University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

Leiden University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Claims4Sources4
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Leiden University currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Leiden University current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+8-0
11 # Leiden University AI policy record
2+privacy: Leiden University's Dutch staff guidance says staff should use only AI tools marked green in the university toolpicker, should not process personal data or confidential information with AI tools, and should verify AI output.
3+Evidence (nl, ac8f29a6855b): Gebruik alleen AI-tools die op 'groen' staan in de toolpicker. Verwerk geen persoonsgegevens. Deel geen vertrouwelijke informatie. Verifieer altijd de uitkomst van AI.
4+research: Leiden Law School's research guidance says its researchers are responsible for correct genAI use, must review genAI-generated output, and must use genAI responsibly and transparently.
5+Evidence (en, 32f1364847df): Researchers at Leiden Law School are themselves responsible for the correct use of genAI in their research. Reviewing (checking) all genAI-generated output ... is essential.
6+academic_integrity: Leiden University's assessment guidance describes a five-level scale for AI integration in assessments, ranging from no AI to AI task completion with human evaluation.
7+Evidence (en, 56b50935cd53): Levels of AI integration: Level 1: no AI; Level 2: AI-assisted idea generation and structuring; Level 3: AI-assisted editing; Level 4: AI task completion, human evaluation; Level 5: Full AI.
8+teaching: Leiden University's general AI in education page says the university offers a learning environment where AI may be used to support education when lecturers and students use tools responsibly.
9+Evidence (en, f0887f7e0ee5): The university therefore offers a learning environment where AI may be used to support education. By taking a responsible approach, lecturers and students can use various tools to innovate both teaching and learning.

Claim changes

4 claim records

research

Leiden Law School's research guidance says its researchers are responsible for correct genAI use, must review genAI-generated output, and must use genAI responsibly and transparently.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Leiden University's Dutch staff guidance says staff should use only AI tools marked green in the university toolpicker, should not process personal data or confidential information with AI tools, and should verify AI output.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesnl

academic_integrity

Leiden University's assessment guidance describes a five-level scale for AI integration in assessments, ranging from no AI to AI task completion with human evaluation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Leiden University's general AI in education page says the university offers a learning environment where AI may be used to support education when lecturers and students use tools responsibly.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions