University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPLESNLMSJAKOPTARRUDEITCSTRFISVDANBHULTIDVITHFAHEHIURBNUKELZH-HANT

Cardiff, United Kingdom Last checked

Cardiff University

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities
Can I use AI for my coursework?Evidence gap or scope limitsDo I need to disclose AI use?Evidence gap or scope limitsCan I upload sensitive data?Source guidanceWhich tools can I access?Conditional in this scope
Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautionsRecord updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Evidence gap or scope limits

Check your module or course guidance before using AI in assessed work; the library guidance does not grant a general permission.

Official source ↗

Exams

Evidence gap or scope limits

An exam-specific permission rule was not established in this review. Check the instructions for the actual exam.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Evidence gap or scope limits

A university-wide disclosure format was not established from these sources; check your course requirements.

Privacy and data

Source guidance

Staff should not upload student submissions or identifiable student work to external GenAI tools.

Official source ↗

Institutional tools

Conditional in this scope

Cardiff lists Copilot, Gemini and NotebookLM as institutionally available to staff and students through university accounts. Assessment permission is separate.

Official source ↗

Research and publication

Source guidance

Library guidance describes Copilot as potentially useful for defining a literature-search topic or research question. It does not establish publication or thesis rules.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Required in this scope

Students are expected to maintain academic standards; allegations follow the relevant misconduct procedure. A review is available only where the originating procedure provides that right.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Source guidance

The Academic Integrity module covers responsible GenAI use; staff and student guidance are referenced by the university.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Evidence gap or scope limits

University-account access is recommended for the listed institutional tools; a complete procurement or data-approval process was not established here.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • Check the module or course rules before assessed AI use.
    Source guidance

Don’t

  • Do not treat access to a named tool as permission for an assessment.
    Site advice
AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

AI use questioned?

Cardiff University

Use the source-specific audience, assessment and publication limits below. Institution-wide policy review remains PARTIAL.

Investigation & response

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Possible outcomes

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Review & appeal

Students are expected to maintain academic standards; allegations follow the relevant misconduct procedure. A review is available only where the originating procedure provides that right.

Original evidence and scope

Students are expected to maintain academic standards; allegations follow the relevant misconduct procedure. A review is available only where the originating procedure provides that right.

academic_integrity:live-cardiff_review-01

General integrity framework. Where the review procedure applies, its deadline runs from the date the decision is sent; the originating procedure must be checked.

Where a decision is made under a University procedure that specifies the right to request a review, you can use this Procedure to do so. The deadline to request a review is 14 days from the date the decision is sent to you

Section 1.2; SHA256 refers to excerpt file; not original source bytes.

Official university source ↗

AI tools & access

  • Microsoft CopilotOfficial recommendationConditions apply

    Institutional account access; individual activation and prices have not been tested. Cardiff lists Copilot, Gemini and NotebookLM as institutionally available to staff and students through university accounts. Assessment permission is separate.

  • Google GeminiOfficial recommendationConditions apply

    Institutional account access; individual activation and prices have not been tested. Cardiff lists Copilot, Gemini and NotebookLM as institutionally available to staff and students through university accounts. Assessment permission is separate.

  • NotebookLMOfficial recommendationConditions apply

    Institutional account access; individual activation and prices have not been tested. Cardiff lists Copilot, Gemini and NotebookLM as institutionally available to staff and students through university accounts. Assessment permission is separate.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 1

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

Records cover only part of this period, starting 2026-10-27.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

5

Historical and pending public Claims (1)

These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.

claim-cardiff-regulations-genai-approaches · excluded_pending_review

Original public Claim retained in its source-specific scope; institution audit remains PARTIAL.

Excluded from current conclusions pending source, temporal or normative review; original text and evidence retained.

Record history

Official sources

4 official URLs; 4 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

Academic Integrity Policy

www.cardiff.ac.uk

University official source

cardiff.ac.uk

Hash and captured version

Academic Integrity Policy · 2026-05-15T04:29:50Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

30f259949dd92baeb135fa5c965fb867c828b7d8332828dad413154c112d2e78

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Academic Regulations and Policies 2025/2026

www.cardiff.ac.uk

University official source

cardiff.ac.uk

Hash and captured version

Academic Regulations and Policies 2025/2026 · 2026-05-15T04:32:20Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

9e766787a5760b9187b4732bd46fd35a135c04a8564b269774d478b510c7c6bf

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

AI in Education at Cardiff University

blogs.cardiff.ac.uk

University official source

blogs.cardiff.ac.uk

Hash and captured version

AI in Education at Cardiff University · 2026-05-15T04:30:40Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

027cde52fc4222fb7385dcb1d347bfa932aaedcc063640a41d6885279c10bc4f

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Using Gen AI to support your literature searching

sites.cardiff.ac.uk

University official source

sites.cardiff.ac.uk

Hash and captured version

Using Gen AI to support your literature searching · 2026-05-15T04:31:10Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

ca5c1bb77561c39996c7b81021220d8f9c479be2cd1ff19b712190e0e29d49b5

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
v6-reading-rankings-ten-20261027
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · All record history

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • Institution-wide semantic audit remains PARTIAL. Private historical objects and every new requirement are not automatically accepted by public-Claim review.
  • New evidence retains original bytes where obtained; other items are reviewer excerpts or historical snapshots and do not establish full original documents.
  • Unchanged public APIs, snapshots, MCP, history and tool records do not adopt this local candidate.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        Check your module or course guidance before using AI in assessed work; the library guidance does not grant a general permission.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        A university-wide disclosure format was not established from these sources; check your course requirements.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        Staff should not upload student submissions or identifiable student work to external GenAI tools.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        Cardiff lists Copilot, Gemini and NotebookLM as institutionally available to staff and students through university accounts. Assessment permission is separate.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        An exam-specific permission rule was not established in this review. Check the instructions for the actual exam.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        Library guidance describes Copilot as potentially useful for defining a literature-search topic or research question. It does not establish publication or thesis rules.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        Students are expected to maintain academic standards; allegations follow the relevant misconduct procedure. A review is available only where the originating procedure provides that right.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        The Academic Integrity module covers responsible GenAI use; staff and student guidance are referenced by the university.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        University-account access is recommended for the listed institutional tools; a complete procurement or data-approval process was not established here.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        5 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →