Seoul National University

Do

• Check your course syllabus for permitted AI scope and reporting rules (§2(5)).

  Source guidanceEvidence ↗

  Check your course syllabus for permitted AI scope and reporting rules (§2(5)).

  ×

  Scope

  SNU's AI Guidelines (enacted Jan. 1, 2026) set voluntary principles: instructors should state course AI rules in syllabi (§2(1)–(2)) and students must comply and report when required (§2(5)). Campus ChatGPT Edu or Codex access is not assessment permission; research language-editing (§3(3) Footnote 1), research data protection (§3(4)), and Library e-resource licenses have specific conditions.

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(1)–(2) and §2(5), instructors should determine the scope of permitted and prohibited AI use and reporting requirements according to course nature and should clearly state and communicate their policies in course syllabi, whereas students must review and comply with the instructor's syllabus policies and must report their AI use in the prescribed manner when required.

  Original evidence and scope

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(1)–(2) and §2(5), instructors should determine the scope of permitted and prohibited AI use and reporting requirements according to course nature and should clearly state and communicate their policies in course syllabi, whereas students must review and comply with the instructor's syllabus policies and must report their AI use in the prescribed manner when required.

  claim-snu-002b

  Course-level teaching, syllabi, and enrolled student coursework

  Respecting instructors’ autonomy and discretion, each instructor should determine, in accordance with the nature of the course, the scope of permitted and prohibited AI use and the reporting requirements for such use. AI tools should be used to support and promote effective learning and must not hinder the development of learners’ critical and creative thinking abilities.

  Physical page 4; Chapter 2 §2(1) (Instructor Autonomy & Course-Specific Scope); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 135–139; characters 9061–9435; excerpt offset 0–374

  Official university source ↗

  Instructors should clearly state their policies regarding AI use in course syllabi or equivalent materials and communicate these policies sufficiently to enrolled students.

  Physical page 4; Chapter 2 §2(2) (Instructor Syllabus Communication); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 141–142; characters 9512–9684; excerpt offset 0–172

  Official university source ↗

  Students must review and comply with the instructor’s course policies as stated in the syllabus or related materials and must report their use of AI tools in the prescribed manner when required.

  Physical page 4; Chapter 2 §2(5) (Student Syllabus Compliance & Reporting Duty); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 152–154; characters 10200–10394; excerpt offset 0–194

  Official university source ↗

  (5) [학생] 수업 정책 준수 학생은 강의계획서 등에 명시된 교수자의 수업 정책을 확인하고 이를 준수하 여야 하며, AI 도구를 활용한 경우 정해진 방식에 따라 보고해야 한다.

  Physical page 5; 제2장 §2(5) [학생] 수업 정책 준수 (Korean normative 준수하여야 하며 / 보고해야 한다); Extracted text SHA256 2c619f3cb1595f38a11f6fe224a05c532e08a94ef89a826e2f5d97cc6f688139; original binding lines 129–131; characters 4189–4288; excerpt offset 0–99

  Official university source ↗

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(1), respecting instructors' autonomy and discretion, each instructor should determine, in accordance with the nature of the course, the scope of permitted and prohibited AI use and the reporting requirements for such use; AI tools should support effective learning and must not hinder learners' critical and creative thinking.

  Original evidence and scope

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(1), respecting instructors' autonomy and discretion, each instructor should determine, in accordance with the nature of the course, the scope of permitted and prohibited AI use and the reporting requirements for such use; AI tools should support effective learning and must not hinder learners' critical and creative thinking.

  clm-snu-course-instructor-authority

  Course-level teaching and learning across SNU (Chapter 2 §2(1), physical page 4)

  Respecting instructors’ autonomy and discretion, each instructor should determine, in accordance with the nature of the course, the scope of permitted and prohibited AI use and the reporting requirements for such use. AI tools should be used to support and promote effective learning and must not hinder the development of learners’ critical and creative thinking abilities.

  Physical page 4; Chapter 2 §2(1) (Instructor Autonomy & Course-Specific Scope); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 135–139; characters 9061–9435; excerpt offset 0–374

  Official university source ↗

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(2), instructors should clearly state their policies regarding AI use in course syllabi or equivalent materials and communicate these policies sufficiently to enrolled students.

  Original evidence and scope

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(2), instructors should clearly state their policies regarding AI use in course syllabi or equivalent materials and communicate these policies sufficiently to enrolled students.

  clm-snu-instructor-syllabus-statement

  Instructor syllabus communication (Chapter 2 §2(2), physical page 4)

  Instructors should clearly state their policies regarding AI use in course syllabi or equivalent materials and communicate these policies sufficiently to enrolled students.

  Physical page 4; Chapter 2 §2(2) (Instructor Syllabus Communication); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 141–142; characters 9512–9684; excerpt offset 0–172

  Official university source ↗

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(5), students must review and comply with the instructor's course policies as stated in the syllabus or related materials (수업 정책을 확인하고 이를 준수하여야 하며) and must report their use of AI tools in the prescribed manner when required (정해진 방식에 따라 보고해야 한다).

  Original evidence and scope

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(5), students must review and comply with the instructor's course policies as stated in the syllabus or related materials (수업 정책을 확인하고 이를 준수하여야 하며) and must report their use of AI tools in the prescribed manner when required (정해진 방식에 따라 보고해야 한다).

  clm-snu-student-syllabus-compliance

  Mandatory student compliance with syllabus AI policies and reporting rules (Chapter 2 §2(5), physical page 4)

  Students must review and comply with the instructor’s course policies as stated in the syllabus or related materials and must report their use of AI tools in the prescribed manner when required.

  Physical page 4; Chapter 2 §2(5) (Student Syllabus Compliance & Reporting Duty); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 152–154; characters 10200–10394; excerpt offset 0–194

  Official university source ↗

  (5) [학생] 수업 정책 준수 학생은 강의계획서 등에 명시된 교수자의 수업 정책을 확인하고 이를 준수하 여야 하며, AI 도구를 활용한 경우 정해진 방식에 따라 보고해야 한다.

  Physical page 5; 제2장 §2(5) [학생] 수업 정책 준수 (Korean normative 준수하여야 하며 / 보고해야 한다); Extracted text SHA256 2c619f3cb1595f38a11f6fe224a05c532e08a94ef89a826e2f5d97cc6f688139; original binding lines 129–131; characters 4189–4288; excerpt offset 0–99

  Official university source ↗

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(6), students may use AI tools within the scope permitted by the instructor's policy and should bear final responsibility for such use.

  Original evidence and scope

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(6), students may use AI tools within the scope permitted by the instructor's policy and should bear final responsibility for such use.

  clm-snu-student-permitted-scope-responsibility

  Student coursework AI use within instructor-permitted scope (Chapter 2 §2(6), physical page 4)

  Students may use AI tools within the scope permitted by the instructor’s policy and should bear final responsibility for such use.

  Physical page 4; Chapter 2 §2(6) (Student Use Within Permitted Scope & Final Responsibility); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 156–157; characters 10457–10587; excerpt offset 0–130

  Official university source ↗
• Verify facts/sources, keep process drafts, and check funder/journal rules in research (§1(2), §3(7)).

  Source guidanceEvidence ↗

  Verify facts/sources, keep process drafts, and check funder/journal rules in research (§1(2), §3(7)).

  ×

  Scope

  SNU's AI Guidelines (enacted Jan. 1, 2026) set voluntary principles: instructors should state course AI rules in syllabi (§2(1)–(2)) and students must comply and report when required (§2(5)). Campus ChatGPT Edu or Codex access is not assessment permission; research language-editing (§3(3) Footnote 1), research data protection (§3(4)), and Library e-resource licenses have specific conditions.

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(1)–(2) and §2(5), instructors should determine the scope of permitted and prohibited AI use and reporting requirements according to course nature and should clearly state and communicate their policies in course syllabi, whereas students must review and comply with the instructor's syllabus policies and must report their AI use in the prescribed manner when required.

  Original evidence and scope

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(1)–(2) and §2(5), instructors should determine the scope of permitted and prohibited AI use and reporting requirements according to course nature and should clearly state and communicate their policies in course syllabi, whereas students must review and comply with the instructor's syllabus policies and must report their AI use in the prescribed manner when required.

  claim-snu-002b

  Course-level teaching, syllabi, and enrolled student coursework

  Respecting instructors’ autonomy and discretion, each instructor should determine, in accordance with the nature of the course, the scope of permitted and prohibited AI use and the reporting requirements for such use. AI tools should be used to support and promote effective learning and must not hinder the development of learners’ critical and creative thinking abilities.

  Physical page 4; Chapter 2 §2(1) (Instructor Autonomy & Course-Specific Scope); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 135–139; characters 9061–9435; excerpt offset 0–374

  Official university source ↗

  Instructors should clearly state their policies regarding AI use in course syllabi or equivalent materials and communicate these policies sufficiently to enrolled students.

  Physical page 4; Chapter 2 §2(2) (Instructor Syllabus Communication); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 141–142; characters 9512–9684; excerpt offset 0–172

  Official university source ↗

  Students must review and comply with the instructor’s course policies as stated in the syllabus or related materials and must report their use of AI tools in the prescribed manner when required.

  Physical page 4; Chapter 2 §2(5) (Student Syllabus Compliance & Reporting Duty); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 152–154; characters 10200–10394; excerpt offset 0–194

  Official university source ↗

  (5) [학생] 수업 정책 준수 학생은 강의계획서 등에 명시된 교수자의 수업 정책을 확인하고 이를 준수하 여야 하며, AI 도구를 활용한 경우 정해진 방식에 따라 보고해야 한다.

  Physical page 5; 제2장 §2(5) [학생] 수업 정책 준수 (Korean normative 준수하여야 하며 / 보고해야 한다); Extracted text SHA256 2c619f3cb1595f38a11f6fe224a05c532e08a94ef89a826e2f5d97cc6f688139; original binding lines 129–131; characters 4189–4288; excerpt offset 0–99

  Official university source ↗

  SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §1 sets general ethical principles: members should share and acknowledge AI use to the extent possible (§1(1)), should verify facts and sources (§1(2)), must comply with copyright, privacy, and information security laws and University rules and ensure inputs do not include personal or rights-infringing content (§1(3)), should make diligent efforts to mitigate bias (§1(4)), and must recognize full personal responsibility for submitted AI-assisted outputs (§1(6)).

  Original evidence and scope

  SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §1 sets general ethical principles: members should share and acknowledge AI use to the extent possible (§1(1)), should verify facts and sources (§1(2)), must comply with copyright, privacy, and information security laws and University rules and ensure inputs do not include personal or rights-infringing content (§1(3)), should make diligent efforts to mitigate bias (§1(4)), and must recognize full personal responsibility for submitted AI-assisted outputs (§1(6)).

  claim-snu-002d

  All intramural members across education, research, and administration

  To build and maintain such trust, members of the University should, to the extent possible, share and appropriately acknowledge their use of AI in educational, research, and administrative processes.

  Physical page 3; Chapter 2 §1(1) (Transparent Disclosure to Extent Possible); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 92–94; characters 6249–6448; excerpt offset 0–199

  Official university source ↗

  Outputs generated through the use of AI may be misleading, inaccurate, or factually incorrect, and may infringe upon copyright. They may also contain expressions inconsistent with the purpose and objectives of educational, research, and administrative activities conducted by University members or may constitute plagiarism. Accordingly, prior to using or distributing such outputs, necessary fact-checking, source verification, review, and revision should be conducted.

  Physical page 3; Chapter 2 §1(2) (Verifying and Reviewing Facts and Sources); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 96–101; characters 6495–6965; excerpt offset 0–470

  Official university source ↗

  University members must comply with relevant laws, regulations, and University rules concerning copyright, privacy, and information security when using AI. In particular, when using generative AI, they must ensure that inputs such as data or prompts do not include personal information, copyrighted works, or other content that infringes upon the rights of others or violates applicable laws or University regulations.

  Physical page 3; Chapter 2 §1(3) (Ensuring Copyright, Privacy, and Information Security); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 103–107; characters 7024–7442; excerpt offset 0–418

  Official university source ↗

  AI tools may reflect, amplify, or propagate biases and forms of discrimination embedded in society. University members should be aware of the potential risks associated with AI use and take proactive measures and make diligent efforts to minimize such risks and ensure the ethical use of AI.

  Physical page 3; Chapter 2 §1(4) (Mitigating Bias and Ensuring Ethical Use); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 109–112; characters 7488–7779; excerpt offset 0–291

  Official university source ↗

  When University members prepare or generate outputs using AI tools in educational, 3 research, or administrative processes, they must recognize that they bear full responsibility for the submission and use of such outputs, including responsibility for their accuracy, integrity, and any potential copyright infringement.

  Physical pages 3–4; Chapter 2 §1(6) (User Accountability for Outputs); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 120–125; characters 8233–8555; excerpt offset 0–322

  Official university source ↗

  SNU Central Library guidance cites COPE's position that authors who use AI tools in manuscript writing, image or graphic production, or data collection and analysis must clearly disclose in the materials and methods (or equivalent) section which AI tool was used and how.

  Original evidence and scope

  SNU Central Library guidance cites COPE's position that authors who use AI tools in manuscript writing, image or graphic production, or data collection and analysis must clearly disclose in the materials and methods (or equivalent) section which AI tool was used and how.

  claim-snu-005b

  Scholarly manuscript methodology disclosure (SNU Library citing COPE)

  논문의 원고 작성, 이미지 또는 그래픽 요소 제작, 데이터 수집 및 분석 등에서 AI 도구를 사용한 저자는   논문의 재료 및 방법론(또는 유사한 섹션)에서 어떤 AI 도구가 어떻게 사용되었는지 명확히 공개해야 한다.

  AI와 연구·출판 윤리 > COPE 사용 투명성 공개 요건; Extracted text SHA256 dee979f7d152587164b7241295a2d4c5c84f6676045be9e2df2227c1aa1de778; original binding lines 83–84; characters 2557–2688; excerpt offset 0–131

  Official university source ↗

  SNU Central Library guidance warns that failing to cite generative AI use when writing papers risks being regarded as plagiarism, and advises researchers to cite generative AI appropriately according to each target journal's citation style (introducing MLA, APA, and Chicago examples).

  Original evidence and scope

  SNU Central Library guidance warns that failing to cite generative AI use when writing papers risks being regarded as plagiarism, and advises researchers to cite generative AI appropriately according to each target journal's citation style (introducing MLA, APA, and Chicago examples).

  claim-snu-006b

  SNU Central Library academic citation guidance (p=7079698)

  논문 작성시 생성형 AI의 사용을 인용하지 않는 경우 표절로 간주될 위험이 있습니다. 따라서 연구자들은 각 저널의 스타일에 맞춰 생성형 AI의 사용을 적절하게 인용해야 합니다.

  논문 작성 시 AI 관련 도구 > 3. 생성형 AI 인용; Extracted text SHA256 6b71d5c7cea682bbb4bc091617f762a2ff85c87f12582f96ae7d94090c7adc0d; original binding lines 62–62; characters 1428–1526; excerpt offset 0–98

  Official university source ↗

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(5), students must review and comply with the instructor's course policies as stated in the syllabus or related materials (수업 정책을 확인하고 이를 준수하여야 하며) and must report their use of AI tools in the prescribed manner when required (정해진 방식에 따라 보고해야 한다).

  Original evidence and scope

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §2(5), students must review and comply with the instructor's course policies as stated in the syllabus or related materials (수업 정책을 확인하고 이를 준수하여야 하며) and must report their use of AI tools in the prescribed manner when required (정해진 방식에 따라 보고해야 한다).

  clm-snu-student-syllabus-compliance

  Mandatory student compliance with syllabus AI policies and reporting rules (Chapter 2 §2(5), physical page 4)

  Students must review and comply with the instructor’s course policies as stated in the syllabus or related materials and must report their use of AI tools in the prescribed manner when required.

  Physical page 4; Chapter 2 §2(5) (Student Syllabus Compliance & Reporting Duty); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 152–154; characters 10200–10394; excerpt offset 0–194

  Official university source ↗

  (5) [학생] 수업 정책 준수 학생은 강의계획서 등에 명시된 교수자의 수업 정책을 확인하고 이를 준수하 여야 하며, AI 도구를 활용한 경우 정해진 방식에 따라 보고해야 한다.

  Physical page 5; 제2장 §2(5) [학생] 수업 정책 준수 (Korean normative 준수하여야 하며 / 보고해야 한다); Extracted text SHA256 2c619f3cb1595f38a11f6fe224a05c532e08a94ef89a826e2f5d97cc6f688139; original binding lines 129–131; characters 4189–4288; excerpt offset 0–99

  Official university source ↗

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §3(3) Footnote 1, in research and development, where AI is used solely for correcting foreign-language expressions or grammatical review—analogous to traditional language editing services—such use does not in itself constitute research misconduct such as plagiarism merely because AI use is not explicitly disclosed, provided that it does not violate the policies of research funding agencies, affiliated institutions, academic societies, or scholarly journals (this applies to research under Section 3 and is not a coursework exception).

  Original evidence and scope

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §3(3) Footnote 1, in research and development, where AI is used solely for correcting foreign-language expressions or grammatical review—analogous to traditional language editing services—such use does not in itself constitute research misconduct such as plagiarism merely because AI use is not explicitly disclosed, provided that it does not violate the policies of research funding agencies, affiliated institutions, academic societies, or scholarly journals (this applies to research under Section 3 and is not a coursework exception).

  clm-snu-research-language-editing-exception

  Research and development writing only (Chapter 2 §3(3) Footnote 1, physical page 5); conditioned on funder, institution, society, and journal rules; not a coursework exception

  For example, where AI is used solely for the correction of foreign-language expressions or for grammatical review, such use, analogous to the use of traditional language editing services, does not in itself constitute research misconduct such as plagiarism merely because the use of AI is not explicitly disclosed, provided that it does not violate the policies of research funding agencies, affiliated institutions, academic societies, or scholarly journals.

  Physical page 5; Chapter 2 §3(3) Footnote 1 (Foreign Language Editing Exception); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 198–201; characters 12820–13279; excerpt offset 0–459

  Official university source ↗

  1) 예로, 오로지 외국어 표현의 교정 또는 문법 검토를 위해서만 AI를 활용할 경우, 전통적인 외국어 교정 서비스의 이용과 마찬가지로, 연구비 지원 기관, 소속 기관, 학회·학술지의 정책 등에 위배 되지 않는 이상, 그 활용 사실을 명시하지 않 았다는 이유만으로 표절 등 연구 부정행위에 해당하는 것은 아니다.

  Physical page 6; 제2장 §3(3) 각주 1 (외국어 표현 교정·문법 검토 예외 조건: 연구비 지원 기관, 소속 기관, 학회·학술지 정책 미위배 조건); Extracted text SHA256 2c619f3cb1595f38a11f6fe224a05c532e08a94ef89a826e2f5d97cc6f688139; original binding lines 172–174; characters 5488–5662; excerpt offset 0–174

  Official university source ↗
• Comply with privacy/copyright rules and prevent leakage of sensitive research data (§1(3), §3(4)).

  Source guidanceEvidence ↗

  Comply with privacy/copyright rules and prevent leakage of sensitive research data (§1(3), §3(4)).

  ×

  Scope

  SNU's AI Guidelines (enacted Jan. 1, 2026) set voluntary principles: instructors should state course AI rules in syllabi (§2(1)–(2)) and students must comply and report when required (§2(5)). Campus ChatGPT Edu or Codex access is not assessment permission; research language-editing (§3(3) Footnote 1), research data protection (§3(4)), and Library e-resource licenses have specific conditions.

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §3(2), §3(4), and §3(5), researchers must review AI outputs and cross-validate them against literature, experiments, and expert judgment; must take care to prevent leakage of sensitive research information, should not unnecessarily enter or share research data or confidential information with AI tools, and must strictly observe research security laws; and should record and preserve the AI usage process (prompts, versions, model names, scope) to the extent possible for reproducibility.

  Original evidence and scope

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §3(2), §3(4), and §3(5), researchers must review AI outputs and cross-validate them against literature, experiments, and expert judgment; must take care to prevent leakage of sensitive research information, should not unnecessarily enter or share research data or confidential information with AI tools, and must strictly observe research security laws; and should record and preserve the AI usage process (prompts, versions, model names, scope) to the extent possible for reproducibility.

  claim-snu-002c

  University research and development activities

  AI-generated outputs and cited materials may contain errors or biases. Researchers must therefore review such outputs and cross-validate them against existing literature, experiments, and expert judgment.

  Physical page 5; Chapter 2 §3(2) (Re-examining and Cross-Validating Outputs); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 186–188; characters 12162–12366; excerpt offset 0–204

  Official university source ↗

  Researchers must take care to prevent the leakage of sensitive information directly related to research, including research and development plans, research data, project-related information, and personal data of research personnel, during the use of AI. Research data or confidential information should not be unnecessarily entered into or shared with AI tools, and research security requirements and relevant laws and regulations must be strictly observed.

  Physical page 6; Chapter 2 §3(4) (Protecting Research Data and Confidential Information); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 204–209; characters 13284–13741; excerpt offset 0–457

  Official university source ↗

  (4) 연구데이터 및 기밀정보 보호 연구자는 AI를 활용하는 과정에서 연구개발계획서, 연구데이터, 과제 관련 정보, 연구 수행자의 개인정보 등 연구와 직결된 민감한 정보가 외부로 유출 되지 않도록 주의해야 한다. AI 도구에 연구데이터나 기밀정보를 불필요하게 입력 하거나 공유하지 않으며, 연구 보안과 관련 법규를 철저히 준수해야 한다.

  Physical page 6; 제2장 §3(4) 연구데이터 및 기밀정보 보호 (유출 방지 주의 및 불필요한 입력·공유 지양); Extracted text SHA256 2c619f3cb1595f38a11f6fe224a05c532e08a94ef89a826e2f5d97cc6f688139; original binding lines 164–168; characters 5219–5407; excerpt offset 0–188

  Official university source ↗

  To ensure research reproducibility, the AI usage process (including prompts, versions, model names, and scope of use) should be recorded and preserved to the extent possible.

  Physical page 6; Chapter 2 §3(5) (Ensuring Reproducibility and Keeping Records); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 211–212; characters 13791–13965; excerpt offset 0–174

  Official university source ↗

  SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §1 sets general ethical principles: members should share and acknowledge AI use to the extent possible (§1(1)), should verify facts and sources (§1(2)), must comply with copyright, privacy, and information security laws and University rules and ensure inputs do not include personal or rights-infringing content (§1(3)), should make diligent efforts to mitigate bias (§1(4)), and must recognize full personal responsibility for submitted AI-assisted outputs (§1(6)).

  Original evidence and scope

  SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §1 sets general ethical principles: members should share and acknowledge AI use to the extent possible (§1(1)), should verify facts and sources (§1(2)), must comply with copyright, privacy, and information security laws and University rules and ensure inputs do not include personal or rights-infringing content (§1(3)), should make diligent efforts to mitigate bias (§1(4)), and must recognize full personal responsibility for submitted AI-assisted outputs (§1(6)).

  claim-snu-002d

  All intramural members across education, research, and administration

  To build and maintain such trust, members of the University should, to the extent possible, share and appropriately acknowledge their use of AI in educational, research, and administrative processes.

  Physical page 3; Chapter 2 §1(1) (Transparent Disclosure to Extent Possible); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 92–94; characters 6249–6448; excerpt offset 0–199

  Official university source ↗

  Outputs generated through the use of AI may be misleading, inaccurate, or factually incorrect, and may infringe upon copyright. They may also contain expressions inconsistent with the purpose and objectives of educational, research, and administrative activities conducted by University members or may constitute plagiarism. Accordingly, prior to using or distributing such outputs, necessary fact-checking, source verification, review, and revision should be conducted.

  Physical page 3; Chapter 2 §1(2) (Verifying and Reviewing Facts and Sources); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 96–101; characters 6495–6965; excerpt offset 0–470

  Official university source ↗

  University members must comply with relevant laws, regulations, and University rules concerning copyright, privacy, and information security when using AI. In particular, when using generative AI, they must ensure that inputs such as data or prompts do not include personal information, copyrighted works, or other content that infringes upon the rights of others or violates applicable laws or University regulations.

  Physical page 3; Chapter 2 §1(3) (Ensuring Copyright, Privacy, and Information Security); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 103–107; characters 7024–7442; excerpt offset 0–418

  Official university source ↗

  AI tools may reflect, amplify, or propagate biases and forms of discrimination embedded in society. University members should be aware of the potential risks associated with AI use and take proactive measures and make diligent efforts to minimize such risks and ensure the ethical use of AI.

  Physical page 3; Chapter 2 §1(4) (Mitigating Bias and Ensuring Ethical Use); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 109–112; characters 7488–7779; excerpt offset 0–291

  Official university source ↗

  When University members prepare or generate outputs using AI tools in educational, 3 research, or administrative processes, they must recognize that they bear full responsibility for the submission and use of such outputs, including responsibility for their accuracy, integrity, and any potential copyright infringement.

  Physical pages 3–4; Chapter 2 §1(6) (User Accountability for Outputs); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 120–125; characters 8233–8555; excerpt offset 0–322

  Official university source ↗

  SNU Central Library warns that uploading subscribed electronic resources to generative AI services (such as ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini), or performing bulk downloads, calls, or full-text inputs, may exceed publisher license terms and could result in access suspension or subscription fee increases for the entire university.

  Original evidence and scope

  SNU Central Library warns that uploading subscribed electronic resources to generative AI services (such as ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini), or performing bulk downloads, calls, or full-text inputs, may exceed publisher license terms and could result in access suspension or subscription fee increases for the entire university.

  claim-snu-007a

  SNU Central Library subscribed electronic resources and publisher license compliance

  도서관 구독 계약에 따라 제공되는 전자자료를 ChatGPT·Claude·Gemini 등 생성형 AI 서비스에 업로드하거나 대량 다운로드 또는 호출, 전문(全文)을 입력하는 행위는 출판사의 이용 허락 범위를 초과할 수 있습니다.

  전자자료 생성형 AI 활용 관련 제한사항, 항목 가; Extracted text SHA256 edff94382f278c4d6d2a3abe0b3abbc912f7cf1d33250d2fbe4d7a7fa692da91; original binding lines 124–124; characters 1306–1432; excerpt offset 0–126

  Official university source ↗

  라이선스 계약상 허용하지 않는 이용약관 위반이 반복될 경우, 출판사에서 우리 대학 전체의 이용 중지 및 구독료 인상 등의 조치를 취할 수 있으며, 이는 전체 구성원의 학술 자료 이용에 중대한 지장을 초래할 수 있습니다.

  전자자료 생성형 AI 활용 관련 제한사항, 항목 마; Extracted text SHA256 edff94382f278c4d6d2a3abe0b3abbc912f7cf1d33250d2fbe4d7a7fa692da91; original binding lines 128–128; characters 1847–1969; excerpt offset 0–122

  Official university source ↗

  SNU Central Library states that most electronic resource subscription agreements permit only viewing, downloading, and printing, while input for AI training/analysis or uploading to third-party services is not permitted without separate authorization, and notes that publisher license restrictions may separately prohibit such use even where copyright fair use might otherwise be recognized.

  Original evidence and scope

  SNU Central Library states that most electronic resource subscription agreements permit only viewing, downloading, and printing, while input for AI training/analysis or uploading to third-party services is not permitted without separate authorization, and notes that publisher license restrictions may separately prohibit such use even where copyright fair use might otherwise be recognized.

  claim-snu-007b

  SNU Central Library subscribed electronic resources (contractual license vs. copyright fair use)

  대부분의 구독 계약은 열람(viewing)·다운로드(download)·인쇄(printing) 용도의 이용만을 허용하며, AI 학습·분석 목적의 입력 또는 제3자 서비스로의 업로드는 별도 허락 없이는 허용되지 않음을 명시하고 있습니다.

  전자자료 생성형 AI 활용 관련 제한사항, 항목 나; Extracted text SHA256 edff94382f278c4d6d2a3abe0b3abbc912f7cf1d33250d2fbe4d7a7fa692da91; original binding lines 125–125; characters 1436–1566; excerpt offset 0–130

  Official university source ↗

  저작권법상 공정이용(Fair Use)이 인정되는 경우라도, 출판사와 체결한 라이선스 계약(License Agreement)에 따라 이용이 별도로 제한할 수 있으며, 계약상 금지 규정이 있는 경우 이용자는 이를 위반한 것에 해당될 수 있습니다.

  전자자료 생성형 AI 활용 관련 제한사항, 항목 라; Extracted text SHA256 edff94382f278c4d6d2a3abe0b3abbc912f7cf1d33250d2fbe4d7a7fa692da91; original binding lines 127–127; characters 1708–1843; excerpt offset 0–135

  Official university source ↗

  SNU's AI Guidelines (Chapter 2) set forth core ethical standards—transparency, fact and source verification, copyright/privacy/information security compliance, bias mitigation, and personal accountability—along with domain-specific ethical guidelines for teaching and learning, research and development, and administration.

  Original evidence and scope

  SNU's AI Guidelines (Chapter 2) set forth core ethical standards—transparency, fact and source verification, copyright/privacy/information security compliance, bias mitigation, and personal accountability—along with domain-specific ethical guidelines for teaching and learning, research and development, and administration.

  claim-snu-003b

  University-wide ethical guidelines across education, research, and administration (Chapter 2)

  University members must comply with relevant laws, regulations, and University rules concerning copyright, privacy, and information security when using AI. In particular, when using generative AI, they must ensure that inputs such as data or prompts do not include personal information, copyrighted works, or other content that infringes upon the rights of others or violates applicable laws or University regulations.

  Physical page 3; Chapter 2 §1(3) (Ensuring Copyright, Privacy, and Information Security); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 103–107; characters 7024–7442; excerpt offset 0–418

  Official university source ↗

  When University members prepare or generate outputs using AI tools in educational, 3 research, or administrative processes, they must recognize that they bear full responsibility for the submission and use of such outputs, including responsibility for their accuracy, integrity, and any potential copyright infringement.

  Physical pages 3–4; Chapter 2 §1(6) (User Accountability for Outputs); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 120–125; characters 8233–8555; excerpt offset 0–322

  Official university source ↗

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §3(4), researchers must take care to prevent the leakage of sensitive information directly related to research (including R&D plans, research data, project-related information, and personal data of research personnel), should not unnecessarily enter into or share research data or confidential information with AI tools (불필요하게 입력하거나 공유하지 않으며), and must strictly observe research security requirements and relevant laws and regulations.

  Original evidence and scope

  Under SNU AI Guidelines Chapter 2 §3(4), researchers must take care to prevent the leakage of sensitive information directly related to research (including R&D plans, research data, project-related information, and personal data of research personnel), should not unnecessarily enter into or share research data or confidential information with AI tools (불필요하게 입력하거나 공유하지 않으며), and must strictly observe research security requirements and relevant laws and regulations.

  clm-snu-research-data-confidentiality

  Research data, R&D plans, project information, and researcher personal data (Chapter 2 §3(4), physical pages 5–6)

  Researchers must take care to prevent the leakage of sensitive information directly related to research, including research and development plans, research data, project-related information, and personal data of research personnel, during the use of AI. Research data or confidential information should not be unnecessarily entered into or shared with AI tools, and research security requirements and relevant laws and regulations must be strictly observed.

  Physical page 6; Chapter 2 §3(4) (Protecting Research Data and Confidential Information); Extracted text SHA256 8339b710951123c45cb0ad432f2de0f2b56ef00ae01eb99cca03b511e2c44cd5; original binding lines 204–209; characters 13284–13741; excerpt offset 0–457

  Official university source ↗

  (4) 연구데이터 및 기밀정보 보호 연구자는 AI를 활용하는 과정에서 연구개발계획서, 연구데이터, 과제 관련 정보, 연구 수행자의 개인정보 등 연구와 직결된 민감한 정보가 외부로 유출 되지 않도록 주의해야 한다. AI 도구에 연구데이터나 기밀정보를 불필요하게 입력 하거나 공유하지 않으며, 연구 보안과 관련 법규를 철저히 준수해야 한다.

  Physical page 6; 제2장 §3(4) 연구데이터 및 기밀정보 보호 (유출 방지 주의 및 불필요한 입력·공유 지양); Extracted text SHA256 2c619f3cb1595f38a11f6fe224a05c532e08a94ef89a826e2f5d97cc6f688139; original binding lines 164–168; characters 5219–5407; excerpt offset 0–188

  Official university source ↗