHFAHEHIURBNUKELZH-HANT

Uppsala, Sweden Last checked

Uppsala University

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities
Can I use AI for my coursework?Check the applicable scopeDo I need to disclose AI use?Check the applicable scopeCan I upload sensitive data?Check the applicable scopeWhich tools can I access?Check the applicable scope
Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautionsRecord updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Check the applicable scope

Course examiners may set justified restrictions. The Law Faculty has narrower assessment rules.

Official source ↗

Exams

Check the applicable scope

Check instructions before using AI in an examination; Law faculty restrictions apply to assessment.

Official source ↗

AI disclosure

Check the applicable scope

Courses must specify in writing whether and how AI use must be reported.

Official source ↗

Privacy & data

Check the applicable scope

Sensitive personal data require an approved system; student material cannot be sent to potential training systems without consent.

Official source ↗

Approved tools

Check the applicable scope

Uppsala students have free institutional browser Copilot access, not blanket assessment permission.

Official source ↗

Research & publication

Check the applicable scope

Research practical guidance recommends documenting use and checking outputs; it is not a binding research publication policy.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Check the applicable scope

Retained excerpts cover suspected-deception checks, Board referral and court appeals of warnings/suspensions; full hearing steps and deadlines remain unverified.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Check the applicable scope

Teaching guidance asks staff to check AI output; uploading identifiable student content and machine grading require further scrutiny.

Official source ↗

Security & procurement

Check the applicable scope

Research tool procurement is directed to IT support for licence and security assessment; institution-wide procurement rule not verified.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • Read course-specific instructions before AI use.
    Site advice
  • Verify all AI-generated claims before use.
    Source guidance

Don’t

  • Do not treat institutional Copilot access as assessment authorisation.
    Site advice
  • Do not transfer sensitive personal data into non-approved AI systems.
    Requirement in this scope
AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

AI use questioned?

Uppsala University

Uppsala University student AI guidance and Faculty of Law assessment restrictions apply at different levels: course examiners may set justified restrictions for specific learning objectives, courses must state in writing whether and how AI use is reported, and campus browser access to Microsoft Copilot never grants assessment permission.

Investigation & response

Teachers who detect suspected plagiarism must, in consultation with the examiner, immediately determine if there has been an attempt to deceive

Original evidence and scope

Teachers who detect suspected plagiarism must, in consultation with the examiner, immediately determine if there has been an attempt to deceive

academic_integrity:e19

Retained university excerpts say teachers and examiners assess suspected plagiarism/deception and such cases are reported to the Disciplinary Board; warnings or suspensions may be appealed to the Administrative Court. Board decisions do not automatically determine examination pass/fail. Full hearing stages, Vice-Chancellor decisions, stay requests and filing deadlines are not verified by these excerpts.

Teachers who detect suspected plagiarism must, in consultation with the examiner, immediately determine if there has been an attempt to deceive

Measures for dealing with suspected plagiarism; SHA-256 identifies this retained UTF-8 excerpt, not raw HTML/PDF; physical page and original offsets unavailable.

Official university source ↗

Such cases will be reported to the university’s disciplinary board.

Original evidence and scope

Such cases will be reported to the university’s disciplinary board.

academic_integrity:e15

Retained university excerpts say teachers and examiners assess suspected plagiarism/deception and such cases are reported to the Disciplinary Board; warnings or suspensions may be appealed to the Administrative Court. Board decisions do not automatically determine examination pass/fail. Full hearing stages, Vice-Chancellor decisions, stay requests and filing deadlines are not verified by these excerpts.

Such cases will be reported to the university’s disciplinary board.

Attempted deception; SHA-256 identifies this retained UTF-8 excerpt, not raw HTML/PDF; physical page and original offsets unavailable.

Official university source ↗

Possible outcomes

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Review & appeal

You have the right to appeal the decision on warning or suspension to the Administrative Court (Förvaltningsrätten).

Original evidence and scope

You have the right to appeal the decision on warning or suspension to the Administrative Court (Förvaltningsrätten).

academic_integrity:e16

Retained university excerpts say teachers and examiners assess suspected plagiarism/deception and such cases are reported to the Disciplinary Board; warnings or suspensions may be appealed to the Administrative Court. Board decisions do not automatically determine examination pass/fail. Full hearing stages, Vice-Chancellor decisions, stay requests and filing deadlines are not verified by these excerpts.

You have the right to appeal the decision on warning or suspension to the Administrative Court (Förvaltningsrätten).

In case of a decision of suspension; SHA-256 identifies this retained UTF-8 excerpt, not raw HTML/PDF; physical page and original offsets unavailable.

Official university source ↗

Tool discovery records: scope pending review

Tool discovery information and cited sources are retained. Current account eligibility, cost, endorsement and assessment permission are not confirmed.

Copilot

Microsoft Copilot

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 2

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Record maintenance

    Other records · Record maintenance

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

2

Historical and pending public Claims (10)

These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.

cl-uppsala-university-microsoft-copilot-366 · excluded_pending_review

university-wide, course-conditional

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (UNVERIFIED: 官方片段证明免费访问及 UU licence，但没有充分证明 derived availability=allowed 与 institutionally licensed or procured 作为正式政策分类，更不等于考核许可。).

Record history

cl-uu-required-ai-tools-free · excluded_pending_review

university-wide, course-conditional

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (UNVERIFIED: e2直接支持授课或考试要求使用时免费提供工具，但现有引用未覆盖博士生及主要导师的独立责任，整句不可标 VERIFIED。).

Record history

cl-uu-ai-material-user-responsibility · excluded_pending_review

university-wide, course-conditional

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (UNVERIFIED: e5证明使用者对使用方式负责；现有逐字证据没有覆盖学术诚信、可靠性批判与伦理考量三项，需连续原文。).

Record history

cl-uu-students-inform-themselves · excluded_pending_review

university-wide, course-conditional

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (UNVERIFIED: 现有 e6/e7 是限制与披露要求，不能证明学生有义务查阅中央及地方指引；需直接取得对应条款。).

Record history

cl-uu-law-faculty-assessment-restriction · excluded_pending_review

Faculty of Law assessments

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (VERIFIED: 适用期、法学院课程范围、课程明确许可例外以及仅校对且不产生新内容的例外均由现有原文支持；不得扩大至全校。).

Record history

cl-uu-student-copilot-access-protection · excluded_pending_review

university-wide, course-conditional

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (UNVERIFIED: 已有免费使用、聊天不保存及不用于训练的校方表述；现有片段不足证明学生登录触发 Microsoft 数据保护协议的完整条件，亦不能把不保存外推成无任何保留。).

Record history

cl-uu-students-course-check-ai-use · excluded_pending_review

university-wide, course-conditional

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (UNVERIFIED: 现有片段仅论纪律决定申诉及成绩独立，未直接支持联系教师、违规使用的报告条件和可能停学的完整连接。).

Record history

cl-uu-local-and-faculty-guidelines-index · excluded_pending_review

university-wide, course-conditional

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (UNVERIFIED: e22证明 2025-01-20 生效；缺当地指南持续增加及覆盖博士教育层次的同页原文。).

Record history

cl-uu-ai-exam-feedback-and-grading-caution · excluded_pending_review

staff teaching guidance

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (UNVERIFIED: 现有证据索引没有教师上传文本去标识、Copilot 建议及慎用 AI 评分的逐字证据。).

Record history

cl-uu-research-ai-support-guide · excluded_pending_review

researchers/staff

Original canonical claim retained in public record but excluded from strong conclusions (UNVERIFIED: e20/e21证明非规则性质及不得分享敏感保密信息；缺 UU 登录 Copilot Chat、复核生成内容和记录用途的逐字原文。).

Record history

Official sources

7 official URLs; 8 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

AI tool – Students – Uppsala University

www.uu.se

University official source

uu.se

Hash and captured version

AI tool – Students – Uppsala University · 2026-07-15T23:25:43.896Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

2f303427084376f0d0e3e3ce52f085a4adb40ca77c7f2aa00e9afcf0ca32367e

AI tools for students · 2026-05-13T22:31:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

3acf265249f083fa0729ddfcf907dca6417eb1587d9579f6114ed416d9689ac1

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Faculty of Law guidelines on restrictions on Generative AI (GAI) in assessment

www.uu.se

University official source

uu.se

Hash and captured version

Faculty of Law guidelines on restrictions on Generative AI (GAI) in assessment · 2026-05-13T22:36:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

4a5b77117ca1a24b02dc2b8442f06f4aa6064fe6826bd9e6fa9b9b5cd0ad6f53

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Generative AI and studies

www.uu.se

University official source

uu.se

Hash and captured version

Generative AI and studies · 2026-05-13T22:32:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

762f5f7fa2104a268f75fa168e7100a38551e7701a6933ed6c36bd056c6ae6b6

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Introduktion för användning av AI i forskningen

www.uu.se

University official source

uu.se

Hash and captured version

Introduktion för användning av AI i forskningen · 2026-05-13T22:34:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

d0aebded125abb8ef356619c04a6ef277c185769e3661c455a19df292baa14b0

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Lokala riktlinjer för AI

www.uu.se

University official source

uu.se

Hash and captured version

Lokala riktlinjer för AI · 2026-05-13T22:35:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

693c2365c604d142d51bfb3246943301c2b0f686ef9ca7e64662e85c565914c8

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Riktlinjer för användning av generativ AI i undervisning och examination

www.uu.se

University official source

uu.se

Hash and captured version

Riktlinjer för användning av generativ AI i undervisning och examination · 2026-05-13T22:30:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

486996c87eca67fbaf98fc059cfde6a437f72f7028aa296f3295743baf64e9d5

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Using AI in Examinations

www.uu.se

University official source

uu.se

Hash and captured version

Using AI in Examinations · 2026-05-13T22:33:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

93bd58a7a86377dcf13dbfe37957af1f2402edd7e213eccae18e80e5c6989fb6

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
qs91-100-v6-presentation-r1-20261026
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · All record history

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
  • Raw EN page and public JSON bytes not retrieved
  • tools.json raw full list not retrieved
  • Complete historical records not available
  • Law original PDF raw file not saved
  • PDF raw content unavailable in container
  • No live browser interaction/mobile/theme test
  • Current approved_tools/history/analysis API full export unavailable
  • Appeal duration and exact clock trigger
  • Independent source retention controls not verified
  • Full raw HTML/PDF source bytes were not closed-loop archived in the research package; SHA-256 hashes on topic excerpts identify UTF-8 excerpt text only.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        Course examiners may set justified restrictions. The Law Faculty has narrower assessment rules.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        Courses must specify in writing whether and how AI use must be reported.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        Sensitive personal data require an approved system; student material cannot be sent to potential training systems without consent.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        Uppsala students have free institutional browser Copilot access, not blanket assessment permission.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        Check instructions before using AI in an examination; Law faculty restrictions apply to assessment.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        Research practical guidance recommends documenting use and checking outputs; it is not a binding research publication policy.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        Retained excerpts cover suspected-deception checks, Board referral and court appeals of warnings/suspensions; full hearing steps and deadlines remain unverified.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        Teaching guidance asks staff to check AI output; uploading identifiable student content and machine grading require further scrutiny.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        Research tool procurement is directed to IT support for licence and security assessment; institution-wide procurement rule not verified.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        12 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →
        Uppsala University AI Policy