Busca políticas universitarias de IA

When students submit reports that utilized generative AI tools, course instructors are officially recommended to have students clearly specify which generative AI tools were used; specific attribution format and disclosure requirements remain at faculty discretion.

言語生成系AIを利用したレポートでは、どの言語生成系AIを利用したかを学生に明記させることも推奨されます。

Cisco AI アシスタント is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Webex における Cisco AI アシスタント ， Webex AI

Since May 1, 2026, McGill GPS asks thesis students to consult its GenAI Research Statement and Disclosure Guidelines and, with their supervisor, include a GenAI statement and disclosure framework in master's and doctoral theses. This statement and framework are recommended, not yet mandatory; failure to disclose AI use may compromise or delay assessment of the thesis, and after Fall 2026 consultations they may become mandatory. Department, supervisor and discipline requirements still apply.

The use of a generative AI statement and disclosure framework is recommended, but not yet mandatory.

McGill IT Services offers a secure Commercial Data Protection version of Microsoft Copilot, accessed with McGill credentials, which it chose because it conforms to the University's privacy and data protection standards; the public version of Copilot does not conform and should not be used for McGill-related purposes. Even in the secure version, users should not share private, sensitive, PII, PHI, PCI or other confidential information. McGill's separate 'AI Tools at McGill' directory returned HTTP 403 when re-checked on 2026-10-20, so the current directory entries (names, audiences, prices) could not be independently re-verified. Tool approval is not permission to use AI in an assessment.

McGill offers a secure version of Microsoft Copilot that protects our data, known as the Commercial Data Protection version.

University of Tulsa's McFarlin Library Generative AI guide points students to AI citation guidance, explains why disclosure is encouraged, and says best practice is to check with the professor before using generative-AI tools.

Professors may require less or more specific notes about your generative-AI use for course work. Best practice is to always check with your professor before using any generative-AI tools.

University of Tulsa's official McFarlin Library Generative AI guide states that it is educational guidance and does not represent generative-AI use policies for the entire university.

Information contained on this website is educational in nature and does not represent the generative-AI use policies for the entirety of The University of Tulsa.

The Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences requires manuscript AI-use disclosure at submission and bars reviewers from using AI tools to generate review reports while stating that editors must not rely on AI for editorial decisions.

Authors must disclose AI usage at submission. A statement must be included in the manuscript under a section titled: "AI Usage Disclosure" ... Reviewers: Must NOT use AI tools to generate review reports ... Editors: Must not rely on AI for editorial decisions.

The University of Anbar Journal of Languages and Literature requires authors to explicitly disclose AI-tool use in the Acknowledgment or Methodology section, including the tool, version, and purpose.

Authors must explicitly disclose any use of AI tools in the Acknowledgment or Methodology section, specifying the tool, version, and purpose of use (e.g., ChatGPT 5, Grammarly, etc.).

UBC recognizes generative AI as a tool to assist in tasks, not a replacement for human creativity and judgment, and encourages experimentation within ethical and responsible use boundaries.

generative AI is a tool to assist in our tasks, not a replacement for human creativity and judgment. UBC encourages experimentation and use within the boundaries of ethical and responsible use.

Faculty and staff may use GenAI in teaching and learning so long as this is within the bounds of legal, university, Faculty, or program-level policies and requirements.

Faculty and staff may use GenAI in teaching and learning so long as this is within the bounds of legal, university, Faculty, or program-level policies and requirements, and the guidelines below.

Microsoft Copilot is supported by ANU IT Services for all staff via Microsoft 365; staff enterprise tool availability does not establish permission for student assessment use.

All staff have access to Microsoft Copilot through the Microsoft 365 Applications Portal or through either Microsoft Edge, Firefox, Chrome or Safari web browser, navigate to the Copilot icon.

ANU approved six institutional AI principles via Academic Board in June 2023, covering excellence/integrity, research engagement, clear guidance, AI literacy, access/privacy/security, and collaborative policy development.

These six guiding principles on the use of artificial intelligence at the ANU were approved by the Academic Board in June 2023.

CUHK leaves pedagogical AI rules to course teacher discretion. For example, Chung Chi College General Education courses (GECC3130/4130, AY2026/27) adopt Approach 2 ('Use only with prior permission'), where GenAI is prohibited for drafting written assignments but permitted for spelling and grammar checking, subject to approval by the Senate Committee on General Education (university-wide full student guide rules remain unverified behind ADFS SSO).

Approach 2 (i.e. “Use only with prior permission”) is adopted for Chung Chi College General Education courses (the revised approach is subject to approval by the Senate Committee on General Education). Students are not allowed to use generative AI (GenAI) tools to prepare or write any part of their written assignments, such as proposals, essays, or project reports. However, students may use GenAI tools solely for spelling and grammar checking. In addition, students are strongly discouraged from using GenAI tools to generate summaries or paraphrases as a substitute for close reading of the core texts. Students may also be asked to engage in interactions with GenAI tools under teachers’ strict

At CUHK, improper or unauthorized use of AI tools in learning activities and assessments constitutes academic dishonesty (including plagiarism or unauthorized third-party assistance) under Senate policy (effective from AY2025-26, updated July 2026), subject to penalties ranging from zero marks to demerits, suspension, or termination of studies, adjudicated by the course-offering faculty/college or the Faculty of Medicine Fitness to Practice (FTP) Committee.

all academic-related discipline cases of undergraduate and postgraduate students, including cases of academic dishonesty in course work shall be handled by the faculties/colleges/offices/centres that offer the courses concerned instead of the students’ major programmes/faculties, and in the case of MBChB students, if the relevant courses are offered by the Faculty of Medicine, the cases shall be handled by the Fitness To Practice (FTP) Committee formed under the Faculty of Medicine;

The University of Edinburgh does not ban the use of generative AI by students, though its use is restricted for much assessed work and governed by course-level guidance.

The University does not ban the use of AI, though its use will be restricted for much of your assessed work. Where necessary, some of your courses may also restrict its use in other ways. You must always check your course level guidance.

At the University of Edinburgh, presenting AI outputs as your own original work, machine-translating assessed work to English, submitting AI content without acknowledgment, and using AI agents within university learning platforms constitute academic misconduct.

The following uses of generative and agentic AI are not acceptable and constitute misconduct: if you use them you risk investigation and penalties.

Zhejiang University names and promotes the “浙大先生” intelligent-agent platform for learning, research and campus services. Institutional announcements do not by themselves establish permission to use AI for a particular assessment, or current eligibility for all students; consult the applicable course rules and current service access conditions.

由专到通研制学科大模型和大学大模型，构建支撑大规模个性化教学科研基础设施，深度融合智能体技术，借助“智海”新一代人工智能科教创新平台和“浙大先生”智能体平台等实训体系，促进学生个性化学习与课程管理，覆盖教学、科研、生活全场景，打造“时时处处人人可学习”的育人环境。

For submissions to Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, AI and LLM systems cannot be manuscript authors or co-authors. Authors retain responsibility for AI-assisted content, must disclose substantive generative-AI use explicitly and in detail in the manuscript, and follow the journal’s permitted-use and prohibited-use conditions. This journal-specific policy is not a university-wide coursework or thesis rule.

1. Principle of Human Authorship: Artificial intelligence (AI) or large language models (LLMs) cannot be listed as an author or co-author of a manuscript. Authorship and order of authors must be predicated on substantive intellectual contributions. AI tools are incapable of assuming legal or ethical responsibility for the originality, integrity, or validity of the work.1

PKU’s undergraduate thesis management rules require students to complete theses independently under supervision, follow school and department requirements and citation formats, and avoid academic misconduct. The text does not establish an institution-wide AI disclosure template.

四、 学生要求 1. 学生应在教师指导下按学校和所在院系的毕业论文管理要求独立完成毕业论文。 2. 学生应定期向指导教师汇报毕业论文进展情况。 3. 学生应遵循院系对毕业论文行文格式和引文规范的相关要求完成毕业论文。 4. 学生应遵守学术道德规范，严禁各种学术不端行为。

Peking University lists 北大问学 (Beida Wenxue) as an AI-assisted teaching and learning service for its faculty and students. Its listing does not establish permission to use AI-generated work in coursework, examinations or degree assessments.

是北京大学师生专属的人工智能辅助教学平台，希望通过集成最新的 AI 技术和工具，帮教师更高效地备课教学、帮学生更有效地学习提升。

Johns Hopkins IT policies prohibit entering non-public proprietary Hopkins data—including clinical data, financial records, and business records—into unapproved third-party AI tools. Instructors should consider FERPA guidelines before submitting student work to AI tools or utilizing Zoom AI Companion, ensuring proper removal of personally identifiable information. In healthcare education, instructors should consider HIPAA implications, and use or disclosure of health information in generative AI must be made only with JH-approved vendors where appropriate agreements offering data protections are in place. HopGPT is approved for sensitive data (including PHI and PII) under institutional stewardship, subject to required approvals: IRB approval is required for non-clinical research cases, and SIP approval is required for clinical research cases or uses involving PHI/PII.

Do not enter nonpublic proprietary Hopkins data—including clinical data, financial information, and business records—into third-party AI tools not approved by Johns Hopkins, in accordance with the University Policy on Acceptable Use and Security of Johns Hopkins Information Technology Resources and the University Code of Conduct.

Engineering for Professionals (EP) student guidance requires students to adhere to instructor standards regarding the disclosure of generative AI use. Disclosure may encompass full chat transcripts, citations of specific models or websites, short descriptions of use, single citations per assignment, or visual highlighting of AI-generated content. Students remain fully responsible for verifying accuracy, identifying bias, and ensuring the quality of final submissions. Students must save GenAI outputs or interaction records if disclosure or verification is requested by the course or instructor, and failure to disclose GenAI use when required may constitute academic misconduct.

Disclosure of Generative AI Use Your instructor will outline specific standards regarding the level of GenAI-use disclosure required. Disclosure may include, but is not limited to: Full transcripts of chats or chat history Citations of a specific model or website used for particular tasks A short description of how GenAI was used A single citation per assignment, citing each model or website used Visual identification (for example, highlighting) of GenAI-generated content Failure to disclose GenAI use when required may constitute academic misconduct.

Under Code II.E and II.G, completed Accepting Responsibility creates an internal Academic Integrity Registry record despite not being a finding of guilt. Central records also include Primary Hearing/appeal guilt findings, course, charge, evidence summary, faculty decision, penalties and appeal outcome. Records must be disclosed to Hearing Boards considering other penalties for the same student and to college deans/associate deans for legitimate educational interests; other violation disclosures require student direction or law. A Board or Dean finding of no violation requires expunging all case records from the central registry and college files. No fixed retention duration is specified in II.G.

The Accepting Responsibility process does not result in a finding of guilt under the Code of Academic Integrity. In that sense, the process is akin to a warning. But the process does provide for consequences in the form of a limited penalty and mandatory completion of a workshop.

Adobe Firefly has the stated Cornell access and data conditions; its listing does not authorize coursework or examinations. Adobe licence required; contact Hub/local IT to confirm entitlement.

Adobe Firefly More information Adobe Firefly Adobe Firefly (Available with an Adobe license) Firefly allows you to generate images from text, then manipulate and edit them. Coming soon: generative voice and video content.

Teachers College example syllabus statements require citations or disclosure detailing specific AI tools and models used when AI use is permitted.

Generative AI tools are generally permitted in this course for research and completion of assignments, provided that all AI-generated content is clearly attributed as such in the student’s work. Students must include citations or disclosure detailing the specific AI tools and models used.

Under Columbia Law School Policy§7, students must disclose any AI use contributing to a written submission or other work product; students should be transparent and err on the side of disclosure and follow additional instructor citation requirements.

Disclosure: Students are required to disclose any use of AI that contributes to a written submission or other work product. - Students should always be transparent and err on the side of disclosure when their work relies on the output of an AI tool. Individual instructors may prescribe additional requirements, including protocols for citing AI outputs.

Higher Degree by Research (HDR) students should discuss with, and seek guidance from, their supervisors on any intended use of Generative AI and how to best acknowledge and cite its use in their work. Students are asked about Generative AI use in their research at each progress management review milestone and must confirm that use is consistent with Monash policies and guidance with due acknowledgement. Generative AI disclosure questions are included on the online thesis submission form, and thesis preliminary pages prompt candidates and supervisors to acknowledge Generative AI use.

HDR Students should discuss with, and seek guidance from, their supervisors on any intended use of Generative AI and how they can best acknowledge and cite its use in their work. Students will be asked about their use of Generative AI in their research at each progress management review milestone and will be required to confirm they have used Generative AI in ways that are consistent with Monash policies and guidance and have made due acknowledgement when used. For the purposes of thesis submission, a series of questions about use of Generative AI are included thesis submission on-line form, and the thesis preliminary pages will prompt students and supervisors to acknowledge any Generative

Under Assessment Regime Procedure V12 §1.7–1.7.2 and Table 2, Chief Examiners must determine where and how generative AI can be used in a unit or assessment task, clearly publish use specifications in the required LMS section before the teaching period or at least 4 weeks before task details are released (with Table 2 noting a 4-week deadline before the due date / timetable release), and provide educational reasoning when AI is disallowed.

1.7 The chief examiner must determine where and how generative artificial intelligence tools can be used in a unit, an assessment task, or part of an assessment task.

Social Studies prohibits generative or agentic AI assistance in submitted coursework, exams/quizzes and all thesis stages by default. Instructors may publish alternative syllabus rules but must require disclosure. Thesis exceptions are case-specific: obtain supervisor approval, submit the AI Policy Attestation request, and secure DUS approval by November 1 of senior year, or April 1 for off-cycle fall seniors. The AI Policy Attestation form is required in consultation with the supervisor at Prospectus submission and again in senior year. Thesis work cannot reuse AI-assisted work from another course merely because that course allowed it. These rules apply to Social Studies requirements.

Policy: the use of generative or agentic AI in any form is prohibited for aid in analyzing, idea-generation, research, formatting, organizing, outlining, drafting, revising, or editing any work submitted in Social Studies courses or other concentration requirements.

AWS Bedrock via Harvard API Platform is available through Harvard's API Platform for eligible users. The platform offers self-service AI API access, including pay-as-you-go or limited-access credit-redemption options; some individual APIs have limited eligibility stated in their documentation. API/developer services are approved up to Level 3 confidential data. Account access is separate from course, research-use and feature-specific approval.

Self-service AI API access for eligible users is available through Harvard’s API Platform . These include pay-as-you-go or limited-access, credit-redemption options, including the FAS OpenAI “Community Developer” API (HarvardKey-protected). For additional guidance on these and other AI offerings, request a consultation .

At the University of Chicago, entering sensitive data into AI tools without review and approval by security, privacy, and the appropriate data steward may create an unauthorized data disclosure that may violate University policy, federal and state law, sponsor or contract obligations, and data use agreements.

Entering sensitive data into AI tools without review and approval by security, privacy, and the appropriate data steward may create an unauthorized data disclosure. Such disclosures may violate University policy, federal and state law, sponsor or contract obligations, and data use agreements.

Azure AI is listed in UChicago’s approved/restricted table under these data and purpose conditions: Approved up to SRDS low protection level.. Only for non-sensitive information General Use Payment/support label: Enterprise Supported. This listing does not establish coursework or examination permission.

Azure AI Approved up to SRDS low protection level. General Use Enterprise Supported Only for non-sensitive information January 17, 2025

Feinberg medical students submitting work for publication or presentation must follow the relevant journal or organization AI-use disclosure requirements.

5. When submitting scholarly work for publication or presentation, students must adhere to generative AI policies set forth by journals and organizations and disclose when and how these tools have been used.

Northwestern states that faculty, staff, students and affiliates should not enter institutional data into AI tools that have not been university-validated for the intended use and for which the data provider has not given explicit permission.

In most cases, the data you share as part of your queries in generative AI tools will be accessible by others using the same tools. This is because generative AI learns by collecting, analyzing, and storing user-provided information. Therefore, University faculty, staff, students, and affiliates should not enter institutional data into any generative AI tools that have not been validated by the University for appropriate use and have explicit permission of the data provider.

EPFL guidance specifies that submitting AI-generated content as one's own work without proper attribution is considered AI plagiarism. Tools specifically aiming to detect AI-generated content are not admissible as stand-alone evidence of AI plagiarism due to a high risk of false positives. Under continuous assessment procedures, where unauthorized AI use or non-disclosure is suspected, the course teacher writes a report and submits it with evidence to the section director and Legal Service (Affaires juridiques) for formal evaluation, which constitutes a referral of suspected misconduct rather than an adjudication of cheating.

Submitting AI-generated content as your own work without proper attribution is considered AI plagiarism.

aiaiapps is listed for EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne in an official teaching tools source as a collection of crystallized prompts developed by CEDE for teachers to facilitate the generation of quizzes, exercises, hints, and image descriptions. It is designed primarily for instructors and teaching staff to support course design; student use in assessments is not authorized by this tool listing.

aiaiapps are cristallized prompts for teachers that facilitate the generation of quizzes, exercises and image descriptions.

Researchers should disclose generative AI use in research reports, manuscripts, and publications where appropriate (identifying platform/version, scope, purpose, and human verification), and follow funding agency disclosure requirements for grant proposals.

UC Berkeley researchers are responsible for all aspects of their research, including work assisted or generated by artificial intelligence (AI). Consistent with University research misconduct policies and applicable guidance from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity (ORI), researchers should disclose the use of generative AI where appropriate and identify the tool and how it was used as well as how results were verified.

Adobe Firefly is licensed for Berkeley students and employees through Adobe Creative Cloud via CalNet, permitted for public Protection Level P1 information only.

We strongly encourage use of Berkeley-licensed tools, which have been vetted for ethical and risk considerations and include contractual protections not present in most standard consumer licenses. The protection of university licensing is provided only when a users accesses a tool by first authenticating through CalNet. Before using these tools, please review Campus Guidance on the Appropriate Use of AI.

U-M requires AI use in teaching and learning to align with principles of honesty, candor, openness, and integrity in scholarship and research, including appropriate disclosure and citation.

Align with the university’s principles for honesty, candor, openness, and integrity in scholarship and research, including appropriate disclosure and citation where AI has been used.

U-M sample syllabi allow instructors to specify GenAI disclosure, restrictions, or bans by activity, in alignment with college policy; examples are not automatically binding campus-wide rules.

Teaching in the presence of ubiquitous GenAI tools should be considered a dynamic endeavor and necessitates flexibility. Approaches and expectations will vary by instructor, course, assessment, and activity. To ensure transparency, it is critical that expectations are clearly articulated in the syllabus and continually reinforced when assignments are given. Instructors should align their course policies with their college’s academic misconduct policies. Instructors are disciplinary experts responsible for what is taught, appropriate pedagogies, and assessment methodologies. GenAI may influence all three, and as such, instructors need flexibility to allow or disallow the use of GenAI tools. I

UCL Press permits certain responsible supporting uses of GenAI in book preparation (brainstorming, language improvement, structure), subject to human oversight, accountability, and disclosure via the Gen AI Disclosure Form. GenAI tools cannot be credited as authors on research-based works. For research monographs, UCL Press does not permit GenAI creation or manipulation of images, figures, charts, tables, or original research data. Editors and peer reviewers shouldn't upload proposals or manuscripts into GenAI tools (advisory guidance), in contrast to the strict mandatory ban for UCL Press journals.

This policy outlines how to acknowledge human authors and contributors in published work. We don’t allow AI or LLM tools to be listed as an author on any research-based work published by UCL Press.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for UCL in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

UCL staff and students can now access Microsoft Copilot. Microsoft Copilot is a safer generative AI tool than using the consumer-oriented generative AI services, provided you log in with your UCL credentials.

MIT does not permit Medium Risk data in publicly available GenAI tools. High Risk MIT information must not be used with any GenAI tool, including MIT enterprise tools; report an existing high-risk disclosure to security@mit.edu immediately. Public tools are not recommended for Low Risk MIT data.

Do not use high-risk information with Generative AI tools, including MIT enterprise Generative AI tools.

MIT Libraries advises citing or acknowledging AI contributions in academic papers and consulting the applicable school, class, and publication policies. This is citation guidance, not a universal assessment-use permission or a new university-wide mandatory disclosure rule.

If AI is used in the creation of an academic paper in any way, it should be cited in the text and references and/or in the acknowledgements.

HKU permits GenAI for research ideation and background research only with documentation and acknowledgement, verification of accuracy, fairness and originality, fair representation and citation of primary sources, and protection against inevitable disclosure of patentable inventions.

11. Use of GenAI for ideation and background research is only acceptable if • this specific usage of the GenAI system is duly documented and acknowledged; • the researcher has verified the accuracy, fairness, and originality (or lack of originality) of text, figures, table and data generated by a GenAI tool; • the researcher has verified that all relevant external primary sources are cited and represented fully and fairly; and • the use of GenAI does not inevitably disclose patentable inventions.

HKU allows GenAI for experimentation, data collection and analysis only with documentation, fit-for-purpose and data verification, participant confidentiality and prior consent for disclosure beyond the study, protection of proprietary or agreement-controlled data, and applicable ethics-approved participant information for ultra-realistic generated materials.

20. Use of GenAI for experimentation, data collection, and data analysis is only acceptable if a. the specific usage of the GenAI system is duly documented and acknowledged; b. the researcher has verified that the GenAI tool used is accurate, unbiased and fit- for-purpose for the specific research study; c. the researcher has verified the veracity of all the raw and processed data; d. confidentiality and privacy of data from research participants are respected and not shared or disclosed outside the scope of this study without prior consent; e. no proprietary data or data under the control of a data sharing agreement is disclosed to external parties, such as a cloud-based GenAI service provi

Princeton's Rights, Rules, Responsibilities (2.4) states that generative AI is not a source; where an instructor permits generative AI, students must disclose its use rather than cite or acknowledge it. Disclosure of permitted use is therefore required, not merely recommended, while whether AI may be used at all is set by the course or department. Scholarly Integrity guidance says failure to disclose, even in a course where AI is permitted, is a scholarly integrity violation, and offers a disclosure template.

Generative AI is not a source as defined in this provision because its output is not created by a person. If generative AI is permitted by the instructor, students must disclose its use rather than cite or acknowledge the use, since it is an algorithm rather than a source.

Princeton's Office of the Dean of the College requires faculty to set clear expectations for whether, when and how generative AI can be used and to state them in the course syllabus; all students are expected to disclose their generative AI use and not pass off AI-generated content as their own, and faculty may provide their own disclosure template or use the standard one.

Faculty must set clear expectations for whether, when, and how generative AI can be used and state those expectations in the course syllabus. Work created with the assistance of AI tools should never be a proxy for original work. All students are expected to abide by scholarly integrity expectations for appropriate generative AI use, which include disclosing their use of generative AI and not passing off AI-generated content as their own work.

UQ Library advises coursework students to acknowledge AI use, including summarising, brainstorming, planning and editing. Assessment instructions and discipline-specific practices determine the required form and relevance of disclosure; students must check each task and course profile.

You must acknowledge where you used AI in assessment, including where you have directly quoted or paraphrased AI-generated content or used tools to summarise readings, brainstorm ideas, plan your process, or for editing or proofreading purposes.

From Semester 2, 2026 UQ classifies assessment tasks as Secure or Open. Secure tasks specify approved materials and whether AI may be used; Open tasks permit resources including AI, subject to task instructions and any specified disclosure requirements. An 'AI required' condition applies to tasks assessing AI use.

Assessment tasks are classified as secure or open,  with matching automated text added to course profiles to improve consistency and clarity. Task instructions must still specify the materials and tools students may use and any disclosure requirements.

Violations of GenAI guidelines such as use of unauthorised aids or non-disclosure of their use are subject to disciplinary action under existing performance assessment rules and the declaration of originality.

4. Legal aspects of GenAI uses are covered by the existing rules for performance assessments and the “declaration of originality”. Violations such as use of unauthorised aids or non-disclosure of their use will continue to be subject to disciplinary action.

ETH Zurich's teaching guidelines instruct students to be transparent about their use of generative AI and to identify which tools contributed to which parts of their work, in accordance with applicable lecturer instructions and citation conventions. For scientific writing and theses, students should agree in advance with their supervisors on authorised AI use and disclosure requirements. ETH Library guidance recognises an exception where a supervisor has expressly agreed that particular AI use need not be separately declared. In the absence of such an agreement, undeclared use may constitute a breach of academic integrity.

Transparency : Clearly communicate to your students in what circumstances GenAI use is permitted and provide guidance on making its use transparent. Be a good role model and make the use of GenAI visible in your own documents, teaching materials, and whether it’s used for assessing student work.

KU researcher guidance says researchers should comply with sponsor, publisher, institutional, and disciplinary rules when using GenAI and should consider confidentiality, privacy, intellectual property, and disclosure requirements.

Researchers should exercise appropriate caution when using GenAI tools in research activities. In particular: Review and comply with funding agency, sponsor, and publisher policies related to AI use. Be attentive to how AI tools handle data, including confidentiality, privacy, and intellectual property considerations.

Adobe Firefly is listed for University of Kansas in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

KU makes Adobe Creative Cloud available to faculty, staff, researchers, and eligible students, with eligibility depending on major or employment role.

TU Delft OPEN Publishing requires disclosure of generative AI use within its publishing policy. Human-participant research needs HREC approval before engaging participants. These scopes do not establish every thesis/journal rule or assessment permission.

In order to maintain integrity and transparency, and to preserve trust in the scholarly record, authors must disclose any use of generative AI technologies (e.g. ChatGPT, Copilot, image generators, or  code assistants) that contributed to the manuscript, whether for text production, summarizing, image generation or coding support). This disclosure must specify how the tool was used and which tool was used. This information must be included in the “Use of AI”, in the “Methods” and in the data/software statement (if applicable) section of the manuscript as well as in the cover letter submitted before the review process. This policy is subject to review based on new developments, including futu

The ME faculty recommends web Microsoft Copilot and states students can sign in with their TU Delft credentials; recommendation and access do not establish blanket task permission or an institution-wide endorsement.

• Assisting with programming and debugging • Acting as a brainstorming partner These uses can often enhance your learning experience. However, AI tools must not replace your own analysis, critical thinking, or academic writing. With data safety and uniformity in mind, the TU Delft recommends using the web-version of Microsoft Copilot at this moment in time. You can log into Copilot with your TU Delft credentials. Student Responsibilities As a student, you are ultimately responsible for your own work, including any work produced with the help of AI. When using AI tools, be aware of the following responsibilities: • Permission: Check the written statement* regarding AI use for

All generative AI usage at Caltech should adhere to four institutional principles: prompt disclosure or referencing of GenAI tools and application plug-ins as applicable, data and information protection, content responsibility by the user, and the Caltech Honor Code. This guidance does not mandate a universal prompt-log format or tool-version record.

As you use GenAI and LLM technologies in your work at Caltech, we ask that you apply these four guiding principles to your practice: disclosure, data and information protection, content responsibility, and Caltech's honor code. Disclosure: When using GenAI, always disclose promptly, or reference the use of GenAI tools and application plug-ins, as applicable.

Anthropic Claude Premium is listed for California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Anthropic Claude Premium Available $600/user/year PTA via access.caltech**

Student academic-integrity guidance says a full disclosure of GenAI-produced content should always be acknowledged, and passing off that content as one's own work counts as academic misconduct.

A full disclosure of any content produced by GenAI should always be acknowledged in your work. Attempts to pass off content as your own work is counted as academic misconduct and may lead to action being taken against you.

Assessment guidance says that when GenAI use is allowed, students may be asked to provide full disclosure using an Acknowledge, Describe, Evidence template, while noting that some schools may use a different process.

In assignments where you are sure that you are allowed to use GenAI, you may be asked to provide a full disclosure of how you have done so. You can provide this information by completing an Acknowledge, Describe, Evidence template.

Emory Responsible AI guidance says public-facing AI platforms create disclosure risks for Sensitive Information and directs users to use Emory-approved secure AI tools when handling such information.

Use of these public-facing AI platforms creates risks of inadvertent disclosure of Sensitive Information. To protect sensitive information, always use Emory approved AI tools.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Emory University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

OIT has launched Microsoft Copilot, a secure generative AI chat companion. The service is now available to all members of Emory University and Emory Healthcare. Once logged in with Emory credentials, it is no cost to Emory users.

Rutgers teaching guidance recommends clear and transparent course policies around generative AI, class discussion of those policies and rationales, and, when GenAI is permissible, student disclosure and reflection on use plus submission of prompts and outputs.

Have clear and transparent policies around generative artificial intelligence and discuss them with each class as well as the rationales behind them. If utilizing GenAI is permissible in a course, in addition to having students disclose usage, have students reflect on how they used it and how it impacted their learning. In addition, have students turn in any prompts and outputs.

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Rutgers University–Newark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Rutgers is now offering ChatGPT Edu as a $20/month subscription

NTU Library instructs students to disclose AI-tool use in their submissions and follow their module’s AI-use policy and instructor guidance. The required level of documentation and disclosure format depend on the assignment and instructor’s expectations; detailed prompt-and-output records and a particular declaration form are not universal requirements.

Use AI tools to support tasks such as brainstorming, outlining, or checking grammar, but ensure you disclose their use in your submissions. Always refer to your module's AI use policy and seek guidance from your instructor regarding specific expectations for acceptable AI usage in your courses.

From November 2025, NTU’s thesis/dissertation Statement of Originality includes an AI-use disclosure section. The required declarations form part of thesis submission requirements; the source does not establish a single faculty-independent template.

The following 3 statements are to be included in all theses and dissertations by students: ​ Statement of Originality : Certifies that work done and reported is the student's own and has not been previously submitted to another University or Institution. [New (from Nov 2025)] It includes a section on the disclosure of AI-use in the preparation of the thesis/ dissertation.

For IP Paris M1/M2 students in 2026–27, AI use in any examination is prohibited unless the instructor explicitly authorizes it in their instructions; unauthorized use constitutes fraud. Outside examinations, AI may support information searches, knowledge deepening or reasoning checks with systematic, precise, detailed disclosure, subject to explicit instructor bans stated in course instructions and plagiarism restrictions.

Applicable pour l’année académique 2026-2027 Adopté par le Conseil d’Administration de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris, dans sa séance du 01 juillet 2026

At École polytechnique, an Institut Polytechnique de Paris member school, the Teaching & Learning Center publishes an AI resource page for instructors that includes AI-detection tools such as Turnitin, AI Text Classifier, and GPTZero.

Outils de détection : Une sélection de logiciels comme Turnitin, AI Text Classifier et GPTZero, permettant d’identifier les contenus générés par l’IA et de préserver l’intégrité académique.

Tufts' generative AI usage guidelines state that community members must be transparent about AI use and that instructors and units are strongly encouraged to clarify permitted AI use and disclosure expectations.

Members of the Tufts community must be transparent about their use of AI. Disclosure of when and how one is engaging with AI is a requirement for trust and integrity within the academic community.

Firefly is listed for Tufts University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

TTS states that its recommended and supported tools are officially approved, licensed, and supported by TTS. Firefly is free with a Tufts Adobe account.

University of Munster central guidance says it orients itself to the DFG statement on generative models for text and image creation in research, including disclosure of whether, which, why, and how extensively generative models were used when results are made publicly accessible.

Für den Bereich Forschung hat das Präsidium der DFG am 21.09.2023 in einer Stellungnahme Leitlinien zum Umfang mit generativen Modellen zur Text- und Bilderstellung herausgegeben, an denen sich die Universität Münster orientiert: ... Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler sollten bei der öffentlichen Zugänglichmachung ihrer Ergebnisse im Sinne wissenschaftlicher Integrität offenlegen, ob und welche generativen Modelle sie zu welchem Zweck und in welchem Umfang eingesetzt haben.

uniGPT is listed for University of Münster in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

The University of Münster CIT officially provides UniGPT as an official university chatbot service for research, teaching and administration, integrating on-premise and external models; it lists employees and students as target groups, says usage is free of charge, and provides gpt.uni-muenster.de as the access route.

Westminster doctoral researcher guidance says doctoral assessments and research outputs must be the researcher's own original work, and that using GenAI to generate doctoral research content without agreement and disclosure is academic misconduct.

In summary Using GenAI to generate content for your doctoral research without agreement and disclosure is unethical and violates academic and research integrity. Doing this is academic misconduct.

Grammarly AI is listed for University of Westminster in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Generative AI Tools and Systems Supported at the University of Westminster

Penn's university-community generative AI guidance directs members to be transparent about AI use and disclose when a work product was created wholly or partially using AI, including how it was used when appropriate. The statement is guidance, not a final policy; instructors may set course-specific disclosure and citation requirements.

Be transparent about the use of AI.  Disclose when a work product was created wholly or partially using an AI tool and, if appropriate, how AI was used to create the work product.

ChatGPT Edu is institutionally available under its stated account, audience, cost and data conditions. This does not establish permission to use it in coursework or examinations.

ChatGPT Edu Full-range generative AI chat client (text, images, audio). FAQs can be found here. Available for faculty and staff at $13 per month; please contact your IT Support Provider . Students may have access when required in course or research experience, and paid by the School, department, or instructor; annual commitment required Low and Moderate Risk Data . Do not input sensitive data including HIPAA data, personal health information (PHI), financial account information, SSNs, and credit card data. Additional Guidance.

For educator teaching, NTHU's Chinese AI guideline says the university respects instructors' course AI-tool strategies and that instructors should state student AI-use rules in syllabi, especially correct AI citation and disclosure of the use process.

教師教學 R 校方尊重教師對於課程使用 AI 工具的策略，教師應於課程大綱中敘明學生 使用 AI 的規則，尤其是正確引註 AI 並揭露使用的歷程。

NTHU CTLD's course-syllabi generative-AI guidance encourages faculty members to specify course logistics and AIGC policies using four options: unrestricted use with no disclosure required, conditionally open, prohibited use, or not applicable.

Faculty members are encouraged to specify course logistics and policies regarding AIGC using one of the following four options: 1. Unrestricted use with no disclosure required 2. Conditionally open; please specify how to utilize generative AI in course output 3. Prohibited use; please specify relevant monitoring mechanisms 4. Not applicable

On 12 January 2026 Fudan launched the AI3A education co-creation platform and published the Generative AI Education and Teaching Application Guide 1.0, with 11 annexes such as an AI use declaration template and reference syllabus clauses. According to Fudan's official announcement, the guide allows AI for supporting steps such as language polishing and structural suggestions but not to replace core academic work such as research conception, theory building and data analysis, and judges integrity mainly on honest disclosure and process records. The guide's full text sits on the AI3A platform and was not independently reviewed; it is teaching guidance and does not by itself override the stricter undergraduate-thesis rule.

1月12日，复旦大学正式上线AI3A教育共创平台，同步发布《复旦大学生成式人工智能教育教学应用指引1.0版》

Fudan's formal rule on AI tools in undergraduate theses (adopted by the Academic Affairs Office on 24 September 2024, trial) allows AI use only with the supervisor's consent and only where AI output does not affect assessment of the student's own innovative ability, in four areas: literature search and management (verifying references), suggesting chart types and auxiliary charting (not generating or altering original data or key research figures), coding and method screening where the method is not the thesis's innovation (all code and methods must be reviewed and tested by the author), and reference formatting (with checking). This rule is specific to undergraduate theses; it is not a rule for all courses or for graduate theses.

原则：征得指导教师同意的前提下，且当 AI 工具生成的内容不影响对学生在毕业论文（设计）中的创新等能力的考察时，作者可在以下范围内使用 AI 工具：

Yonsei’s May 2024 guideline asks students to clearly cite generative AI use; the August 2025 instructor guideline requires instructors to specify permissible course uses and choose and announce appropriate disclosure or prompt-record submission methods.

4 Instruct students to provide accurate citations and source attributions in their submissions, and ensure these are thoroughly reviewed. ● If students use generative AI in their academic work, they must provide clear and accurate citations. Students should be informed that submitting AI-generated content without proper attribution or using it without modification may be considered plagiarism or academic misconduct. ● Provide students with clear instructions on how to properly cite generative AI tools, including the specific model used, the prompt entered, and the name of the platform. This guidance should be communicated when assigning coursework.

Yonsei students should follow the instructor’s announced syllabus/course AI-use rules; the August 2025 instructor guideline also addresses permitted and prohibited exam contexts and disclosure when use is allowed.

1 Review and adhere to the course policies. ● The use of generative AI may be permitted or restricted depending on the course. Students are expected to consult the syllabus and course policies to determine whether its use is allowed. In certain cases, the use of generative AI may constitute academic misconduct. ● Students should thoroughly review and adhere to any guidelines provided by the instructor regarding the use of generative AI. ● Students should be aware that they bear full responsibility for any issues arising from the submission of assignments involving generative AI.

Universität Mannheim assigns users responsibility for the correctness, legal permissibility, and dissemination of AI-generated content, says AI outputs should be checked and critically assessed before further use, and requires transparent disclosure where a notice obligation applies.

Die Verantwortung für die Richtigkeit, die rechtliche Zulässigkeit der Nutzung sowie die Verbreitung von Inhalten, welche mit Hilfe von KI-Systemen erstellt wurden, tragen die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer ... KI-generierte Aussagen, Literatur, Quellen und Ergebnisse sind daher immer zu überprüfen.

HAWKI-GPT is listed for Universität Mannheim in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Zur universitätsweiten Nutzung stehen Ihnen aktuell die KI-Systeme HAWKI-GPT sowie Copilot Chat zur Verfügung. HAWKI ist ein datenschutzkonformes, didaktisch entwickeltes Interface zur Nutzung generativer KI. Über HAWKI können Sie das KI-Modell GPT-5 nutzen. Um im dienstlichen Kontext oder im Rahmen Ihres Studiums KI-Systeme einsetzen zu dürfen, müssen Sie über ein ausreichendes Maß an KI-Kompetenz verfügen. Sofern Sie nicht sicher sind, müssen Sie zunächst das KI-Quiz auf der Lernplattform ILIAS absolvieren.

UNC-Chapel Hill's research guidance treats entering private or confidential information, research data, grant proposals, or analytical results into public generative AI tools as a public disclosure of that information.

Uploading information (e.g., research data, grant proposals, unpublished manuscripts, or analytical results) to a public AI tool is equivalent to releasing it publicly; thus, before any information from you or another individual is uploaded to a public AI tool, appropriate steps must be taken to ensure that the disclosure of that information is consistent with all rules and laws related to the handling of private information.

Adobe Firefly is listed for University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

UNC's official AI Tools catalogue lists Adobe Firefly as accessible through the UNC Creative Cloud subscription, free for students and instructional faculty and staff and $25/year for non-instructional faculty and staff.

RUB's ZfW FAQ says generative AI tools can be used at RUB in research, teaching, and study, but that use can be restricted or tied to disclosure requirements in certain contexts such as written examinations.

Ja: Generative KI-Tools konnen an der RUB in Forschung, Lehre und Studium genutzt werden. Diese Nutzung kann aber in bestimmten Kontexten (zum Beispiel bei schriftlichen Prufungen) eingeschrankt oder mit Kennzeichnungspflichten verbunden werden.

GPT@RUB is listed for Ruhr-Universität Bochum in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

With GPT@RUB, Ruhr University Bochum is providing all students, teachers, and staff with a privacy-friendly way to use ChatGPT and, in the future, other language models for free. The RUB login ID is required for registration. Ruhr University Bochum pays for the use of Open AI language models. Therefore, students, staff, and teachers have a certain usage quota available, which is automatically recharged at the beginning of each month.

University of Pretoria Library guidance states that submitting AI-generated content as one's own work without explicit lecturer permission and proper disclosure constitutes academic misconduct under UP's Academic Integrity Policy.

Submitting AI-generated content as your own work — whether in whole or in part, whether modified or unmodified — without explicit permission from your lecturer and proper disclosure, constitutes academic misconduct under UP's Academic Integrity Policy and may result in serious disciplinary consequences.

24/7 AI Tutoring App is listed for University of Pretoria in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

University of Pretoria reports AI Tutoring Guidelines and implementation of the 24/7 AI Tutoring App to support students in preparing before class and consolidating knowledge after class.

For the University of Zurich Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, teaching staff determine for each module the extent to which AI is permitted for assessments; use of tools or generative AI without explicit consent and disclosure is punished as academic misconduct.

The Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences is generally supports the productive and considered use of AI. Teaching staff determine for each module the extent to which the use of AI is permitted for assessments. The use of AI can also be completely excluded. The use of tools or generative AI without the explicit consent of the teaching staff and without disclosing the tools will be punished as academic misconduct.

Microsoft 365 Copilot (Premium) is listed for University of Zurich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

UZH Central IT lists Microsoft 365 Copilot (Premium) for UZH employees at CHF 18.00/month. It is subject to a fee and can be ordered through the UZH Software Portal if the organizational unit is enabled for licensing; it must be used in the protected UZH environment.

Vilnius University Business School guidelines allow students to use AI tools in academic works, while requiring disclosure and treating failure to specify AI use and provide a transcript in annexes as academic dishonesty.

VU BS students are allowed to use artificial intelligence tools in academic works ... Failure to follow the instructions ... without specifying where and how artificial intelligence was used, without providing a transcript in the annexes, is treated as academic dishonesty.

The Vilnius University AI guidelines treat undisclosed use of a generative AI model in academic work as academic dishonesty.

DI generatyvinio modelio panaudojimo akademiniame darbe neatskleidimas laikytinas akademiniu nesąžingumu.

American University guidance says students are responsible for course AI policies in syllabi, and misuse of AI or use without permission or disclosure may constitute an Academic Integrity Code violation.

Misuse of AI or use of AI without permission or disclosure may constitute a violation of the Academic Integrity Code.

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for American University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Copilot Chat is part of American University's Microsoft 365 enterprise package and is securely available to all AU community members.

NSYSU's student generative AI guidance says students may not use generative AI tools for plagiarism or ghostwriting, cheating on exams, or privacy disclosure.

學生不得使用生成式AI工具從事下列行為。08. 抄襲或代寫...09. 考試作弊...10. 隱私洩露：學生應避免將個人或他人隱私資訊輸入至生成式AI工具。

NSYSU's teacher guidance says teachers should not use AI-detection tools as the sole basis for handling academic-ethics violations, and should assess suspected misuse according to academic-ethics rules.

教師不應以AI偵測工具作為處理違反學術倫理的唯一依據。由於這些工具不能完全準確地判定內容是否由AI生成，若學生之作業或報告有濫用AI生成工具之疑慮，教師應依照學術倫理則進行評估。

Swansea University's student AI framework asks students to apply University policies on data protection, privacy, and academic integrity when selecting and using approved academic work, and to follow assessment instructions around permitted AI use and disclosure.

Apply University policies on data protection, privacy, and academic integrity when selecting and using approved academic work, ensuring responsible and ethical practice. Follow assessment instructions around permitted AI use and disclosure.

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Swansea University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Microsoft Copilot Guide: This quick-start EDT guide to Microsoft Copilot, the University's recommended Gen AI tool, includes where to find Copilot and responsible use. Digital Services identifies why Copilot is the recommended AI tool for staff at Swansea University.