Lund, Sweden Last checked Sep 24, 2026

Lund University

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Can I use AI for my coursework?Read scoped evidence; review pending Do I need to disclose AI use?Read scoped evidence; review pending Can I upload sensitive data?Read scoped evidence; review pending Which tools can I access?Read scoped evidence; review pending

Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautions Record updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Read scoped evidence; review pending

For a compulsory assignment, check with the teacher whether GenAI is permitted and how to report it; silence in course materials is not permission.

Official source ↗

Exams

Read scoped evidence; review pending

For an examination, double-check teacher permission and reporting requirements. Student access to a tool does not settle the exam rules.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Read scoped evidence; review pending

Ask the teacher how to report permitted GenAI use. Do not assume there is one disclosure format for every Lund assignment.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Read scoped evidence; review pending

Student guidance prohibits uploading other students’ work, sensitive personal data or protected material, even with a student login; staff ChatGPT guidance also excludes medical information.

Official source ↗

Tools and eligibility

Read scoped evidence; review pending

Student guidance lists Copilot Chat and Gemini with student-account login. It recommends licensed tools, but staff ChatGPT/DeepL/M365 eligibility remains separate and pending.

Official source ↗

Research and publication

Read scoped evidence; review pending

The policy describes GenAI as support for learning and research, not a replacement for basic skills, critical thinking or scientific method.

Official source ↗

Academic integrity

Read scoped evidence; review pending

Staff and students remain responsible for their content. Passing off generated work as your own may be treated as cheating.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Read scoped evidence; review pending

Teacher guidance calls for clear course rules, learning-outcome checks and equal access; it also says students’ work must not be shared with GenAI tools.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Read scoped evidence; review pending

Student guidance favours licensed services, but the exact Swedish procurement wording and staff-tier conditions remain unresolved here.

Do

Before a compulsory assignment or exam, ask the teacher whether GenAI is permitted and how to report its use.
Requirement in this scope
Before a compulsory assignment or exam, ask the teacher whether GenAI is permitted and how to report its use.
Scope
Lund separates course assessment rules, student account guidance and staff services. Confirm teacher permission and reporting for each compulsory task.
Lund University's student guidance says students who want to use GenAI for a compulsory assignment or examination must check whether it is permitted and how to report its use; presenting GenAI-generated work as one's own may be treated as cheating.
Original evidence and scope
Lund University's student guidance says students who want to use GenAI for a compulsory assignment or examination must check whether it is permitted and how to report its use; presenting GenAI-generated work as one's own may be treated as cheating.
claim-lund-student-exam-permission
For a compulsory assignment, check with the teacher whether GenAI is permitted and how to report it; silence in course materials is not permission.
If you wish to use GenAI for a compulsory assignment or in an examination, you must always double-check with the teacher whether it is permitted and, if so, how you should report its use. Even if it is not clearly stated in the course materials that GenAI is prohibited, it may still be considered cheating if you make it appear as though you have created something yourself that a GenAI tool has generated for you.
Be open with your teachers
Official university source ↗
Take responsibility for the correctness and integrity of your content, including AI-assisted content.
Requirement in this scope
Take responsibility for the correctness and integrity of your content, including AI-assisted content.
Scope
Lund separates course assessment rules, student account guidance and staff services. Confirm teacher permission and reporting for each compulsory task.
Lund University's Swedish policy says staff and students are responsible for all content they produce, including when generative AI has been used as support.
Original evidence and scope
Lund University's Swedish policy says staff and students are responsible for all content they produce, including when generative AI has been used as support.
claim-lund-policy-content-responsibility
Staff and students remain responsible for their content. Passing off generated work as your own may be treated as cheating.
Medarbetare och studenter är ansvariga för allt innehåll de producerar, oavsett om generativ AI har använts som stöd. Det är den enskildes ansvar att säkerställa att materialet uppfyller krav på korrekthet och akademisk integritet.
Principer - Ansvarig för innehåll
Official university source ↗
For study, give priority to Lund-licensed tools as the student guidance recommends.
Source guidance
For study, give priority to Lund-licensed tools as the student guidance recommends.
Scope
Lund separates course assessment rules, student account guidance and staff services. Confirm teacher permission and reporting for each compulsory task.
Lund University's student guidance says students should primarily use Lund-licensed tools such as Microsoft Copilot Chat and Google Gemini, and must not upload other students' work, sensitive personal data, or copyright-protected material.
Original evidence and scope
Lund University's student guidance says students should primarily use Lund-licensed tools such as Microsoft Copilot Chat and Google Gemini, and must not upload other students' work, sensitive personal data, or copyright-protected material.
claim-lund-student-licensed-tools-privacy
Student guidance prohibits uploading other students’ work, sensitive personal data or protected material, even with a student login; staff ChatGPT guidance also excludes medical information.
When studying, you should primarily use the tools for which Lund University holds licences. As a student at Lund University, you can use Microsoft Copilot Chat and Google Gemini by logging in with your student account. However, even if you are logged in with your student account, you must never upload, for example, other students' work, sensitive personal data or copyright-protected material - this applies to text as well as images, audio or video.
Protect your privacy and that of others
Official university source ↗

Don’t

Do not upload other students’ work, sensitive personal data or protected material, even with your student account.
Requirement in this scope
Do not upload other students’ work, sensitive personal data or protected material, even with your student account.
Scope
Lund separates course assessment rules, student account guidance and staff services. Confirm teacher permission and reporting for each compulsory task.
Lund University's student guidance says students should primarily use Lund-licensed tools such as Microsoft Copilot Chat and Google Gemini, and must not upload other students' work, sensitive personal data, or copyright-protected material.
Original evidence and scope
Lund University's student guidance says students should primarily use Lund-licensed tools such as Microsoft Copilot Chat and Google Gemini, and must not upload other students' work, sensitive personal data, or copyright-protected material.
claim-lund-student-licensed-tools-privacy
Student guidance prohibits uploading other students’ work, sensitive personal data or protected material, even with a student login; staff ChatGPT guidance also excludes medical information.
When studying, you should primarily use the tools for which Lund University holds licences. As a student at Lund University, you can use Microsoft Copilot Chat and Google Gemini by logging in with your student account. However, even if you are logged in with your student account, you must never upload, for example, other students' work, sensitive personal data or copyright-protected material - this applies to text as well as images, audio or video.
Protect your privacy and that of others
Official university source ↗
Do not make GenAI-generated work appear to be entirely your own.
Requirement in this scope
Do not make GenAI-generated work appear to be entirely your own.
Scope
Lund separates course assessment rules, student account guidance and staff services. Confirm teacher permission and reporting for each compulsory task.
Lund University's student guidance says students who want to use GenAI for a compulsory assignment or examination must check whether it is permitted and how to report its use; presenting GenAI-generated work as one's own may be treated as cheating.
Original evidence and scope
Lund University's student guidance says students who want to use GenAI for a compulsory assignment or examination must check whether it is permitted and how to report its use; presenting GenAI-generated work as one's own may be treated as cheating.
claim-lund-student-exam-permission
For a compulsory assignment, check with the teacher whether GenAI is permitted and how to report it; silence in course materials is not permission.
If you wish to use GenAI for a compulsory assignment or in an examination, you must always double-check with the teacher whether it is permitted and, if so, how you should report its use. Even if it is not clearly stated in the course materials that GenAI is prohibited, it may still be considered cheating if you make it appear as though you have created something yourself that a GenAI tool has generated for you.
Be open with your teachers
Official university source ↗
Do not use GenAI as a substitute for basic skills, critical thinking or scientific method.
Source guidance
Do not use GenAI as a substitute for basic skills, critical thinking or scientific method.
Scope
Lund separates course assessment rules, student account guidance and staff services. Confirm teacher permission and reporting for each compulsory task.
Lund University's Swedish policy says generative AI use is to support learning and research and does not replace basic skills, critical thinking, or scientific method.
Original evidence and scope
Lund University's Swedish policy says generative AI use is to support learning and research and does not replace basic skills, critical thinking, or scientific method.
claim-lund-policy-learning-support
The policy describes GenAI as support for learning and research, not a replacement for basic skills, critical thinking or scientific method.
Stöd i lärande och forskning. Användning av generativ AI ska stödja lärande och forskning och ersätter inte grundläggande färdigheter, kritiskt tänkande eller vetenskaplig metod.
Principer - Stöd i lärande och forskning
Official university source ↗

AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

Tool discovery records: scope pending review

Tool discovery information and cited sources are retained. Current account eligibility, cost, endorsement and assessment permission are not confirmed.

ChatGPT Edu

Copilot Web

DeepL

M365 Copilot

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 4

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

2026-10-27Page update
Other records · Page update
View revision
Loading revision…
2026-10-26Record maintenance
Other records · Record maintenance
View revision
Loading revision…
2026-10-25Record maintenance
Other records · Record maintenance
View revision
Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

Historical and pending public Claims (7)

These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.

cl-lund-university-chatgpt-327 · excluded_pending_review

Managed ChatGPT Edu staff application; ordinary student licences excluded in research excerpt.

Derived availability is not student eligibility or assessment permission; staff/teacher/researcher restrictions required.

Record history

cl-lund-university-deepl-328 · excluded_pending_review

Staff translation service; research reports SEK 3,900/user/year without original source bytes.

Translation licence listing does not imply free student seats or assessed-work permission; cost/eligibility remain pending.

Record history

cl-lund-university-microsoft-copilot-329 · excluded_pending_review

Account/service-mode-specific access; course assessment rules independently apply.

Copilot Web access must distinguish employee service and student Copilot Chat accounts.

Record history

cl-lund-university-microsoft-copilot-for-m365-330 · excluded_pending_review

Department/account/tier-specific licence; assessment permission not established.

M365 Copilot tier is separate from Copilot Web; departmental eligibility and licensing must not become universal access.

Record history

claim-lund-policy-responsible-use · excluded_pending_review

General policy principles, not course assessment permission; Swedish source-byte/wording gap remains.

Precise creative/responsible-use modality in Swedish policy was not verified against original PDF.

Record history

claim-lund-policy-procured-tools · excluded_pending_review

University procurement/privacy principles; original Swedish policy not verified.

Exact normative strength of prioritising procured tools requires original Swedish text; tool directory cannot establish it.

Record history

claim-lund-chatgpt-edu-staff · excluded_pending_review

Eligible teachers/researchers during 2026; doctoral employment account/admin exception pending exact source review.

One-year free access statement omits 2026 time boundary and doctoral employment/admin exceptions; no indefinite free entitlement.

Record history

Official sources

5 official URLs; 7 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

AI at Lund University

www.staff.lu.se

University official source

staff.lu.se

Hash and captured version

AI at Lund University · 2026-05-13T02:34:24.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

0898924449cbcd289abef0b7c3e64caf87fb7175a2f32ababf0459d073e9dc08

AI at Lund University | Staff Pages · 2026-07-15T22:49:43.896Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

fe675d991284a7b014f6719cd0dd0c26c5c37751361ea90c13bf436283547ac8

AI at Lund University | Staff Pages · 2026-09-24T12:58:27.542Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

44c3f81d6316da2ad64cb8702aa2891cfa191bdd8c5f0f596e891e001ce7be9a

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Guidance for teachers in five steps

www.education.lu.se

University official source

education.lu.se

Hash and captured version

Guidance for teachers in five steps · 2026-05-13T02:34:24.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

811076a3f7b53ebd4788a49d0e34add584ff2904a73e3efe00c3a716cc352871

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

How to use generative AI responsibly

www.campusonline.lu.se

University official source

campusonline.lu.se

Hash and captured version

How to use generative AI responsibly · 2026-05-13T02:34:24.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

d98e2627a0c485eaef1055c32ccc7e6084b80a88703084abcc6589594789b3b6

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Policy med principer för användning av generativ AI inom Lunds universitet

www.medarbetarwebben.lu.se

University official source

medarbetarwebben.lu.se

Hash and captured version

Policy med principer för användning av generativ AI inom Lunds universitet · 2026-05-13T02:34:24.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

9f79df69b0f3917129e3bf2c6e8ffa2fc3fbaa7b01704990290a13f8e698bcc3

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Questions and answers on GenAI tools

www.education.lu.se

University official source

education.lu.se

Hash and captured version

Questions and answers on GenAI tools · 2026-05-13T02:34:24.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

f63436f46cefa8b4b4f1d498bb617dc2713ba930cf0dc7482258a36c52aa0ac0

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state: agent_reviewed
Analysis review state: machine_candidate
Record revision: qs71-90-v6-completeness-r3-20261025
Dataset release: public-release-20260924-002
Correction published: 2026-10-26T02:55:31.205Z
Student snapshot: Not published

Current reviewed JSON · All record history

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

Institution audit PARTIAL. Official raw HTML/PDF originals and full version/context verification remain incomplete.
Original public records remain unchanged. Excluded records are historical or pending scope review, not current permissions.
New corrections, tools, student interpretations and snapshots remain unapproved.

Current reviewed JSON

Questions students ask

Can I use AI for my coursework?

For a compulsory assignment, check with the teacher whether GenAI is permitted and how to report it; silence in course materials is not permission.

View evidence →

Do I need to disclose AI use?

Ask the teacher how to report permitted GenAI use. Do not assume there is one disclosure format for every Lund assignment.

View evidence →

Can I upload sensitive data?

Student guidance prohibits uploading other students’ work, sensitive personal data or protected material, even with a student login; staff ChatGPT guidance also excludes medical information.

View evidence →

Which tools can I access?

Student guidance lists Copilot Chat and Gemini with student-account login. It recommends licensed tools, but staff ChatGPT/DeepL/M365 eligibility remains separate and pending.

View evidence →

What are the examination rules?

For an examination, double-check teacher permission and reporting requirements. Student access to a tool does not settle the exam rules.

View evidence →

What rules apply to research and publication?

The policy describes GenAI as support for learning and research, not a replacement for basic skills, critical thinking or scientific method.

View evidence →

What counts as academic misconduct?

Staff and students remain responsible for their content. Passing off generated work as your own may be treated as cheating.

View evidence →

What guidance applies to teaching?

Teacher guidance calls for clear course rules, learning-outcome checks and equal access; it also says students’ work must not be shared with GenAI tools.

View evidence →

What security and procurement requirements apply?

Student guidance favours licensed services, but the exact Swedish procurement wording and staff-tier conditions remain unresolved here.

View evidence →

When was this record checked?

Record checked: 2026-09-24

Record version →

Which official sources support these rules?

Official source →

Where can I read the full evidence?

15 · Full policy evidence

Full policy evidence →

Lund University

What would you like to check?

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Exams

Disclosure

Privacy and data

Tools and eligibility

Research and publication

Academic integrity

Teaching guidance

Security and procurement

Do

Don’t

Tool discovery records: scope pending review

ChatGPT Edu

Copilot Web

DeepL

M365 Copilot

Reviewed claims

Official sources

AI at Lund University

Guidance for teachers in five steps

How to use generative AI responsibly

Policy med principer för användning av generativ AI inom Lunds universitet

Questions and answers on GenAI tools

Related university AI policy records

Questions students ask