变更日志

Cardiff University

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

Cardiff University currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月15日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Cardiff University。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

Cardiff University combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # Cardiff University AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: Cardiff University's public library guidance tells students to check module or course guidance and the University's student AI guidance before using any AI tool to support assessed work.
3+Evidence (en-GB, ca5c1bb77561): Before you use any AI tool to support your assessed work, please check the guidance from your module or course and read the University's guidance for students on using artificial intelligence in your learning.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Cardiff University's public library guidance presents generative AI tools such as Microsoft Copilot as potentially helpful for identifying a research topic or defining a research question in the context of literature searching.
5+Evidence (en-GB, ca5c1bb77561): Generative AI tools such as Microsoft Copilot can be helpful when you need to identify a topic to research and/or define a research question.
6+teaching: Cardiff University's 2025/26 Academic Regulations and Policies include a teaching, learning and assessment expectation that providers establish communicated approaches to technologies such as Generative Artificial Intelligence and define misuse of those technologies.
7+Evidence (en-GB, 9e766787a576): Providers establish coherent approaches to technologies that impact teaching, learning and assessment (such as Generative Artificial Intelligence). These approaches are clearly communicated to staff and students, include how they are utilised and define misuse of such technologies.
8+academic_integrity: Cardiff University's Academic Integrity Policy expects students to maintain high standards of academic practice and provides that the relevant Academic Misconduct Procedure applies where concerns are raised about alleged academic misconduct.
9+Evidence (en-GB, 30f259949dd9): A student is expected to maintain high standards of academic practice and not engage in academic misconduct. The relevant Academic Misconduct Procedure will be applied to any student where concerns are raised that they have not followed the appropriate academic procedures or standards, and are alleged to have engaged in academic misconduct.
10+academic_integrity: A Cardiff Learning and Teaching Academy post says students are encouraged to complete Cardiff's Academic Integrity module and that the module includes generative AI content in the context of academic integrity.
11+Evidence (en-GB, 027cde52fc42): In the meantime, please encourage students to complete the Academic Integrity module in their Learning Central Organisations. The module includes content on using generative AI in the context of academic integrity. By completing the module, students develop their understanding of honest, ethical and responsible conduct when submitting academic work.
12+teaching: A Cardiff Learning and Teaching Academy post reports that Cardiff published updated staff guidance on AI in education on the intranet and worked with students on guidance for ethical and responsible generative AI use in learning.
13+Evidence (en-GB, 027cde52fc42): Working with colleagues in the AI in Education Group, we have published updated staff guidance on the use of AI in education, now available on the intranet. This resource offers practical advice, examples, and considerations for integrating AI into teaching and learning in a responsible and pedagogically sound way. We have also worked with students to create new guidance to support them in the ethical and responsible use of generative AI technologies as part of their learning experience.

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

6 声明 条记录

ai_tool_treatment

Cardiff University's public library guidance tells students to check module or course guidance and the University's student AI guidance before using any AI tool to support assessed work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言en-GB

ai_tool_treatment

Cardiff University's public library guidance presents generative AI tools such as Microsoft Copilot as potentially helpful for identifying a research topic or defining a research question in the context of literature searching.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%证据1语言en-GB

teaching

Cardiff University's 2025/26 Academic Regulations and Policies include a teaching, learning and assessment expectation that providers establish communicated approaches to technologies such as Generative Artificial Intelligence and define misuse of those technologies.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度86%证据1语言en-GB

academic_integrity

Cardiff University's Academic Integrity Policy expects students to maintain high standards of academic practice and provides that the relevant Academic Misconduct Procedure applies where concerns are raised about alleged academic misconduct.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度84%证据1语言en-GB

academic_integrity

A Cardiff Learning and Teaching Academy post says students are encouraged to complete Cardiff's Academic Integrity module and that the module includes generative AI content in the context of academic integrity.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度82%证据1语言en-GB

teaching

A Cardiff Learning and Teaching Academy post reports that Cardiff published updated staff guidance on AI in education on the intranet and worked with students on guidance for ethical and responsible generative AI use in learning.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度78%证据1语言en-GB

源快照

4 source attributions