University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Idioma
ENZHFRPLES

Chapel Hill, United States

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

ClasificaciónQS World University Rankings 2026: =140Updated19 jul 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Afirmaciones revisadas

10 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Adobe Firefly is listed for University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza97%

Valor normalizado: {"tool":"adobe_firefly","rawToolName":"Adobe Firefly","description":"Adobe Firefly available through the UNC Creative Cloud subscription.","howToObtain":"Use the UNC Creative Cloud subscription.","costToUser":"Free for students and instructional faculty/staff; $25/year for non-instructional faculty/staff.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Última verificación
16 jul 2026
Último cambio
16 jul 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
UNC's official AI Tools catalogue lists Adobe Firefly as accessible through the UNC Creative Cloud subscription, free for students and instructional faculty and staff and $25/year for non-instructional faculty and staff.

Vista localizada only

UNC's official AI Tools catalogue lists Adobe Firefly as accessible through the UNC Creative Cloud subscription, free for students and instructional faculty and staff and $25/year for non-instructional faculty and staff.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en-US)
Hash de instantánea
049ed831…
Recuperado
16 jul 2026

Ai Tool Treatment

PromptLab is listed for University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza97%

Valor normalizado: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"PromptLab","description":"Secure UNC access to advanced large language models from multiple providers.","howToObtain":"Sign in with an Onyen.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Última verificación
16 jul 2026
Último cambio
16 jul 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
UNC's official AI Tools catalogue lists PromptLab as secure access to advanced LLMs from multiple leading providers and says it is available to anyone with an Onyen.

Vista localizada only

UNC's official AI Tools catalogue lists PromptLab as secure access to advanced LLMs from multiple leading providers and says it is available to anyone with an Onyen.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en-US)
Hash de instantánea
049ed831…
Recuperado
16 jul 2026

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (with Data Protection) is listed for University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza97%

Valor normalizado: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (with Data Protection)","description":"Institutionally scoped Copilot Chat with UNC data protection.","howToObtain":"Sign in using an Onyen UNC account.","costToUser":"Basic licence is included; some users have a paid premium licence.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Última verificación
16 jul 2026
Último cambio
16 jul 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
UNC's official ITS calls Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat an institutionally-scoped tool, says it is available to anyone with an Onyen and that everyone at UNC has the basic licence.

Vista localizada only

UNC's official ITS calls Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat an institutionally-scoped tool, says it is available to anyone with an Onyen and that everyone at UNC has the basic licence.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en-US)
Hash de instantánea
049ed831…
Recuperado
16 jul 2026

Security Review

UNC-Chapel Hill's administrative generative AI guidance says sensitive information should not be entered into generative AI tools unless the Information Security Office has completed a risk assessment and the Data Governance Oversight Group has approved the tool for sensitive information.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%

Valor normalizado: sensitive-information-requires-iso-dgog-approval

Última verificación
14 may 2026
Último cambio
14 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Do not enter sensitive information (as defined by the UNC-Chapel Hill Information Classification Standard) into generative AI tools unless the University’s Information Security Office (ISO) has conducted a risk assessment of the generative AI tool and the University’s Data Governance Oversight Group (DGOG) has approved the tool to handle sensitive information.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en-US)
Hash de instantánea
64b070af…
Recuperado
14 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Staff Generative AI Usage Guidance, Protecting Confidential, Copyrighted, or Personal Data

Enseñanza

UNC-Chapel Hill's faculty grading and assessment guidance says students must be able to request a full instructor-led review if they disagree with an AI-generated grade or have concerns about automated feedback.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%

Valor normalizado: student-right-to-instructor-review-of-ai-generated-grade

Última verificación
14 may 2026
Último cambio
14 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Students must be able to request a full instructor-led review if they disagree with an AI- generated grade or have concerns about automated feedback, without additional scrutiny, justification, or penalty.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en-US)
Hash de instantánea
9c6c27e1…
Recuperado
14 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Guidance for Faculty Use of AI in Grading and Assessment, Transparency with Students

Privacidad

UNC-Chapel Hill's research guidance treats entering private or confidential information, research data, grant proposals, or analytical results into public generative AI tools as a public disclosure of that information.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%

Valor normalizado: public-ai-inputs-treated-as-public-disclosure

Última verificación
14 may 2026
Último cambio
14 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Uploading information (e.g., research data, grant proposals, unpublished manuscripts, or analytical results) to a public AI tool is equivalent to releasing it publicly; thus, before any information from you or another individual is uploaded to a public AI tool, appropriate steps must be taken to ensure that the disclosure of that information is consistent with all rules and laws related to the handling of private information.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en-US)
Hash de instantánea
1d0574d9…
Recuperado
14 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Research Use Guidance, limitations and risks

Enseñanza

UNC-Chapel Hill's faculty grading and assessment guidance says AI systems used for grading or feedback must be institutionally approved and compliant with data security and privacy standards; faculty using GenAI for grading retain full responsibility for evaluative decisions and feedback.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%

Valor normalizado: ai-grading-approved-systems-and-faculty-accountability

Última verificación
14 may 2026
Último cambio
14 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Faculty must ensure that any AI system used for grading or feedback is institutionally approved and compliant with data security and privacy standards. Uploading student work to consumer-grade AI platforms not contracted by the university is inconsistent with student privacy laws and university policy.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en-US)
Hash de instantánea
9c6c27e1…
Recuperado
14 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Guidance for Faculty Use of AI in Grading and Assessment, Privacy and Intellectual Property

Investigación

UNC-Chapel Hill's research generative AI guidance applies to members of the research community involved in research under the auspices of the University, including faculty, staff, students, guest researchers, collaborators, and consultants.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza91%

Valor normalizado: research-community-guidance

Última verificación
14 may 2026
Último cambio
14 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
This guidance applies to all members of the research community, including faculty, staff (SHRA and EHRA non-faculty), students (undergraduate, graduate and professional), guest researchers (e.g., unpaid volunteers, interns, and visiting scholars), collaborators, and consultants involved in research occurring under the auspices of the University.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en-US)
Hash de instantánea
1d0574d9…
Recuperado
14 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Research Generative AI Usage Guidance, opening guidance scope

Enseñanza

UNC-Chapel Hill says faculty should clearly explain when and how AI tools are used in assessment evaluation, including what comes from AI and what comes from instructor judgment.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%

Valor normalizado: Faculty should disclose AI use in assessment evaluation and distinguish AI-supported evaluation from instructor judgment.

Última verificación
25 may 2026
Último cambio
26 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Faculty should clearly explain to students when and how AI tools are used in support of assessment evaluation. Students should understand which parts of their evaluation come from AI and which come from the instructor's own judgment.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
9c6c27e1…
Recuperado
25 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Transparency with Students

Enseñanza

UNC-Chapel Hill faculty guidance encourages instructors to state course and assignment AI expectations in the syllabus and tells Carolina students to follow the specific AI guidelines in that syllabus.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%

Valor normalizado: faculty-syllabus-ai-use-guidance

Última verificación
14 may 2026
Último cambio
14 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Conveying your stance on students’ use of AI in your course is important; it clarifies your expectations and ensures that any use of AI supports rather than frustrates your learning objectives.

Vista localizada only

The same page's syllabus starter language tells students to follow specific AI guidelines in the syllabus and check with the instructor if unsure.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en-US)
Hash de instantánea
2e373948…
Recuperado
14 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Developing AI Guidance for Faculty, introduction and syllabus starter language

Source record

Fuentes oficiales

6 sources

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (with Data Protection) - Information Technology Services

its.unc.edu

Hash de instantánea
049ed831…
Record information, JSON & citation
Revisiónagent reviewedConfianza97%Snapshot statusNo publicadoJSONJSON público

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-north-carolina-at-chapel-hill

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Abrir registro de cambios