Seoul, South Korea Last checked

Yonsei University

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Conditional

The2025 instructor guideline assigns the course instructor the choice of prohibition, limited uses or broader uses, announced in syllabus and class. Example syllabus texts are options, not universal student permission.

Official source ↗

Exams

Restricted

The2025 teacher guideline generally prohibits GenAI in supervised exams and limits electronic devices. In unproctored/open assessments, any permitted uses must be decided and announced beforehand. Preserve the “in principle” qualification and actual exam instructions.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Conditional

Where AI use is permitted, the instructor selects and announces one or more disclosure/log methods. Prompt fields, versions and upload examples are selected course methods, not a universal checklist.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Restricted

The2025 guidance warns against inputting personal/confidential/unpublished research or patent information into external cloud AI. Teachers should not upload entire student assessment texts for AI grading/analysis. No retention duration or approved institutional service is established.

Official source ↗

Tools and access

Unclear

No institution-provided student tool entitlement is established. Examples in teacher/research guidance do not authorize access or assessed use.

Research and publication

Restricted

The2025 researcher guideline does not recognise AI as author. Humans retain core design/analysis/conclusions and responsibility; disclose tool/version/developer/purpose, verify outputs and follow journal requirements. Core original outputs may not be generated by AI under the stated restriction.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Restricted

The2026 academic rules require scholarly ethics and allow discipline under their conditions. The undergraduate grading page says dishonesty/cheating invalidates obtained grades and gives the course F. No universal AI-specific penalty follows without the applicable course rule and finding. AI detector results are supplementary and should not alone determine grades or sanctions; consider the student’s explanation and instructor review. General grading dishonesty rules do not make every AI use cheating. The research-integrity committee process is for research participants, not ordinary course appeals. Preliminary investigation starts within30 days of report and finishes within30 of start; main investigation starts within30 after approval and finishes within120, extendable with approval. Objection is within30 days of determination notice and processed within60 of receipt. Day types are unspecified.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Recommended

The2025 instructor guideline assigns the course instructor the choice of prohibition, limited uses or broader uses, announced in syllabus and class. Example syllabus texts are options, not universal student permission. AI detector results are supplementary and should not alone determine grades or sanctions; consider the student’s explanation and instructor review. General grading dishonesty rules do not make every AI use cheating.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Unclear

The2025 guidance warns against inputting personal/confidential/unpublished research or patent information into external cloud AI. Teachers should not upload entire student assessment texts for AI grading/analysis. No retention duration or approved institutional service is established.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • Check the exact course and assessment instructions before use.
    Site advice
  • Follow the applicable disclosure and attribution rules.
    Site advice
  • Preserve the actual notice and identify the correct review procedure.
    Site advice

Don’t

  • Do not treat tool access or examples as assessment permission.
    Site advice
  • Do not assume a service has unrestricted data approval or no retention.
    Site advice
  • Do not transfer another programme’s sanction or deadline to your case.
    Site advice

AI use questioned?

Yonsei University

Rules depend on the course, unit, research role and source version. This institution audit remains partial.

Investigation & response

The research-integrity committee process is for research participants, not ordinary course appeals. Preliminary investigation starts within30 days of report and finishes within30 of start; main investigation starts within30 after approval and finishes within120, extendable with approval. Objection is within30 days of determination notice and processed within60 of receipt. Day types are unspecified.

Original evidence and scope

The research-integrity committee process is for research participants, not ordinary course appeals. Preliminary investigation starts within30 days of report and finishes within30 of start; main investigation starts within30 after approval and finishes within120, extendable with approval. Objection is within30 days of determination notice and processed within60 of receipt. Day types are unspecified.

yonsei-university-local-20261023-process

Research-integrity committee only;30/120/60 clocks not ordinary grading appeals.

이의 신청 (30일 이내) 1. 제보접수 : 연구부정행위 제보방법 참고 2. 예비조사 : 제보접수일로부터 30일 이내에 착수. 조사 시작일로부터 30일 이내 완료 후 위원회 승인 3. 본조사 : 연구윤리진실성위원회의 예비조사 결과 승인 후, 30일 이내에 조사위원회를 구성하여 본조사 착수. 조사 시작일로부터 120일 이내에 완료 (위원회 승인 후 기간 연장가능)

Bounded full continuous context; Extracted text SHA256 1da01c40a76586f21bee37373d349d533ba538e6bd77171b09a516bdb58b33cf; original binding lines 635–737; characters 9778–11820; excerpt offset 0–700

Official university source ↗
4. 판정 : 위원회 승인 받은 후 결과를 제보자 및 피제보자에게 통보 5. 이의신청 : 조사결과 불복 시, 판정 통보일로부터 30일 이내 자유형식으로 이메일(yre1885@yonsei.ac.kr) 로 이의신청/ 이의신청 처리는 접수일로부터 60일 이내 6. 후속조치 : 연구지원 기관에 조사결과 통보, 필요 시 총장에게 징계조치 건의 및 관련 기관의 요청 시 조사자료 제출 연구부정행위 후속조치 교내 「연구윤리진실성위원회의 설치·운영에 관한 규정」 제26조

Bounded full continuous context; Extracted text SHA256 1da01c40a76586f21bee37373d349d533ba538e6bd77171b09a516bdb58b33cf; original binding lines 635–737; characters 9778–11820; excerpt offset 700–1400

Official university source ↗
1. 징계 2. 연구비 지원 기관에 대한 통보 3. 피조사자에 대한 해당 논문의 철회 또는 수정 요구 및 해당 학술지 편집인에 대한 통보 4. 학위 논문의 지도 및 심사의 제한 5. 당해 학위논문에 의하여 수여된 학위의 취소 6. 생명윤리를 위반한 경우 본교 생명윤리위원회에 대한 통보 연세대학교 연구처 (03722) 서울특별시 서대문구 연세로 50 연세대학교 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2016 YONSEI UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 개인정보처리방침

Bounded full continuous context; Extracted text SHA256 1da01c40a76586f21bee37373d349d533ba538e6bd77171b09a516bdb58b33cf; original binding lines 635–737; characters 9778–11820; excerpt offset 1400–2042

Official university source ↗

Possible outcomes

The2026 academic rules require scholarly ethics and allow discipline under their conditions. The undergraduate grading page says dishonesty/cheating invalidates obtained grades and gives the course F. No universal AI-specific penalty follows without the applicable course rule and finding.

Original evidence and scope

The2026 academic rules require scholarly ethics and allow discipline under their conditions. The undergraduate grading page says dishonesty/cheating invalidates obtained grades and gives the course F. No universal AI-specific penalty follows without the applicable course rule and finding.

yonsei-university-local-20261023-integrity

2026 academic rules and undergraduate grading context; no universal assessment appeal deadline.

① 학생은 학습활동 시 학문윤리를 준수하여야 한다. ② 성적이 과오 또는 부정행위에 의하여 인정된 것이 판명된 때에는 이를 인정하지 아니한다. 제47조 (진급) <개정 2020.11.06>

Captured continuous source context; Extracted text SHA256 ee4933c84c0fe11df288bd2b8505499c1de1ddebfb9c32a37507a5e8d8d3c9af; original binding lines 351–353; characters 19373–19478; excerpt offset 0–105

Official university source ↗
① 학생이 다음 각 호에 해당할 때에는 징계할 수 있으며, 이에 관한 사항은 따로 정한다. 1. 성행이 불량한 자 2. 학업을 방해한 자

Captured continuous source context; Extracted text SHA256 ee4933c84c0fe11df288bd2b8505499c1de1ddebfb9c32a37507a5e8d8d3c9af; original binding lines 418–420; characters 22236–22312; excerpt offset 0–76

Official university source ↗
If a student's grade is discovered to have been earned by cheating or dishonesty, the grade will become invalid and further disciplinary actions will be enforced. Examples of violation of the academic integrity

Captured continuous source context; Extracted text SHA256 20e97caa4b4a2724cb12956a56ec5e06eec0f64a1c6d6159c559ecae1d713e5b; original binding lines 639–641; characters 7275–7492; excerpt offset 0–217

Official university source ↗
In the case of a student who has been suspended from the university for more than one (1) month or subjected to a higher level of disciplinary action for their misconduct prior to the end of the final examination, their enrollment for the whole course of the semester will be canceled. When disciplinary action is taken due to academic dishonesty, the grade of the course shall be "F", but the procedures and standards for the processing of academic dishonesty shall be separately determined.

Captured continuous source context; Extracted text SHA256 20e97caa4b4a2724cb12956a56ec5e06eec0f64a1c6d6159c559ecae1d713e5b; original binding lines 654–656; characters 8037–8536; excerpt offset 0–499

Official university source ↗

Review & appeal

The research-integrity committee process is for research participants, not ordinary course appeals. Preliminary investigation starts within30 days of report and finishes within30 of start; main investigation starts within30 after approval and finishes within120, extendable with approval. Objection is within30 days of determination notice and processed within60 of receipt. Day types are unspecified.

Original evidence and scope

The research-integrity committee process is for research participants, not ordinary course appeals. Preliminary investigation starts within30 days of report and finishes within30 of start; main investigation starts within30 after approval and finishes within120, extendable with approval. Objection is within30 days of determination notice and processed within60 of receipt. Day types are unspecified.

yonsei-university-local-20261023-process

Research-integrity committee only;30/120/60 clocks not ordinary grading appeals.

이의 신청 (30일 이내) 1. 제보접수 : 연구부정행위 제보방법 참고 2. 예비조사 : 제보접수일로부터 30일 이내에 착수. 조사 시작일로부터 30일 이내 완료 후 위원회 승인 3. 본조사 : 연구윤리진실성위원회의 예비조사 결과 승인 후, 30일 이내에 조사위원회를 구성하여 본조사 착수. 조사 시작일로부터 120일 이내에 완료 (위원회 승인 후 기간 연장가능)

Bounded full continuous context; Extracted text SHA256 1da01c40a76586f21bee37373d349d533ba538e6bd77171b09a516bdb58b33cf; original binding lines 635–737; characters 9778–11820; excerpt offset 0–700

Official university source ↗
4. 판정 : 위원회 승인 받은 후 결과를 제보자 및 피제보자에게 통보 5. 이의신청 : 조사결과 불복 시, 판정 통보일로부터 30일 이내 자유형식으로 이메일(yre1885@yonsei.ac.kr) 로 이의신청/ 이의신청 처리는 접수일로부터 60일 이내 6. 후속조치 : 연구지원 기관에 조사결과 통보, 필요 시 총장에게 징계조치 건의 및 관련 기관의 요청 시 조사자료 제출 연구부정행위 후속조치 교내 「연구윤리진실성위원회의 설치·운영에 관한 규정」 제26조

Bounded full continuous context; Extracted text SHA256 1da01c40a76586f21bee37373d349d533ba538e6bd77171b09a516bdb58b33cf; original binding lines 635–737; characters 9778–11820; excerpt offset 700–1400

Official university source ↗
1. 징계 2. 연구비 지원 기관에 대한 통보 3. 피조사자에 대한 해당 논문의 철회 또는 수정 요구 및 해당 학술지 편집인에 대한 통보 4. 학위 논문의 지도 및 심사의 제한 5. 당해 학위논문에 의하여 수여된 학위의 취소 6. 생명윤리를 위반한 경우 본교 생명윤리위원회에 대한 통보 연세대학교 연구처 (03722) 서울특별시 서대문구 연세로 50 연세대학교 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2016 YONSEI UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 개인정보처리방침

Bounded full continuous context; Extracted text SHA256 1da01c40a76586f21bee37373d349d533ba538e6bd77171b09a516bdb58b33cf; original binding lines 635–737; characters 9778–11820; excerpt offset 1400–2042

Official university source ↗

AI tools & access

No source-backed tool record has been established for this university yet. This does not mean AI tools are unavailable or prohibited.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 2

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

Records cover only part of this period, starting 2026-10-23.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Held / removed from current conclusions · Record addition · Site correction

    Coursework · Exams · 8 more topics · Records involved: 12 (3 corrected / adjusted · 8 added · 1 held)

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

11

Held conclusions and historical evidence (1)

These original records and prior review states are retained for provenance, not as current permissions, duties or precise deadlines.

Yonsei University Research Ethics Center guidance says generative AI use in courses should be based on clear agreement between instructors and learners, with instructors giving minimum guidance when use is permitted.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

yonsei-claim-course-agreement-genai

Generative AI should be used only after a clear agreement between instructors and learners on its terms of use. If instructors permit its use, they are responsible for providing clear and minimum guidelines.

Official sources

6 official URLs; 6 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

교수자를 위한 생성형 AI 수업 활용 지침 v1.0 (2025년 8월)

complit.yonsei.ac.kr

University official source

Hash and captured version

교수자를 위한 생성형 AI 수업 활용 지침 v1.0 (2025년 8월) · 2026-10-23T19:46:49.736811Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

a7901d77b83292583dd39f0297b9ab5f55eb2807839025ac27235ffb864ee850

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

연구자를 위한 생성형 AI 활용 지침 v1.0 (2025년 8월)

arch.yonsei.ac.kr

University official source

Hash and captured version

연구자를 위한 생성형 AI 활용 지침 v1.0 (2025년 8월) · 2026-10-23T19:46:49.760384Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

3f4ab418ef4deafaf9ff388d570578ba1c4a7f96469b58e8ba192553a7c1aef6

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

연세대학교 연구윤리진실성위원회

yure.yonsei.ac.kr

University official source

Hash and captured version

연세대학교 연구윤리진실성위원회 · 2026-10-23T19:46:50.270454Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

2bdc4615f3b3d5d9a62b70d0102ea04a4e6e4a717c614e6be78139dbc8286211

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

연세대학교 학칙

rules.yonsei.ac.kr

University official source

Hash and captured version

연세대학교 학칙 · 2026-10-23T19:46:50.922481Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

bf3f03afc4e8911edaee4c5d27da7d962241659f57bbe912276c3c0ba128ff67

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Undergraduate Grading System — Cheating or Dishonesty

www.yonsei.ac.kr

University official source

Hash and captured version

Undergraduate Grading System — Cheating or Dishonesty · 2026-10-23T19:46:51.219269Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

c90be73b608c3fcd53653286566c1542c652460b1f45aa5d27700fc9a07140b6

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Research Ethics Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI, May 2024 v1.0

socsci.yonsei.ac.kr

University official source

Hash and captured version

Research Ethics Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI, May 2024 v1.0 · 2026-10-23T19:46:51.226639Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

34d566381ce14c7e5e71163fc2e47be451abdff801b6e8ce558714257b7c0fd6

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
qs46-50-v6-r1-20261023
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • All original objects, public Claim IDs, independent tool objects, held inputs and historical student snapshots are separately reconciled and retained. Research findings are not publication approval.
  • Original research captures remain excerpts/transcriptions. New original raw response hashes are separately bound; historical snapshot hashes not overwritten.
  • Only selected official URLs acquired; whole-institution currentness and all-course coverage not established. Source/year/unit/must-may and unresolved procedure conflicts retained.
  • Original remaining keys and33 requirement gaps persist unless an explicit scoped local evidence receipt addresses them.
  • No commit/push/productionbuild/SSHmutation/deploy/restart/cutover/snapshotrepin/IndexNow. Public/API/MCP/history not changed.
  • ENZH local presentation is a private candidate, not approved strong student snapshot.
  • 2025guidelines separate from2026academic rules. Research30/120/60days not ordinary course appeal. No institutional student-tool entitlement proved.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        The2025 instructor guideline assigns the course instructor the choice of prohibition, limited uses or broader uses, announced in syllabus and class. Example syllabus texts are options, not universal student permission.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        Where AI use is permitted, the instructor selects and announces one or more disclosure/log methods. Prompt fields, versions and upload examples are selected course methods, not a universal checklist.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        The2025 guidance warns against inputting personal/confidential/unpublished research or patent information into external cloud AI. Teachers should not upload entire student assessment texts for AI grading/analysis. No retention duration or approved institutional service is established.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        No institution-provided student tool entitlement is established. Examples in teacher/research guidance do not authorize access or assessed use.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        The2025 teacher guideline generally prohibits GenAI in supervised exams and limits electronic devices. In unproctored/open assessments, any permitted uses must be decided and announced beforehand. Preserve the “in principle” qualification and actual exam instructions.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        The2025 researcher guideline does not recognise AI as author. Humans retain core design/analysis/conclusions and responsibility; disclose tool/version/developer/purpose, verify outputs and follow journal requirements. Core original outputs may not be generated by AI under the stated restriction.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        The2026 academic rules require scholarly ethics and allow discipline under their conditions. The undergraduate grading page says dishonesty/cheating invalidates obtained grades and gives the course F. No universal AI-specific penalty follows without the applicable course rule and finding. AI detector results are supplementary and should not alone determine grades or sanctions; consider the student’s explanation and instructor review. General grading dishonesty rules do not make every AI use cheating. The research-integrity committee process is for research participants, not ordinary course appeals. Preliminary investigation starts within30 days of report and finishes within30 of start; main investigation starts within30 after approval and finishes within120, extendable with approval. Objection is within30 days of determination notice and processed within60 of receipt. Day types are unspecified.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        The2025 instructor guideline assigns the course instructor the choice of prohibition, limited uses or broader uses, announced in syllabus and class. Example syllabus texts are options, not universal student permission. AI detector results are supplementary and should not alone determine grades or sanctions; consider the student’s explanation and instructor review. General grading dishonesty rules do not make every AI use cheating.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        The2025 guidance warns against inputting personal/confidential/unpublished research or patent information into external cloud AI. Teachers should not upload entire student assessment texts for AI grading/analysis. No retention duration or approved institutional service is established.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        11 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →
        Yonsei University AI Policy