Leiden, Netherlands

Leiden University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage6 reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources5Source languageen, nlPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/leiden-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence76%

AI disclosure

Leiden University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

Leiden University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

Leiden University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

Leiden University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence73%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

Leiden University has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records1

ChatGPT

Leiden University

Tool
ChatGPT
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Unknown
Review
Agent reviewed

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

Leiden University's Dutch staff guidance says staff should use only AI tools marked green in the university toolpicker, should not process personal data or confidential information with AI tools, and should verify AI output.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: staff_ai_toolpicker_privacy_confidentiality_verification

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Gebruik alleen AI-tools die op 'groen' staan in de toolpicker. Verwerk geen persoonsgegevens. Deel geen vertrouwelijke informatie. Verifieer altijd de uitkomst van AI.

Localized display only

Use only AI tools marked green in the toolpicker. Do not process personal data. Do not share confidential information. Always verify AI output.

Research

Leiden Law School's research guidance says its researchers are responsible for correct genAI use, must review genAI-generated output, and must use genAI responsibly and transparently.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: law_school_research_genai_responsible_transparent_review_required

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Researchers at Leiden Law School are themselves responsible for the correct use of genAI in their research. Reviewing (checking) all genAI-generated output ... is essential.

Ai Tool Treatment

Leiden University states that ChatGPT is not supported because data security and privacy are not guaranteed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: Leiden University states that ChatGPT is not supported because data security and privacy are not guaranteed.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
ChatGPT wordt niet ondersteund door Universiteit Leiden. De veiligheid van je gegevens en je privacy is niet gegarandeerd.

Localized display only

Leiden University states that ChatGPT is not supported because data security and privacy are not guaranteed.

Privacy

Leiden University tells staff to check confidentiality labels before using AI with documents.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: Leiden University tells staff to check confidentiality labels before using AI with documents.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Check dan altijd het vertrouwelijkheidslabel wat er automatisch aan is gekoppeld.

Localized display only

Staff should always check the automatically attached confidentiality label before using documents with AI.

Academic Integrity

Leiden University's assessment guidance describes a five-level scale for AI integration in assessments, ranging from no AI to AI task completion with human evaluation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: five_level_ai_assessment_scale

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Levels of AI integration: Level 1: no AI; Level 2: AI-assisted idea generation and structuring; Level 3: AI-assisted editing; Level 4: AI task completion, human evaluation; Level 5: Full AI.

Teaching

Leiden University's general AI in education page says the university offers a learning environment where AI may be used to support education when lecturers and students use tools responsibly.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: ai_may_support_education_responsible_use

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The university therefore offers a learning environment where AI may be used to support education. By taking a responsible approach, lecturers and students can use various tools to innovate both teaching and learning.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

5 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 23, 2026Last changedMay 23, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities