Seoul, South Korea

Seoul National University

Seoul National University is listed as QS 2026 rank =38. Seoul National University has 16 source-backed AI policy claim records from 7 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready overview

v1 public contract

Seoul National University is listed as QS 2026 rank =38. Seoul National University has 16 source-backed AI policy claim records from 7 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Reviewed claims15Candidate claims1Official sources7

Candidate claims are source-backed records pending review. They are not final policy conclusions and are not legal or academic integrity advice.

Reviewed claims

15 reviewed public claim

Ai Tool Treatment

SNU's AI Guidelines do not uniformly restrict or prohibit AI use; they establish standards to support rational judgment and ethical, creative use based on autonomy and trust.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
이번 가이드라인은 AI 활용을 일률적으로 제한하거나 금지하는 규범이 아니라, 자율성과 신뢰를 바탕으로 한 합리적 판단과 윤리적·창의적 활용을 지원하기 위한 기준이다.

Localized display only

This guideline is not a norm that uniformly restricts or prohibits AI use, but rather a standard to support rational judgment and ethical/creative use based on autonomy and trust.

Teaching

SNU requires instructors to communicate AI tool usage policies (permitted/prohibited scope and reporting methods) through syllabi, and students must comply.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
교육·학습 영역에서는 교수자는 강의계획서를 통해 AI 도구 활용의 허용·금지 범위와 보고 방식을 안내하고, 학생은 해당 정책을 준수하여야 한다.

Localized display only

In the education/learning domain, instructors must guide students on the scope of permitted/prohibited AI tool use and reporting methods through the syllabus, and students must comply with that policy.

Research

SNU's AI Guidelines for research require cross-verification of AI outputs for errors/bias, protection of research data and confidential information, and documentation of AI use for research reproducibility.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
연구·개발 영역에서는 AI 결과물의 오류·편향 가능성에 대비한 교차 검증, 연구데이터 및 기밀정보 보호, 활용 과정의 기록·보존 등 연구 재현성 확보를 위한 절차를 포함하였다.

Localized display only

In the research/development domain, the guidelines include procedures for cross-verification against AI output errors/bias, protection of research data and confidential information, and record-keeping for research reproducibility.

Academic Integrity

SNU's AI Guidelines require transparent disclosure of AI use, fact and source verification, copyright/privacy/information security compliance, bias correction, and awareness of accountability.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
투명한 활용 공개, 사실·출처 확인, 저작권·프라이버시·정보보안 준수, 편향성 교정, 책임소재의 인지 등 구성원이 유의해야 할 공통 윤리 기준을 명시하였다.

Localized display only

The guidelines specify common ethical standards members must observe: transparent disclosure of use, fact/source verification, copyright/privacy/information security compliance, bias correction, and awareness of accountability.

Research

SNU Library cites COPE's position that AI tools cannot be listed as authors because they cannot take responsibility for research results and lack legal personality.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI 도구는 제출된 연구결과물에 대한 책임을 지지 못하기 때문에 저자로서의 요건을 충족시킬 수 없다. AI 도구는 법인격이 없기 때문에 이해충돌 유무를 주장하거나 저작권과 라이센스 계약을 관리할 수도 없다.

Localized display only

AI tools cannot meet authorship requirements because they cannot take responsibility for submitted research results. AI tools lack legal personality and cannot assert conflicts of interest or manage copyright and license agreements.

Research

SNU Library cites COPE requiring authors to clearly disclose in their methods section which AI tools were used and how, covering manuscript writing, image creation, and data analysis.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
논문의 원고 작성, 이미지 또는 그래픽 요소 제작, 데이터 수집 및 분석 등에서 AI 도구를 사용한 저자는 논문의 재료 및 방법론(또는 유사한 섹션)에서 어떤 AI 도구가 어떻게 사용되었는지 명확히 공개해야 한다.

Localized display only

Authors who use AI tools in manuscript writing, image/graphic creation, data collection and analysis must clearly disclose in the methods section which AI tools were used and how.

Procurement

SNU Library warns that uploading subscribed e-resources to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or similar AI services, or performing bulk downloads, may exceed publisher license terms and could result in access being blocked for the entire university.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
구독 전자자료를 ChatGPT·Claude·Gemini 등 생성형 AI 서비스에 업로드하거나 대량 다운로드 또는 호출, 전문(全文)을 입력하는 행위는 출판사의 이용 허락 범위를 초과할 수 있습니다.

Localized display only

Uploading subscribed e-resources to generative AI services like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or performing bulk downloads/calls or full-text input may exceed publisher license terms.

Privacy

SNU Library states that most e-resource subscription agreements only permit viewing, downloading, and printing; using resources for AI training/analysis or uploading to third-party AI services requires separate authorization.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
대부분의 구독 계약은 열람(viewing)·다운로드(download)·인쇄(printing) 용도의 이용만을 허용하며, AI 학습·분석 목적의 입력 또는 제3자 서비스로의 업로드는 별도 허락 없이는 허용되지 않음을 명시하고 있습니다.

Localized display only

Most subscription agreements only permit viewing, downloading, and printing; input for AI training/analysis or uploading to third-party services is not permitted without separate authorization.

Ai Tool Treatment

SNU's AI Guidelines establish basic principles requiring members to understand AI tool purposes and characteristics, apply critical thinking, and balance creativity with social responsibility.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI 도구의 목적 및 특성을 이해하고 비판적 사고를 바탕으로 창의성과 사회적 책임이 균형있게 확보되도록 활용하는 기본 원칙 제시

Localized display only

Presents basic principles for AI use ensuring creativity and social responsibility are balanced, based on understanding AI tool purposes and characteristics and critical thinking.

Academic Integrity

SNU's AI Guidelines require compliance with core ethical standards (transparency, accuracy, privacy, information security, accountability) throughout the entire AI use process, with domain-specific considerations for education, research, and administration.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI 활용의 전 과정에서 투명성, 정확성, 프라이버시 · 정보보안, 책임성 등 핵심 윤리 기준을 준수하도록 하고, 교육/학습 · 연구/개발 · 행정 영역별로 요구되는 윤리적 고려 사항 제시

Localized display only

Requires compliance with core ethical standards throughout the AI use process: transparency, accuracy, privacy/information security, accountability, and presents domain-specific ethical considerations for education, research, and administration.

Research

SNU Library guidance states that researchers should use AI to improve research efficiency while maintaining research ethics and practicing responsible AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
연구자들은 변화하는 시대에 맞게 학술 연구를 함에 있어 새로운 기술(AI)을 활용하여 연구 효율을 상향시키는 동시에, 연구 윤리를 지키며 책임 있는 AI 사용을 해야 합니다.

Localized display only

Researchers should use new AI technology to improve research efficiency while maintaining research ethics and responsible AI use.

Academic Integrity

SNU Library provides an AI ethics checklist requiring researchers to cite AI sources, avoid rights infringement, not input sensitive information, cross-verify AI outputs, and use AI only as a supplementary tool.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
생성형 AI의 결과물을 활용할 때 출처를 명확하게 표기했나요? 생성형AI를 활용할 때 타인의 권리가 침해될 수 있는 텍스트, 오디오, 이미지 등을 사용하지 않았나요?

Localized display only

Checklist: Did you clearly cite sources when using generative AI outputs? Did you avoid using text, audio, images that could infringe others' rights?

Research

SNU Library advises researchers to check target journal editorial policies from the planning stage, as policies vary on whether LLMs can be listed as authors and whether AI-generated text is permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
연구 진행 단계에서부터 논문 투고를 고려하는 저널 및 출판사의 편집 정책을 반드시 확인해야 합니다. 저널·출판사에 따라 ChatGPT와 같은 LLMs를 저자로 인정하지 않으며, AI가 생성한 텍스트를 논문에 사용할 수 없다고 제한하거나 오로지 보조적인 기능으로서의 AI 활용만 인정한다는 입장을 편집 정책에 명시하고 있습니다.

Localized display only

From the research planning stage, researchers must check the editorial policies of target journals. Some journals do not recognize LLMs as authors, restrict AI-generated text in papers, or only permit AI as a supplementary function.

Academic Integrity

SNU Library warns that not citing generative AI use in papers risks plagiarism charges; researchers must cite AI use according to journal-specific styles (MLA, APA, Chicago).

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
논문 작성시 생성형 AI의 사용을 인용하지 않는 경우 표절로 간주될 위험이 있습니다. 따라서 연구자들은 각 저널의 스타일에 맞춰 생성형 AI의 사용을 적절하게 인용해야 합니다.

Localized display only

Not citing generative AI use when writing papers risks being considered plagiarism. Researchers must cite AI use appropriately according to each journal's style.

Source Status

SNU Library notes that many research institutions lack clear AI policies, and researchers operate in uncertainty or within extremely limited scope.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence80%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
다수의 연구 기관에서는 아직 AI 활용에 관한 명확한 정책을 도입하지 않고 있습니다. 연구자들은 이러한 불확실성 속에서 AI 도구를 사용하거나 극히 제한된 범위 내에서만 사용할 수밖에 없습니다.

Localized display only

Many research institutions have not yet introduced clear policies on AI use. Researchers must use AI tools in this uncertainty or within extremely limited scope.

Candidate claims

1 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Source Status

SNU hosts official Korean and English PDF versions of the SNU AI Guidelines on its downloads page, published January 1, 2026.

Review: Needs reviewConfidence60%

This claim is held for review because the evidence or classification needs another pass.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
서울대학교 AI 가이드라인 제정 전문 국문/영문 PDF download page on snu.ac.kr official downloads section.

Official sources

7 source attribution

AI와 연구 활동 (AI and Research Activities) - SNU Library LibGuide

libguide.snu.ac.kr

Snapshot hash
4ea76e38765e99a80e40a80bb057db4883fa8942fb467b093ffa0adb3e7fff4e
Back to universities