Buenos Aires, Argentina Last checked Jul 19, 2026

Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Can I use AI for my coursework?Scoped public references; review pending Do I need to disclose AI use?Scoped public references; review pending Can I upload sensitive data?Scoped public references; review pending Which tools can I access?Scoped public references; review pending

Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautions Record updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Scoped public references; review pending

CITEP recommends explicit classroom AI rules so students understand suitable uses and limits. This teaching guidance does not itself grant permission for a UBA course or assignment.

Official source ↗

Exams

Scoped public references; review pending

These CITEP teaching references do not establish an AI rule for a specific UBA exam. The relevant course or faculty must provide that instruction.

Disclosure

Scoped public references; review pending

CITEP’s teaching guidance connects ethical AI use with source attribution and recognition of AI co-creation. A compulsory UBA-wide declaration format or deadline is not established here.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Scoped public references; review pending

CITEP warns that not every AI tool protects entered information. Its teaching guidance calls for reliable choices and awareness of the risks of sharing sensitive data.

Official source ↗

Tools and eligibility

Scoped public references; review pending

The Mi Econ chatbot belongs to UBA’s Faculty of Economic Sciences. Current eligibility, hosting claims, costs and use in assessments are unresolved; no UBA-wide access is concluded.

Research and publication

Scoped public references; review pending

The retained CITEP material addresses teaching and does not establish a UBA-wide research, thesis or publication AI rule. Check the relevant research authority or publisher.

Academic integrity

Scoped public references; review pending

CITEP distinguishes legitimate AI support from improper appropriation and discusses attribution. This is educational guidance, not an AI-specific UBA penalty schedule.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Scoped public references; review pending

CITEP’s La Brújul-IA encourages contextual AI integration and explicit classroom limits. It recommends assessments of understanding, argument and application, beyond technical AI use.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Scoped public references; review pending

CITEP’s warning about information protection is not a procurement approval. These references do not verify a UBA-wide security review or approved-product list.

Do

For a UBA course, ask which AI uses and limits the instructor has made explicit.
Site advice
For a UBA course, ask which AI uses and limits the instructor has made explicit.
Scope
CITEP’s La Brújul-IA is teaching guidance, not a mandatory UBA-wide AI policy. Mi Econ is a Faculty of Economic Sciences service; its access and technical claims remain pending.
The CITEP/UBA guidance recommends making precise classroom rules for AI use explicit and lists possible agreement contents such as permitted uses, restricted/prohibited uses, transparency, and declarations of use.
Original evidence and scope
The CITEP/UBA guidance recommends making precise classroom rules for AI use explicit and lists possible agreement contents such as permitted uses, restricted/prohibited uses, transparency, and declarations of use.
claim-uba-brujulia-ai-use-contract-001
CITEP La Brújul-IA is teaching guidance and recommendations, not a mandatory UBA-wide AI policy. Mi Econ is Faculty of Economic Sciences activity; no UBA-wide access, self-hosting or unrestricted assessment permission is established. General discipline is not an AI-specific penalty.
Para integrar efectivamente la IA al aula es fundamental explicitar reglas precisas sobre su uso, asegurando transparencia y responsabilidad académica. Las directrices claras permiten que los estudiantes comprendan los usos apropiados de la IA, cómo aprovecharla para mejorar su aprendizaje y qué límites deben respetar para garantizar la integridad de sus producciones.
Acordar el contrato de uso
Official university source ↗
UBA educators: teach source attribution and recognition of AI co-creation, as CITEP recommends.
Source guidance
UBA educators: teach source attribution and recognition of AI co-creation, as CITEP recommends.
Scope
CITEP’s La Brújul-IA is teaching guidance, not a mandatory UBA-wide AI policy. Mi Econ is a Faculty of Economic Sciences service; its access and technical claims remain pending.
The CITEP/UBA guidance frames ethical AI use as distinguishing legitimate support from improper appropriation and includes source attribution and recognition of AI co-creation.
Original evidence and scope
The CITEP/UBA guidance frames ethical AI use as distinguishing legitimate support from improper appropriation and includes source attribution and recognition of AI co-creation.
claim-uba-brujulia-integrity-001
CITEP La Brújul-IA is teaching guidance and recommendations, not a mandatory UBA-wide AI policy. Mi Econ is Faculty of Economic Sciences activity; no UBA-wide access, self-hosting or unrestricted assessment permission is established. General discipline is not an AI-specific penalty.
Es fundamental comprender la diferencia entre el uso legítimo de la IA como herramienta de apoyo y la apropiación indebida del contenido generado con ella. Enseñar el uso ético de esta tecnología debe incluir estrategias para la correcta atribución de fuentes y el reconocimiento de la cocreación con IA. Este enfoque se enmarca en la problemática de la integridad académica y propiedad intelectual.
Promover el uso ético
Official university source ↗
UBA educators: assess understanding, argument and application, beyond technical AI use.
Source guidance
UBA educators: assess understanding, argument and application, beyond technical AI use.
Scope
CITEP’s La Brújul-IA is teaching guidance, not a mandatory UBA-wide AI policy. Mi Econ is a Faculty of Economic Sciences service; its access and technical claims remain pending.
For evaluation contexts, the CITEP/UBA guidance suggests designing activities that assess understanding, argumentation, and application of knowledge, not only technical AI use.
Original evidence and scope
For evaluation contexts, the CITEP/UBA guidance suggests designing activities that assess understanding, argumentation, and application of knowledge, not only technical AI use.
claim-uba-brujulia-evaluation-001
CITEP La Brújul-IA is teaching guidance and recommendations, not a mandatory UBA-wide AI policy. Mi Econ is Faculty of Economic Sciences activity; no UBA-wide access, self-hosting or unrestricted assessment permission is established. General discipline is not an AI-specific penalty.
Es fundamental diseñar actividades que, además de medir el uso técnico de la IA, evalúen la comprensión, la argumentación y la capacidad de aplicar el conocimiento en distintos contextos.
Incluir IA en la evaluación
Official university source ↗

Don’t

Do not treat CITEP’s teaching suggestions as permission to use AI in every UBA assessment.
Site advice
Do not treat CITEP’s teaching suggestions as permission to use AI in every UBA assessment.
Scope
CITEP’s La Brújul-IA is teaching guidance, not a mandatory UBA-wide AI policy. Mi Econ is a Faculty of Economic Sciences service; its access and technical claims remain pending.
The CITEP/UBA guidance recommends making precise classroom rules for AI use explicit and lists possible agreement contents such as permitted uses, restricted/prohibited uses, transparency, and declarations of use.
Original evidence and scope
The CITEP/UBA guidance recommends making precise classroom rules for AI use explicit and lists possible agreement contents such as permitted uses, restricted/prohibited uses, transparency, and declarations of use.
claim-uba-brujulia-ai-use-contract-001
CITEP La Brújul-IA is teaching guidance and recommendations, not a mandatory UBA-wide AI policy. Mi Econ is Faculty of Economic Sciences activity; no UBA-wide access, self-hosting or unrestricted assessment permission is established. General discipline is not an AI-specific penalty.
Para integrar efectivamente la IA al aula es fundamental explicitar reglas precisas sobre su uso, asegurando transparencia y responsabilidad académica. Las directrices claras permiten que los estudiantes comprendan los usos apropiados de la IA, cómo aprovecharla para mejorar su aprendizaje y qué límites deben respetar para garantizar la integridad de sus producciones.
Acordar el contrato de uso
Official university source ↗
CITEP/UBA presents La Brújul-IA as teaching guidance that offers conceptual keys and concrete strategies for critical, situated integration of AI in higher-education teaching.
Original evidence and scope
CITEP/UBA presents La Brújul-IA as teaching guidance that offers conceptual keys and concrete strategies for critical, situated integration of AI in higher-education teaching.
claim-uba-brujulia-teaching-001
CITEP La Brújul-IA is teaching guidance and recommendations, not a mandatory UBA-wide AI policy. Mi Econ is Faculty of Economic Sciences activity; no UBA-wide access, self-hosting or unrestricted assessment permission is established. General discipline is not an AI-specific penalty.
La Brújul-IA: Orientaciones para la integración de la IA en la Educación Superior es un decálogo que invita a repensar nuestras prácticas de enseñanza ante la irrupción de nuevas tecnologías, producido colaborativamente por docentes universitarios durante el Hackatón IA que organizó el CITEP. Ofrece claves conceptuales y estrategias concretas para una integración crítica y situada de la IA en la enseñanza.
Page intro
Official university source ↗
Do not assume an AI tool protects sensitive information; consider CITEP’s warning before sharing it.
Site advice
Do not assume an AI tool protects sensitive information; consider CITEP’s warning before sharing it.
Scope
CITEP’s La Brújul-IA is teaching guidance, not a mandatory UBA-wide AI policy. Mi Econ is a Faculty of Economic Sciences service; its access and technical claims remain pending.
The CITEP/UBA guidance says AI use in education should consider personal-data protection and digital security, noting that not all AI tools safeguard entered information.
Original evidence and scope
The CITEP/UBA guidance says AI use in education should consider personal-data protection and digital security, noting that not all AI tools safeguard entered information.
claim-uba-brujulia-privacy-001
CITEP La Brújul-IA is teaching guidance and recommendations, not a mandatory UBA-wide AI policy. Mi Econ is Faculty of Economic Sciences activity; no UBA-wide access, self-hosting or unrestricted assessment permission is established. General discipline is not an AI-specific penalty.
Además de su pertinencia didáctica, el uso de IA en educación debe considerar la protección de datos personales y la seguridad digital. No todas las herramientas de IA garantizan el resguardo de la información ingresada y es necesario elegir opciones confiables y concientizar a los estudiantes sobre los riesgos de compartir información sensible.
Cuidar los criterios de selección
Official university source ↗

AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

Tool discovery records: scope pending review

Tool discovery information and cited sources are retained. Current account eligibility, cost, endorsement and assessment permission are not confirmed.

Chatbot de UBA Económicas / Mi Econ

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 3

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

2026-10-27Page update
Other records · Page update
View revision
Loading revision…
2026-10-26Record maintenance
Other records · Record maintenance
View revision
Loading revision…
2026-10-25Record maintenance
Other records · Record maintenance
View revision
Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

Historical and pending public Claims (1)

These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.

cl-universidad-de-buenos-aires-institutional-ai-service-401 · excluded_pending_review

CITEP La Brújul-IA is teaching guidance and recommendations, not a mandatory UBA-wide AI policy. Mi Econ is Faculty of Economic Sciences activity; no UBA-wide access, self-hosting or unrestricted assessment permission is established. General discipline is not an AI-specific penalty.

Original record retained for provenance; version, scope, qualification or tool-derived conclusion requires review. Excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis.

Record history

Official sources

2 official URLs; 2 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

La Brújul-IA: Orientaciones para la integración de la IA en la Educación Superior

observatoriocitep.rec.uba.ar

University official source

observatoriocitep.rec.uba.ar

Hash and captured version

La Brújul-IA: Orientaciones para la integración de la IA en la Educación Superior · 2026-05-13T13:11:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

a7070768f42649a23b93dab100fe8ae6f559858d36b2d4141468b8c5b79d9d3a

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Nuevos criterios para el uso de chatbot de UBA Económicas

economicas.uba.ar

University official source

economicas.uba.ar

Hash and captured version

Nuevos criterios para el uso de chatbot de UBA Económicas · 2026-07-16T00:00:43.896Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

a6cc6cadc279718d25a11fd58d7bd95fc366a9ac1420a5663971cd74c4b8b03c

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state: agent_reviewed
Analysis review state: machine_candidate
Record revision: qs71-90-v6-completeness-r3-20261025
Dataset release: public-release-20260924-002
Correction published: 2026-10-26T02:55:31.205Z
Student snapshot: Not published

Current reviewed JSON · All record history

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

Policy semantic review remains PARTIAL. Original HTML/PDF bytes unavailable; inherited source hash representations unresolved.
Tool discovery does not establish current eligibility, cost, endorsement or assessment permission.

Current reviewed JSON

Questions students ask

Can I use AI for my coursework?

CITEP recommends explicit classroom AI rules so students understand suitable uses and limits. This teaching guidance does not itself grant permission for a UBA course or assignment.

View evidence →

Do I need to disclose AI use?

CITEP’s teaching guidance connects ethical AI use with source attribution and recognition of AI co-creation. A compulsory UBA-wide declaration format or deadline is not established here.

View evidence →

Can I upload sensitive data?

CITEP warns that not every AI tool protects entered information. Its teaching guidance calls for reliable choices and awareness of the risks of sharing sensitive data.

View evidence →

Which tools can I access?

The Mi Econ chatbot belongs to UBA’s Faculty of Economic Sciences. Current eligibility, hosting claims, costs and use in assessments are unresolved; no UBA-wide access is concluded.

View evidence →

What are the examination rules?

These CITEP teaching references do not establish an AI rule for a specific UBA exam. The relevant course or faculty must provide that instruction.

View evidence →

What rules apply to research and publication?

The retained CITEP material addresses teaching and does not establish a UBA-wide research, thesis or publication AI rule. Check the relevant research authority or publisher.

View evidence →

What counts as academic misconduct?

CITEP distinguishes legitimate AI support from improper appropriation and discusses attribution. This is educational guidance, not an AI-specific UBA penalty schedule.

View evidence →

What guidance applies to teaching?

CITEP’s La Brújul-IA encourages contextual AI integration and explicit classroom limits. It recommends assessments of understanding, argument and application, beyond technical AI use.

View evidence →

What security and procurement requirements apply?

CITEP’s warning about information protection is not a procurement approval. These references do not verify a UBA-wide security review or approved-product list.

View evidence →

When was this record checked?

Record checked: 2026-07-19

Record version →

Which official sources support these rules?

observatoriocitep.rec.uba.ar ↗

Official source →

Where can I read the full evidence?

6 · Full policy evidence

Full policy evidence →

Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)

What would you like to check?

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Exams

Disclosure

Privacy and data

Tools and eligibility

Research and publication

Academic integrity

Teaching guidance

Security and procurement

Do

Don’t

Tool discovery records: scope pending review

Chatbot de UBA Económicas / Mi Econ

Reviewed claims

Official sources

La Brújul-IA: Orientaciones para la integración de la IA en la Educación Superior

Nuevos criterios para el uso de chatbot de UBA Económicas

Related university AI policy records

Questions students ask