Policy presence
Leiden University has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Leiden, Netherlands
Leiden University has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Leiden University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Leiden University has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Leiden University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Leiden University has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Leiden University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Leiden University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Leiden University has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Leiden University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Leiden University has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Normalized value: staff_ai_toolpicker_privacy_confidentiality_verification
Original evidence
Evidence 1Gebruik alleen AI-tools die op 'groen' staan in de toolpicker. Verwerk geen persoonsgegevens. Deel geen vertrouwelijke informatie. Verifieer altijd de uitkomst van AI.
Localized display only
Use only AI tools marked green in the toolpicker. Do not process personal data. Do not share confidential information. Always verify AI output.
Research
Normalized value: law_school_research_genai_responsible_transparent_review_required
Original evidence
Evidence 1Researchers at Leiden Law School are themselves responsible for the correct use of genAI in their research. Reviewing (checking) all genAI-generated output ... is essential.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: Leiden University states that ChatGPT is not supported because data security and privacy are not guaranteed.
Original evidence
Evidence 1ChatGPT wordt niet ondersteund door Universiteit Leiden. De veiligheid van je gegevens en je privacy is niet gegarandeerd.
Localized display only
Leiden University states that ChatGPT is not supported because data security and privacy are not guaranteed.
Privacy
Normalized value: Leiden University tells staff to check confidentiality labels before using AI with documents.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Check dan altijd het vertrouwelijkheidslabel wat er automatisch aan is gekoppeld.
Localized display only
Staff should always check the automatically attached confidentiality label before using documents with AI.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: five_level_ai_assessment_scale
Original evidence
Evidence 1Levels of AI integration: Level 1: no AI; Level 2: AI-assisted idea generation and structuring; Level 3: AI-assisted editing; Level 4: AI task completion, human evaluation; Level 5: Full AI.
Teaching
Normalized value: ai_may_support_education_responsible_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1The university therefore offers a learning environment where AI may be used to support education. By taking a responsible approach, lecturers and students can use various tools to innovate both teaching and learning.
0 machine or needs-review claim
5 source attribution
staff.universiteitleiden.nl
staff.universiteitleiden.nl
organisatiegids.universiteitleiden.nl
medewerkers.universiteitleiden.nl
medewerkers.universiteitleiden.nl