Stockholm, Sweden

Stockholm University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage6 reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources4Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/stockholm-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence80%

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coursework

Stockholm University has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

Stockholm University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

Stockholm University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

Stockholm University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records1

AI tools

Stockholm University

Tool
AI tools
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Unknown
Review
Agent reviewed

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

Stockholm University's central chatbot guidance says suspected unauthorized AI-chatbot use in an examination should be investigated and, if there is well-founded suspicion of cheating, reported in the same way as other cheating cases.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: unauthorized_ai_exam_use_reported_as_cheating_when_well_founded

Original evidence

Evidence 1
If it is suspected that a student has used an AI chatbot in an unauthorized way in connection with an examination, the offense must be investigated, and, if there is a well-founded suspicion of cheating, reported in the same way as in other cases of cheating.

Privacy

Stockholm University's AI resources page says employees signed in to Microsoft 365 with a university account have data protection for Copilot, but it also says information at confidentiality level 3 or 4 should not be entered into Copilot.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: copilot_data_protection_with_confidentiality_limits

Original evidence

Evidence 1
As long as you are signed in to Microsoft 365 with your university account, data protection for Copilot is enabled and nothing you enter into the chat is used to train the model Copilot is based on. However, this does not mean you are allowed to enter information with confidentiality level 3 or 4 into Copilot.

Teaching

Stockholm University's central chatbot guidance recommends that teachers and examiners decide what AI-chatbot use is allowed or impermissible, noting that this may differ from course to course.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: teachers_examiners_decide_course_specific_ai_use

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Stockholm University therefore recommends that teachers/examiners need to decide which type of use is allowed, and which is considered impermissible, which may differ from course to course.

Academic Integrity

Stockholm Business School says use of generative AI in examinations or mandatory assignments is prohibited unless explicitly allowed in the study guide or examination instructions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: sbs_generai_prohibited_unless_explicitly_allowed

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Any use of generative AI (e.g. ChatGPT) during examinations or mandatory assignments, beyond what is explicitly allowed in the study guide or examination instructions, is prohibited. A student who uses generative AI in their work or writing in any way not explicitly permitted may be suspected of attempting to deceive.

Academic Integrity

DSV's AI policy authorizes students enrolled at DSV to use AI tools for learning support and exam preparation, while requiring proper references and a description when AI-generated text, models, or code are used in submissions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: dsv_ai_use_allowed_with_reference_and_use_description

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Students are authorized to utilize AI tools to enhance their understanding of scientific knowledge. This includes employing AI tools to support their learning, improve communication, and enhance their writing skills. It is prohibited for students to claim ownership of AI tool-generated texts, models, or code without proper references to the utilized AI tools. Any submission must include a description of how these AI tools were employed.

Ai Tool Treatment

Stockholm University's AI resources page says the university has chosen not to implement a mandatory policy for AI tools and that usual regulations and employee judgment apply.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: no_mandatory_ai_tools_policy_for_employees

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Stockholm University has chosen not to implement a mandatory policy for the use of AI tools, partly due to the very rapid development, and partly because different disciplines have widely varying needs and conditions. Our usual regulations and the employee's judgment apply, just as for other digital tools.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

4 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities