Policy presence
Stockholm University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Stockholm, Sweden
Stockholm University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Stockholm University has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Stockholm University has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Stockholm University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Stockholm University has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Stockholm University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
Stockholm University has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Stockholm University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: unauthorized_ai_exam_use_reported_as_cheating_when_well_founded
Original evidence
Evidence 1If it is suspected that a student has used an AI chatbot in an unauthorized way in connection with an examination, the offense must be investigated, and, if there is a well-founded suspicion of cheating, reported in the same way as in other cases of cheating.
Privacy
Normalized value: copilot_data_protection_with_confidentiality_limits
Original evidence
Evidence 1As long as you are signed in to Microsoft 365 with your university account, data protection for Copilot is enabled and nothing you enter into the chat is used to train the model Copilot is based on. However, this does not mean you are allowed to enter information with confidentiality level 3 or 4 into Copilot.
Teaching
Normalized value: teachers_examiners_decide_course_specific_ai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Stockholm University therefore recommends that teachers/examiners need to decide which type of use is allowed, and which is considered impermissible, which may differ from course to course.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: sbs_generai_prohibited_unless_explicitly_allowed
Original evidence
Evidence 1Any use of generative AI (e.g. ChatGPT) during examinations or mandatory assignments, beyond what is explicitly allowed in the study guide or examination instructions, is prohibited. A student who uses generative AI in their work or writing in any way not explicitly permitted may be suspected of attempting to deceive.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: dsv_ai_use_allowed_with_reference_and_use_description
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students are authorized to utilize AI tools to enhance their understanding of scientific knowledge. This includes employing AI tools to support their learning, improve communication, and enhance their writing skills. It is prohibited for students to claim ownership of AI tool-generated texts, models, or code without proper references to the utilized AI tools. Any submission must include a description of how these AI tools were employed.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: no_mandatory_ai_tools_policy_for_employees
Original evidence
Evidence 1Stockholm University has chosen not to implement a mandatory policy for the use of AI tools, partly due to the very rapid development, and partly because different disciplines have widely varying needs and conditions. Our usual regulations and the employee's judgment apply, just as for other digital tools.
0 machine or needs-review claim
4 source attribution
medarbetare.su.se
su.se
su.se
medarbetare.su.se