Change log

Cardiff University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Cardiff University currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Cardiff University current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+12-0
11 # Cardiff University AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: Cardiff University's public library guidance tells students to check module or course guidance and the University's student AI guidance before using any AI tool to support assessed work.
3+Evidence (en-GB, ca5c1bb77561): Before you use any AI tool to support your assessed work, please check the guidance from your module or course and read the University's guidance for students on using artificial intelligence in your learning.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Cardiff University's public library guidance presents generative AI tools such as Microsoft Copilot as potentially helpful for identifying a research topic or defining a research question in the context of literature searching.
5+Evidence (en-GB, ca5c1bb77561): Generative AI tools such as Microsoft Copilot can be helpful when you need to identify a topic to research and/or define a research question.
6+teaching: Cardiff University's 2025/26 Academic Regulations and Policies include a teaching, learning and assessment expectation that providers establish communicated approaches to technologies such as Generative Artificial Intelligence and define misuse of those technologies.
7+Evidence (en-GB, 9e766787a576): Providers establish coherent approaches to technologies that impact teaching, learning and assessment (such as Generative Artificial Intelligence). These approaches are clearly communicated to staff and students, include how they are utilised and define misuse of such technologies.
8+academic_integrity: Cardiff University's Academic Integrity Policy expects students to maintain high standards of academic practice and provides that the relevant Academic Misconduct Procedure applies where concerns are raised about alleged academic misconduct.
9+Evidence (en-GB, 30f259949dd9): A student is expected to maintain high standards of academic practice and not engage in academic misconduct. The relevant Academic Misconduct Procedure will be applied to any student where concerns are raised that they have not followed the appropriate academic procedures or standards, and are alleged to have engaged in academic misconduct.
10+academic_integrity: A Cardiff Learning and Teaching Academy post says students are encouraged to complete Cardiff's Academic Integrity module and that the module includes generative AI content in the context of academic integrity.
11+Evidence (en-GB, 027cde52fc42): In the meantime, please encourage students to complete the Academic Integrity module in their Learning Central Organisations. The module includes content on using generative AI in the context of academic integrity. By completing the module, students develop their understanding of honest, ethical and responsible conduct when submitting academic work.
12+teaching: A Cardiff Learning and Teaching Academy post reports that Cardiff published updated staff guidance on AI in education on the intranet and worked with students on guidance for ethical and responsible generative AI use in learning.
13+Evidence (en-GB, 027cde52fc42): Working with colleagues in the AI in Education Group, we have published updated staff guidance on the use of AI in education, now available on the intranet. This resource offers practical advice, examples, and considerations for integrating AI into teaching and learning in a responsible and pedagogically sound way. We have also worked with students to create new guidance to support them in the ethical and responsible use of generative AI technologies as part of their learning experience.

Claim changes

6 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

Cardiff University's public library guidance tells students to check module or course guidance and the University's student AI guidance before using any AI tool to support assessed work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

Cardiff University's public library guidance presents generative AI tools such as Microsoft Copilot as potentially helpful for identifying a research topic or defining a research question in the context of literature searching.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

teaching

Cardiff University's 2025/26 Academic Regulations and Policies include a teaching, learning and assessment expectation that providers establish communicated approaches to technologies such as Generative Artificial Intelligence and define misuse of those technologies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

academic_integrity

Cardiff University's Academic Integrity Policy expects students to maintain high standards of academic practice and provides that the relevant Academic Misconduct Procedure applies where concerns are raised about alleged academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

academic_integrity

A Cardiff Learning and Teaching Academy post says students are encouraged to complete Cardiff's Academic Integrity module and that the module includes generative AI content in the context of academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

teaching

A Cardiff Learning and Teaching Academy post reports that Cardiff published updated staff guidance on AI in education on the intranet and worked with students on guidance for ethical and responsible generative AI use in learning.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence78%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

Source snapshots

4 source attributions